The type of legal provision that allows individuals to relinquish their claims against others without an exchange of consideration, by making a written statement to that effect, is known as a release or a waiver.
A release or waiver is a legal clause that enables people to freely give up or abandon their claims against other people without expecting anything in return. This clause gives people the option to expressly waive their right to file a lawsuit or request compensation for a specific claim or incident in a written statement.
People acknowledge that they have voluntarily and knowingly chosen to waive their rights by signing a release or waiver which exonerates the other party from any liability or responsibility related to the claim. This legal tool is frequently employed in a variety of situations including liability waivers for taking part in particular activities or events, contract negotiations and personal injury settlements.
To know more about waiver here
brainly.com/question/31838925
#SPJ4
The complete question is "Which type of legal provision allows individuals to relinquish their claims against others without an exchange of consideration, by making a written statement to that effect?"
Give me the example of custodial arrest about investigation and criminal justice system
Answer:
Explanation:
Lia and Bianca entered into a contract. It was agreed that if Lia will be Bianca’s event coordinator for four weeks, the latter will give Lia the amount of P50,000. Is Lia’s obligation legally enforceable?
A borrower has defaulted on the mortgage. The mortgage contains an acceleration clause. This permits the lender to
Answer:
gives them the right to advance the due date of the part that they didn't pay for with (interest most likely)
What are the three main forms of city government?
Answer: legislative, Executive, and Judicial. Hope this helped: )
Discuss how drugs and substance abuse in prisons can affect the safety of inmates and staff.
One of the seven principles of the North American Model for Wildlife
Conservation states that wildlife is an international resource. What does this
mean?
A
Wildlife found in the United States and
Canada is owned by North Americans,
B
Dead game animals may be sold throughout
North American without being regulated.
C
Hunting and fishing are managed
cooperatively across state and province
boundaries.
D
Only those persons who have a valid
passport may hunt legally.
lo
Answer:
C Hunting and fishing are managed cooperatively across state and province boundaries.Explanation:
According to the North American Model for Wildlife Conservation, wildlife is a an international resource. No party has exclusive right over it and, therefore, should be shared across state and province boundaries.It advocates that hunting and fishing should be open and free to all citizen regardless of status, or land ownership. However, it also advocates that these activities should be practiced within legal limits and not for commercial purposes.Considering the North American Model for Wildlife.
Conservation states that wildlife is an international resource. This implies that "Hunting and fishing are managed cooperatively across state and province boundaries."This conservation of wildlife deals with the management of the wildlife such that there wouldn't be the extinction of wildlife animals.Also, being international, means, such management should be done beyond individual boundaries of States and provinces across North America, including the United States, Canada, and Mexico.Hence, in this case, the correct answer is option C "Hunting and fishing are managed cooperatively across state and province boundaries."
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/6333981
Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the Estimates Committee?
Choose the correct statements given below.
A
1 only
B
2 only
C
Both 1 and 2
D
Neither 1 nor 2
The Committee on Estimates is not an ad hoc committee but a standing committee of the Parliament. On the other hand, the Committee on Railway Convention is not a standing committee but an ad hoc committee of the Parliament. Therefore, the correct option (D)
The origin of this committee can be traced back to the pre-independence era to the standing finance committee set up in 1921.As mentioned in the then-finance minister John Mathai's speech presenting the 1950-51 budget, the first estimate committee in the post-independence era was formed in 1950 on his advice.The Estimate Committee had 25 members at first, but that number increased to 30 in 1956.It is a type of financial commitment in the constitution of India. It is one of the permanent standing committees. Hence, Statement 1 is not correct.All the 30 members are from Loksabha onlyRajya Sabha has no representation in this committee.Members are elected every year from amongst Lok Sabha members according to the principle of proportional representation by means of a single transferable vote. Thus all parties get due representation in the committee.Hence the correct statement D
Learn more about Rajya Sabha
https://brainly.com/question/17331973
#SPJ11
Full Question: Which of the following statements is/are correct?
1. Committee on Estimates is an ad hoc committee of the Parliament.
2. Committee on Railway Convention is a standing committee of the Parliament.
Select the correct answer using the code given below: 100 word
Choose the correct statements given below.
