Write a sentence for each of the four sentence types.
1. Declarative: 2. Interrogative: 3. Imperative: 4. Exclamatory:

The island nation that the Allies fought to liberate in the Battle of Leyte is the Philippines.

The Battle of Leyte was a significant military campaign during World War II, specifically in October 1944. It was fought between the Allied forces, primarily the United States, and the Imperial Japanese Army in the Philippines. The objective of the Allies was to liberate the island nation of the Philippines from Japanese occupation. Leyte, an island in the central part of the Philippines, was strategically important due to its location and resources.

The battle resulted in a decisive victory for the Allies, marking a turning point in the Pacific theater of the war. The liberation of Leyte was a crucial step towards the eventual defeat of Japan and the restoration of Philippine independence.

Learn more about battle of leyte here

https://brainly.com/question/16987002

#SPJ11

Answer: NAACP

Explanation:

The Niagara Movement, met annually until 1910. It was one of the organizations that paved the way for the formation of the NAACP.

Answer: Eli Whitney

Explanation: In 1798 Eli Whitney built a firearms factory near New Haven. The muskets his workmen made by methods comparable to those of modern mass industrial production were the first to have standardized, interchangeable parts.

Eli Whitney is the person helped develop the use of interchangeable parts in 1798. Hence, option D is correct.

He invented the cotton gin, Eli Whitney is most remembered for being the inventor of mass production. In 1798, he found a method for automating the manufacture of muskets with interchangeable parts. Whitney achieved financial success thanks to his career as a musketeer.

In popular culture, Eli Whitney is credited as the "father of American technology" for two innovations: the cotton gin and the idea of interchangeable parts. Eli Whitney was born in Massachusetts in 1765 and was raised on a farm.

Eli Whitney constructed a guns factory close to New Haven in 1798. The first firearms with standardized, replaceable parts were the muskets his workers produced using techniques akin to those used in contemporary mass industrial production.

Thus, option D is correct.

For more information about Eli Whitney, click here

https://brainly.com/question/8274300

#SPJ6

Answer:

Ancient Greece (Greek: Ἑλλάς, romanized : Hellás) was a civilization belonging to a period of Greek history from the Greek Dark Ages of the 12th–9th centuries BC to the end of antiquity (c. AD 600). This era was Immediately followed by the Early Middle Ages and the Byzantine period.

Explanation:

what is ancient greece rome

Answer:

HOW THEY WORSHIP THEIR gods IS

1.THEY MAKE A STATUE OF THEMSELVES.

2.THEY USE BRONZE AND SILVER TO WORSHIP THEM.

3.THEY CREATE A ALTAR TO WORSHIP AND ALSO SACRIFICE .

Answer:

The ansewer is B

Explanation: Manifest destiny was the westward expansion of the rising American population in 1803.

Answer:

The fire incident was a wake up call and it influenced the legislation which required improved factory safety standards. It promoted better working conditions for the workers.

It also helped promote the growth of the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union (ILGWU), which fought for better working conditions for sweatshop workers.

Answer: The war of 1812 began in 1812.

The Greeks and Persians organized their cities in different ways due to a combination of factors, including geographical, cultural, and political influences.

Geography played a significant role in shaping the organization of Greek cities. Greece consists of many small, independent city-states scattered across the region, often separated by mountainous terrain. These natural barriers led to the development of independent city-states, each with its own government, laws, and political structure. The Greek city-states, such as Athens and Sparta, were known for their emphasis on citizen participation in government and a sense of local autonomy.

On the other hand, the Persian Empire encompassed a vast territory that stretched across different regions and varied landscapes. The Persians, under the Achaemenid dynasty, adopted a more centralized approach to governance. They established a network of administrative centers known as satrapies, which were governed by appointed officials called satraps. The Persian cities, such as Persepolis, served as administrative hubs, but they were designed more as centers of power and control rather than independent city-states.

Culturally, the Greeks valued individualism, democratic ideals, and the participation of citizens in the political process. This led to the development of city-states with a strong focus on civic engagement and local governance. In contrast, the Persian culture placed more emphasis on centralized authority and hierarchical structures, which influenced the organization of their cities.

Lastly, political factors also played a role. The Greeks had a long history of city-state rivalries and conflicts, which further reinforced the need for independent governance and fortified city walls. In contrast, the Persian Empire sought to establish and maintain control over a vast empire, necessitating a more centralized and hierarchical administrative structure.

For more such answers on Greeks and Persians

https://brainly.com/question/20725624

#SPJ8

Answer:

They may have had to adapt to the sheer lack of proper amenities in the reservations, as most supermarkets, stores and the sort were outside of the reservation itself. Also they must also adapt to the lack of avaliable jobs, and of course the bad living in the reservations + the mere fact that federal troops/settlers may settle and even steal your land

Explanation:

Answer:

Native American tribes had to adapt to living in a new environment. They learned to hunt animals and fish and developed farming techniques. Some tribes also adopted European clothing and tools.

The person who led a coalition of abolitionists in England for many years and was finally able to get slavery outlawed is William Wilberforce.

William Wilberforce (1759-1833) was a British politician, philanthropist, and a leader of the movement to abolish the slave trade. He was a Member of Parliament for Kingston upon Hull, and later for the County of York. Wilberforce was an active campaigner against the slave trade and worked tirelessly to get slavery outlawed.

After many years of campaigning, he was finally able to get the Slave Trade Act of 1807 passed, which abolished the slave trade in the British Empire.

However, it was not until the Slavery Abolition Act of 1833 that slavery was completely abolished throughout the British Empire. Wilberforce died just three days after hearing that the passage of the Act through Parliament was assured.

For more similar questions on abolitionists:

brainly.com/question/1818846

#SPJ11

Answer:

okokokokokokoo

ExplanationIn philosophy there is a lot of emphasis on what exists. We call this ontology, which means, the study of being. What is less often examined is what does not exist.

It is understandable that we focus on what exists, as its effects are perhaps more visible. However, gaps or non-existence can also quite clearly have an impact on us in a number of ways. After all, death, often dreaded and feared, is merely the lack of existence in this world (unless you believe in ghosts). We are affected also by living people who are not there, objects that are not in our lives, and knowledge we never grasp.

Upon further contemplation, this seems quite odd and raises many questions. How can things that do not exist have such bearing upon our lives? Does nothing have a type of existence all of its own? And how do we start our inquiry into things we can’t interact with directly because they’re not there? When one opens a box, and exclaims “There is nothing inside it!”, is that different from a real emptiness or nothingness? Why is nothingness such a hard concept for philosophy to conceptualize?

Let us delve into our proposed box, and think inside it a little. When someone opens an empty box, they do not literally find it devoid of any sort of being at all, since there is still air, light, and possibly dust present. So the box is not truly empty. Rather, the word ‘empty’ here is used in conjunction with a prior assumption. Boxes were meant to hold things, not to just exist on their own. Inside they might have a present; an old family relic; a pizza; or maybe even another box. Since boxes have this purpose of containing things ascribed to them, there is always an expectation there will be something in a box. Therefore, this situation of nothingness arises from our expectations, or from our being accustomed. The same is true of statements such as “There is no one on this chair.” But if someone said, “There is no one on this blender”, they might get some odd looks. This is because a chair is understood as something that holds people, whereas a blender most likely not.

The same effect of expectation and corresponding absence arises with death. We do not often mourn people we only might have met; but we do mourn those we have known. This pain stems from expecting a presence and having none. Even people who have not experienced the presence of someone themselves can still feel their absence due to an expectation being confounded. Children who lose one or both of their parents early in life often feel that lack of being through the influence of the culturally usual idea of a family. Just as we have cultural notions about the box or chair, there is a standard idea of a nuclear family, containing two parents, and an absence can be noted even by those who have never known their parents.

This first type of nothingness I call ‘perceptive nothingness’. This nothingness is a negation of expectation: expecting something and being denied that expectation by reality. It is constructed by the individual human mind, frequently through comparison with a socially constructed concept.

Pure nothingness, on the other hand, does not contain anything at all: no air, no light, no dust. We cannot experience it with our senses, but we can conceive it with the mind. Possibly, this sort of absolute nothing might have existed before our universe sprang into being. Or can something not arise from nothing? In which case, pure nothing can never have existed.

If we can for a moment talk in terms of a place devoid of all being, this would contain nothing in its pure form. But that raises the question, Can a space contain nothing; or, if there is space, is that not a form of existence in itself?

This question brings to mind what’s so baffling about nothing: it cannot exist. If nothing existed, it would be something. So nothing, by definition, is not able to ‘be’.

Is absolute nothing possible, then? Perhaps not. Perhaps for example we need something to define nothing; and if there is something, then there is not absolutely nothing. What’s more, if there were truly nothing, it would be impossible to define it. The world would not be conscious of this nothingness. Only because there is a world filled with Being can we imagine a dull and empty one. Nothingness arises from Somethingness, then: without being to compare it to, nothingness has no existence. Once again, pure nothingness has shown itself to be negation.

A world where there is nothing is just an empty shell, you might reply; but the shell itself exists, is something. And even if there were no matter, arguably space could still exist, so could time; and these are not nothing.

The numbered pair of phrases that best complete this diagram of the presidential impeachment process are:

The House of Representatives is responsible for bringing accusations against federal officials, such as the President, Vice President, and other civil authorities of the United States, who are thought to have engaged in "Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanours."

The latter stages of the impeachment procedure are perfectly exemplified by this couple. The president is actually removed from office after the Senate convicts him or her with a two-thirds majority.

As a result, the significance of the pair of phrases that best completes this diagram of the presidential impeachment process is the aforementioned. Therefore, option (d) is correct.

Learn more about on impeachment process, here:

https://brainly.com/question/29613803

#SPJ12

Answer: 7

Explanation:

Answer:

i think it is seven

Explanation:

"The Star-Spangled Banner" is the national anthem of the United States of America. It was written by Francis Scott Key during the War of 1812 and originally titled "Defence of Fort M'Henry". The song was later set to the tune of an English drinking song called "To Anacreon in Heaven."

