Describe 3 different characteristics of handwriting that experts analyze during a forensic investigation.
Handwriting experts analyze line quality, letter formation, and signature characteristics to determine authorship or authenticity during forensic investigations.
During a forensic investigation of handwriting, experts analyze various characteristics to determine authorship or authenticity. Here are three different characteristics that experts commonly analyze:
1. Line Quality: Line quality refers to the overall appearance and consistency of the lines in handwriting. It involves examining factors such as the smoothness, uniformity, and pressure applied to the writing instrument. Variations in line thickness, breaks, waviness, or hesitations can provide insights into the writer's style and stability. Experts analyze line quality to identify similarities or discrepancies between questioned documents and known handwriting samples.
2. Letter Formation: Letter formation examines the specific shapes and structure of individual letters in handwriting. It involves observing elements such as the size, proportion, slant, and connections between letters. Experts study the consistency in the way certain letters are formed, the presence of unique or distinctive letter formations, and the overall legibility of the writing. Comparing the formation of specific letters across different documents can help in identifying commonalities or differences that may indicate the same or different authors.
3. Signature Analysis: Signatures are highly individualistic and unique to each person. When analyzing signatures, experts look for specific features, including the overall flow, size, style, loops, curves, and alignment. They consider factors such as the presence or absence of specific elements, the level of consistency across different signatures, and any variations or abnormalities that may indicate forgery or alteration. Signature analysis plays a crucial role in determining the authenticity of documents and detecting potential fraud.
learn more about Signature Analysis here:
https://brainly.com/question/31853398
#SPJ11
Pure Oil Company enters into a contract with QuikBilt, Inc., to construct an oil pipeline to withstand specific conditions. If QuikBilt fails to meet this standard, which is construed as a breach of contract and a breach of a duty of care, Pure might be awarded punitive damages to
Options are:
A. establish, as a matter of principle, that QuikBilt acted wrongfully.
B. Pure with funds for a foreseeable loss beyond the contract.
C. Pure with funds for its loss of the bargain.
D. Punish QuikBilt and deter others from similar acts
Answer:
D. Punish QuikBilt and deter others from similar acts
Explanation:
Punitive Damages, often used in a law of tort, when the jury considered the acts of the tortfeasor or defendant to be either intentional, malicious, fraudulent, or violent in nature, and it is designed to do the following:
1. punish a defendant or tortfeasor and
2. discourage further such acts by the defendant or tortfeasor and others.
Therefore, in this case, if QuikBilt fails to meet the agreed standard, which is construed as a breach of contract and a breach of a duty of care, Pure might be awarded punitive damages to punish QuikBilt and deter others from similar acts. Because such acts is deemed malicious, fraudulent and intentional.
Question 12 of 20
Which constitutional amendment expanded the right to vote?
A. Twenty-Second
B. Twenty-Third
C. Twenty Fifth
D. Twenty-Fourth
SSM
The 23rd amendment granted the District of Columbia the right to vote. The amendment granted access to Electoral votes as if it were a state.
Joe hires Sam and Toby to paint his barn. Sam decides it would be easier to paint the top of the barn by climbing up a nearby tree and jumping on the roof of the barn. Sam falls out of the tree and hurts a passer-by. As a general rule, under the law of agency, Joe is liable to the passer-by for:
Answer: nothing; because Sam is an independent contractor.
Explanation:
Under the law of agency, an agency is created when an authority is delegated from one individual to another individual whereby such person is appointed to do a particular job.
Based on the information given, Joe is not liable liable to the passer-by because Sam is an independent contractor as he was contracted to Casey out a task. If he was an employee of Joe, then he will be liable.
A student took the state examination at a testing facility and failed. She wants to review the test and see what answers she provided. She knows that she can review the exam within two years of the date of the examination and she makes an appointment to do so. Will she be able to review the entire exam?
yes she will because she made an appointment to do so
She be able to review the entire exam as yes. She will be able to review the entire exam since she is doing it in the two years allowed by law.
What is law?The term “law” refers to a system of rules created by authorities and governments. The law's objective is to safeguard citizens against the abuses of others. The law exists on three levels: local, state, and national. The Law of the different are in the country and the proportional term as the principle of the concept.
According to the facts of the case, the student failed the state exam at a testing institution. She is aware that she can retake the exam after two years of the exam date and schedules an opportunity to do so. She will be able to go over the entire exam because she is taking it inside the two-year period permitted by law.
