When is a lie a lie?

Answer:

To "protect the confidentiality of high level presidential communications and the principle of separation of powers protects the president through the independence of the executive branch.

Explanation:

Answer: to test the drug content in the blood

Explanation:Option C

If a court finds that Lincoln has been taking advantage of Benson through an unfair contract for several years when Benson seeks relief and legal freedom, the b) Contract is voided.

An unfair contract is one that adversely affects the rights of one of the contracting parties.

Such an unfair contract is void.

By definition, a void contract is effectively illegitimate and unenforceable ab nitio.

a) Contract will be modified

b) Contract is voided

c) Contract is voided, subject to investigation

d) Contract is valid

Thus, if a court finds that Lincoln has been taking advantage of Benson through an unfair contract for several years when Benson seeks relief and legal freedom, the b) Contract is voided.

Learn more about void contracts at https://brainly.com/question/7306383

#SPJ1

Once a plaintiff determines that she has standing to sue and has chosen the proper court in terms of jurisdiction, she must serve the defendant with a summons and complaint to put the defendant on notice of the suit. The defendant must then submit his answer to the court and indicate any defenses that justify his actions.

After establishing standing to sue and selecting the appropriate court, the plaintiff is responsible for serving the defendant with a summons and complaint. The summons formally notifies the defendant of the lawsuit and the need to respond. The complaint outlines the specific claims and allegations against the defendant.

Upon receiving the summons and complaint, the defendant must respond by submitting his answer to the court within the specified timeframe. In the answer, the defendant addresses the plaintiff's claims and can raise various defenses to justify his actions. Common defenses may include asserting that the plaintiff lacks sufficient evidence, arguing the statute of limitations has expired, or claiming a legitimate legal justification for the defendant's conduct.

To know more about plaintiff

brainly.com/question/32362772

#SPJ11

The residents will have to pay a sales tax whenever they bought a lottery ticket.

A Sales tax refers to a taxation charged to consumers based on the purchased price of products.

This type of tax is not imposed on getting a driver's license, going to a state campground or going to an amusement park because they are not sales.

Hence, the sales tax will be charged only on lottery ticket.

Therefore, the Option D is correct.

Read more about Sales tax

brainly.com/question/9437038

Presuming that the parties are using a standard AIA contract, an owner can Suspend work for a good reason.

The correct option is A.

An Architect of Record will prepare, sign, and seal construction documents for a project and provide construction contract administration services. This contract is a standard form of agreement between the Owner and the Architect of Record. An owner and contractor can use the AIA A101®-2017 standard form of agreement when the basis of payment is a predetermined amount or fixed price. A101 incorporates AIA Document A201®-2017, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, by reference and is intended for use with it.

Because it outlines the terms and conditions for how the Owner, Contractor, and Architect will collaborate during the building construction process, AIA Document A201-2017, General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, is regarded as the foundational document of the Conventional family of documents. The correct option is A.

Learn more about standard AIA contract at:

brainly.com/question/30778337

#SPJ4

According to Justice Kennedy, the reason why the Court of Appeals overturned Alvarado’s conviction is:

This refers to a legal verdict whereby a person is found guilty of an offence in a competent court of law and given a sentence.

With this in mind, we can see that the case of Alvarado was not one that was very straightforward because of the feelings of being in custody and being coerced by police tactics and thus the verdict was overturned because the Court said that being "in custody" was a matter of law, not of whether Alvarado believed he was in custody.

Read more about convictions here:
https://brainly.com/question/25480701

Answer:

c. Minors require special legal protections.

d. He was in custody because he concluded that he was under arrest.

Explanation:

c. and d.

Explanation:

đáp án C

The amount of Joshua’s overdraft on his account equals $65.

On a bank account, the overdraft fees means a limited loan that is provided by a bank that allows a customer to pay for bills and other expenses when the account reaches zero.

A very good example of a bank overdraft is when we write a check for $40 when you only have $20 in your account.

