Which of the following would be an example of a mutual mistake that could
make a contract voidable?
O A. Both parties are mistaken about the location of a construction
site, which is actually far away from where it was initially believed
to be.
B. Both parties are mistaken about the legal name of the
manufacturer of certain equipment being sold.
O C. One of the parties initially believed that the value of merchandise
in the transaction was much higher than the party later realized.
O D. One of the parties misleads the other party by misrepresenting the
condition of a piece of property being sold.
A is the answer
Answers
Related Questions
Yousaf, a forensic scientist, performed the Reinsch test on a sample, and the results were positive. Which of the following can Yousaf rule out according
to those results?
O A. thallium
O B. carbon monoxide
O c. arsenic
O D. mercury
Answers
In Yousaf, a forensic scientist, performed the Reinsch test on a sample, and the results were positive the term that Yousaf can rule out accordingly is B. carbon monoxide.
Who are the forensic scientist?Forensic scientists can be described as the branch of the scientist that focus on the examination as well as the analyzis of the evidence that is been gotten from the crime scenes and elsewhere.
It should be noted tat they do help in providing the necessary evidence that will be used in the court of law so that the criminal can be prosecuted accordingly.
Therefore, option B is correct.
Read more about scientists at:
https://brainly.com/question/17216882
#SPJ1
At first what did the Bill of rights apply to, as a result the Court could do what?
Answers
A person is convicted of armed robbery. In what situation would the defendant be able to appeal the trial court decision?
The trial judge wrote a dissenting opinion.
They can show there was an error of law.
The trial used an adversarial system.
There was irrelevant evidence.
Answers
Answer:
The defendant would be able to appeal the trial court decision in the following situation:
They can show there was an error of law: If the defendant can demonstrate that there was a legal error made during the trial proceedings, such as an incorrect interpretation or application of the law, it could provide grounds for an appeal.
It's worth noting that the other options you mentioned, such as the trial judge writing a dissenting opinion, the trial using an adversarial system, or the presence of irrelevant evidence, do not necessarily provide direct grounds for an appeal.
A dissenting opinion from the trial judge means that they disagreed with the majority decision, but it doesn't automatically invalidate the trial court decision or provide grounds for an appeal.
The use of an adversarial system is a standard approach in many legal systems and is not in itself a basis for appeal.
The presence of irrelevant evidence may be an issue during the trial, but it does not guarantee the right to appeal unless it significantly impacted the fairness of the trial or affected the outcome in a prejudicial manner.
A person convicted of armed robbery can appeal the trial court decision if they can show an error of law took place during the trial or irrelevant evidence was introduced. A dissenting opinion by the judge or the fact that the trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Explanation:A person convicted of armed robbery has the right to appeal the trial court decision under certain circumstances. The most typical situation would involve showing that there was an error of law during the trial. An error of law might occur if the court wrongly applied or interpreted a law, made a procedural mistake, or allowed inadmissible evidence. Furthermore, they may also appeal if irrelevant evidence was introduced that may have influenced the jury's final decision negatively. However, a judge having a dissenting opinion or the simple fact that trial used an adversarial system are not valid grounds for appeal.
Learn more about Appeals in law here:https://brainly.com/question/32247683
#SPJ12
After reading the initial description of the Adnan Syed trial, would you have found him "guilty" or "not guilty" had you been a member of the jury? Explain the reasoning process that would have led you to that conclusion.
Answers
Charges were dropped after the office ran DNA tests on the case's evidence, which it claimed proved Syed's innocence. "The results of the DNA tests include what Adnan and his supporters have always known, while excluding Adnan.
Why is Adnan Syed innocent, exactly?Because of three things, Adnan Syed is not responsible for the death of Hai-Min Lee. Jay is a poor witness, the window of time does not line up, and Adnan's attorney Cristina Gutierrez failed to position him to win the case.
Who is Adnan's victim?The murder of Hai Min Lee and Adnan Syed's subsequent arrest and trial were the focus of the first season of the podcast Serial from October 3 to December 18, 2014.
To Know more about supporters
https://brainly.com/question/28749204
#SPJ1
3. Josiah is a police officer. Each day, he must do his job in
accordance with laws that govern his daily duties, such as arrest,
use of force, searches, and seizures. Consider and explain how
regulations in each of these areas impact his work and the
members of his community.