As a result, the she be able to review the entire exam as yes. She will be able to review the entire exam since she is doing it in the two years allowed by law.
Learn more about on Law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/6534668
#SPJ5
Refer to your Who is Sonia Sotomayor? book for a complete version of this text.
Part A
Where can readers find more information about the job of a Supreme Court justice?
A. an illustration of the judges in Chapter 9
B. a text box in Chapter 9
C. an illustration of Sonia and a judge in Chapter 9
D. a text box in Chapter 7
Part B
How does the feature identified in Part A contribute to readers’ understanding of the topic?
A. It depicts a swearing-in ceremony showing that justices must take an oath to serve.
B. It compares local and federal U.S. courts and their functions.
C. It shows justices in the robes they wear in court to convey authority and fairness.
D. It shows justices in the robes they wear in court to convey authority and fairness.
In a text box in Chapter 9 readers find more information about the job of a Supreme Court justice and It depicts a swearing-in ceremony showing that justices must take an oath to serve. The correct options are B and A respectively.
Who is Sonia Sotomayor?Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court Sonia Sotomayor. In 2009, after President Barack Obama's nomination and confirmation, she joined the Supreme Court as the third woman and first Hispanic.
Readers can get more information about a Supreme Court justice's duties in a text box in Chapter 9, which also features a picture of a ceremony where justices are sworn in to their positions.
Thus, the correct options are B and A respectively.
For more details regarding Sonia Sotomayor, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14495765
#SPJ1
Which of the following agencies are permanent legal attaches, or “legats,” associated?
A. the FBI
B. The CIA
C. The bureau of immigration and customs enforcement
D. The US secret service
Write a research about a human rights violation case, for example, discrimination, lack of
access to justice, police abuse, arbitrary arrest and detention, illtreatment and torture.
Define one category of human rights, for example, civil and
political rights, women’s rights or children rights.
• Applicable Law / International convention governing the
category of rights relating to your choice (its Structure)?
• Give one example of case about human rights violations under the
international conventions concerning human rights and review the
ability of individuals to complain about the violation of their rights in an
international arena.
• You may introduce any other parts you consider
Discrimination as a breach of civil rights is still a major problem in the field of human rights. The legal framework for people to seek redress for such violations is provided by the UDHR and ICCPR.
Progress in addressing and preventing discrimination promoting equality and protecting civil rights for all can be made by empowering people to lodge complaints at international forums and interacting with pertinent stakeholders.
A serious issue in the field of human rights is discrimination as a violation of civil rights. Civil rights include access to justice and are safeguarded by international treaties like the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. James, who experienced age discrimination in the workplace is a notable example of this violation.
Through institutions like the UN Human Rights Committee and regional human rights courts, people are better able to seek redress for these violations in a global setting. In order to combat discrimination, uphold civil rights and work toward equality and justice for all, cooperation with human rights organizations and group efforts are essential.
Learn more about human rights at:
brainly.com/question/701318
#SPJ4
Differentiate the classification of food and beverages facilities
Answer:
Food and beverage facilities are classified into two namely; the Primary and Secondary facilities.
While the Primary facilities are mainly concerned with the preparation of food and beverages for the customers, the Secondary facilities are concerned with the provision of catering services as an arm of another business entity.
Explanation:
In the Primary Food and Beverage facilities, the main focus of such facilities is the preparation of food and beverage for customers. Examples of facilities under this category include hotels, bars, restaurants, coffee shops, etc.
The Secondary Food and Beverage Facilities are an arm or offshoot of another business. Examples of these are the catering services offered in commercial vehicles, in airplanes, on the trains, at the offices, or on the ships. So they are just one of the many services offered by these media.
A difference between a trespass and a conversion is a matter of
O A. the degree of damage or loss
B. the number of defendants
C, the age of the defendant
O D. the intent of the defendant
Answer:
A, THE DEGREE OF DAMAGE OR LOSS.
Explanation:
Write a brief summary based on the constitutional issue for each of the following cases (do not include the "facts" of the case- just the constitutional argument- the "law" of the case):
Furman v Georgia
Gregg v Georgia
Coker v Georgia
McCleskey v Kemp
Ring v. Arizona
Atkins v Virginia
Roper v Simmons
Witherspoon v Illinois
Hurst v. Florida
In order to receive full credit, you must have: A) the most important constitutional issues that were argued in each case- B) who the courts supported, and C) why. Each case should have a minimum of six (6) sentences.
