Answers
Answer:
Assuming this is for PLATO, the answer would be reblogging.
Explanation:
Related Questions
100 POINTS!!!!!!!! At close firing distances, gasses from a gun's muzzle can produce a star-shaped pattern around a bullet hole. true false
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The star comes from the gasses and heat so it has to be close to the bullet hole.
My question was True or Flase it has to be 3 feet away and I chose false and got it right.
The statement is "The star comes from the gasses and heat, so it has to be close to the bullet hole" is true.
What is a gun's muzzle?A gun muzzle is an essential component of firearms such as small firearms, artillery pieces, and air guns. It is the straight firing tube, generally composed of rigid high-strength metal, through which a confined fast expansion of high-pressure gas is employed to drive a projectile at high velocity out of the front end.
Muzzle gases can also create a star-shaped pattern around the bullet hole. As the distance increases, a gun shot 12 to 18 inches from the target can frequently create a halo of smoke around the bullet hole. The target may still display gunpowder residue at 25 inches. Therefore, it can be concluded that the above statement is true.
Learn more about gun muzzle here:
https://brainly.com/question/30167057
#SPJ2
Assignment 3.7. Wills trusts, and estate administration
Natalie Robinson dies without a will. The tollowing relatives survive her: a husband. Len: an adopted daughter. Lana: a toster son. I homas: two sisters. Faith and Nadine: a brother. I hor: her
mother, Simone; her father, Ernie; her mother-in-law, Isla; Len's sister, Cynthia; an aunt, Rose; an uncle, Oscar; two nephews, Donnie and Kevin, sons of her deceased brother, William; a
niece, Diane, daughter of her deceased sister, Sharon; a grandson, David, son of her deceased daughter, Denise; a granddaughter, Luella, daughter of her deceased daughter, Nancy; and
Manny, a husband by a prior marriage whom she divorced.
Who is the intestate:
Who is the administrator or administratriX
3. Name the laws that govern the passage of the decedent's estate
4. Hind and cite the state statute that would determine the nassage of Natalie's estate in vour state
Name the decedent S lineal relatives who are ascendants and descendants
b. Name the colateras related to the decedent
TaList al the potential successors (heirs )of the decedent
8. Name the relationship that entitles the persons in Ouestion 7 to possibly share in the decedent's estate
Answers
The answer response are given below:
The intestate refers to a person who dies without a will.The administrator or administratrix refers to the person appointed by the court to manage and distribute the estate of a person who dies without a will.The laws that govern the passage of the decedent's estate are referred to as intestate succession laws. These laws determine who will inherit the property of a person who dies without a will.The state statute that would determine the passage of Natalie's estate would vary based on the state in which she resided at the time of her death. In most states, the state's probate code governs the distribution of an intestate estate.Natalie's lineal relatives who are ascendants include her mother, Simone; her father, Ernie; and her mother-in-law, Isla. Her lineal relatives who are descendants include her adopted daughter, Lana; her foster son, Thomas; her grandson, David; and her granddaughter, Luella.The collateral relatives related to the decedent include her two sisters, Faith and Nadine; her brother, Ihor; Len's sister, Cynthia; her aunt, Rose; her uncle, Oscar; two nephews, Donnie and Kevin; a niece, Diane; and a husband by a prior marriage, Manny.The potential successors (heirs) of the decedent would typically include her surviving spouse, Len, and her children, Lana, Thomas, David, and Luella. In some states, Natalie's siblings and parents may also be considered as potential heirs.The relationship that entitles the persons in question 7 to possibly share in the decedent's estate is that of legal heirs under the state's intestate succession laws.What is the intestate about?Intestate: A person who dies without a valid will is said to have died intestate. In this case, their assets will be distributed according to state law, rather than the individual's wishes.
Therefore, Administrator or Administratrix: An administrator or administratrix is the person appointed by the court to manage the estate of an intestate decedent. The administrator is responsible for collecting and distributing the assets of the estate to the rightful heirs.
Learn more about intestate at:
https://brainly.com/question/1140802
#SPJ1
What are the elements of voluntary manslaughter?
Answers
Disclosing workplace issues in a public setting is _
Answers
Let
a
,
b
where
a
=(a
1
,a
2
),
b
=(b
1
,b
2
) where 0
2
1
y 0
2
1
a) Consider the vector
c
=(−a
2
,a
1
). What is the relationship between the vectors
a
and
c
? b) Calcute
c
⋅
b
c) Explain why
c
⋅
b
is the area of the paralle lo gram formed by the vectors
a
and
b
prove that
a
×
b
=(0,0,a
1
b
2
−a
2
b
1
)
Answers
The cross product of vectors a and b is equal to (0, 0, a1b2 - a2b1).
a) The relationship between the vectors a and c is that c is the result of rotating vector a by 90 degrees counterclockwise. In other words, vector c is the perpendicular (or orthogonal) vector to vector a.
b) To calculate the dot product c ⋅ b, we multiply the corresponding components of c and b and sum them up.
c ⋅ b = (-a2) * b1 + (a1) * b2
c) The dot product c ⋅ b represents the projection of vector c onto vector b. The absolute value of c ⋅ b represents the area of the parallelogram formed by vectors a and b.
To prove that a × b = (0, 0, a1b2 - a2b1), we use the cross product formula:
a × b = (a1, a2, 0) × (b1, b2, 0)
Expanding the cross product:
= (a2 * 0 - 0 * b2, 0 * b1 - a1 * 0, a1 * b2 - a2 * b1)
= (0, 0, a1b2 - a2b1)
Therefore, the cross product of vectors a and b is equal to (0, 0, a1b2 - a2b1).
To know more about rotating vector visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30262632
#SPJ11
What determines the number of seats in the senate? A B C or D?
Answers
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Evaluate the success or failures of the competition policy in South Africa using current examples
Answers
The success of the competition policy of South Africa lead to:
The product choices as well as with its competitive prices were given to consumers. Market Practices e.g. horizontal collusion and resale price maintenance was deemed unlawful.What is the competition policy in South Africa?The aim of the Competition Act of 1998 is to boasr and maintain competition in South Africa as it was enacted to:
To promote efficiency.The development of the economy as well as others.Therefore, The success of the competition policy of South Africa lead to:
The product choices as well as with its competitive prices were given to consumers. Market Practices e.g. horizontal collusion and resale price maintenance was deemed unlawful.Learn more about South Africa from
https://brainly.com/question/1056948
#SPJ1
why is a crime committed?
Answers
Answer:
The causes of crime are complex. Poverty, parental neglect, low self-esteem, alcohol and drug abuse can be connected to why people break the law. Some are at greater risk of becoming offenders because of the circumstances into which they are born.
Explanation:
There just lot's of evil people out there pray 4 them
The passage is from the Declaration of Independence (1776). Which earlier thinker influenced the reasoning of this passage?
A.
agreement on preserving the Articles of Confederation
B.
the death of James Madison
C.
agreement on the inclusion of a Bill of Rights
D.
the states were declared more powerful than the federal government
Answers
Answer:
I think the answer is D but I'm not sure
Explanation:
the declaration of independence said that they wanted to colonists to be a free country and separate from england. Meaning they did not want the government to hold that much power.
Individual state laws (vary by state) that provides legal recourse or some form of remedy to consumers when a product does not meet basic quality and performance standards. In most states, a car qualifies as a lemon if it has a substantial defect that is under warranty and has not been repaired after a reasonable number of attempts.
A) Obligatory Agreement
B) Lemon laws
C) Junk Law
D) Damaged Deed Agreement
E) Potential Damage Warranty
Answers
Lemon laws are regulations that attempt to protect consumers in the event in which when a product does not meet basic quality and performance standards.
Lemon laws are laws that are designed to protect consumers from being taken advantage of by businesses. These laws attempt to ensure that products meet basic quality and performance standards, and if they do not, the consumer is given some form of compensation or remedy.
Lemon laws vary from state to state, but generally they provide consumers with the right to return a product or receive a refund if it does not meet the required standards. Lemon laws are an important part of consumer protection and can help ensure that businesses are held accountable for the products they sell.
Hence, the correct option is "B".
To know more about laws, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ4
What is the legal threshold in criminal court needed in order for the prosecution to secure a conviction?.
Answers
The legal threshold in a criminal court needed in order for the prosecution to secure a conviction is to prove a case beyond reasonable doubt.
What is Reasonable Doubt?Reasonable doubt is a legal standard which a prosecution team must attain in order to secure the conviction of a person on trial.
Reasonable doubt means that the prosecution must present to the court all admissible evidence to prove that a person on trial actually committed that crime and that all the evidence provided must have been obtained through an admissible means.
What is a ConvictionConviction is the formal verdict which is issued by the jury in a competent court of jurisdiction that the accused of a crime is found guilty of that crime.
This means that the jury must have taken in to consideration the evidence set before it by both the defense and the prosecution team and that they have voted amongst themself and the number of votes for conviction outweighs the other.
Learn more about Reasonable Doubt at https://brainly.com/question/27077531
#SPJ1
Clair DeLoon was one of five current roommates in a house where tenants are continually moving in and moving out. An unknown past tenant vacated the premises, leaving behind a VCR and a collection of campy video tapes, frequently enjoyed by later groups of select tenants. When it came time for Clair to move on to more a more luxurious living space, she took the VCR and tape collection with her. One of the remaining tenants has filed a complaint with the police on the grounds that the items did not belong to Clair. Clair is being charged with theft.
a. Locate and correctly cite relevant secondary authority
b. Provide your exact search query
c. State the legal issue/s involved after studying the information
d. Discuss the arguments supporting Clair’s conviction, as well as arguments that can be raised in her defense.
e. Correctly cite one case supporting each of the arguments provided above.
Answers
Plzz help
Which two sentences in the scenario show
some of the symptoms of stress among law
enforcement, correctional, and public
security workers?
1, Not only has she started drinking copious
amounts of alcohol, but she's also started
smoking excessively.
2, Ruiz put on a charming and witty façade
at a recent family dinner to quell her
parents' worries about her.
3, It's become impossible for her to get a
good night's sleep-she fears she's
developing insomnia.
4, However, Ruiz is still hopeful. She's
planning to visit her counselor to improve
her mental and physical health.
Answers
Answer:
Not only has she started drinking copious amounts of alcohol, but she's also started smoking excessively
An approach to the Constitution that uses a looser reading of the document and reads into its rights that the framers might have recognized or that should be recognized as a result of "evolving standards" is called
Answers
The approach to the Constitution that uses a looser reading of the document and reads into its rights that the framers might have recognized or that should be recognized as a result of "evolving standards" is called the Living Constitution approach.
This approach suggests that the Constitution is a living document that should be interpreted in light of changing social, cultural, and political values and norms, rather than being read narrowly according to the original intent of the framers. The Living Constitution approach holds that the Constitution's principles and values are enduring, but its application should evolve to reflect the changing needs and aspirations of society.
The approach to the Constitution that uses a looser reading of the document and reads into its rights that the framers might have recognized or that should be recognized as a result of "evolving standards" is called the Living Constitution approach or theory.
The Living Constitution approach holds that the Constitution is a living document, capable of adapting and changing over time to meet the needs and values of a changing society. This approach often involves interpreting the Constitution in light of evolving social and cultural norms and values and recognizing new rights that may not have been explicitly mentioned in the original text of the Constitution.
Proponents of the Living Constitution approach argue that this approach allows the Constitution to remain relevant and responsive to the changing needs of society. Opponents argue that it can lead to a lack of consistency and predictability in constitutional law and may allow judges to make decisions based on their own personal beliefs and values rather than the text and original intent of the Constitution.
To know more about the Constitution- https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ11
A Sargent span of control is over who:
Answers
Which term refers to the fact that the therapist cannot disclose private communications to any
third party unless mandated or permitted by law to do so?
A. confidentiality
B. disclosure
C. discretion
D. privilege
Answers
The term that refers to the fact that the therapist cannot disclose private communications to any third party unless mandated or permitted by law to do so is confidentiality. Correct answer is option (A).
Confidentiality is the legal and ethical responsibility to keep personal information confidential. This means that the therapist can't share the client's confidential information with anyone else without the client's explicit consent. Any type of private information, such as your medical history, mental health diagnosis, or financial situation, may be covered by confidentiality regulations.
The importance of confidentiality. In a therapeutic context, confidentiality is critical. It enables the patient to feel safe and comfortable with their therapist and fosters a trusting connection between them. The client may not be open with their therapist if they believe their confidentiality will be breached or if they feel their personal information will be revealed to others. A breach of confidentiality can cause patients to feel exposed and vulnerable, eroding the trust necessary for therapeutic progress.
The therapist is obligated by law to keep their client's private communications confidential unless mandated or permitted by law to do so. Exceptions to confidentiality may include threats to harm oneself or others, child abuse, or court-ordered testimony. Therefore option (A) is correct answer.
Learn more about therapist private information https://brainly.com/question/14885106
#SPJ11
For each of the following five cases, please state 1) whether the case is criminal or civil in nature, and 2) which court has jurisdiction in the case: 2.1 Obakeng, the founder of a social media network heads the unlawful operation of releasing the users’ data to third party companies for profit. The users decided to sue the social media network company as a result of this. The claim was to the value of R850 000. 2.2 Anna has been married to Tom for 15 years and they have 3 children together. They decide to get a divorce as a result of Anna committing adultery. Tom issues summons and Anna disputes the settlement agreement. 2.3 Cindy attended a soccer match one day and met up with a classmate John after to have some lunch, John had too much to drink and attempted to sexually assault Cindy against her consent. 2.4 Neo got accepted into the chess team and Arnold did not, Arnold was jealous of Neo and punched him in the face outside the school property. 2.5 Jacob the father of baby Kekana, was not awarded custody over him. He fetched him after school and never returned him to his mother Lerato. Lerato called the police and reported Kekana missing.
Answers
2.1 - Civil case, the court with jurisdiction would depend on the location where the lawsuit was filed and the laws of that jurisdiction.
2.2 - Civil case, the court with jurisdiction would depend on the location where the divorce was filed and the laws of that jurisdiction.
2.3 - Criminal case, the court with jurisdiction would be the criminal court in the jurisdiction where the assault occurred.
2.4 - Criminal case, the court with jurisdiction would be the criminal court in the jurisdiction where the assault occurred.
2.5 - Criminal case, the court with jurisdiction would be the criminal court in the jurisdiction where the child was taken.
Ford, GM, and Stellantis produce electric vehicles. Provide an explanation for whether each of the following activities would be legal or illegal based on US antitrust law. (a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agree not to lower prices for the rest of 2022. (b) Ford, GM, and Stellantis have electric vehicle factories in different US states, but they sell their vehicles in every US state. (c) Due to higher input prices (i.e. labor costs and computer chips). Ford, GM, and Stellantis each increased the price of new electric vehicles this year. (d) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agree to isolate dealerships into separate geographic regions of the US. Ford will take the Eastern region, GM will take the Midwest region, and Stellantis will take the Western region.
Answers
(a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing not to lower prices would be illegal; (b) having electric vehicle factories in different states and selling nationwide would be legal; (c) increasing prices due to higher input costs would be legal; and (d) isolating dealerships into separate geographic regions would be illegal.
(a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing not to lower prices for the rest of 2022 would likely be considered illegal under US antitrust law. This type of agreement would be classified as price fixing, which is an anticompetitive practice. Price fixing involves competitors colluding to set prices at a certain level, eliminating competition and harming consumers. Such agreements are typically prohibited under US antitrust laws, including the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act. Price fixing reduces consumer choice, suppresses competition, and can result in higher prices for consumers.
(b) Ford, GM, and Stellantis having electric vehicle factories in different US states but selling their vehicles in every US state would generally be legal under US antitrust law. This situation does not involve any explicit anticompetitive practices such as price fixing or market allocation. As long as each company competes independently in the marketplace and does not engage in collusion or other forms of anticompetitive behavior, their ability to sell vehicles across state lines is generally permissible.
(c) Ford, GM, and Stellantis increasing the price of new electric vehicles due to higher input prices, such as labor costs and computer chips, would likely be legal under US antitrust law. Pricing decisions based on legitimate factors such as increased production costs are generally within the purview of individual companies. As long as these companies do not coordinate their pricing decisions through collusion or anticompetitive agreements, they have the discretion to set prices according to their own cost structures and market conditions.
(d) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing to isolate dealerships into separate geographic regions of the US, with each company taking control of a specific region, would likely be considered illegal under US antitrust law. This type of agreement is known as market allocation, where competitors divide markets among themselves, eliminating competition in certain areas. Market allocation agreements are generally considered anticompetitive and are prohibited under US antitrust laws. These agreements harm competition, restrict consumer choice, and can lead to higher prices. In the given scenario, if Ford, GM, and Stellantis agree to isolate dealerships into specific regions, it would restrict competition and violate antitrust laws.
In summary, (a) Ford, GM, and Stellantis agreeing not to lower prices would be illegal; (b) having electric vehicle factories in different states and selling nationwide would be legal; (c) increasing prices due to higher input costs would be legal; and (d) isolating dealerships into separate geographic regions would be illegal.
Learn more about illegal
https://brainly.com/question/27375182
#SPJ11
congress' ability to pass laws needed to carry out its expressed powers is known as the __________ clause.
Answers
Congress' ability to pass laws needed to carry out its expressed powers is known as the "necessary and proper" clause.
The necessary and proper clause is found in Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 of the United States Constitution, which grants Congress the authority to make all laws that are necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers specifically enumerated to it.
The exact wording of the clause states that Congress has the power "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
The purpose of the necessary and proper clause is to provide Congress with the flexibility and authority to pass legislation beyond its expressly listed powers, as long as it is necessary and proper for the functioning and execution of those powers.
It serves as a constitutional basis for implied powers, allowing Congress to legislate on matters that may not be explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but are closely related to its enumerated powers.
The necessary and proper clause has been interpreted broadly by the courts, expanding Congress' authority to pass laws that enable the effective exercise of its express powers.
For such more question on laws:
https://brainly.com/question/30037866
#SPJ8
Question 2
Prior notice deposit means bank shall returns the deposited amount without need for notice from customer
А
True
B
False
Answers
If I make a report in good faith and dad determines I am wrong, I can be held liable.
Answers
Liability may arise if a report made in good faith leads to harm or if negligence in information gathering is proven.
If an individual makes a report in good faith, meaning they genuinely believe the information they are providing is accurate and reliable, but their dad determines that they are wrong, there are certain circumstances in which they can be held liable. One such circumstance is if the report leads to tangible harm or negative consequences for others based on the erroneous information. If the report causes financial loss, reputational damage, or any form of harm to individuals or entities, the person who made the report may be held responsible for the resulting damages.Additionally, liability may arise if it can be proven that the individual was negligent in gathering or verifying the information before making the report. While good faith provides some level of protection, it does not absolve individuals of the responsibility to exercise reasonable care and diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the information they are reporting.It is important to note that liability in such cases would generally be determined through legal processes and would depend on the specific laws and regulations applicable in the relevant jurisdiction.The complete question should be In what circumstances can an individual be held liable if they make a report in good faith, but their dad determines that they are wrong?
For more questions on Liability
https://brainly.com/question/14921529
#SPJ8
Prompt: Can multiple people interpret the same law differently and still be correct? Provide an example.
Answers
the president of the united states gets their powers from…
Answers
The President of the United States gets their powers from the United States Constitution, specifically from Article II of the Constitution.
The President is the head of the executive branch of the federal government and is responsible for enforcing federal laws, conducting foreign policy, and serving as commander-in-chief of the armed forces.
Some of the powers granted to the President by the Constitution include the power to veto legislation passed by Congress, the power to appoint federal judges and other officials with the advice and consent of the Senate, the power to make treaties with foreign governments with the advice and consent of the Senate, and the power to grant pardons and reprieves for federal crimes. The President is also required by the Constitution to give an annual State of the Union address to Congress.
For such more question on Constitution
https://brainly.com/question/453546
#SPJ4
how can class evidence become individual evidence.
Answers
Answer:
Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source. The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic.
Explanation:
I hope it helps you
A(n) ________ is issued by the clerk of the court and is delivered with a copy of the complaint to the defendant.
Answers
Answer:
Summons.
Explanation:
A(n) summons is issued by the clerk of the court and is delivered with a copy of the complaint to the defendant.
Which of the following is NOT a program of the United Nations designed to help the poor and needy of the world
1. NATO
2. WHO
3. UNICEF
4. UNESCO
Answers
If I get it wrong that’s mean I am not a refugee.
Answer:
NATO
Explanation:
NATO is an organization of countries of Europe and north America who formed an alliance to protect the world from threats.
Is it illegal to videotape someone without their consent.
Answers
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Do you think that the dairy industry is an example of a purely competitive market? Why or why not? If not, what industry is?
Answers
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
because it record everything
in this case, the court determined it had personal jurisdiction. did the court also have jurisdiction over property located within its boundaries?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
It is not possible to answer this question without more specific information about the case in question.
Personal jurisdiction refers to the court's authority to exercise power over a particular individual or entity, such as the defendant in a lawsuit. It is based on a variety of factors, such as the defendant's presence or contacts within the jurisdiction, and is distinct from jurisdiction over property.
Jurisdiction over property, also known as in rem jurisdiction, refers to a court's authority to adjudicate disputes over specific property, regardless of who owns or possesses that property. In rem jurisdiction can be based on a variety of factors, such as the location of the property or the source of a particular claim.
Whether or not the court in the case in question had jurisdiction over property located within its boundaries would depend on the specific facts of the case and the basis for the court's jurisdiction. Without further information, it is impossible to say whether the court had jurisdiction over property as well as over the individuals involved in the case.
Which of the following is not a purpose of government?
1.protection
2.exploration
3.conflict resolution
4.order
A government that earns the respect of its citizens is said to have which of the following?
1.legitimacy
2.command
3.fear
4.power
Answers
Among the following, is not the purpose of government is exploration. Thus the correct option is 2.
A government that earns the respect of its citizens is said to have legitimacy. Thus the correct option is 1.
What is government?A government refers to an administrative system developed to mnaintian the functioning of any country by maintaining peace and order by implementing laws and legislation of the constitution and providing better facilities to its citizens.
An authority's ability to exist and accept is referred to as legitimacy. The concept that a law, institution, or leader has the authority to rule is known as legitimacy in political science and sociology.
Learn more about Government, here:
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ1