The option which is not a result of acid precipitation is It can increase the chance of asthma attacks. (Option C).
What is Acid Precipitation?Acid rainfall, also known as air pollution or acid deposition, refers to the phenomenon place atmospheric issuances containing high levels of sour pollutants oppose precipitation (rain, snow, fog, or mist) and begin the Earth's surface. It occurs when sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx), generally emitted from human activities in the way that burning hydrocarbon deposits and industrial processes, respond with water, oxygen, and other chemical compound in the atmosphere.
These sour pollutants, namely sulfuric acid (H2SO4) and nitric acid (HNO3), are made when the sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides undergo synthetic reactions. When acid precipitation falls upon the Earth's surface, it can have detrimental belongings on the environment, ecosystems, and human-created structures.
Learn more about acid precipitation here: https://brainly.com/question/22143130
#SPJ1
Assume Plaintiff (P) is a Georgia resident. While driving through Birmingham, Alabama, P is involved in an accident with D, an Alabama resident. P alleges more than $75,000 in personal and property injuries. Does a federal court in Georgia have subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute based on the diversity of citizenship of the parties
Answer:
75,000
Explanation:
i belive this correct
In two paragraphs, explain the significance of katarungan pambarangay in criminal justice system
Answer:
1. Katarungang Pambarangay is an innovation of the Philippine justice system. It provides for resolution of disputes at the barangay level in order to achieve peace and harmony within the community and to provide an accessible and effective form of justice for community members.
2.Katarungang Barangay (KP) is a system of justice administered at the barangay level for the purpose of amicable settling disputes through mediation, conciliation or abitration among the family or barangay without resorting to the courts.
the most common form of direct government participation in trade is? A. the subsidy.
B. shipping on national vessels.
C. import duties.
D. a combination of subsidy, shipping, and import duties.
The most common form of direct government participation in trade is D. a combination of subsidy, shipping, and import duties. Each of these components plays a significant role in the way governments interact with international trade.
Subsidies are financial assistance provided by governments to domestic industries, helping them stay competitive in the global market. This support can be in various forms, such as cash grants, tax breaks, or low-interest loans, and it helps maintain the viability of certain industries and protect domestic jobs.
Shipping on national vessels refers to the government's involvement in the transportation of goods and services through state-owned shipping companies. This helps ensure the country's imports and exports are securely and efficiently managed while also supporting the domestic shipping industry.
Import duties, also known as tariffs, are taxes imposed on imported goods by the government. These duties serve to protect domestic industries by making foreign products more expensive, thereby encouraging consumers to purchase domestically produced goods. Import duties also generate revenue for the government.
In summary, direct government participation in trade is not limited to a single method but often involves a combination of subsidies, shipping on national vessels, and import duties. This multifaceted approach enables governments to promote and protect their domestic industries while participating in the global trading system.
Learn more about subsidies here:
https://brainly.com/question/30722203
#SPJ11
Analisis "Preciosidad" de clarice lispector por favor alguien urgente
what is RA 6675 The Generic Act of 1988
Amendment XX, section 1
The terms of the President and the Vice President shall end at noon on the 20th day of January, and the terms of Senators and Representatives at noon on the 3d day of January, of the years in which such terms would have ended if this article had not been ratified; and the terms of their successors shall then begin.
In complete sentences, paraphrase the above amendment.
The given amendment is the 20th amendment of the US Constitution. It is paraphrased in complete sentences as given below.
The Twentieth Amendment is the amendment which sets the dates for the President, Vice President and members of Congress (Senators and Representatives). It sets the dates for when all these important personalities would take office.
The President and the Vice President shall start their jobs on 20th January. The members of Congress (Senators and Representatives) shall start their jobs on 3rd January.
Before this amendment, all of them started their jobs on 4th March. President Franklin Roosevelt was the first president who started his term in January.
To know more about 20th amendment here
https://brainly.com/question/13846279
#SPJ1
Answer:
What this amendment means is that all the terms that they have made have not been approved by, those that date then they will be ended, but if they have been, then the terms will arise.
Explanation:
What this assignment is asking is to paraphrase this amendment and a paraphrase is express the meaning of the writer or speaker or something written or spoken using different words, especially to achieve greater clarity. Which means for this assignment all you had to do is to put what you got out of the amendment.
in roe v wade the supreme court was required to rule on the iss of ___ due to the fact that the pregnancy has already come to term
Answer:
Explanation:
I think so yes you are correct I think so yes you are correct
TRUE/FALSE. The same states must be named in the Choice of Law and Choice of Forum provision.