These cases are related to the criminal justice system of United States. The founding's of the supreme court in the form of constitutional arguments is highlighted.
Furman v. Georgia 1972 - The main constitutional question in this case was whether the death penalty was being applied in a way that violated the eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment by being applied in a discriminatory manner. The Supreme Court ruled that all current death penalty laws are unconstitutional after concluding that the death penalty is being used arbitrarily and capriciously.
Gregg v. Georgia 1976 - Whether the death penalty, as modified by the state of Georgia was constitutional was at issue in this case. The Supreme Court ruled that the revised death penalty statute was constitutional and did not contravene the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment because it provided for a segmented trial process with specific aggravating and mitigating factors.
The constitutional question in Coker v. Georgia (1977) was whether the death penalty was an appropriate sentence. The death penalty was deemed to be an excessive punishment for serious crimes by the Supreme Court, and it also violated the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
The main constitutional question in McCleskey v. Kemp (1987) was whether statistical proof of racial bias in the execution of death sentences was sufficient to establish an Eighth Amendment violation. The Supreme Court ruled that there was insufficient evidence to prove a constitutional violation.
Arizona v. Ring (2002) - In this case, the legal issue was whether the fact based determinations required to impose the death penalty must be made by a jury rather than a judge. The Supreme Court ruled that in order to impose the death penalty, factual findings must be made by a jury, not a judge, in accordance with the Sixth Amendment's guarantee of a jury trial.
In 2002 Atkins v. Virginia The Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment was at issue in this case's constitutionality which involved the execution of defendants who had intellectual disabilities. Such executions, according to the Supreme Court, violated the Eighth Amendment and were therefore unconstitutional.
The main constitutional query raised in Roper v. Simmons 2005 was whether the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishment applied to defendants who were under the age of 18 when they committed the crimes. According to the Supreme Court it is unconstitutional to execute defendants who were under the age of 18 when they committed the crimes.
The legal question in Witherspoon v. Illinois 1968 was whether potential jurors who expressed opposition to the death penalty could be barred from a capital trial. According to the Supreme Court, such jurors cannot be automatically disqualified rather, they can only be disqualified if their stance on the death penalty would prevent them from upholding the law and applying the death penalty when necessary.
Florida v. Hurst (2016) - The Sixth Amendment guarantee of a jury trial was at stake in this case and it was unclear whether Florida's death penalty sentencing policy was constitutional. The Supreme Court ruled that the plan was unconstitutional because it gave a judge the authority to determine the facts necessary to impose the death penalty rather than a jury.
Learn more about supreme court at:
brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ1
How does the fact that the court cannot set an agenda complement its reactionary nature?
Answer:
To figure out what's been happening and that everything's been busy
Explanation:
hope this helps
valley mart told its employees that they would be fired if they actively supported a unionizing effort. valley mart has committed an unfair labor practice T/F
The statement "valley mart told its employees that they would be fired if they actively supported a unionizing effort, valley mart has committed an unfair labor practice" is true because it is considered an unfair labor practice under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).
The correct answer is true.
The NLRA is a federal law that protects employees' rights to organize and engage in concerted activity to improve their wages, benefits, and working conditions. This includes the right to form or join a union, bargain collectively with their employer, and engage in other concerted activities for mutual aid and protection.
Valley Mart's statement that employees would be fired if they actively supported a unionizing effort is considered an unfair labor practice under the NLRA because it is a form of interference, restraint, or coercion that can intimidate employees and chill the exercise of their protected rights.
To know more about National Labor Relations Act, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8726856
#SPJ4
Val is attempting to buy Terry another alcoholic drink, however, Terry does not want another drink. What should the server do?
Val is attempting to buy Terry another alcoholic drink, however, Terry does not want another drink. The server should reject the order of alcohol.
What is moral responsibility?The position of morally deserved praise, blame, reward, or punishment for an act or omission in conformity with one's moral responsibilities is known as moral responsibility in philosophy. An important question in ethics is what, if anything, constitutes a "morally obligatory" action. Moral agents are those who are held morally accountable for their actions.
Agents have the capacity to consider their circumstances, make plans for their actions, and then carry those plans out. In the discussion of whether or not people are ever ethically accountable for their acts and, if so, in what capacity, the concept of free will has emerged as a crucial topic. While compatibilists believe the two may coexist, incompatibilists believe that determinism and free will are incompatible.
