Answers
Answer:
I believe it is a, c and possibly e
Explanation:
Its not the other answer.
Right to privacy and the rights of victims of crimes are some rights those are protected by the Washington declaration of rights.
What is a right?Right is the power given to a person to own, possess, commit, acquire or hold somethings by virtue of some title. To every right there is equal duty of some other person to fulfil such right of the person.
What is a right to privacy?Right to privacy as explained under section 7 of washing declaration of rights as, no person shall be disturbed in his private affair or has his home invaded without the authority of law. In layman language the right to privacy can be understood as a right of an individual to have his private affairs and secrecy to his business, that only he is entitled to disclose.
What are rights of victims of crimes?The rights of victims of crimes are those rights which are conferred upon the persons who has suffered the physical or emotional harm, property damage or economic loss as a result of some crime. The concept of the right of crimes has been discussed under section 35 of the Washington declaration of rights.
What is the Washington declaration of rights?Article I of the Washington State Constitution is termed as the Washington declaration of rights. It is a formal declaration enumerating the rights of the citizen, which confers a range of rights to its citizen.
To know more about rights here,
https://brainly.com/question/16874430
#SPJ2
Related Questions
If an offer has been communicated, a contract is formed if an offeree communicates any of the following EXCEPT:___________. (Choose ONE correct answer)
Answers
Answer:
If an offer has been communicated, a contract is formed if an offeree communicates any of the following EXCEPT: a counter-offer.
Complete the passage by filling in the blanks. the___ in the___protects prison and jail inmates from unfair treatment at the hands of The in the prison authorities based on color, gender, or race.
Answers
Answer:
The Douple Jeopardy Clause in the Sixth Amendment (It's really the Eighth Amendment but that wasn't one of the answer's so I put the Sixth.)
I hope this helps!
Answer:
The Equal Protection Clause in the Fourteenth Amendment protects prison and jail inmates from unfair treatment at the hands of prison authorities based on color, gender, or race.
Answer 1:
Equal Protection Clause
Answer 2:
Fourteenth Amendment
Explanation:
The three main sources of international law are treaty, custom, and
.
government
general principles of international law
commerce
country allegiance
Answers
Answer:
General principles of international law
Answer:
general principles of international law
Explanation:
got it right on exam
Define personal characteristics
Answers
Answer:
it is how you characterize your self
What is a document filed with government that outlines wages, taxes paid and reconciliation?
Answers
U.S. taxpayers utilize form 1040 to submit an annual income tax return to the government that lists wages, taxes paid, and reconciliation.
What is meant by annual income tax?An income tax is a charge levied against people or organizations (taxpayers) in relation to their earnings (commonly called taxable income). In most cases, income tax is calculated as the sum of the tax rate and the amount of taxable income. All sources of taxable income earned during a tax year must be added up in order to determine your income tax liability. The following step is to determine your adjusted gross income (AGI). Once you've done that, take your AGI and any deductions you are qualified for.Income taxes make up about 80% of all federal revenue, which is the primary source of funding for social programs like Social Security and Medicare. Payroll taxes are another important source of funding for the federal government.To learn more about annual income tax, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30157668
A construction contractor brought a breach of contract claim in federal court against a homeowner who had hired the contractor to build an apartment over an existing garage. The action turned on the scope of the work covered by the contract. The contractor and the homeowner were the only witnesses at the bench trial, and they strongly disagreed about the scope of the work. At the end of the trial, the judge stated findings of fact on the record but never issued a written opinion. Neither party objected to the findings. The judge found in favor of the homeowner, and the contractor appealed. Is the appellate court likely to overturn the findings?
Answers
Answer:
No, because the appellate court must give due regard to the trial judge's opportunity to determine witness credibility.
Explanation:
Appellate courts or appeal courts are those that are empowered to review judgements that have been given at trial by lower courts.
Appeal courts exist at the state and federal level and they do not use a jury to review judgements.
In the given instance the construction contractor and home owner did not disagree on the findings of the trial judge and never issued a written opinion.
The appeal court is not likely to overturn the findings because they must give due regard to the trial judge's opportunity to determine witness credibility.
