Answer:
the purchase of ahouse
Which of the following would NOT be a reason people create government?
- Leadership
- Protection
- Economics
-Taxes
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates the distribution of Gensol. The FDA is a federal executive agency. Its administrator is under the control of: the President. Congress. Voters. the Commission of Federal Agencies.
Answer:
The President.
Explanation:
The president is the head of the executive branch and there for is under the control of the President.
Please sub my yt channel EpicGamer Vortex
Benefits of the european and liberian from the transatlantic trade.
The European and Liberian societies greatly benefited from the transatlantic trade in various ways. Europeans experienced economic growth due to increased access to resources, labor, and new markets. The transatlantic trade provided them with raw materials such as sugar, cotton, and tobacco, which were essential for their growing industries. Additionally, European countries expanded their colonial empires, gaining control over territories and populations, which increased their global influence.
The slave trade was another aspect of the transatlantic trade that immensely benefited European countries, as it supplied them with a cheap and abundant labor force. Liberians, on the other hand, benefited from the transatlantic trade through the introduction of new crops, technologies, and cultural exchanges. Europeans brought crops like cassava, maize, and plantains, which became staples in the Liberian diet. The new technologies introduced by Europeans, such as metallurgy and textile production, significantly improved local industries. The cultural exchanges resulting from the transatlantic trade led to the blending of African and European traditions, creating unique art, music, and languages. Both European and Liberian societies experienced significant benefits from the transatlantic trade, such as economic growth, access to new resources and markets, improved industries, and rich cultural exchanges.
to know about transatlantic trade visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14260809
#SPJ11
What are the four steps, in order, of active crime response
Answer:
Introduce yourself to victims by name and title. Briefly explain your role and purpose.
Reassure victims of their safety and your concern by paying close attention to your own words, posture, mannerisms, and tone of voice. Say to victims, “You're safe now” or “I'm here now.” Use body language to show concern, such as nodding your head, using natural eye contact, placing yourself at the victim's level rather than standing over seated victims, keeping an open stance rather than crossing your arms, and speaking in a calm, sympathetic voice.
Ask victims to tell you in just a sentence or two what happened. Ask if they have any physical injuries. Take care of their medical needs first.
Offer to contact a family member, friend, or crisis counselor for victims.
Ensure privacy during your interview. Conduct it in a place where victims feel secure.
Ask simple questions that allow victims to make decisions, assert themselves, and regain control over their lives. Examples: “Would you like anything to drink?”; “May I come inside and talk with you?”; and “How would you like me to address you, Ms. Jones?”
Assure victims of the confidentiality of their comments whenever possible.
Ask victims about any special concerns or needs they may have.
Provide a “safety net” for victims before leaving them. Make telephone calls and pull together personal or professional support for the victims. Give victims a pamphlet listing resources available for help or information. This pamphlet should include contact information for local crisis intervention centers and support groups; the prosecutor's office and the victim-witness assistance office; the State victim compensation/assistance office; and other nationwide services, including toll-free hotlines.
Give victim's—in writing—your name and information on how to reach you. Encourage them to contact you if they have any questions or if you can be of further help.
Explanation:
How do terrorists become radicalized and what does research suggest about radicalization?
Answer:
Radicalisation is when someone starts to believe or support extreme views, and in some cases, then participates in terrorist groups or acts. It can be motivated by a range of factors, including ideologies, religious beliefs, political beliefs and prejudices against particular groups of people.
Today you have been appointed by the USA Supreme Court to represent one side in the case of Mandrill vs. the USA.
There are some issues which settled by lower courts , but the case was overturned and reinstated multiple times until it reached SCOTUS, Now you have been asked To write a 150 -200 -word brief of the issue is "Mandrill, as an animal, is entitled to the same rights as a human".
Simply list both arguments, side by side
Case: Mandrill vs. America
Issue: Whether Mandrill, as an animal, is entitled to the equal rights as a human.