Learn more about moral responsibility, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13792888
#SPJ2
Peyton is a california resident who is serving active military duty in california when he is transferred to north carolina under permanent change of station (pcs) orders. his salary is $4,000 per month. peyton is transferred on september 1 of the current year. how much of his income is taxable in california?
If California military members who are ordered to leave the state become nonresidents for income tax purposes. Any income earned or received in California before leaving the state is considered California source income and is taxable on the California return.
As a result, Peyton's income prior to September 1 is considered California Source Income.
Income Taxable in California = Monthly Income * Number of Months Served in California
Income Taxable in California = $4,000 x 8 months
Income Taxable in California = $32,000
Months Served in California = January 1 to August 31
Months Served in California = 8 months
If you are a resident or nonresident of California and receive income from a California source, you must pay taxes to the state. State income tax rates range from 1% to 12.3%, and sales tax rates range from 7.25% to 10.75%.
To learn more about Income Tax in California, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/21147304
#SPJ4
So if a person is bored and wants to text random people’s numbers as a hope to make friends.. is that legally allowed? Also any # suggestions?
Answer:
Explanation:
yeah technically its legal
The origin of the legal rules governing today’s hotel industry can be found in:
a.
The Greco-Roman Code.
b.
English Common Law.
c.
Early American Statutory Law.
d.
Decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court.
Answer:
b. English Common Law.is right
4 orginazations /agencies that work to adress human rights violations
Answer:
Amnesty International
Human Rights Watch
UN human rights council
Human rights first
Explanation:
What was the court's majority opinion in Plessy v. Ferguson?
On Plato
Answer:
majority opinion by Henry B. Brown. The Court held that the state law was constitutional. In an opinion authored by Justice Henry Billings Brown, the majority upheld state-imposed racial segregation.
PLEASE HELP:
What percentage of law enforcement agencies use community policing?
A. 87 percent
B. 56 percent
C. 94 percent
D. 62 percent
87 percent of law enforcement agencies use community policing. Thus, option A is the correct option.
Community policing is a widely embraced approach by law enforcement agencies, with a staggering 87 percent adoption rate. This approach focuses on building strong partnerships between law enforcement personnel and the communities they serve.
Through this collaborative effort, law enforcement agencies aim to address local issues and concerns, prevent crime, and improve public safety. Community policing strategies revolve around proactive engagement, problem-solving, and trust-building initiatives. By involving community members in decision-making processes, law enforcement agencies can tap into their invaluable knowledge and support to effectively identify and solve local problems.
This widespread utilization of community policing reflects its proven effectiveness and recognition among law enforcement agencies as a key tool for promoting safe and inclusive communities.
Thus, option A is the correct option.
Learn more about community policing here:
https://brainly.com/question/32898107
#SPJ6
-- In the past, nonmanagerial employees were viewed as employees who
A. Reported to top executives O
B. Reported to middle managers O
C. Supervised others
D. Had no others reporting to them O
Answer D
Explanation:
Answer:
d
Explanation:
In the end of the court case it was decided by the court that Sally was just over-reacting and should not receive any retribution for the stolen boyfriend. She decides she wants a second opinion and therefore appeals. The court is known as: *
Answer:
Appellate Court.Explanation:
The Appellate Court, also known as the Court of Appeals, is a judicial court that hears cases which have been already heard in other courts. The duty of an appellate court is to review the processes and verdicts givens by the trial courts.
Here, since Sally is not satisfied with the judgement made by the trial court, she can apply for a hearing in the Appellate Court. The appellate court would review hear case and make the final decision.
You own a German Shepherd named Max who you love and adore. You are aware that Max is sometimes aggressive with new people. Because of that, you are usually very careful to prevent Max from running out of the house unleashed. One day, as you open the door to bring in the mail, Max escapes out of the door and attacks a woman walking in the vicinity of your home. The woman suffers significant injuries on her right arm, some of which she claims will leave permanent scars. You feel very bad about this. The woman is now suing you for $18,000 to cover her alleged medical bills, missed time at work, and pain and suffering.To prepare for the trial, you would like to review the womanâs medical records, medical bills, work schedule, and salary. Additionally, you would like to have a doctor of your choosing examine her arm and assess the true extent of the injuries.What is the procedure a defendant uses to learn more about a plaintiffâs claim before trial?voir diremotion for a directed verdictdiscoverypretrial conference
In the above situation, it may be stated that the defendant will use discovery as the aspect for learning more regarding the claim made against him by the plaintiff before a trial. Therefore, the option C holds true.