Answers
As a police officer, Josiah is under regulations that oversee his normal duties involving arrest, force, searches, and seizures. These controls are established to ensure that his operations are inline with the law, as well as guarantee the protections of the citizens whom he serves.
How Josiah uses the regulationsArrests:
For an arrest, Josiah must substantiate plausible cause which authenticates that the person being apprehended has committed an offense. This demonstrates that he needs to have a sensible opinion, supported by facts and circumstances, that crime has ensued. If Josiah falls short of verifying probable cause, the arrest may be considered delinquent and he may be held responsible for ignoring the rights of the subject.
Force:
Josiah is allowed to use strength when necessary to safeguard himself or others from danger or catch a wrongdoer. Nevertheless, he has to utilize only the required degree of power to control the situation. In case he deploys surplus strength, it is considered illegitimate and he might face disciplinary measures.
Searches:
Inability to abide by certain procedures, such as getting consent or a warrant before conducting a search, Josiah can query a person or property if there is convincing evidence of the presence of criminal activity. Nonetheless, if he does not comply with the protocols or performs an unreasonable hunt, the findings henceforth might be dismissed in court and he could be liable for disregarding the liberties of the subject.
Seizures:
Disregard for procedures precedes a seizure for Josiah, who must acquire a warrant before proceeding to confiscating any belonging if he has enough reason to judge that it was used in a criminal act or is proof of one. Unreasonable seizing of goods will, however, necessitate these items to be returned to their owner while leaving Josiah answerable for not offering due consideration of the rights of the involved individual.
Read more on police officers here:https://brainly.com/question/29668617
#SPJ1
Investigating careers. Answer quick, 80 points.
One of the main issues pre-school teachers face is helping kids do which of the following?
A. be away from their parents
B. learn a different language
C. pass standardized tests
D. graduate pre-school
Answers
Answer:
Explanation: passing standardized tests will help the teachers in gaining more confidence while teaching students and to interact with them in a different manner.
What are your opinions about police that do bad things
Answers
Answer:
They need to get punishment for thier deeds.
Explanation:
Police's job is to take care of the civilians and forbid bad deeds and make sure people are living happily and safely. If they commit bad deeds like the criminals, they are not worthy of the job.
What female was a veteran
Answers
Explanation:
grace Murray hooper
Bea Arthur
Betty white
grace hopper
Question 8 of 10
What is one reason the Constitution divides powers between the federal
government and state governments?
A. To prevent another American Revolution from occurring
B. To limit the power of the federal government
C. To ensure that the government will be able to collect taxes
D. To provide more opportunities for citizens to serve as
representatives
Answers
Answer:
B. To limit the power of the federal government
Which of the following is the most widely used crime-mapping
application?
Answers
Of the slightly less that 1.5 percent of those stopped by the police on U.S. streets, the majority of these individuals claimed that _____.
the police used unnecessary force
they were questioned and quickly released
the police acted appropriately
they were not asked a single question by the police officer
Answers
a breef summary using at least one quote on the presidents view on the economy
Answers
Answer:
And the January jobs numbers came out today. And while we are grateful for everyone who found work and is earning a paycheck, it is very clear our economy is still in trouble. We added just 6,000 private sector jobs in the country last month. Overall, we added 49,000 jobs. And this at a time when we have more than 10 million people out of work, 4 million people have been out of work for six months or longer, and 2.5 million women have been driven from the workforce. Fifteen million Americans are behind in their rental payments. Twenty-four million adults and twelve million children literally don’t have enough food to eat.
QUESTION 1
Crimes that require specific intent fall into which category:
O The defendant intends to cause a certain bad result
O The defendant intends to do something more than commit the criminal act
O The defendant acts with knowledge that his or her conduct is illegal
O Any or all of the above
Answers
The apt response is choice (d). All of the aforementioned crimes require particular intent to be committed.
What does "particular intent" mean?In order to be convicted of a crime with specific intent, the defendant must knowingly do an act while intending to get a specific outcome out of it.
What crimes call for a special motive?Crimes with a specific intent are those that are intentionally committed to cause harm. Crimes with specific intent may include forgery, theft, robbery, and violence.
What category do crimes that call for specific intent fit into?Crimes requiring specific intent typically fall into one of three categories: either the defendant intends to do something other than commit the criminal act, the defendant intends to do something else, or the defendant acts with knowledge that his or her conduct is unlawful, which is known as scienter.