Data given

Joshua has $116 in his checking account (+)

Get a gas in his car for $43 (-)

For senior yearbook clears,  $75 comes out of his account (-)

Netflix account subscription $10 (-)

Debit card used to buy a $3 coffee (-)

Payment to friend $15 for his share of dinner (-)

To buy new soccer gear for $35 (-)

Existing amount in account = $116

Total Expenses = $43 + $75 + $10 + $3 + $15 + $35 = $181

Hence, Overdraft fee = $65 ($181 - $116)

Therefore, the amount of Joshua’s overdraft on his account equals $65.

Read more about bank overdraft

brainly.com/question/25772671

#SPJ1

Answer: see below

Explanation:

New Jersey V. T.L.O. 469 U.S. 325 (1985) the scotus ruled that school officials do need a warrant or probable cause to search a student, they only need responsible suspicion

Answer:

The best ways to control organized crime :

1. The center link where such groups are being controlled from should be attacked .

2. Special forces for special crimes should be trained and maintained.

3. Special laws should be passed against such crimes for punishment and also for investigation purposes.

4. Strict actions from forces should be taken at first.

5. General public should be made aware of popular faces so that people can help the authorities also.

The president appointed Neil Gorsuch to the supreme court as a justice at the commencement of his term. The president was acting within the bounds of his constitutionally given jurisdiction to nominate and appoint different political offices when he made this appointment.

The United States President has the power to nominate as well as appoint public officials, which would include federal judges of the United States Supreme Court, with both the confirmation (advice and consent) of the United States Senate under the Appointments Clause in Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the U.S Constitution. This clause, often known as the Appointments Clause, serves as an example of the checks and balances that are built into the Constitution. While the president does have full power to nominate and appoint, the Senate has the sole authority to accept or reject a presidential candidacy.

To know more about Jurisdiction:

brainly.com/question/14179714

#SPJ4

Answer:

I am sorry that this has happened however he is not going to come back. Most likely cause he dislikes you. :)

Explanation:

Option (B) is correct. The federal government was permitted by the Articles of Confederation to ask the states for money, but it was not allowed to tax people directly; this was changed by the United-States Constitution.

Articles had been unicameral, had no strength of tax, had no status military, and there has been no change process. Constitution is bicameral, has the rights to levy taxes, has a military, have change process. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress lacked the authority to alter commerce, making it not able to shield or standardize exchange among overseas countries and the diverse states.

Outwardly patterned on a lot of the US, it had 3 obtrusive modifications: 1) the Preamble makes clean that is a federal authorities of Sovereign, Independent States, 2) they invoked 'the choose of Almighty God', and 3) they outlawed the Slave Trade absolutely, a primary in American Constitutional law. Articles are the sections of the report that describe the powers and features of the authorities. The U.S. Constitution has 7 articles at the same time as the Florida Constitution has 12 articles. 21. Amendments are modifications which have been made to a constitution.

Learn more about Confederation visit: brainly.com/question/19875019

#SPJ4

Under Hawaii state law, if a buyer fails to obtain financing as specified in a purchase agreement, the agreement may be terminated.

This termination would typically occur when the buyer is unable to secure the necessary financing within the specified timeframe or under the agreed-upon terms and conditions.

When a purchase agreement is contingent upon the buyer obtaining financing, it means that the buyer's obligation to proceed with the purchase is dependent on their ability to secure a loan or mortgage. If the buyer is unable to secure financing, it is considered a breach of the purchase agreement, and the agreement can be terminated.

In such cases, the specific terms and conditions outlined in the purchase agreement, as well as applicable state laws, will govern the process of terminating the agreement. It is important for buyers and sellers to carefully review the terms of the purchase agreement, including any financing contingencies, to understand their rights and obligations in the event that financing cannot be obtained.

Terminating the purchase agreement due to the buyer's failure to obtain financing typically involves notifying the other party in writing and following the procedures outlined in the agreement. This may include providing documentation or evidence of the buyer's unsuccessful attempts to secure financing.

It is advisable for buyers to work closely with their lenders and ensure they meet all necessary requirements and deadlines for obtaining financing. If financing cannot be secured, it is essential to communicate this promptly to the seller or their representative to initiate the termination process in accordance with Hawaii state law and the terms of the purchase agreement.

Learn more about purchase agreement here

https://brainly.com/question/31087216

#SPJ11

Answer:

A.

----

Knew this because I lived there

Answer: The question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and contested issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While it is true that humans are the only species that are legally accountable for their actions, the reasons for this are not necessarily clear-cut, and raise important ethical and philosophical questions.

One argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans possess a unique capacity for moral reasoning and decision-making that other animals lack. This capacity allows humans to understand the consequences of their actions and make choices based on ethical principles, which is a key factor in determining legal accountability. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which non-human animals are capable of moral reasoning, and whether their actions should be judged by the same standards as human actions.

Another argument in favor of human exceptionalism is that humans have created complex legal systems that are designed to regulate and enforce social norms. These legal systems are based on the principle of individual responsibility, which holds that individuals should be held accountable for their actions and the consequences that result. However, this argument raises questions about the extent to which legal systems are designed to reflect universal ethical principles, and whether they are biased in favor of human interests.

Ultimately, the question of whether human beings are the only animal accountable before the law is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a critical thinking approach. While there are certainly arguments in favor of human exceptionalism, there are also important ethical and philosophical questions that need to be considered. It is important to engage in a rigorous and thoughtful analysis of these issues in order to arrive at a well-reasoned conclusion.

The legislative branch of government is accountable for making legal guidelines within a rustic. Legislatures are made of people referred to as legislators who, in democracies, are elected with the aid of the united states' populace.

Their powers can also include passing legal guidelines, setting up the authorities' finances, confirming executive appointments, ratifying treaties, investigating the executive department, impeaching and casting off from workplace participants of the government and judiciary, and redressing components' grievances.

The Legislative meeting has four primary roles: to symbolize the people; to form the executive government for brand spanking new South Wales; to legislate, and to approve the government's request for cash.

A state is a legislative branch or body of a political subdivision in a federal gadget. two federations literally use the time period "state legislature": The legislative branches of each of the fifty nation governments of us are known as state legislatures.

Learn more about legislature here:

https://brainly.com/question/809346

#SPJ4

This question is about the text "Dr. Coppolino's Deadly House Calls"

Answer and Explanation:

1. The possible people involved in Carmela's death are her husband Dr. Carl Coppolino and Dr. Karrow. That's because they probably gave a fake death certificate on Carmela's death. This is because when Dr. Karrow arrived home, Carmela was already dead and did not appear to have had a heart attack (as her husband had stated. On the contrary, it seemed that her death had been caused, but even so Dr. Karrow agreed to sign a state of death stating that Carmela had died of "coronary occlusion".

2. William Farber died of suffocation by the hands of Dr. Carl Coppolino, who used a pillow to kill Faber. he did this because Faber's wife had an affair with him and was unable to give her husband a lethal injection. The injection was given by Carl himself.

3. Because Marjorie Farber told the police how Carl murdered her husband and why he did it. The police then launched an investigation and realized that William Faber's death certificate indicated death from "coronary occlusion," a death that is rarely investigated by the police. After that, the police managed to obtain authorization to carry out the bodies of Camela and William Farber for an autopsy to be done, confirming that both did not die of "coronary occlusion," the police therefore decided to accuse Dr. Coppolinode of murdering his wife and William Farber.

4. Marjorie Farber had an affair with Dr. Carl Coppolino and decided to report it because she was sad when he decided to marry a wealthy socialite. She was portrayed in court as an embittered woman against a respected and professional doctor, which lightened her complaint. Furthermore, no chemical substances were found in William Farber's body, although there were indeed signs of strangulation. In the end Coppolino was not convicted because he was a professional doctor, while Marjorie was a betrayed and sad woman.

5. He proved that Carl Coppolino injected his wife with succinylcholine chloride. This substance is paralyzing and deadly, but its identification in the body is almost impossible, because it is degraded by two substances that happen naturally in the human organism. So Dr. Umberger created a new method to detect this substance. He managed to isolate, in Camelia's body, very high levels of succinic acid, which is a strong indication of the use of succinylcholine chloride

6. The Fryer standard would accept the process applied by the doctor as proof of Umberger's guilt. That's because Dr. Umberger was a toxicology expert and the Fryer standard states that within a trial, an expert's opinion should be accepted as evidence if he can use a scientifically recognized technique to prove the point, like Dr. Umberger did.

7. After presenting the facts discovered by Dr. Umberger, Dr. Coppolino was found guilty of the murder of his wife and was convicted of second-degree murder.

8. We can consider that the case was tried within the Dauber Ruling, as it considered Dr. Umberger's methodology as a proof of Coppolino's guilt. However, the case of the murder of William Farber was also investigated by an expert, but it did not have the same result, probably for sexist reasons.

Answer:

Por fuera del poder judicial, crearía un organismo colegiado formado igualitariamente por miembros pertenecientes a los distintos partidos políticos que se hubieran presentado en las elecciones presidenciales: por ejemplo, si hubiesen participado 5 partidos, cada uno tendría una participación del 20% en dicho organismo.

Este organismo tendría la función de evaluar las políticas del gobierno y, a través de mayorías simples, emitir dictámenes evaluatorios periódicos respecto del poder ejecutivo, pudiendo, en caso de creerlo conveniente, remitir causas al poder judicial para evaluar las políticas llevadas a cabo y declararlas nulas.

Long-term capital gains (depending on the type) for individual taxpayers can be taxed at a maximum rate of 20%. The correct option is A.

When an asset is sold or otherwise disposed of after being held for more than a year, it is said to have generated long term capital gains. Stocks, bonds, real estate and other investments are examples of these assets.

Long term capital gains may be taxed differently depending on the asset's type and the taxpayer's income. The maximum tax rate for long-term capital gains for the majority of individual taxpayers in the United States, as of the deadline in September 2021, was 20%. However, a maximum effective tax rate of 23.8% may apply to some high income taxpayers who are additionally subject to a 3.8% Net Investment Income Tax (NIIT). The correct option is A.

Learn more about capital gains at:

brainly.com/question/31782735

#SPJ4

The court decided in favor of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.

The court found that there was no implied-in-fact contract between Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company.

The court found that the hospital and Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP had an express contract requiring the hospital to pay for legal work rendered by Jordan Keys Jessamy LLP. The court found that an implied contract cannot stand in the face of an express one.

Read more about court case here;

https://brainly.com/question/30552468
#SPJ1

"each hazard carries an associated risk, which is represented by the likelihood of the hazard leading to an actual disaster event and the consequences of that event should it occur."

The likelihood (probability) of a harmful event, such as injury or death from a specific hazard, is referred to as risk; a hazard is a situation that has the potential to cause harm (regardless of the likelihood of it actually occurring). Physical hazards events include radiation, magnetic fields, pressure extremes (high pressure or vacuum), noise, and so on. Psychosocial hazards include stress, violence, and so on. Safety hazards include slipping/tripping hazards, inadequate machine guarding, and equipment malfunctions or breakdowns. A function of hazard level and likelihood (or probability) that the hazard will cause harm.

learn more about hazard event here:

https://brainly.com/question/2817915

#SPJ4

Margaret and Roy have formed a bilateral contract. A bilateral contract is a type of agreement in which both parties make promises to each other.

In this scenario, Margaret promises to give Roy a new iPad, and Roy promises to cut Margaret's grass for a month. Both parties have exchanged promises, creating a mutual obligation to fulfill their respective commitments.

It's worth noting that for a contract to be enforceable, certain elements must be present, such as an offer, acceptance, consideration (something of value exchanged between the parties), and the intention to create a legal relationship. In this case, Margaret's offer of a new iPad, Roy's acceptance by promising to do the chores, and the consideration of Roy's grass-cutting service all suggest the formation of a valid bilateral contract.

However, it's important to recognize that the performance of the contract has not yet begun, as Roy has not yet started cutting Margaret's grass. Until the duties under the contract are performed or unless there are specific provisions for termination or cancellation, both parties are bound by their promises and have an obligation to fulfill their respective parts of the agreement.

Learn more about service here:

https://brainly.com/question/30418810

#SPJ11