The statement 'the same states must be named in the Choice of Law and Choice of Forum provision' is false because the same states do not have to be named in the Choice of Law and Choice of Forum provisions. These provisions serve different purposes and focus on different aspects of a legal agreement.
The Choice of Law provision determines which jurisdiction's laws will govern the interpretation and enforcement of the contract. It specifies the legal system or the laws of a particular state or country that will apply to any disputes arising from the agreement.
This provision identifies the substantive laws that will guide the resolution of legal issues.
On the other hand, the Choice of Forum provision determines the jurisdiction or court where any disputes related to the agreement will be litigated.
It designates the specific court, tribunal, or arbitration forum that will have the authority to hear and decide the case.
While it is possible for the same states to be named in both provisions, it is not a requirement. Each provision serves a distinct purpose, and the parties may have different preferences or strategic considerations when selecting the applicable law and the appropriate forum for dispute resolution.
To learn more about Law, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/27871277
#SPJ11
Question 2 of 29 Read this passage: Candidate A receives 48 percent of the popular vote in a state during a presidential election, while Candidate B receives 41 percent and Candidate C receives 11 percent. For most states, what outcome would the election have? O A. Each of the candidates would receive some of the electoral votes. O B. Candidate A and Candidate B would split the state's electoral votes. O C. The state would have to cast new ballots until one candidate wins a majority O D. Candidate A would receive all of the state's electoral votes. SUBMIT
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Candidate A has the highest vote among all the candidates participating in the election.
Hence, in order to form a party two of the parties need to collaborate to form a government as none of the three candidates is in majority.
Therefore, the candidate B and C or A and B or A and C will share their votes to form a government.
Hence, option B is correct
Whats the difference between a federal judge and a supreme court justice
The federal judge perform legal duties at Federal district court while the supreme court justice perform legal duties at U.S. Supreme Court
Who are the Federal judges?
These are justices that serve in a federal court and can only be impeached by House of Representatives.
Who are the Supreme Court Justices?These Justices are part of the nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court that were nominated by the President and confirmed by the U.S. Senate.
Read more about Federal judges
brainly.com/question/1622017
_______ is when someone has some sort of mental or physical defect that prevents him or her from being able to enter into a legally binding contract.
The term you are looking for is "incapacity". Incapacity refers to the inability of an individual to make informed decisions due to some kind of mental or physical defect. This incapacity can be temporary or permanent and can affect an individual's ability to understand the nature of a contract, its terms, and its implications.
In the context of contract law, incapacity means that the affected individual is not legally competent to enter into a contract, and any contract entered into by them may be considered void or unenforceable.
Mental incapacity can arise due to a variety of factors such as mental illness, cognitive impairment, intellectual disability, and even intoxication. Physical incapacity can arise due to factors such as injury, illness, or disability. In such cases, a court may appoint a legal guardian or conservator to act on behalf of the incapacitated individual and make legal decisions for them.
It is important to note that the determination of incapacity is not always straightforward and may require a formal evaluation by a medical or legal expert. The law generally seeks to protect individuals with mental or physical incapacity from being exploited or taken advantage of, especially in contractual relationships. Therefore, it is essential to be aware of these issues when entering into any contractual agreement.
Learn more about physical defect here:
https://brainly.com/question/29796206
#SPJ11
On average, how much money should an American make a day?
Answer: Daily Earnings Of An American On Average
The workday for an average American is 8 hours. Based on this and the mean income (as on May, 2016) of nearly $23.86, an American makes $190.88 every day. While the weekly median salary in the third quarter of 2017 was calculated as $857, it varied considerably between genders.
Explanation:
I hope this helps
Lacey files a civil suit against Mischa. To succeed, Lacey must prove her case
a.
beyond a reasonable doubt.
b.
by a preponderance of the evidence.
c.
through a scintilla of evidence.
d.
to the extent promised in her attorney’s opening statement.
2. In Coastal Fishing Company’s suit against Dockside Marina, Inc., the jury returns a verdict in Coastal’s favor. Dockside files a motion stating that even if the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to Coastal, a reasonable jury should not have found in its favor. This is a motion for
a.
a judgment in accordance with the verdict.
b.
a judgment as a matter of law.
c.
a new trial.
d.
judgment n.o.v.
3. Gabrielle files a suit against Hard ‘n Fast Adhesives, Inc. Hard ‘n Fast responds that even if Gabrielle’s statement of the facts is true, according to the law Hard n’ Fast is not liable. This is
a.
a counterclaim.
b.
a motion for judgment on the pleadings.
c.
a motion for summary judgment.
d.
a motion to dismiss.
4. Madison files a complaint in a suit against Christopher, and he files an answer. The case may now be
a.
appealed to a higher court.
b.
dismissed or settled.
c.
resolved but only after a trial.
d.
remanded for further proceedings.
How did this supreme court decision affect judicial interpretations of the constitution?.
The judge ruled in favor of Sam. The statements made to the jury by Linda and Sam immediately after the jury was chosen were _____.
the first question of the wall street journal model is whether the conduct complies with the law. group of answer choices true false
The statement "the first question of the Wall Street Journal model is whether the conduct complies with the law" is TRUE.
Wall Street Journal is a popular financial newspaper that is published daily. It offers economic, financial, and business news worldwide. Its goal is to provide reliable and unbiased coverage of the business and finance world. The Wall Street Journal's model is a well-known decision-making method that consists of a series of questions that assist in ethical decision-making in the workplace. This approach helps you to consider the moral implications of your choices before making them.
The first question in the Wall Street Journal's model is whether the conduct complies with the law.
To know more about financial visit:
https://brainly.com/question/32292990
#SPJ11
Paragraph
5. What impact did the creation of political parties ultimately have on the press?
what did carr argue in baker v carr
After a census, a process called "aportionment" is used to plan up legislative districts with an equitable population distribution.
What is an example of apportionment?For instance, if a property is damaged, three insurers who each provide $60,000 in coverage are each given 50% of the claim. Real estate, workers' insurance, and the range of financial advantages are further examples of allocation.
How does apportionment work?The process of distributing the 435 membership, or seats, across the 50 states is known as "apportionment." Every ten years, the Census conducts a census. The results of each census are used to determine the number pf House seats that each state is eligible for.
To know more about Apportionment visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1130701
#SPJ4
does the use of judicial review in dred scott v. sanford (1857) support or refute scholars who believe that judicial review should be used sparingly? why?
The use of judicial review in Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857) does not support scholars who believe that judicial review should be used sparingly. Instead, it supports scholars who believe that judicial review is a powerful tool that should be used with caution.What is judicial review.
Judicial review is the power of the courts to review and potentially invalidate actions taken by the other two branches of government (the executive and legislative branches) that are deemed to be unconstitutional. This power is not explicitly stated in the U.S. Constitution, but it has been established through a series of court cases, including Marbury v. Madison (1803), which is often cited as a landmark case in American law.Judicial review in Dred Scott v. SanfordDred Scott was a slave who lived in Missouri but was taken by his owner to Illinois (a free state) and then to the Wisconsin Territory (where slavery was prohibited by the Missouri Compromise). Scott sued for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived in free territories and states. The Supreme Court, in a decision written by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, held that Scott was not entitled to his freedom because he was not a citizen of the United States (and therefore did not have the right to sue in federal court) and because Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in the territories. This decision was widely criticized at the time and is now considered to be one of the worst decisions in the history of the Supreme Court.
To know more about history , visit;
https://brainly.com/question/24466312
#SPJ11
True or False The Surpreme Court consists of 7 members and One Chief Justice and 6 associate justices.
\(false\)
The Surpreme Court consists of 9 members and One Chief Justice and 8 associate justices.
true or false? justification defenses provide that acts that are ordinarily criminal are justified or carry no criminal liability under certain circumstances.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
10 points
True/False: Delwyn is driving on a rainy night after having a few drinks at
the bar. He hears a thump and peaks behind him. He doesn't see anything
so he drives home. He does not realize that he hit Laila and put her in a
"permanently vegetative state". A witness saw his license plate and they
track him down. In front of his car they find Laila's blood on the fender.
Laila's family sues for Delwyn for Laila's injuries. If the police then attempt
to arrest Delwyn, the case will be dismissed because you cannot be tried
for the same crime twice
True
False
There are many different human resource considerations for expatriates, host country nationals, and third country nationals, including compensation for foreign service, adhering to foreign what laws, employee security, travel, and employee benefits.
There are many different human resource considerations for expatriates, host country nationals, and third-country nationals, including compensation for foreign service, adhering to foreign cyber laws, employee security, travel, and employee benefits.
Federal U.S. Employment laws usually observe simplest to the employees who work inside the US Or its territories.
Advantages presently required by using law consist of social protection, unemployment insurance, and workers' reimbursement insurance. The Social Protection Act established Social security management.
Usually, better-degree overseas positions are filled with expatriate personnel from the parent USA. The overall motive behind the ethnocentric technique is that the workforce from the determined USA could represent the hobbies of the headquarters efficaciously and hyperlink properly with the figure USA.
Learn more about human resources here https://brainly.com/question/25443563
#SPJ4
In this case, why was the Crown justified in applying the reverse onus clause?
In the case where the Crown was justified in applying the reverse onus clause, this was because it was proven that the accused individual had possession of the drugs or illegal substances involved.
The reverse onus clause was introduced to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act in order to place the responsibility of proof on the accused individual.The Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA) has provisions that apply a “reverse onus clause” to those who are charged with possession or possession for the purpose of trafficking in a controlled substance.
This clause means that the accused person has to prove that they were not in possession of the controlled substance, that they were not aware of its presence, or that it was not intended for trafficking purposes
Learn more about CDSA at at
https://brainly.com/question/18759936
#SPJ11
What is the definition of political ideology
A political ideology may be defined as an ideology that gives idea about the way in which the political functioning of a society must take place, which may differ based on a number of internal as well as the external factors.
A political ideology can be referred to or taken into consideration as an ideology that is revolving around the political functioning of a society. The ideas in reference to democracy, monarchy, communism, etc. can all be considered as the different definitions of political ideologies that exist in the society.
Learn more about political ideology here:
https://brainly.com/question/30017758
#SPJ4
which of the following, if committed by a member, is NOT considered an act discreditable to the profession?
a) disclosure of questions and/or answers to the Uniform CPA Exam
b) filing a member's personal tax return on extension
c) determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to have violated US laws against sexual harassment
d) makes, or permits or directs another to make materially false and mislead entries int eh FS or records of an entity
The following is NOT considered an act discreditable to the profession: filing a member's personal tax return on extension. Option b is correct.
The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) is a US-based professional body for certified public accountants (CPAs).The AICPA has defined six categories of acts that would be discreditable to the profession, that are as follows: Disclosing or using information without proper authority.
Violating applicable state or federal laws, rules, or regulations in connection with the professional services being provided. Making or permitting another to make false and misleading entries into the books of account, records, or financial statements of an organization.
Failing to follow applicable standards when performing professional services. Negligently performing professional services in a way that violates professional standards or regulations. However, filing a member's personal tax return on extension is NOT considered an act discreditable to the profession.
Learn more about AICPA
https://brainly.com/question/30637398
#SPJ11
Which of the following is not contained in the Environmental Impact Statement
A. A statement of any adverse negative environmental impacts that cannot be avoided if the proposal is carried out
B. Alternatives to the proposal, including taking no action
The item that is not contained in the Environmental Impact Statement is A. A statement of any adverse negative environmental impacts that cannot be avoided if the proposal is carried out.
What is the Environmental Impact Statement?The environmental impact statement can be described as the government document which is been used to display the impact of a proposed project on its surrounding environment.
It should be noted that In the United States, it was mandated by federal law for certain projects and this guarantees that no species or habitat will be negatively impacted by the proposal.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about proposal at:
https://brainly.com/question/28905012
#SPJ1
Which of the following BEST describes the “rule of four”?
A.
The Supreme Court uses the rule of four after they have heard a case to decide whether they will issue an opinion on the case.
B.
The Supreme Court uses the rule of four to determine whether a case will be granted a writ of certiorari.
C.
It refers to the number of votes required to make a majority decision on the Court.
D.
The rule of four refers to the number of justices it takes to form a minority opinion on a case
Answer:
i think its B
Explanation:
short explaination of
Republic act 9163
Answer:
The Republic act 9163 is the act that established the NSTP National Service Training Program
Answer:
The National Service Training Program (NSTP) Act of 2001 (R.A. 9163) was enacted in response to public clamor for reforms in the Reserved Officers Training Corps (ROTC) Program. This act affirms that the prime duty of the government shall be to serve and protect its citizens.
Name at least 3 characteristics of Asian street gangs
Answer:
Activities include intimidation and extortion, vandalism, theft, assault, swarming, drug trafficking, stabbings, shootings and sometimes murder.
.Members may wear certain kinds of colors of clothing in very specific ways and/or use special hand signals, nicknames or symbols.