A
1 only
B
2 only
C
Both 1 and 2
D
Neither 1 nor 2
The statement that is correct regarding the Estimates Committee is:Both 1 and 2.What is the Estimates Committee?The Estimates Committee is one of the largest and most important parliamentary committees.
Its primary goal is to examine the estimates that the executive submits to Parliament each year and submit reports to the House. Members of Parliament examine the financial estimates made by the government in the budgets and take appropriate measures. Below are some correct statements regarding the Estimates Committee:The committee was first created in 1921 to examine the budget estimates. The committee is made up of thirty members, and the chairman is always a member of the opposition.
To know more about Estimates visit
https://brainly.com/question/33016179
#SPJ11
1. Which is not a mitigating factor?
History of abuse and neglect
History of brain injury or abnormality
Likelihood of rehabilitation
Low intelligence
All are possible mitigating factors
2.
Compared to small juries, large juries ...
are more likely to have all jurors actively participate
are better at recalling presented arguments
have more conformity
are less likely to have a hung jury
may take longer to deliberate
3. A meticulously planned set of murders across a period of six months could best be characterized as...
mass organized
spree organized
serial organized
mass disorganized
spree disorganized
serial disorganized
4. Which question might lead to a psychological autopsy?
Cause of death?
How competent was this person to make their will?
Was this an accident?
All of the above
5.
Who does the largest portion of criminal profiling?
FBI
Forensic Psychologists
Individuals with graduate training in psychology
1. The statement "All are possible mitigating factors" is incorrect. The mitigating factor that is not listed is "Low intelligence."
While the other three factors (history of abuse and neglect, history of brain injury or abnormality, and likelihood of rehabilitation) can be considered mitigating factors in a legal context, low intelligence is not typically recognized as a mitigating factor.
2. Large juries may have more conformity compared to small juries. While large juries can have advantages such as a more diverse range of perspectives and more comprehensive deliberations, they are also more prone to conformity. As the number of jurors increases, the likelihood of groupthink and conformity to majority opinions tends to rise.
3. A meticulously planned set of mu*ders across a period of six months could best be characterized as "serial organized." The term "serial" refers to a pattern of committing multiple murders over time with a cooling-off period between each incident. The fact that the murders were meticulously planned indicates a level of organization in the perpetrator's actions.
4. The question "All of the above" might lead to a psychological autopsy. A psychological autopsy is an investigation into a person's psychological state and factors leading up to their death, particularly in cases of su*cide, suspicious deaths, or unclear circumstances. Understanding the cause of death, the person's competence in making their will, and whether it was an accident are all relevant questions that may be explored during a psychological autopsy.
5. Criminal profiling is primarily conducted by the FBI. While forensic psychologists may contribute to aspects of criminal profiling, including psychological assessments, the FBI is the organization most commonly associated with criminal profiling. The FBI's Behavioral Analysis Unit (BAU) is well-known for its work in developing profiles of unknown offenders based on crime scene analysis and behavioral patterns.
To know more about Criminal profiling :
https://brainly.com/question/32224204
#SPJ4
Who won the Gonzales v CARHART case?
Answer:
The decisions of the Courts of Appeals for the Eighth and Ninth Circuits reversed. Gonzales v. Carhart, 550 U.S. 124 (2007), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003
gerrymandering is used to protect what kind of incumbent?
Gerrymandering is used to protect incumbent politicians of the dominant political party by manipulating electoral district boundaries in their favor.
Gerrymandering is the practice of manipulating the boundaries of electoral districts to benefit a particular political party or group. It involves strategically redrawing district lines in a way that gives an advantage to one party by concentrating or dispersing voters based on their political preferences.
The primary goal of gerrymandering is to secure electoral outcomes that favor the party in power, often by creating safe seats or maximizing the number of districts where a party has a higher chance of winning.
Gerrymandering can distort democratic representation, undermine fair elections, and perpetuate political dominance by manipulating the voting power of citizens.
Learn more about Gerrymandering here:
https://brainly.com/question/29615435
#SPJ4
When a country chooses to limit the kinds of goods or services it produces, it is practicing
O absolute advantage.
O globalization.
O dependency.
O specialization.
When a country chooses to limit the kinds of goods or services it produces, it is practicing specialization.
Option D is correct.
Why is specialization important?Specialization helps companies maximize productivity. It's all about using your resources to produce just one product, making your business more efficient and effective. This increases profitability while minimizing operating costs for your business.
What does specialization do in the production of goods?The more focused you are on a task, the more efficient you will be at that task. This means less time and money spent producing goods. This means you can produce more goods for the same amount of time and money.
Learn more about specialization:
brainly.com/question/14588686
#SPJ1
Larry, Moe, and Curly own the Three Stooges as joint tenants with rights of survivorship. Curly conveys his interest to Shemp. Subsequently, Moe dies. Who owns Moe's interest in the Three Stooges?
Answer:
Larry, Moe and Curly own an investment property as tenants in common. Because of a recent business disagreement, Curly wants to divest himself of the property. If the three owners cannot mutually agree on a plan to settle the matter, Curly may seek an equitable distribution of the property
All three own Moe's interest in the Three Stooges as all of them were the tenants.
This is due to the fact that a business with a survivorship right legally goes to the person who survives. As a result, the property cannot be considered part of both the estate of the dead owner under the law.
Joint property owners have the right of succession, which guarantees that, in the event of one owner's passing, the surviving owner(s) will take over ownership of the deceased owner's part of the property.
As renters in common, Curly, Moe, and Larry jointly own a rental. Cindy wishes to sell property due to a recent economic quarrel. Curly may ask for a fair division of the land if the three owners are unable to come to an arrangement. The Three Stooges are owned by Larry, Moe, and Curly as equal partners with right of survivorship.
Learn more about the rights of survivorship, Here:
https://brainly.com/question/14140061
#SPJ5
Agencies develop what
from legislative guidelines.
Answer:
Federal administrative law derives from the President, agencies of the Executive Branch, and independent regulatory agencies. Agencies are given the authority to create administrative law through laws enacted by Congress. The law comes in the form of rules, regulations, procedures, orders, and decisions.
A request for a change of venue is an example of a _______________motion
Answer:
venue
Explanation:
Of the proposed methods for responding to an unruly defendant in Illinois v. Allen, which did the Supreme Court state should be used as a last resort for fear of prejudicing the jury against the defendant?
Answer:
Gag and bind defendants
Explanation:
In the Illinois v. Allen case of 1970, the Supreme court upheld the gag or bind order which allows for the removal of an unruly defendant who interrupts court proceedings. In that particular case, Allen was tried for ordering a drink in a bar, refusing to pay, and collecting $200 at gunpoint from a bartender. When he was charged to court, Allen refused the public defender whom the court assigned to him, rather insisting that he would defend himself. He proved verbally abusive to the judge even issuing him a death threat when he tried convincing him of the need for a public defender who understands the language of the court. When the situation proved uncontrollable, the judge ordered that Allen be taken out of the court and only brought in when there was a need for him to be identified.
The Supreme court upheld this decision agreeing that any defendant whose actions proved disruptive to the court should be removed from the courtroom. Gag and shackles were one of the three methods proposed for controlling an unruly defendant and it was to be the last resort. The reason for this is that when the judges see the defendant in that condition it could play on their emotions, thus making them prejudiced.
100 points!!!!!!!!!! A student is trying to understand the differences between correctional officers and probation and parole officers. What are the key differences between the three? Are there any similarities?
Answer:
Explanation:
A correction officer is responsible for watching the individuals while they are in jail waiting for trial, after they have been convicted and are serving time for their offense. A parole office oversees the individual after they have been released and are required to be under supervision for a period of time
Probation is part and parcel of the offender's initial sentence, whereas parole comes much later, allowing the offender early release from a prison sentence. Probation is handed down by the judge at trial. It may be in lieu of jail time or in combination with some jail time.
Answer:
A correction officer is responsible for watching the individuals while they are in jail waiting for trial, after they have been convicted and are serving time for their offense. A parole office oversees the individual after they have been released and are required to be under supervision for a period of time
Probation is part and parcel of the offender's initial sentence, whereas parole comes much later, allowing the offender early release from a prison sentence. Probation is handed down by the judge at trial. It may be in lieu of jail time or in combination with some jail time.
Explanation:
In Texas, both the lieutenant governor and the Speaker of the House are elected in statewide elections. True False.
True. In Texas, both the lieutenant governor and the Speaker of the House are elected in statewide elections.