Arguments:
For Mandrill's Rights:
Animal Sentience and Intrinsic Value: Mandrill advocates argue that animals, inclusive of primates like Mandrills, possess sentience and enjoy feelings and cognitive competencies similar to human beings. They contend that these attributes supply animals with inherent value, deserving of legal safety and popularity in their rights.
Evolving Standards of Morality: Supporters of Mandrill's rights declare that societal attitudes in the direction of animal welfare have advanced over time. They argue that legal recognition of animal rights aligns with contemporary moral and ethical values, selling compassion and empathy toward all sentient beings.
Against Mandrill's Rights:
Legal Status: Opponents argue that the existing felony framework only grants rights to people, as they own a wonderful criminal personality and potential for the moral enterprise. They contend that extending human rights to animals, such as Mandrill, might require a sizable redefinition of felony ideas.
Practical Implications: Critics enhance issues approximately the realistic implications of granting animals identical rights as human beings. They argue that such recognition should have some distance-attaining effects, affecting regions like property ownership, medical studies, and animal agriculture, doubtlessly disrupting established societal norms and human pursuits.
Conclusion:
The case of Mandrill vs. The us affords a complicated and controversial difficulty regarding the extension of human rights to animals. Advocates emphasize animal sentience and evolving moral requirements while warring parties highlight prison status and sensible implications.
The Supreme Court needs to cautiously take into account the arguments offered to decide the extent of prison protections afforded to animals in light of societal, ethical, and legal concerns.
To know more about animal welfare,
https://brainly.com/question/28201931
#SPJ4
Which amendment prevents states from denying citizens equal protection of the laws?.
The Fourteenth Amendment prevents states from denying citizens equal protection of the laws.
What is the Fourteenth Amendment?The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was ratified as one of the Reconstruction Amendments on July 9, 1868. It was proposed in response to issues concerning former slaves following the American Civil War and is widely regarded as one of the most consequential amendments.It addresses citizenship rights and equal protection under the law. The amendment was fiercely contested, especially by the defeated Confederacy's states, which were forced to ratify it in order to regain representation in Congress.The first section of the amendment, in particular, is one of the most litigated parts of the Constitution, serving as the foundation for landmark Supreme Court decisions such as Brown v. Board of Education (1954) regarding racial segregation, Roe v. Wade (1973) regarding abortion (overturned in 2022), Bush v. Gore (2000) regarding the 2000 presidential election, and Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) regarding same-sex marriage. The amendment restricts the actions of all state and local officials, as well as those acting on their behalf.Therefore, the Fourteenth Amendment prevents states from denying citizens equal protection of the laws.
Know more about the Fourteenth Amendment here:
https://brainly.com/question/891756
#SPJ4
What are the economic interests of the Constitution?
The economic interest of the constitution is the right to own or acquire land, transfer land or property, and use this land and property freely.
What is Constitution?A constitution is the collection of fundamental ideas or established precedents that serve as the legal foundation of a polity, organization, or other form of body and typically dictate how that entity is to be governed.
Property economic rights encompass the right to own or acquire land, transfer land or property, and freely utilize this land and property. This right is protected not just by the Constitution, but also by federal, state, and municipal legislation.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the right to possess or acquire land, transfer land or property, and freely utilize this land and property is the constitution's economic interest.
Learn more about Constitution here;
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ1
Discuss the differences between individualizing items of evidence and associative items of evidence?
Individualized proof has a common origin, while classification evidence solely shares frequent characteristics. Class proof cannot, however man or woman proof can. It can exonerate suspects who are from a one-of-a-kind group.
What is individualizing evidence?The quality proof is anything that can be linked to a unique, single, unique source. This is called person evidence. Examples are. fingerprints, handwriting, DNA patterns, and.
What is the difference between associative proof and tracing evidence?In terms of investigative aids, hint proof can furnish statistics to decide the origin of a pattern and determine the manufacture date of the material, all of which can restrict possible suspects in a case. Associative proof can partner with or link victims or suspects to a crime scene.
Learn more about individualizing here;
https://brainly.com/question/375166
#SPJ1
Can you identify reasons unrelated to prejudice that would lead texas to want to deny education funds to the students in this case?