Francis Scott Key penned a poem on September 14, 1814, and it was later placed to music. In 1931, the song "The Star-Spangled Banner" was adopted as the national anthem of the United States. After seeing the Maryland fort being attacked by the British during the War of 1812, Key wrote the poem, which was originally named "The Defense of Fort M'Henry."

The song is a tribute to the American flag and the bravery of American soldiers in defending it during the Battle of Baltimore in 1814. It has been played at significant national events, such as presidential inaugurations, the Olympics, and sporting events.

Learn more about The Star-Spangled Banner here:

https://brainly.com/question/21632918

#SPJ1

The statement "The United States was able to build the Panama Canal after they helped Panama lead an independence movement against Colombia" is True because the United States played a significant role in the construction of the Panama Canal.

This canal connects the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. In the late 19th century, Panama was a part of Colombia, and the United States wanted to build a canal through the Isthmus of Panama to improve trade and military capabilities. To achieve this, the United States supported Panama in its quest for independence from Colombia. In 1903, with U.S. assistance, Panama declared independence from Colombia. Shortly after gaining independence, Panama negotiated the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty with the United States, granting the U.S. control over a canal zone. This agreement allowed the United States to build, operate, and maintain the Panama Canal.

By helping Panama lead an independence movement against Colombia, the United States cleared the path for the construction of the Panama Canal, a significant engineering feat that revolutionized global trade and maritime navigation.

Learn more about Panama Canal here: https://brainly.com/question/26573102

#SPJ11

Answer:he Christian church and faith grew more organized

Explanation:

OSHA was created as part of the US Department of Labor to assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and women.OSHA stands for the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. OSHA is a federal organization that was established to guarantee healthy and safe working conditions for workers.

The Occupational Safety and Health Act was signed into law in 1970, which resulted in the creation of OSHA. The mission of OSHA is to assure safe and healthy working conditions for working men and women by providing training, outreach, education, and assistance. It sets and enforces safety standards in various industries to protect workers from workplace hazards.

It also conducts inspections and investigations to identify safety and health hazards.OSHA has had a significant impact on the workplace since its creation. The organization has made workplaces safer by reducing the number of workplace accidents, injuries, and deaths. It also helps businesses save money by lowering workers' compensation costs and improving productivity by reducing the number of lost workdays.

For more questions on: OSHA

https://brainly.com/question/32031618

#SPJ8

Answer:

Explanation:

The Declaration of Independence was designed for multiple audiences: the King, the colonists, and the world. It was also designed to multitask. Its goals were to rally the troops, win foreign allies, and to announce the creation of a new country.

Answer:

C. To establish the Natural Rights of the people of the United States.

Explanation:

Think about it before the Declaration of Independence there was a lot of arguing because of Unfair Rights so they signed the Declaration of Independence hoping that the people would think it was fair. So the way to make things fair was to make Natural Rights and then legalize them.

Answer:

because they found evidence of human in areas in south america in chile than in place up north which means that they may have migrated another way.

Explanation:

because they found evidence of human in areas in south america in chile than in place up north which means that they may have migrated another way.

Answer: i wont do an essay but i can explain why it was the lifeblood

Explanation:

The fertile silt over the farmlands remained to insure rich soil for their crops and thick grasses for their grazing animals which was vital for modern Egypt as it provided crops and fertile soil. :D

Massacre of Glencoe

The Massacre of Glencoe took place in Glen Coe in the Highlands of Scotland on 13 February 1692 where the members of the  Mcdonalds clan were treacherously  murdered by the Scottish government forces under the command of Archibald Campbell the earl of argyll. It is said the reason for the massacre was that the clan refused to pay allegiance to the new monarchs William III  and Mary II. An estimated 30 members and associates of Clan MacDonald of Glencoe were killed.Campbell of Glenlyon led a group of some 128 soldiers who stayed with the MacDonalds for some 12 days and then turned on their hosts in the early morning of 13th February, killing 38 of them whilst some tried to escape into the snowy hills

Read more on how clans work here

https://brainly.com/question/28419429

#SPJ4

Answer: C

Explanation:

It was the last major battle of the American Revolution.

Answer: Japan surrenders after the Soviet Union enters the war which marked the end of ww2.

Explanation: Nuclear weapons shocked Japan into surrendering at the end of World War II, which they didn't. Japan surrendered because the Soviet Union entered the war. Japanese leaders said the bomb forced them to surrender because it was less embarrassing to say they had been defeated by a miracle weapon.

Answer: Atomic Bombs

Explanation:

The two atomic bombs released on Nagasaki and Hiroshima ended WWII.

Answer:  B.

-Western states with many immigrants and migrant labor jobs voted for Hoover.

Answer:

Southern states with African Americans hesitated to vote for Roosevelt

Explanation:

tyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyysm

Answer: Tarrifs to protect industry, and federal subsidies for infrastructure.

Explanation:

the tarrifs on foriegn goods resulted in the buying of more American goods, and the establsihment of infrastructure resultied in better routes of transportations.

Answer:

Also known as antiterrorism meaning,millitary skills used to prevent terrorism