The lieutenant governor is considered to be one of the most powerful positions in Texas government, as he or she presides over the state Senate and controls the flow of legislation in that chamber. The Speaker of the House, on the other hand, presides over the state House of Representatives and plays a critical role in setting the legislative agenda for that chamber. Both of these positions are elected by the people of Texas, and their election can have a significant impact on the direction and priorities of state government.
To know more about lieutenant governor visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28010042
#SPJ11
Do you think the Pennsylvania system of prisons was too cruel or harsh or could modern prisons benefit from revisiting this early system? Explain your answer.
Answer:I do think the Pennsylvania system was too harsh. They was criticized for being too costly because they wanted to focus on solitary confinement. They was also criticized for the inmates physical and mental health because of solitary confinement as well. It seem as if they was going off a method of being a workshop. The system was even impractical. I don’t think modern prisons would be able to benefit off this system. While it’s true that prisons are making money off the amount of inmates, mental help should be offered as well. Physical help should be offered too. I’ve seen plenty of stories where inmates would die from their injuries in prison and no physical help is given such as fighting or even a female inmate giving birth.
Explanation:
What qualifies as the first broken window theory in law
Answer:
The broken windows theory, defined in 1982 by social scientists James Wilson and George Kelling, drawing on earlier research by Stanford University psychologist Philip Zimbardo, argues that no matter how rich or poor a neighborhood, one broken window would soon lead to many more windows being broken: “One unrepaired ...
Explanation:
how does the doctrine of stare decisis help in creating stability in a legal system?
The doctrine of stare decisis plays a crucial role in creating stability within a legal system.
The doctrine of stare decisis plays a crucial role in creating stability within a legal system. Stare decisis, derived from the Latin phrase "to stand by things decided," refers to the principle that courts should follow established precedents when deciding cases with similar facts and issues. This doctrine helps promote consistency, predictability, and fairness in the legal system.
By adhering to stare decisis, courts uphold prior decisions, ensuring that cases with comparable circumstances receive similar treatment. This consistency enables individuals and businesses to understand and anticipate the potential outcomes of legal disputes, fostering a sense of predictability and reliability in the legal system.
Furthermore, stare decisis contributes to fairness by treating litigants equally, preventing arbitrary or biased rulings. It also encourages respect for the judiciary and promotes public trust in the legal system, as individuals perceive the courts as applying rules in a consistent and even-handed manner.
Lastly, the doctrine of stare decisis provides a foundation for legal stability, as it discourages constant changes in judicial interpretations. By upholding established precedents, courts maintain continuity in the law, preventing unpredictable shifts that could undermine confidence in the legal system.
In summary, the doctrine of stare decisis helps create stability in a legal system by promoting consistency, predictability, and fairness, while fostering public trust in the judiciary.
To know more about doctrine of stare decisis visit: https://brainly.com/question/2986841
#SPJ11
in the case of any copyright subsisting in either its first or renewal term on january 1m 1978, other than a copyright in a work made for hire, the exclusive or nonexclusive grant of a transfer or license of the renewal copyright or any
The above paragraph is an excerpt from the judgement in the Copyright case of Community for Creative Non-Violence vs. Reid
The Community for Creative Non-Violence (CCNV) and sculptor James Reid came to an informal agreement for Reid to create a statue reflecting the condition of the homeless for a 1985 Christmas pageant in Washington, D.C. CCNV paid Reid the final payment of the agreed-upon fee upon the completion, delivery, and linking of the work to a base that it prepared independently. Soon later, the parties submitted opposing copyright claims pertaining to the sculpture. A district judge decided in favour of CCNV, finding that the statue qualified as a "work made for hire" under the Copyright Act of 1976. The Supreme Court granted CCNV certiorari after the Court of Appeals reversed itself on appeal.
To know more about work made for hire:
https://brainly.com/question/14615101
#SPJ4
describe two ways in which the above laws protects citizens against gbv
Laws relating to GBV protect citizens in several ways such as:
Punishing perpetrators of GBV. Granting support to victims of GBV. How do laws protect citizens against GBV?Laws against GBV prescribe punishments for those found guilty of engaging in gender-based violence. This acts as a deterrent from the act.
Laws also offer support to those who have gone through GBV to ensure that they can recover from the incident and reassimilate into society.
Find out more on GBV at
https://brainly.com/question/16923564.
#SPJ1
A Texas law which requires that motorcycle riders wear helmets is most accurately described as... Group of answer choices inter lego. mala in se. quid pro quo. mala prohibita. novus ordo seclorum.
Answer: mala prohibita
Explanation:
Malum in se is simply a Latin phrase that means that something wrong or evil. Examples include murder, assault, robbery etc. These act are wrongful.
Malum prohibitum, simply m and that something that's considered to be wrong because it's prohibited. Examples include indecent exposure, not using helmets by bikers etc.
Paul is the neighborhood Peeping Tom.At night he goes into Mary's backyard and peers through her bedroom window as she changes clothes.While Paul gains sexual gratification in watching Mary change clothes,he is also violating the ________ statute.
Answer: the statute depends upon the state you live in.
What is the purpose of the Twenty-fifth Amendment?
1. to allow 18 years to vote
2. to clarify presidential succession
3. to elect senators by popular vote
4. to eliminate the Electoral College
Answer:
not sure but I think 2, to clarify presidential succession
1) Which of the following factors makes it difficult to drive in reverse?
A) Looking back, the driver has a fairly large blind spot.
OB Most of the trajectory is done with the gears in reverse.
OC) The driver could be confused when turning the steering wheel.
OD Both A and C are correct answers.
Answer:
D. Both A and C are correct answers.
Examine each situation described below. Which case does not involve a privilege?
A. An attomey wants a physician to testify that his patient has Alzheimer's disease.
B. An abused woman is willing to testify against her husband to send him to jail for assaulting her.
C. A man confesses to his clergyman that he murdered two people.
D. A state prosecutor wants a psychiatrist to testify that a woman confessed to him that she used to beat her son when he was little.
Mark for review (Will be highlighted on the review page)
Answer: A
Explanation:
But i might be wrong if so it is D
A good team member ________________. does the least amount of work possible is actively engaged in the group doesn't let anyone else participate is unreliable
Answer:
B is actively engaged in the group.
It is the intention of the legislature that asset forfeiture is remedial in nature and ___ a form of punishment.
Answer:
asset Forfeiture is the answer
Explanation:
if a bailment is voluntary and benefits both the bailor and the bailee, what sort of responsibility does the bailee owe the bailor?
When a bailment is voluntary and mutually beneficial for both the bailor and the bailee, the bailee owes a duty of care and reasonable diligence to the bailor. The bailee is responsible for taking reasonable precautions to protect the bailed property and prevent any damage or loss. This includes exercising proper care, skill, and caution in handling and preserving the property.
The bailee must ensure that the property is returned in the same condition as when it was received, or in the condition agreed upon between the parties. They are expected to use the property only within the scope of the agreement and not to exceed the agreed-upon terms.
The level of responsibility or duty of care may vary depending on the nature of the bailment and any specific agreements made between the parties. However, in a voluntary bailment that benefits both parties, the bailee's responsibility is to act in a manner that safeguards the bailor's interests and ensures the safekeeping of the property entrusted to them.
In a voluntary bailment that benefits both the bailor and the bailee, the bailee owes a duty of care and reasonable diligence to the bailor. This means that the bailee must take reasonable precautions to protect the bailed property, exercise proper care and skill in handling it, and ensure its safekeeping. The bailee is responsible for returning the property in the same condition it was received, or as agreed upon between the parties, and must not exceed the authorized use of the property.
To know more about reasonable diligence.
https://brainly.com/question/7005428
#SPJ11
Discuss the legalities of using ruses and pretexts to gain confidential information regarding a target from sources. What are
appropriate deceptive plays and which ones should be illegal? Why? Explain and support your answer.
Pretexting is the act or practice of gaining information about a subject by misrepresentation or under false pretenses. Pretexting is capable to leaving companies involved open to liability claims
The need to understand when pretexting is illegal within federal and state laws, how pretexting has been interpreted by the courts, the type of pretexting that are legal but also not advisable, as well as steps to take against being pretexting when investigative tasks are outsourced
The use of pretext to obtain telephone records or financial information is explicitly against federal law and pretexting used for criminal purposes are stopped by prosecutors using other existing federal laws
However, pretexting in the form of undercover investigation is completely legal, provided the investigator does not present them selves as a person of authority
Learn more about using ruses and pretexting to obtain confidential information here:
https://brainly.com/question/9321150
https://brainly.com/question/14049478