Which of the following statements about common law are not true? (Select all that apply
Common few refers to the fact that judges can only look at written taw to make a decision
Common law evokes in part based on decisions in court cases
Common law means that laws can change based on prevailing behaviors and trends.
Common law means that only written bws can be interpreted by judges.
Common law is the belief that all citizens must follow due process
Answer:
2 & 3 I think
Explanation:
The statements about common law are not true is
Common law is the belief that all citizens must follow due process.Common law means that laws can change based on prevailing behaviors and trends.What is Law?A law is referred to as a set of rules and regulations, guidelines given in the constitution and implemented by the ruling government to maintain cordial relationships among people and helps to conduct the functioning of any country properly.
The set of decisions created by judges and legal procedures starting in the Middle Ages is known as common law. there was not a codified system of laws, instead that there were historical policies and procedures that guided current legal choices.
This method of approaching the law is still employed by the American legal system, which uses earlier cases to guide present-day judgments.
Learn more about Common Law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8476406
#SPJ2
Which of the following is
true about the structure of
state governments?
A. State law can go against the federal government.
B. State law cannot override federal law.
C. State law will never affect the people.
B. State law cannot override federal law is true about structure of state governments.
State governments in the United States are institutional bodies that perform government tasks at a lower level than the federal government. Each government in the United States has legislative, executive, and judicial jurisdiction over a specific geographic territory.
The United States consists of 50 states: nine of the Thirteen Colonies that were already part of the United States when the Constitution went into effect in 1789, four that ratified the Constitution after its inception, and 37 that have been admitted since by Congress as authorized by Article IV, Section 3 of the Constitution.
State governments, which are structured in accordance with state legislation (including state constitutions and state statutes), follow the same structural paradigm as the federal government, with three branches of government—executive, legislative, and judiciary.
To know more about state government :
https://brainly.com/question/12299619
#SPJ1
What does the new abortion law state?
And why is abortion important?
The new abortion law states that only states have the rights to decide on the abortion laws that they have in their states.
What was the Roe V wade ruling?This was the ruling that was formerly used to say that abortions was legal in the United States. This law was overturned recently. This gives the states the rights to decide if they would want to continue allowing abortions or not.
For the states that would rule it as illegal, it means that women would no longer have the rights to terminate the pregnancies that they do not want. The reason I would say abortion is important is because it may be useful in issues where the pregnancy is a high risk for the carrier.
Read more on Roe V Wade here: https://brainly.com/question/3870089
#SPJ1
If God wants us to be happy for who we are then can't we just be happy for us being LGBTQ+
Answer:
because god did not create us to be lgbtq he created man and women. and for them to go together only but god still loves you if you are lgbtq it is a sin but so is lying ive lied and so have you we are the same no matter the sin its simple love the sinner not the sin god loves no matter what you are whether you support trump or biden it doesnt matter he loves us all the same:)
Explanation:
Answer:
im pansexual so like and i agree lgbtq people and everyone else is perfect in gods eyes
Explanation:
any task that is useful
Answer:
I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THE QUESTION
PLEASE ELABORATE
under federal law, an employer can dismiss an employee because his or her wages are being garnished.
Title III restricts the amount of wages that can be garnished on an employee in a single week and prevents employers from terminating an employee because of a single debt.
How many wages can be garnished at once?If a worker is supporting another spouse or child, the garnishment law allows up to 60% of the worker's disposable earnings to be garnished for these purposes. For support payments that are more than two weeks behind schedule, an additional 5% may be garnished.
In Michigan, how much can they garnish my wages for?Limits of 25% on Periodic Garnishments The amount that a creditor can deduct from your earnings is limited. Whatever is less can be garnished by a creditor: up to 25% of your disposable income, whichever is greater than 30 times the federal minimum wage, which is currently $217.50.
To learn more about garnishment law here:
https://brainly.com/question/14042400
#SPJ4
The senate refusing to ratify a treaty, the president vetoing a law, and the senate rejecting the nomination of a supreme court justice are all examples of
Answer:
checks and balances.
Explanation:
Checks and balances refers to a system that is typically used in a democratic society to enforce a balance of power between the three (3) arms of government; executive, judiciary and legislative arm. These checks and balances are really important and necessary so as to ensure there wouldn't be an abuse of power by any of arm of government.
Hence, the senate refusing to ratify a treaty, the president vetoing a law, and the senate rejecting the nomination of a supreme court justice are all examples of checks and balances.
What are examples of federalism in the Constitution?
Federalism is the division of powers between the national government and state governments in the United States, as outlined in the Constitution. This division of power is reflected in various parts of the Constitution, such as the Supremacy Clause, Commerce Clause, 10th Amendment, and the system of dual sovereignty.
The Supremacy Clause establishes that the Constitution, laws passed by Congress, and treaties made by the national government are the supreme law of the land and take precedence over state laws. The Commerce Clause grants Congress the power to regulate interstate commerce, while leaving the regulation of intrastate commerce to the states.
The 10th Amendment states that powers not delegated to the national government by the Constitution, nor prohibited to the states, are reserved to the states or to the people, protecting the states' right to govern in areas not specifically granted to the national government.
The system of dual sovereignty, as reflected in the 5th and 14th amendments, which protect individuals from being deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, and from being denied the equal protection of the laws by either the national or state government.
To know more about Federalism click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/8305583#
#SPJ11
What are five situations in which it is legally permissible for co's to use Force
Under certain circumstances, it is legally permissible for companies to use force. Here are five situations where it is allowed they are Self-defense, Protecting property, Enforcing laws, Emergencies, and Employee safety.
1. Self-defense: If a company is being attacked or threatened with physical harm, it can use force to defend itself or its employees.
2. Protecting property: A company can use force to protect its property from theft, damage, or destruction.
3. Enforcing laws: Companies that are authorized by law to enforce rules and regulations can use force to ensure compliance. Examples include security guards, police officers, and other law enforcement agencies.
4. Emergencies: In some emergencies, such as natural disasters or public safety crises, companies may use force to maintain order or protect the public.
5. Employee safety: Companies must provide a safe working environment for their employees. If an employee poses a threat to themselves or others, a company may use force to restrain them and prevent harm.
It is important to note that while force may be permissible in these situations, it should always be used as a last resort and in a proportionate manner. Companies should always try to resolve conflicts peacefully and use force only when necessary to protect themselves or others.
Know more about Enforcing laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/28173975
#SPJ11
A taxi in which you are a passenger, breaks the stop light and consequently meets in an accident. You sustain injuries. Identify and explain the various laws that may apply as a result.A taxi in which you are a passenger, breaks the stop light and consequently meets in an accident. You sustain injuries. Identify and explain the various laws that may apply as a result.
Laws that may apply include traffic laws, negligence laws, insurance laws, and civil liability laws for seeking compensation.
Several laws may apply if you are a passenger in a taxi that runs a stop sign and causes an accident that results in injuries. The driver's violation of running the stop light would be in violation of traffic laws. If the driver's failure to use reasonable care led to the accident, negligence laws would apply.
Insurance laws would set the parameters and requirements for auto accidents, and civil liability laws would control the procedure for pursuing damages and injury claims. To ensure that your rights are protected, it is essential to seek legal counsel in order to navigate the particular laws and regulations that are relevant to your jurisdiction and circumstances.
Learn more about traffic laws at:
brainly.com/question/30784687
#SPJ4
Who was the US Bill of Rights designed to protect?
Answer:
George Mason
have to add things so it will let me answer
it is
What is true of corporate political speech? (Choose 2 answers.) A. Political donations are protected by the First Amendment as types of corporate political speech.B. Corporate political speech is strongly restricted in a presidential election year.C. Corporate political speech is more restricted than corporate commercial speech.D. Corporate political speech is protected by the First Amendment.
The truth about corporate political speech are:
A. Political donations are protected by the First Amendment as types of corporate political speech.D. Corporate political speech is protected by the First Amendment.What is meant by corporate political speech?Corporate political speech refers to the expression of political views or the making of political contributions by corporations, businesses, and other organizations. This type of speech can include contributions to political campaigns, lobbying activities, and public advocacy on political issues. Corporate political speech is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees the right to free speech and free expression.
However, the Supreme Court has recognized that corporations have different characteristics and interests compared to individual citizens, and has allowed for some regulation of corporate political speech in order to prevent corruption and undue influence in the political process.
As a result, there are limits on the amount and type of contributions that corporations can make, and there are disclosure requirements for certain types of political spending. The legal treatment of corporate political speech is a complex and evolving area of law, and new cases are constantly being brought to challenge existing regulations.
Read more on politics here:https://brainly.com/question/10744844
#SPJ1
Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law.
Answer:
Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law. Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law.
Explanation:
which of the following statements characterizes the legacy of the spanish conquest in the new world in the sixteenth century?
The statement "Spanish government and missionaries conducted a campaign to eliminate indigenous cultures" best captures the legacy of the Spanish conquest of the new world in the sixteenth century.
What is the Spanish conquest?One of the key moments in the Spanish colonization of the Americas was the conquest of the Aztec Empire by the Spanish, commonly known as the Conquest of Mexico or the Spanish-Aztec War (1519–21).
There are numerous accounts of the events from the 16th century by Spanish conquistadors, their native allies, and the vanquished Aztecs.
The legacy of the Spanish conquest of the new globe in the sixteenth century is best summed up by the phrase "Spanish government and missionaries undertook a campaign to eradicate indigenous civilizations."
A coalition of Spanish invaders with tributaries to the Aztecs, especially their indigenous adversaries and competitors, was formed in order to topple the Aztec Empire rather than just a small group of Spaniards.
Therefore, the statement "Spanish government and missionaries conducted a campaign to eliminate indigenous cultures" best captures the legacy of the Spanish conquest of the new world in the sixteenth century.
Know more about the Spanish conquest here:
https://brainly.com/question/13128214
#SPJ1
Complete question:
What statement characterizes the legacy of the Spanish conquest of the new world in the sixteenth century?
Topic: Should gun control be tightened?
1. Does the historical evidence support the conclusion that the second amendment phone to the right of individuals to possess firearms?
Answer: Gun control should be be tightened depending on the individual, area, and motives.
Explanation: The 2nd amendment proclaims the right to keep and bear arms. This amendment shall not be infringed.
Victim assistance and victim compensation programs are well established in many jurisdictions, but are they enough to compensate victims for their losses?
1 - list the three main ways that someone can prove sexual harassment.
Three main ways to prove sexual harassment are through documentation, witness testimony, and corroborating evidence.
Documentation is a crucial form of evidence in proving sexual harassment. This includes any written records such as emails, text messages, or notes detailing incidents of harassment, as well as any formal complaints filed with employers or authorities. Witness testimony plays a significant role in substantiating claims of sexual harassment. Statements from individuals who have observed or experienced the harassment can provide additional support and credibility to the victim's account. Corroborating evidence can further strengthen a case of sexual harassment. This may include physical evidence such as photographs, videos, or audio recordings, or any other relevant material that supports the victim's claims.
It's important to note that each case is unique, and the types of evidence needed may vary. It is advisable for victims of sexual harassment to consult with legal professionals who can provide guidance tailored to their specific circumstances.
To know more about Documentation, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31802881
#SPJ11
What is the policy for non-retaliation
Answer:
A non-retaliation policy is a policy that is developed to ensure that an organization and its employees are complying with state and federal laws regarding the prohibition of retaliation.
Explanation:
Answer:
Protects employees, who in good faith report suspected non-compliance
Explanation:
At least 200 words per question. Just start me off with 100 words and ill finish the rest! THANKS GUYS!!
1. What common problems have existed throughout the centuries for people in law enforcement?
2. Why was there no law enforcement during the daytime for many centuries?
3. What are some of the challenges law enforcement will face with intelligence-led policing as it emerges in the new era of policing?
Answer:
uhhhhh how am i supposed to know this??? u can look it up on the internet lol
When is the President most likely to use an executive order to make importan policy
Answer:
When congress can not reach a compromise
Explanation: