Recommend three practical ways in which local communities could play a significant role in helping effective service delivery​

The president's expressed powers include all of the following categories EXCEPT "b. partisan."

Expressed powers are specifically granted to the president by the Constitution.

These powers cover a wide range of categories, including military (a), judicial (c), diplomatic (d), and executive (e) powers.

However, partisan powers, which involve political party-related activities and decisions, are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution as a category of expressed powers for the president. Thus, the correct answer is b. partisan.

To know more about president's expressed powers refer here: https://brainly.com/question/14720932#

#SPJ11

In the planning function, public management's main focus is on executing the assigned tasks. - False

When organizational management is in the planning phase, this is when it defines its aims, goals, and action plans to accomplish them. One of a firm's most crucial steps is strategic planning because it addresses the organisation's long-term needs. It must be well-structured, contain the organisation's mission, vision, and values, and aid in the achievement of the firm's goals and objectives.

Setting goals, objectives, and priorities as well as creating strategies and action plans to accomplish them are the primary areas of emphasis for public management when performing the planning function. Despite being a crucial component of the implementation stage, carrying out given duties is not the primary concern of the planning function.

Complete Question:

In the planning function, public management's main focus is on executing the assigned tasks. True/False

Read more about planning function on:

https://brainly.com/question/3504046

#SPJ4

After 1837, the Whig Party became the anti-bank, hard-money party. This shift in stance was largely due to the economic crisis that occurred in 1837, which led to widespread bank failures and a sharp contraction of credit.

The Whigs, who had previously supported a national bank and a paper currency backed by government bonds, now blamed these institutions for exacerbating the crisis and called for a return to a specie-based currency system. This new stance was popular among farmers and laborers, who had long complained about the inflationary effects of paper money and debt.After 1837, the Whig Party became the anti-bank, hard-money party. This shift in stance was largely due to the economic crisis that occurred in 1837, which led to widespread bank failures and a sharp contraction of credit.
The Whigs' hard-money platform also helped them win the presidential election of 1840, with William Henry Harrison defeating incumbent Martin Van Buren. However, the Whigs' commitment to hard money was not absolute, and they often compromised with Democrats to pass banking legislation that fell short of their ideal. Additionally, the issue of banking and currency was not the only factor that shaped political loyalties during this period, as party identification was often based on regional and cultural factors as well.

learn more about Party here

https://brainly.com/question/14664576

#SPJ11

Answer:

C a forensic sociologist

Explanation:

they talk to the police and the citizens.

The best profession, which helps in building the relationship between the police and the citizens is a forensic sociologist. Hence, Option D is correct.

Being a forensic sociologist, an individual will be engaged in the activity of analyzing the shreds of evidence and also keeps the research that is related to criminal cases or civil cases.

It is the duty of the forensic sociologist to make sure that not a single piece of evidence will be neglected during the whole investigation. For keeping a track of all the things, forensic sociologists maintain the relationship between the police and the citizens.

Sometimes people often get confused between forensic sociology and criminology. They both are having different sciences. Forensic sociology is an applied science. On the other hand, criminology is a specialized social science.

Thus, Option D is correct.

Learn more about forensic from here:

https://brainly.com/question/14403044

#SPJ2

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

With regards to the question, Howell has committed fraud. In this case, this can be regarded as a mail or wire fraud which is when one uses telephone or mail to defraud someone else.

In this case, Howell may be charged for the unauthorized use of the telephone for his personal use as he made a long-distance telephone calls through the telephone company’s computer- controlled switching system to solicit funding for a nonexistent business enterprise. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act helps address this type of fraud.

Problem Statement The problem that is associated with the ALS & ICE Bucket challenge is a Public Administration problem.

This challenge involves a charitable movement that was initiated by ALS in the US. ALS disease is an illness that damages neurons that are responsible for voluntary muscle movements.

The disease causes muscle stiffness, weakness, and difficulty in moving. The initiative aimed at raising awareness about the disease and raising money to finance research on the cure for ALS.

This movement created a buzz on social media, especially after celebrities participated in the challenge.The major problem with this initiative was the use of the funds collected. The money was used for a wider range of purposes, not necessarily for finding a cure for the disease.

To know more about Public Administration visit:

https://brainly.com/question/22972887

#SPJ11

Answer:

A

Explanation:

it put into writing the principle that the king and his government was not above the law.

Answer:

asset Forfeiture  is the answer

Explanation:

A security officer is not justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone.

A security officer is a professional who is trained to secure and protect individuals and property. Security personnel may be found in a variety of settings, including corporate offices, malls, hospitals, and other locations. These professionals are tasked with ensuring the safety of individuals and property under their supervision.

Provocation is a situation in which an individual engages in actions or makes statements that are intended to provoke or incite another person. This may include insults, threats, and other forms of verbal or physical aggression.

A reaction to a stimulus is referred to as a response. This may include a variety of physiological, emotional, and cognitive changes. In terms of behavior, a response is the way in which an individual responds to a particular situation. The response to verbal provocation by a security officer may differ based on the situation and the level of provocation.

A security officer is not justified to use force in response to verbal provocation alone. This is due to the fact that the use of force is only allowed when it is reasonable and necessary to prevent harm to oneself or others. When verbal provocation occurs, a security officer should attempt to defuse the situation verbally before resorting to the use of force.

Furthermore, if a security officer uses force in response to verbal provocation, they may face legal consequences, including charges of assault or battery. As a result, it is recommended that security personnel receive training on conflict resolution and effective communication to deal with potentially difficult situations.

You can learn more about security officers at: https://brainly.com/question/28326176

#SPJ11

In construing a contract, a court will give the greatest weight to handwritten terms. The Option C is correct.

The rules of construction apply to both simple contracts and contracts under seal. The general rule is that the court strives to give effect to the intention of the parties and must give effect to that intention as expressed.

This means, it must ascertain the meaning of the words actually used and not try to interpret the motive or state of mind of the parties. The he courts must have regard to ordinary meaning of words used unless they are technical or scientific.

That being said, the courts are more concerned to ascertain the intention of the parties and not merely indulge in semantic exercises.

Read more about contract

brainly.com/question/5746834

#SPJ1

Federal courts would be permitted to hear cases under their diversity of citizenship jurisdiction if the following conditions are met:

Under diversity jurisdiction, the federal courts have the authority to hear civil cases between citizens of different states, even if the issues involved are based on state law. This allows for a neutral federal forum to resolve disputes between parties from different states, providing an alternative to state courts.

It's important to note that diversity jurisdiction only applies to civil cases, not criminal cases. Additionally, there are certain exceptions and additional requirements that may apply in specific situations. Consulting with an attorney or referring to current legal statutes and precedents would provide the most accurate and up-to-date information regarding diversity jurisdiction.

To know more about Federal courts

brainly.com/question/31037815

#SPJ11

The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.

The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.

The factors may be as follows  -

Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.

Learn more about price at:

brainly.com/question/26075805

#SPJ1

Full Question:

Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:

The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.

What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?

As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.

As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.

As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.

As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.

See attached image.

Answer:

D: Installation of security cameras

Explanation:

Answer:

- goverment

Explanation:

big brain

Answer:

federal- legislative

Explanation:

Educated Guess

In a civil case, the object is to obtain a remedy to compensate the injured party.  

Civil cases involve those conflicts cases between people or businesses.

These court cases deal with finances or damage to individual rights.

A civil case begins when an individual or business reasons to have been hurt by another person or company.

The civil cases are between the plaintiff and the defendant.

Thus option B is the correct answer.

Learn more about "the Civil Case" here:

brainly.com/question/1065754

A plaintiff wins a lawsuit in a civil case when he is 51% convincing. After winning the case, he collects 100% of his damages.

Yes, the result is reasonable because in a civil lawsuit, the burden of proof is lower than that in a criminal case. In a criminal case, the defendant must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, which means that the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant's guilt. A civil case, on the other hand, only requires the plaintiff to prove that their claims are more likely than not to be true. This is often referred to as a preponderance of the evidence, which means that there is more evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims than there is supporting the defendant's claims.

In addition, a civil lawsuit is typically about resolving a dispute between two parties, whereas a criminal trial is about punishing someone for committing a crime. Because the stakes are lower in a civil case, it makes sense that the burden of proof would be lower as well. Allowing a plaintiff to win a case when they are only 51% convincing is a way to ensure that the party who is more likely to be in the right is the one who is awarded damages. Overall, the burden of proof in civil cases is a reasonable standard that strikes a balance between protecting the rights of the plaintiff and ensuring that the defendant is not punished unjustly.

Learn more about lawsuit from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/30392587

#SPJ11

A plaintiff wins a lawsuit in a civil case when he is 51% convincing. After winning the case, he collects 100% of his damages.

Yes, the result is reasonable because in a civil lawsuit, the burden of proof is lower than that in a criminal case. In a criminal case, the defendant must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, which means that the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant's guilt. A civil case, on the other hand, only requires the plaintiff to prove that their claims are more likely than not to be true. This is often referred to as a preponderance of the evidence, which means that there is more evidence supporting the plaintiff's claims than there is supporting the defendant's claims.

In addition, a civil lawsuit is typically about resolving a dispute between two parties, whereas a criminal trial is about punishing someone for committing a crime. Because the stakes are lower in a civil case, it makes sense that the burden of proof would be lower as well. Allowing a plaintiff to win a case when they are only 51% convincing is a way to ensure that the party who is more likely to be in the right is the one who is awarded damages. Overall, the burden of proof in civil cases is a reasonable standard that strikes a balance between protecting the rights of the plaintiff and ensuring that the defendant is not punished unjustly.

Learn more about lawsuit from the given link:

brainly.com/question/30392587

#SPJ11

Answer:

courts martial in 1971, following his involvement in the killing of hundreds of unarmed Vietnamese civilians, including women and children, during the Vietnam War. The atrocities committed by Calley and his platoon were a clear violation of the Geneva Conventions, which prohibit the targeting of non-combatants in war. Similarly, the Abu Ghraib prison scandal in Iraq in 2004 brought to light the brutal and inhumane treatment of Iraqi prisoners by U.S. military personnel. The photographs and videos that emerged from the prison showed detainees being subjected to physical and sexual abuse, torture, and humiliation. The actions of the soldiers involved in the Abu Ghraib scandal were a clear violation of international law and human rights. In both cases, the soldiers involved were prosecuted and faced punishment for their actions. The question of whether soldiers in the military should be prosecuted for killing or torturing enemies captured

Answer:

Yes but no really.

Explanation:

This behavior would not be expected by a employer but if you really think about it the Employer would rather be shocked and if it was a shop lifter they would be rewarded as because of there braveness to stop a shop lifter if that is what you are referring to.

Cost-benefit analysis is a popular economic tool used to determine the economic feasibility of a project or policy by weighing the costs and benefits of an investment or decision.

One well-known example of cost-benefit analysis is the Ford Pinto case, where the company made a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether it was worth investing in a costly design change that would prevent the car from bursting into flames in a rear-end collision.

However, the Ford Pinto case raises questions about the ethics of cost-benefit analysis and its validity as a decision-making tool. Utilitarianism, as a moral philosophy, argues that actions should be based on the greatest good for the greatest number of people.

The Ford Pinto case highlights a potential flaw in cost-benefit analysis as it seems to prioritize monetary considerations over the well-being of individuals and society.

To read more about cost-benefit analysis, Visit- https://brainly.com/question/14556838

#SPJ11

In a contract under common law, all of the following must be included: the offer, the type of the work, the price, the quantity, and the performance. In a contract under the UCC, just the quantity must be specified.

In general, the UCC offers what the common law does: if the parties have a written document that is meant to be their final agreement, it "may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement." The "course of dealing or usage of trade" may, however, provide an explanation. When someone visits a grocery store to buy their groceries, they enter into an agreement with the store to pay money in exchange for food and drink.

Read more about common law at

https://brainly.com/question/31657506

#SPJ4

Answer:

Jurisdiction

Explanation:

The term that refers to the authority of a court to hear a case is "jurisdiction."

The legal concept you are referring to is known as "copyright."

Copyright grants content creators exclusive rights to control the use and distribution of their original works. These works can include literary, artistic, musical, and dramatic creations, as well as software, architectural designs, and other intellectual property.

Copyright protection is automatically granted to the creator once their work is fixed in a tangible form, such as writing it down, recording it, or saving it digitally. This protection gives the creator the right to reproduce, distribute, display, perform, and create derivative works based on their original creation. In other words, copyright provides creators with the ability to determine how their work is used, whether they want to license it to others, and under what conditions.

Copyright laws vary between countries, but they generally aim to balance the rights of content creators with the public interest in accessing and utilizing creative works. The duration of copyright protection also varies, typically lasting for the life of the creator plus a certain number of years after their death.

Overall, copyright plays a crucial role in promoting creativity, incentivizing innovation, and ensuring that content creators have the ability to control and benefit from their intellectual creations.

Learn more about copyright here : brainly.com/question/14704862

#SPJ11

True. Property covenants restrict ownership rights by establishing rules for acceptable property use.

Property covenants do indeed restrict ownership rights because they function as a set of rules and guidelines that dictate what is considered acceptable and what is not acceptable when it comes to the use of a property. These covenants are typically established by the original developer or the homeowners' association (HOA) and are legally binding for all property owners within a specific community or development.

Property covenants serve several purposes, such as maintaining a certain aesthetic or architectural style, preserving property values, and promoting a harmonious living environment. They often include provisions regarding the type of structures that can be built, the use of the property (e.g., residential only, no commercial activities), and restrictions on external modifications, such as paint colors or landscaping choices.

By enforcing these restrictions, property covenants aim to protect the interests of all property owners within the community. They help create a uniform and cohesive appearance, ensuring that neighboring properties adhere to certain standards. This can be particularly important in planned communities or subdivisions where a consistent image is desired.

While property covenants may limit some aspects of an owner's freedom to use and modify their property, they also offer benefits, such as increased property values and the assurance of living in a well-maintained community. It is essential for prospective buyers to review and understand the property covenants before purchasing a property to ensure they are comfortable with the imposed restrictions.

Learn more about ownership rights

brainly.com/question/30194706
#SPJ11

Forensic interviews are especially important in child abuse cases because it enable the acquisition of factual information and evidence relating to those cases.

To ensure that facts are gathered in a way that can be proven in court, forensic interviews are carefully controlled: the interviewer's utterances and body language must be neutral, alternative explanations for a child's assertions are thoroughly explored, and the results of the interview are substantiated in a way that can be proven in court.

The purpose of a forensic interview is to get a statement from a kid in a way that is objective, developmental, and legally acceptable.

Child welfare officials frequently conduct these interviews in the privacy of their automobiles or vacant classrooms. These "improved" settings, while convenient, may not be perfect.

Because a person's capacity to recall past events is often impacted by his or her environment, best practice in forensic interviewing—even if it occurs "in the field"—entails establishing a neutral, comforting, and child-friendly site prior to the interview.

Learn more about Forensic Interviews:
https://brainly.com/question/15213328
#SPJ1

Answer:

civil court

Explanation:

Allegations of a mining employee who was injured in an accident would be heard in a civil court appeals court criminal court supreme court.

Court, sometimes known as a court of law, is a person or group of people with the power to hear and decide matters involving civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military conflicts.

A number of small civil concerns are handled by civil courts, such as: consumer disputes; landlord and tenant conflicts (such as eviction, rent arrears, and repairs); (eg as faulty goods)

Tort claims, breach of contract proceedings, and landlord/tenant disputes are the three most frequent civil cases. A civil case often goes through the following stages: filing a complaint, gathering evidence, conducting a trial, and appealing the decision.

Most frequently, a judge will hear them alone and reach a decision by gathering evidence and using the pertinent legal standards. Arguments may be made regarding the veracity of the facts and the precise nature of the law. The judge will render a reasoned decision following the conclusion of the argument.

Therefore, The answer is civil court.

Learn more about Court, here;

https://brainly.com/question/13375489

#SPJ2