A defendant may be regarded as the person who is under question while being heard in a trial in the court of law. Moreover, it is also to be interpreted that the plaintiff is the one who makes the charges against a defendant. In order to know more about the charges made against him, the defendant actually uses the procedure of discovery before ultimately moving into the trial.
Learn more about a defendant here:
https://brainly.com/question/30736002
#SPJ4
Complete question
You own a German Shepherd named Max, who you love and adore. You are aware that Max is sometimes aggressive with new people. Because of that, you are usually very careful to prevent Max from running out of the house unleashed. One day, as you open the door to bring in the mail, Max escapes out of the door and attacks a woman walking in the vicinity of your home. The woman suffers significant injuries on her right arm, some of which she claims will leave permanent scars. You feel very bad about this. The woman is now suing you for $18,000 to cover her alleged medical bills, missed time at work, and pain and suffering. To prepare for the trial, you would like to review the woman's medical records, medical bills, work schedule, and salary. Additionally, you would like to have a doctor of your choosing examine her arm and assess the true extent of the injuries.
What is the procedure a defendant uses to learn more about a plaintiff's claim before trial?
A. Voir dire
B. motion for a directed verdict
C. discovery
D. pretrial conference
Which act requires financial institutions to explain To customers how they gather information with whom they share it and what measures they take to safeguard it
Answer:
Financial literacy as essential equipment to secure hacking and theft practices
Explanation:
Some of the measures to be taken are there should be the introduction of the use of ATM cards and allied stuffs in connection to financial matters for every individual
Ned is a registered nurse who gains a certification to identify and interpret injuries for violent causes. Which type of certification has he gained?
A.
CCI
B.
CMI
C.
ACFEI
D.
CFN
E.
ABFA
Answer:
acfel
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is D
Explanation:
absolutely not
PLEASE HELP
Michael J. French v. American Airlines - 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48654 (U.S. District Court Utah Central Division)
Facts:
Plaintiff Michael French, a former ramp worker with the defendant, American Airlines, is suing American for damages caused by American’s alleged fraudulent handling of his Workers’ Compensation claim. Plaintiff’s Workers’ Compensation claim arises from an injury on December 20, 2004.
what is the decision and reasoning
Plaintiff Michael French, a former ramp worker with the defendant, American Airlines, is accusing and suing the American for allegedly handling his Workers’ Compensation claim fraudulently. The Plaintiff sustained an injury to his back on December 20, 2004, while loading heavy luggage onto a plane. After complaining about neck pain, the French began receiving medical treatment for the pain.
In order to identify hazards early and avoid last minute moves, you should scan the road _________ seconds ahead of your vehicle.
Answer:
Signs
Answer in sentence:
In order to identify hazards early and avoid last minute moves, you should scan the road signs seconds ahead of your vehicle.
Hope this helps :)
If someone loses their court case in federal district court in Florida, they have a right to have their case heard a second time by the ______ U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals under that court's __________ jurisdiction.
Answer:
Explanation:
u
In an essay of no fewer than 250-words, explain why you think Congress ratified the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution following the Civil
War.
Answer:
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States—including former enslaved people—and guaranteed all citizens “equal protection of the laws.” One of three amendments passed during the Reconstruction era to abolish slavery and establish civil and legal rights for Black Americans, it would become the basis for many landmark Supreme Court decisions over the years.
Which of the following might make you suspect that an ID is fake?
•The ID feels thinner or thicker than usual.
•Fuzzy printing or different font on the birth date.
•Bar codes or magnetic strips on the back will not scan.
•All of the above.
The following would possibly make you think that an ID is fake: it is probably thinner or thicker, printed with fuzzy bar codes, or bar code strips on back.
What is an ID?Identityentification is the impulsive part of our psyche which responds at once and at once to fundamental urges, needs, and desires. The persona of the new child is all identityentification, and best of all, it expands an ego and super-ego.
From the above rationalization, it's clear that alternative D, all of the above, is the right alternative.
Learn more about ID, refer to:
brainly.com/question/4774641
#SPJ2