The trial judge should give a written opinion on the matter before the appeal court can delibrate
what is the law that protects poor service delivery
Answers
Answer:
Consumer Protection Act
Explanation:
Protects the consumer against poor service delivery.
What is the impeachment process and removal for federal officials according to the united states constitution?.
Answers
The constitution requires a -thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached respectable upon conviction is elimination from the workplace.
In some cases, the Senate has also disqualified such officials from protecting public offices inside the destiny. There may be no enchantment.
Article II, phase 4: The President, vice chairman, and all civil officials of the usa, shall be removed from the workplace on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or different excessive Crimes and Misdemeanors. See, e.g., Va.
The constitution offers the residence of Representatives the only energy to impeach an official, and it makes the Senate the only court for impeachment trials. The power of impeachment is confined to elimination from the workplace but also offers a means by which an eliminated officer may be disqualified from preserving future office.
Learn more about constitution here: https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
After a person is charged with a crime, the U.S. Constitution requires that the
state:
OA. continue looking for other suspects.
OB. keep the charges a secret from the defendant.
OC. file a civil case against the defendant.
OD. provide the defendant with an attorney.
Answers
Task With the aid of case law, discuss the legal concepts of Duty of Care, Breach of Duty of Care, Causation and Damage, paying particular attention to duty and breach and apply these concepts to construction business. Guidance Note: You will need to cite case law for each principle that makes up the elements you discuss. You should then discuss how the principles apply to the construction workplace. Indicative word limit: 1800 words 40% of the grade
Answers
The legal concepts of Duty of Care, Breach of Duty of Care, Causation, and Damage are essential in the construction industry. Duty of Care refers to the responsibility that a person owes to another to ensure that they do not cause harm.
Breach of Duty of Care occurs when a person fails to take reasonable care and this failure causes harm to another. Causation is when the failure to take reasonable care is the cause of the harm. Damage refers to the harm suffered by the injured party.In the construction industry, the duty of care is owed by employers to employees, contractors, and members of the public who may be affected by their actions. The duty of care is also owed by the employees to their employers and co-workers.
A breach of duty of care can occur in many ways. An employer may fail to provide the necessary safety equipment or training to employees, which can cause harm. An employee may fail to follow safety procedures, which can cause harm to themselves or others.The case law that illustrates the concept of Duty of Care is Donoghue v Stevenson (1932). In this case, the claimant bought a bottle of ginger beer from a shop and found a decomposed snail inside the bottle. The claimant suffered from shock and gastroenteritis.
The court held that the manufacturer owed a duty of care to the ultimate consumer to ensure that the product was safe.The case law that illustrates the concept of Breach of Duty of Care is Nettleship v Weston (1971). In this case, a learner driver was being taught by her friend and was involved in a car accident. The court held that the learner driver was responsible for the accident, and her friend, the instructor, was held liable for the injuries caused.The case law that illustrates the concept of Causation is Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee (1969).
In this case, the claimant went to the hospital complaining of stomach pains and vomiting. The doctor on duty sent him home, and he died later that night from arsenic poisoning. The court held that the hospital was not liable for the death of the claimant as the failure to diagnose the condition was not the cause of the death.
The case law that illustrates the concept of Damage is Hughes v Lord Advocate (1963). In this case, the defendant left a manhole on the road with no warning signs. The claimant fell into the hole and suffered burns from molten tar. The court held that the defendant was liable for the injuries caused to the claimant as he failed to provide a warning of the danger.
In conclusion, the legal concepts of Duty of Care, Breach of Duty of Care, Causation, and Damage are significant in the construction industry. These principles ensure that employers, employees, and members of the public are protected from harm. It is the responsibility of all parties to take reasonable care to prevent harm to others.
To know more about Duty of Care visit-
brainly.com/question/30782971
#SPJ11
A steady green traffic light means _____.
a. you may proceed to go forward
b. you may proceed forward or turn left
c. you may proceed, but only if the path is clear
d. no cross traffic will be in the intersection
will mark brainliest if your fast
Answers
Answer:
You may proceed, but only if the path is clear
Explanation:
C
emile durkheim believed that criminals actually provide value to the community by:
Answers
Emile Durkheim believed that criminals actually provide value to the community by highlighting and reinforcing the boundaries of social norms and values.
Durkheim was a prominent sociologist who studied the role of crime and deviance in society. He argued that deviant behavior, including criminal acts, serves important functions in maintaining social order and cohesion. According to Durkheim, crime is an inherent part of any society and serves both positive and negative functions.
One of the key insights of Durkheim's theory is that crime acts as a boundary maintenance mechanism. By committing criminal acts, individuals challenge and violate societal norms, which in turn reinforces the collective conscience of the community. In this sense, criminals play a role in reminding society of its shared values and reinforcing the boundaries between acceptable and unacceptable behavior.
Durkheim also argued that the public reaction to crime, such as punishment and the criminal justice system, serves to reaffirm societal values and strengthen social bonds. When criminals are identified, prosecuted, and punished, it reinforces the collective sense of right and wrong and reinforces the moral fabric of society.
Furthermore, Durkheim believed that the presence of crime and deviance creates a sense of social solidarity among community members. The collective response to deviant acts helps to bring people together, promoting a shared sense of identity and reinforcing social cohesion.
It is important to note that Durkheim did not romanticize or justify criminal behavior itself. Instead, he emphasized the sociological functions and implications of crime within a society. He argued that understanding the social causes and consequences of crime is essential for maintaining social order and addressing the underlying issues that contribute to deviance.
In summary, Emile Durkheim believed that criminals provide value to the community by serving as a reminder of societal norms, reinforcing the collective conscience, and contributing to the maintenance of social order. By challenging and violating societal boundaries, criminals help define and strengthen the shared values and moral boundaries of the community. However, it is crucial to recognize that Durkheim's perspective does not condone criminal behavior but rather emphasizes the sociological functions and implications of crime.
Learn more about reinforcing here
https://brainly.com/question/25961563
#SPJ11
Use complete sentences and proper grammar. You must label your responses numerically (1-5).
Minimum of one page if possible
Explain why the South has the highest regional homicide rate.
Describe the nature of the victim-offender relationship for homicide.
Explain why the United States has a higher homicide rate than other industrial nations.
Explain why men commit most homicides and aggravated assaults.
Describe the types of robbers.
Answers
Crime impact from attachment and delinquent peers. Drug dependency may be the primary element separating offenders from people who commit crimes seldom.
What are the main factors that lead to crime?Crime impact from attachment and delinquent peers. Drug dependency may be the primary element separating offenders from people who commit crimes seldom. Family problems may be the primary cause of criminal involvement.The fundamental steps in a crime scene investigation include physical evidence identification, recording, appropriate collection, packing, preservation, and scene reconstruction.But there are significant regional variations in the legal age of criminal culpability. In North Carolina, the minimum age in the United States is just 6 years old, although other states have no minimum age at all (Cipriani, 2009).To learn more about Crime refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1
If a beneficiary is enrolled in a ma-only ppo and they also sign up for a pdp plan, they will be automatically dropped from their ma plan. True or false?.
Answers
It is True.
What are Medicare Advantage (MA) plans?Medicare Advantage Plans are an additional option for getting Medicare Part A and Part B coverage. Medicare Advantage Plans, often known as "Part C" or "MA Plans," are provided by Medicare-approved private organisations that must adhere to Medicare requirements. The majority of Medicare Advantage Plans provide medication coverage (Part D). In most circumstances, you must use health-care providers who are part of the plan's network. These plans restrict your out-of-pocket expenses for covered services each year.
Some plans provide non-emergency coverage outside of the network, albeit at a greater cost. Remember that you must utilize your Medicare Advantage Plan's card to obtain Medicare-covered services.
To learn more about are Medicare Advantage (MA) plan from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/28041247
#SPJ4
What type of remedy in a tort case is primarily designed to deter wrongful conduct?
Answers
The type of remedy in a tort case that is primarily designed to deter wrongful conduct is known as punitive damages. Punitive damages are awarded in addition to compensatory damages to punish the wrongdoer for their conduct and to deter similar conduct in the future.
Punitive damages are only awarded in cases where the defendant's conduct was particularly egregious or reckless, and the amount of punitive damages awarded is based on the severity of the misconduct.
The purpose of punitive damages is not to compensate the victim, but rather to send a message to the defendant and others that such conduct will not be tolerated.
In this way, punitive damages serve as a deterrent to wrongful conduct and promote the overall goal of tort law, which is to prevent harm and protect individuals from the wrongful acts of others.
To know more about Punitive damages visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30789509
#SPJ11
Which modern criminology has most supplemented its naturalistic ideas with lessons drawn from
religion and spirituality?
A. institutional anomie
B. newsmaking
C. peacemaking
D. critical race theory
Answers
Answer:
c peacemaking
Explanation:
A tenant properly filed a complaint under state law against his landlord in federal district court under diversity jurisdiction, alleging that the landlord's negligence in failing to repair the stairs in a common area of the apartment building resulted in the tenant falling and sustaining significant injuries. After the landlord served his answer, the tenant moved for summary judgment. In support of his motion, the tenant submitted affidavits from three other tenants in which each stated that she had told the landlord prior to the accident that the stairs needed to be fixed. In opposition to the motion, the landlord submitted an affidavit from the maintenance worker employed by the landlord, stating that the stairs were in good condition on the day of the tenant's accident.
How should the court rule on the motion for summary judgment?
Answers
In the situation portrayed above, it may be stated that the court will grant the motion in the interest of the plaintiff, i.e., the tenant.
A court has the power to grant a motion in the case before an actual trial is being held in the court of law as per the legal procedures. In the cases that involve complaints against their landlords, the tenants usually have an upper hand in getting the motion granted by the court in their favors more often than not. Thus, the court readily grants motion in such cases.
Learn more about motion here:
https://brainly.com/question/28432756
#SPJ4
Suggest the scenarios that would prove the Hooman Khanloo's (appellant) NON-EXCLUSIVE use of room No. 1109
Answers
According to the evidence presented in the case, Hooman Khanloo had exclusive use of room No. 1109 for an extended period of time and had made significant investments in the room. This evidence is significant because it supports the appellant's claim to the property and his argument that he had the right to continue using the room.
What was the case of Dato ArRahman all about?Dato ArRahman's case involves a dispute over a property in Kuala Lumpur's Platinum Park. One of the key pieces of evidence in the case is related to Hooman Khanloo, the appellant in the case, having exclusive use of room No. 1109.
Hooman Khanloo had exclusive use of room No. 1109 for a period of time, according to the evidence presented in the case. According to the evidence, the appellant was the only person who had access to and authority over the room.
The evidence also indicates that Hooman Khanloo had lived in the room for some time and had made significant changes to make it his own. Furthermore, the evidence shows that Hooman Khanloo had been paying the room's rent and using it for personal and business purposes.
Read more about Dato ArRahman
brainly.com/question/31123468
#SPJ1
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu.
Allison is a forensic entomologist. Which two methods are available to her to determine the time of death at a crime scene?
Allison studies the life cycle of insects at a crime scene. She uses two methods available to determine the cause of death. She uses
the
method when she studies the different types of insects around the body. She uses the
method when she focuses specifically on the eggs of the blowfly.
Y
Answers
Answer:
succesional wave of insects
maggot age
Explanation:
As a forensic entomologist, Allison will use the two methods, like studying the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene and studying the different types of insects around the body.
What does a forensic entomologist do?A forensic entomologist is one who is involved in the study of insects, and their anatomy and physiology, while reporting their investigation in case of a crime.
In the above example, Allison as a forensic entomologist shall be involved in using the two methods like the life-cycle of insects at a crime scene, and all the kinds of insects that were present around the body.
Hence, option A and C are the two most suitable methods that will be the focus of Allison as a forensic entomologist, and a report of her studies shall be forwarded to the investigating authorities.
Learn more about forensic entomologist here:
https://brainly.com/question/14403044
#SPJ2
Consider the American Constitution. Why has this document survived as the guiding principal of American governance when so many other foreign Constitutions have risen and fallen? Is there anything special about the American Constitution? Does the American Constitution grant us some of our “American Exceptionalism,” or are we exceptional despite of the Constitution or not exceptional at all?
Answers
Answer:
The American Constitution has survived as the guiding principle of American governance for several reasons. Firstly, it is a flexible document that can adapt to changing times and circumstances through the amendment process. Secondly, it establishes a system of checks and balances between the three branches of government, which helps to prevent any one branch from having too much power. Additionally, it guarantees individual rights and freedoms, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press, which have become deeply ingrained in American culture and are fiercely protected by the American people.
The American Constitution does play a role in America's "exceptionalism," but it is not the only factor. American exceptionalism refers to the belief that the United States is a unique and superior nation with a special destiny. This belief is based on a combination of factors, including the country's rich history, its political and economic systems, and its cultural values. The American Constitution is one of the key components of this belief, as it enshrines the values and principles that have made the United States what it is today.
In conclusion, the American Constitution has been a crucial factor in the survival and success of American governance, but it is not the only factor that has contributed to America's exceptionalism. It is the combination of many factors, including the Constitution, that make the United States unique and exceptional.
How can experts match a bullet to a specific make or model of gun?
Answers
Lacey files a civil suit against Mischa. To succeed, Lacey must prove her case
a.
beyond a reasonable doubt.
b.
by a preponderance of the evidence.
c.
through a scintilla of evidence.
d.
to the extent promised in her attorney’s opening statement.
2. In Coastal Fishing Company’s suit against Dockside Marina, Inc., the jury returns a verdict in Coastal’s favor. Dockside files a motion stating that even if the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to Coastal, a reasonable jury should not have found in its favor. This is a motion for
a.
a judgment in accordance with the verdict.
b.
a judgment as a matter of law.
c.
a new trial.
d.
judgment n.o.v.
3. Gabrielle files a suit against Hard ‘n Fast Adhesives, Inc. Hard ‘n Fast responds that even if Gabrielle’s statement of the facts is true, according to the law Hard n’ Fast is not liable. This is
a.
a counterclaim.
b.
a motion for judgment on the pleadings.
c.
a motion for summary judgment.
d.
a motion to dismiss.
4. Madison files a complaint in a suit against Christopher, and he files an answer. The case may now be
a.
appealed to a higher court.
b.
dismissed or settled.
c.
resolved but only after a trial.
d.
remanded for further proceedings.
Answers
2. C or A?
3. A.
4.A B or D.
A survey is planned to estimate the proportion of voters who support a proposed gun control law. The estimate should be within a margin of error of ±3% with 90% confidence, and we do not have any prior knowledge about the proportion who might support the law. How mary people need to be included in the sample? Round your answer up to the nearest integer.
Answers
The required sample size is 753 people.
To calculate the sample size needed for this survey, we can use the formula:
n = (Z^2 * p * (1-p)) / (E^2)
where:
n = sample size
Z = z-score for the desired confidence level (90% confidence corresponds to a z-score of 1.645)
p = estimated proportion of voters who support the proposed gun control law (since we have no prior knowledge, we can assume p = 0.5 for maximum variance)
E = margin of error (±3% = 0.03)
Plugging in the values, we get:
n = (1.645^2 * 0.5 * (1-0.5)) / (0.03^2) = 752.68
We need to round up to the nearest integer, so the final answer is:
n = 753
Therefore, we need to survey at least 753 voters to estimate the proportion of those who support the proposed gun control law with a margin of error of ±3% and 90% confidence.
To know more about sample size, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31734526
#SPJ11
4. As of 2018, how many states have a legalized death penalty for capital crimes?
A. 12
B. 30
C. 49
D. 10
Answers
27
Explanation:
in the United States, capital punishment is a legal penalty the country at federal level, in 27 States and in American Samoa
This is the minimum age required by the Constitution for a person to be President.
Answers
Answer:
You have to be at least 35 to be able to run for president.
Explanation:
Hope this helps! If it does, please mark me brainliest! Thank you! ;)
As directed by the Constitution, a presidential candidate must be a natural-born citizen of the United States, a resident for 14 years, and 35 years of age or older.
Basing government decisions on known legal principles is known as which of the following? Democracy Republicanism Rule of law Separation of power
Answers
Answer:
Rule of Law
Hope this helps, even though it’s been 3 days
who is responsible for records management
Answers
Answer:
Managers and supervisors
Explanation:
In the administration,the people who are more experienced in data collection and data analysis do these works
What is the use of force continuum? Legally does it help or hurt an officer when he has to justify his actions in court.
Answers
The use of force continuum guides officers but can be both helpful and detrimental when justifying their actions in court.
utilizing force Law enforcement personnel are guided by the continuum framework when determining how much force is necessary in various circumstances. If an officer is defending their actions in court, it might help or hurt them. On the one hand it offers a consistent framework to show that the officer adhered to protocol and applied appropriate force. This can help them prove that they were following the law.
But it is also possible to examine the continuum, especially if excessive force is alleged. The officer may have violated the continuum or overused force, according to critics. The effectiveness of the continuum in court ultimately depends on the particular facts, the evidence at hand and the officer's capacity to defend their actions within its bounds.
Learn more about force continuum at:
brainly.com/question/30636540
#SPJ4
firing a worker who refuses to perform an illegal act violates public policy.
True
False
Answers
Firing a worker who refuses to perform an illegal act violates public policy is true. It is generally an illegal act to fire a worker for refusing to commit an illegal act.
To keep things in order, both the employer and the employee must comply with the law and act in accordance with it. A worker who refuses to perform an illegal act may not be lawfully discharged. Similarly, the employee must be sure that the act he or she is refusing to do is truly illegal before refusing to do it. As a result, the employee is usually legally protected, and the firing may be deemed wrongful termination. In general, workers who refuse to perform illegal or unethical acts are protected by whistleblowing laws and are protected from retaliation by their employers. In most cases, whistleblowers are people who have inside information about fraud or other misconduct that is being carried out by their employers. Whistleblowers must go through the appropriate channels to report the misconduct, and they must be protected from retaliation. Many laws have been passed to protect whistleblowers, but there is still a lot of work to be done to ensure that they are not punished for doing the right thing. Firing a worker who refuses to perform an illegal act is not only wrong but also illegal. Employers must be aware of the laws in their jurisdiction and must follow them. It is illegal to fire an employee who refuses to commit an illegal act. Such a termination of employment is usually regarded as wrongful termination, and employees who have been fired for this reason may be able to take legal action against their former employers. It is critical for both the employer and the employee to be aware of the law and to act in accordance with it.
to know more about termination visit:
brainly.com/question/11848544
#SPJ11
You act for Marion Kelly. Ms. Kelly is claiming against David Jackson for personal injuries. Ms. Kelly’s solicitor takes the action on a Conditional Fee Arrangement (‘CFA’) basis on 14 May 2021 and agrees a success fee set at 25%. Ms. Kelly wins her case and is awarded £10,000 damages plus costs amounting to £5,000. Her disbursements total £1,000.
What amount is recoverable by Ms. Kelly’s solicitors from Mr. Jackson in terms of her Total costs and damages
Answers
The amount recoverable by Ms. Kelly's solicitors from Mr. Jackson in terms of her total costs and damages is £16,500.
To calculate the amount recoverable by Ms. Kelly's solicitors from Mr. Jackson, we need to consider the following:
1. Damages awarded to Ms. Kelly: £10,000
2. Costs awarded: £5,000
3. Disbursements: £1,000
4. Success fee set at 25%
First, let's calculate the success fee:
Success Fee = (Base Costs + Disbursements) × Success Fee Percentage
Success Fee = (£5,000 + £1,000) × 25%
Success Fee = £6,000 × 25%
Success Fee = £1,500
Now, let's add the damages, costs, and success fee to determine the total amount recoverable:
Total Recoverable Amount = Damages + Costs + Success Fee
Total Recoverable Amount = £10,000 + £5,000 + £1,500
Total Recoverable Amount = £16,500
In conclusion, the amount recoverable is £16,500.
Learn more about Damages:
https://brainly.com/question/4395083
#SPJ11