Learn more about Crimes: https://brainly.com/question/9336457
#SPJ13
ETHICS!!!!!Help please!!!!!
Ethical guidelines fall under which of the following categories? Select all that apply.
A. behavior
B. finance
C.social media
D.accountability
Answers
what are the factors that cause xenophobia
Answers
What are the main roles of the House of Representatives and the Senate?
Answers
Answer: As per the Constitution, the U.S. House of Representatives makes and passes federal laws. The House is one of Congress's two chambers (the other is the U.S. Senate), and part of the federal government's legislative branch.
Explanation:
Answer:
The House of Representatives has two main duties: making laws and scrutinising the work of the Government. The main task of the Senate is considering bills approved by the House of Representatives. The Senate makes only limited use of its right to scrutinize the work of the Government.
100 POINT QUESTION
SUPPOSE YOU BOUGHT COOKIES FOR 4.99 AND YOU GIVE THE LADY/MAN A 5 DOLLAR BILL AND SHE DOESNT GIVE YOUR CHANGE BACK BUT YOU WANT YOUR CHANGE BACK YOU ASK FOR IT AND SHE/MAN SAYS NO A 1 CENT CHANGE AND YOU CALL THE COPS WHAT WOULD HAPPEN?
Answers
Answer:
you'd get your 1 cent that your entitled to
Explanation:
Because they don't have the right to take your 1 cent if you want it back but then again it depends on the tax
Answer:
Proboably Not Much. Since 1 cent is a low amount of money, they would (if they even responded) might ask to not do it again. It is highly unlikely that they would put them in jail or fine them. The cashier might or might not give it back. It depends on cop and if he/she has call to go to. So it is a 50/50 debate if they would actually get in trouble.
Explanation:
Only________ can declare war!
Answers
Answer:
the president
Explanation:
I believe that is correct
Answer:
NO its CONGRESS
Explanation:
The ability of a corrections employee to work alone is as important as that employee's ability to work well in
groups.
true or false
Answers
Answer: Its True
Explanation:
I put false on the test and got it wrong
If you were given a speeding violation and told to report to court for a hearing, who would MOST likely be listening to your case?
A. a jury of your peers
B. a Supreme Court justice
C. a Justice of the Peace
D. a Federal Magistrate
Answers
C. a Justice of the Peace
Explain the initial complaint and what constitutes supplemental reports.
Answers
Answer:
The initial complaint is usually considered the face sheet of the report. What are supplemental reports? Supplemental reports are reports that are prepared when new findings are reported. What part of the police report depicts an at-a-glance summary of any investigation
Explanation:
ways the government can encourage the youth to actively participate in the democratic process
Answers
A more thorough grasp of what youth engagement entails and how it can be implemented for all young ages is required.
What methods can the government employ to encourage youth participation in the political process?Participation may be increased by involving young people in the design, implementation, monitoring, reporting, and evaluation of tools, strategies, and programs.There are many ways to improve young people's participation, including through education and capacity building.Youth-friendly information and resources can be developed with the aid of conventional and inclusive technology platforms like the internet, SMS, and other such technologies.Those who are young and disabled must be able to use the content.Moreover, procedures and mechanisms can be created to encourage youth participation.These can be developed to institutionalize young people's participation in decision-making processes that affect them, for example, by establishing networks for active civic participation and youth advisory committees.A call for inclusive youth involvement makes the case for greater gender parity and a focus on young women's participation.focusing on involving additional underrepresented youth groups, such as young people with disabilities, those who are indigenous or migrant, young people who have experienced armed conflict and its aftermath, young people who are HIV-positive, etc.While both young men and women are entitled to the same rights, efforts can be made to ensure that youth are fairly represented and included in decision-making bodies.Engage young people in the consultation process to make it easier for them to participate in the creation of laws that affect them. As a result, students will be sure to participate in conversations about how to draft laws and regulations, decide how to distribute resources, and hold the government responsible.It should also be promoted that young people participate in initiatives that address issues that are important to them, including those related to the environment, social protection, reproductive health, and education.Learn more about youth participation: https://brainly.com/question/18336379
#SPJ1
4. You are a Republican president, and a fellow Republican is running for Governor of North Carolina.
You would really like to help her win the office. What can you do to assist, and what gives you this
power?
Answers
Explanation:
As a Republican president, I can use my power and influence to help the Republican candidate win the Governorship of North Carolina. I can attend rallies, endorse the candidate, and provide financial support. I can also use my position to campaign for the candidate and encourage other Republican leaders to support her.
However, it is important to note that the powers of the President are limited when it comes to state elections. The President cannot directly influence the outcome of a state election, as the Constitution gives states the power to conduct their own elections. The President must respect the authority of the state and its citizens to choose their own leaders.
If you had to reform the system of punishments and corrections, what would you do? Why?
Answers
Answer:On the front end, by reducing the number of people who needlessly enter prison in the first place;
On the back end, by shrinking the existing prison population by allowing prisoners who have proven they are ready to re-enter society the opportunity to transition out of confinement; and.
Explanation:
This brings us to the point that rehabilitation is a much better option than punishment because it would help an offender become a peaceful citizen and live a normal life. Punishment is only a way of making an offender pay for the crime committed, but it will not change his/her behavior
WILL PICK BRAINLIEST + 20 POINTS!!!
I have more than 500 points and 5 brainliest. Why can't I be Virturoso?
(plus I don't know which subject to choose)
Answers
Answer:
have you tried to click on the ambitious mark, or contacting brainly
Explanation:
Answer:
maybe cause you dont have enough brainliest
Explanation:
what is centripetal force
Answers
Answer: It is the force acting on an object traveling in a circle that is pointed in the direction of the circle's center.
Explanation:
Newton's laws of motion state that unless acted upon by an outside force, an object in motion tends to continue moving in a straight line. When an object is moving in a circle, it must be under the influence of some force because it is continually changing its direction.
The velocity vector of the object is changed by the centripetal force, keeping it pointed inward and toward the circle's center. The object can continue moving in a circular motion thanks to this force. The object would leave the circle in a straight line tangential to it if there were no centripetal force.
Equation: The magnitude of the centripetal force can be computed.
F = (mv^2) / r
where r is the circumference of the circular path, m is the object's mass, v is its velocity, and F is its centripetal force.
Centripetal force is a net force that results from the interaction of various forces acting on the object, such as tension, gravitational force, or friction. This is vital to keep in mind. Together, these forces produce the centripetal force required to keep motion in a circle.
(JUST MERCY MOVIE)
"Why on earth would you want a nice lawyer!? Nice doesn’t get you anywhere." But it does for Bryan. What’s different about how he does things?
Answers
Answer:
he understands.
Explanation:
He doesn't just listen, argue, and talk, he also understands how it feels. Also by being good/nice.
gimme at least 1 cent for this much points
Answers
Answer:
*gibs 1 cent*
Explanation:
"We the people of the states of New-Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New-York, New-Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North-Carolina, South-Carolina, and Georgia, do ordain, declare and establish the following constitution for the government of ourselves and our posterity.
Report of the Committee of Detail in the Federal Convention, August 1787, page one
"WE the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
Report of the Committee of Style in the Federal Convention, September 1787, page one.
1) What arguments would the framers offer for keeping the list of individual states? For replacing the list of states with "the United States"?
2) Consider and compare what each draft explicitly names as the purpose for Constitution. Why might the later draft list "in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America" when the early draft says merely "do ordain, declare and establish the following constitution for the government of ourselves and our posterity."
3) Can you come up with an example of how one of the goals stated in the final version of the Preamble is carried out by our government today?
Answers
Answer:
The arguments for keeping the list of individual states in the Preamble would be that it emphasizes the federal nature of the government and the fact that the states have ceded some of their sovereignty to the national government. The arguments for replacing the list of states with "the United States" would be that it emphasizes the unity of the country and the fact that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.
The later draft of the Preamble is more specific about the goals of the Constitution, and it also includes the phrase "to ourselves and our posterity." This suggests that the framers were thinking about future generations when they drafted the Constitution.
One example of how the goals of the Constitution are carried out by the government today is in the area of national defense. The Constitution provides for the common defense, and the government carries out this goal by maintaining a standing army and navy, and by providing for the defense of the country through diplomacy and treaties
once a cadet graduates from the academy, he or she is guaranteed employment as a full-time police officer.
True or False?
Answers
Answer: 2
Explanation: