Whats the formula for surface area of a trapezoidal prism?

Answer:

Perimeter = 2(Length + Width)

308m = 2(96m + x)

308m = 192m + 2x

308m - 192m = 2x + 192m - 192m

116m = 2x

x = 58m

therefore, the width is 58m

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

What I Have Learned?

Part 1

Direction. Determine whether each system of linear equations is consistent and

dependent, consistent and independent, or inconsistent. Answer on the

separate sheet

(2x+y = 3

12x + y = 6

3.

(6x-27=

2y 8

ly=3x – 4

1.

4.

3x + y = 10

4x + y - 7

(3x + 5y = 15

14x - 7y = 10

2.

1

The mathematical model of communication would classify this issue as channel capacity.

The greatest quantity of data that can be transferred error-free across a communication channel, such as a mobile phone network, is represented by the channel capacity. In this instance, the phone's battery power determines the channel capacity. As the battery depletes, the phone's ability to send and receive information declines, making it impossible to hear the person on the other end of the line.

Communication models are streamlined depictions of the communication process. Most models attempt to explain both verbal and nonverbal communication, and frequently regard it as a message-exchange. Their purpose is to provide a concise picture of the intricate communication process.

For such more question on mathematical model

https://brainly.com/question/4960129

#SPJ4

There are only two possible values for the order of \(g^q\)modulo p: either q or p-1. We have already shown that g cannot have order q modulo p, so we must have \(g^q\)having order p-1 modulo p. This implies that g is a primitive root modulo p.

To prove that g is a primitive root modulo p, we need to show that the order of g modulo p is equal to p-1. This means that g raised to any power between 1 and p-1 (inclusive) is not congruent to 1 modulo p, and that g^(p-1) is congruent to 1 modulo p.

We know that the order of g modulo p divides p-1 (by Euler's theorem), so it suffices to show that it cannot be any proper divisor of p-1.

Suppose, for contradiction, that g has an order d modulo p that is a proper divisor of p-1. Then we must have:

g^d ≡ 1 (mod p)

Since q is prime, we know that q is odd, and therefore p-1 is even. Thus, we can write:

p-1 = 2q

Now, we consider the following two cases:

Case 1: d = q

Since d is a divisor of p-1, we have d = q or d = 2q. But since q is prime, the only possible divisors of q are 1 and q itself. Therefore, d cannot be equal to 2q, so we must have d = q. Thus, we have:

g^q ≡ 1 (mod p)

Since q is prime, this implies that either g ≡ 1 (mod p) or g has order q modulo p. But we know that g cannot have order q modulo p, because q is prime and therefore the only primitive roots modulo p have order p-1 or (p-1)/2 (by a well-known theorem). Therefore, we must have g ≡ 1 (mod p), which contradicts the assumption that g is an integer satisfying:

Case 2: d ≠ q

In this case, we have d = 2q (since d cannot be a divisor of q). Therefore, we have:

g^(2q) ≡ 1 (mod p)

which implies that:

\((g^q)^2\) ≡ 1 (mod p)

But since q is prime, we know that either\(g^q\) ≡ 1 (mod p) or\(g^q\) has order q modulo p. If\(g^q\) ≡ 1 (mod p), then we are back in Case 1, which we have already shown to be a contradiction. Therefore,\(g^q\) must have order q modulo p.

But since q is prime, there are only two possible values for the order of \(g^q\)modulo p: either q or p-1. We have already shown that g cannot have order q modulo p, so we must have \(g^q\)having order p-1 modulo p. This implies that g is a primitive root modulo p, which completes the proof.

Therefore, we have shown that g is a primitive root modulo p, as required.

Learn more about number theory

brainly.com/question/30414700

#SPJ11

The sum of the m integers between ai and aj is si - s(i-1) + s(i-1) - s(j-1) = si - sj, which is divisible by m since si, sj have same remainder. So, there exists a consecutive subsequence of the original sequence with a sum divisible by m, namely the integers between ai and aj.

We can prove this using the Pigeonhole Principle.

Consider the sequence of m integers a1, a2, ..., am. Let's compute the prefix sums of this sequence, which we'll denote by s0, s1, s2, ..., sm. That is, we define si = a1 + a2 + ... + ai-1 for i = 1, 2, ..., m, and s0 = 0.

Note that there are m + 1 prefix sums, but only m possible remainders when we divide a sum by m (namely, 0, 1, 2, ..., m-1).

Therefore, by the Pigeonhole Principle, at least two of the prefix sums must have the same remainder when divided by m. Let's say these are si and sj, where i < j.

Then, the sum of the m integers between ai and aj (inclusive) is si - s(i-1) + s(i-1) - s(j-1) = si - sj, which is divisible by m since si and sj have the same remainder when divided by m.

Therefore, there exists a consecutive subsequence of the original sequence with a sum divisible by m, namely the integers between ai and aj.

Know more about integers here:

https://brainly.com/question/929808

#SPJ11

18 root

2

Step-by-step explanation:

In this question imagine there is no y

It will be 10 root2 +5 root2 +3 root 2 it will be 18 root 2

The probability of a randomly selected bill being at least $39.10 is approximately option (d) 0.0344

To solve this problem, we need to standardize the given value using the standard normal distribution formula

z = (x - mu) / sigma

where:

x = $39.10 (the given value)

mu = $30 (the mean)

sigma = $5 (the standard deviation)

z = (39.10 - 30) / 5

z = 1.82

Now, we need to find the probability of a randomly selected bill being at least $39.10, which is equivalent to finding the area under the standard normal distribution curve to the right of z = 1.82.

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that the probability of a randomly selected bill being at least $39.10 is approximately 0.0344.

Therefore, the correct option is (d) 0.0344.

Learn more about probability here

brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ4

Answer:

156 for area and 12x+30y as the equivalent equation

Step-by-step explanation:

using the distribute property, u multiply 6 with everything in the () and get

12x+30y as the area

plus in the variables and get

12(3) + 30(4) = 36+120=156

The range of the test scores in Mr. Miller's math class is 42.

Mathematically, the range refers to the difference between the highest value and the lowest value in a data set.

The range is computed by subtraction of the lowest value from the highest value.

Mr. Miller can use the range to measure the spread or dispersion of the test scores.

Test Scores:

52, 61, 69, 76, 82, 84, 85, 90, 94

Highest score = 94

Lowest score = 52

Range = 42 (94 - 52)

Thus, we can conclude that for the math students in Mr. Miller's class, the range of their test scores is 42.

Learn more about the range at https://brainly.com/question/24326172.

#SPJ1

Answer:

The answer's the third one listed.

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation to solve for x is:

6x + 16 + 10x - 6 + 90 = 180

16x + 100 = 180

16x = 80

x = 5

To solve for angle BCD, just substitute 5 for x

m = 10(5) - 6

m = 50 - 6

m = 44

Answer:

is there a diagram

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 4.72

Step-by-step explanation:

divide the 2 numbers

The test statistic for testing equality of proportions is a z-score. It is calculated by dividing the difference in sample proportions by the standard error. The resulting z-score is then compared to critical values from the standard normal distribution to determine the statistical significance of the difference in proportions.

The correct options for the test statistic for testing the equality of proportions in a multiple-select question are:

Assumes when samples are large that p1 - p2 is normally distributed.

Uses a pooled proportion to calculate the standard error.

Is a z-score.

When the samples are large, the difference between two proportions (p1 - p2) can be approximated to follow a normal distribution. This assumption is based on the Central Limit Theorem.

To calculate the standard error in this scenario, a pooled proportion is used. The pooled proportion combines the proportions from both samples to estimate the common population proportion.

Know more about test statistic here;

https://brainly.com/question/31746962

#SPJ11

Answer: 12

Step-by-step explanation:

6y - 3z

6(4) - 3(4)

24 - 12

12

Answer:

10x+12 is the answer in my calculation.

The standard deviation for the total portfolio returns can be calculated using the weighted average of the standard deviations of the index fund and the risk-free asset. The standard deviation for the total portfolio returns is 10.5%.


The standard deviation of a portfolio measures the variability or risk associated with the portfolio's returns. In this case, the portfolio is 70% invested in an index fund (with a standard deviation of returns of 15%) and 30% invested in a risk-free asset.

To calculate the standard deviation of the total portfolio returns, we use the weighted average formula:

Standard deviation of portfolio returns = √[(Weight of index fund * Standard deviation of index fund)^2 + (Weight of risk-free asset * Standard deviation of risk-free asset)^2 + 2 * (Weight of index fund * Weight of risk-free asset * 1Covariance  between index fund and risk-free asset)]

Since the risk-free asset has a standard deviation of zero (as it is risk-free), the second term in the formula becomes zero. Additionally, the covariance between the index fund and the risk-free asset is also zero because they are independent. Therefore, the formula simplifies to:

Standard deviation of portfolio returns = Weight of index fund * Standard deviation of index fund

Plugging in the values, we get:

Standard deviation of portfolio returns = 0.70 * 15% = 10.5%

Hence, the standard deviation for the total portfolio returns is 10.5%. This means that the total portfolio's returns are expected to have a variability or risk represented by this standard deviation.

Learn more about standard deviation here : brainly.com/question/13498201

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

15

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Length = 7cm

Width = 4cm

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of a rectangle is calculated as:

Length × Width

The length of a rectangle is 13 centimeters less than five times its width.

This is expressed Mathematically as:

L = 5W - 13

Its area is 28 square centimeters.

Therefore:

28cm² = 5W - 13 × W

28 = (5W - 13)W

28 = 5W² - 13W

Hence,

5W² - 13W - 28 = 0

We factorise

5W² - 20W - 7W - 28 = 0

5W(W - 4) + 7(W - 4) = 0

(5W + 7)(W - 4) = 0

5W + 7 = 0

5W = -7

W = -7/5

W - 4 = 0

W = 4 cm

Solving for the length

L = 5W - 13

L = 5 × 4 cm - 13

L = 20 cm - 13 cm

L = 7 cm

Therefore, the dimensions of the rectangle is:

Length = 7cm

Width = 4cm

Answer:

Bridget's first fish =f = 5 ounces

Bridget's dad first fish weighs 17 ounces

Step-by-step explanation:

Bridget went fishing with her dad. Bridget caught the first fish of the day, and it weighed f ounces. That day, she caught four more fish. One was 2 times the weight of the first fish, another was 2 more than 3 times the weight of the first fish, the next was 1/2 the weight of the first fish, and the last was 3/5 the weight of the first fish. Bridget’s dad caught four fish. The first fish he caught weighed 2 more than 3 times the weight of the first fish caught that day. One fish weighed 4/5 the weight of the first fish caught that day, one weighed 4 more than 2 times the weight of the first fish caught that day, and the last weighed 1/2 the weight of the first fish caught that day. If all the fish Bridget caught have the same total weight as all the fish her dad caught, then the first fish Bridget caught weighed___ ounces and the first fish her dad caught___ weighed ounces.

Solution:

Bridget's fishes:

f ounces

2f ounces

3f+2 ounces

1/2f ounces

3/5f ounces

Total= f +2f + (3f+2) + 1/2f +3/5f

=3f + 3f + 2 + 5f+6f/10

=6f + 2 + 11f/10

=60f+11f/10 +2

=71/10f +2

Bridget's dad fishes

3f+2

4/5f

2f+4

1/2f

Total =(3f+2) + (2f+4) + 4/5f +1/2f

=3f+2+2f+4 + 8f+5f/10

=5f + 6 + 13/10f

= 50f+13f/10 + 6

=63/10f +6

Equate the total weight

71/10f +2=63/10f +6

Collect like terms

71/10f - 63/10f =6-2

71f-63f/10 = 4

8f/10=4

Cross product

8f=40

Divide both sides by 8

f=5

Bridget's first fish =f = 5 ounces

Bridget's dad first fish = 3f +2

=3(5)+2

=15+2

=17 ounces

Bridget's dad first fish weighs 17 ounces

Answer:

The focus is A. (0, 3/2)

Step-by-step explanation:

I searched it up

The produce the same return as if it all had been invested at 8%, you should invest $125,000 at 10% and $125,000 at 6%.

We have,

P = $25, 000

Let the amount invested at 10% as 'x' and the amount invested at 6% as 'y'

So, x + y = $250,000

Now, the total return from both investments should be equal to the return from investing the entire amount at 8%, which would be 8% of the total $250,000,

0.10x + 0.06y = 0.08 × $250,000

0.10x + 0.06y = $20,000

Solving the equation,

x + y = $250,000

0.10x + 0.06y = $20,000

As, 10x + 6y - (x + y) = $2,000,000 - $250,000

9x + 5y = $1,750,000

9x + 5y = $1,750,000

From the first equation, we have:

x = $250,000 - y

Substitute this value of 'x' into the new equation:

9($250,000 - y) + 5y = $1,750,000

$2,250,000 - 9y + 5y = $1,750,000

-4y = -$500,000

y = $125,000

and, x + $125,000 = $250,000

x = $125,000

Therefore, to produce the same return as if it all had been invested at 8%, you should invest $125,000 at 10% and $125,000 at 6%.

Learn more about Equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ4

the length of the shadow of the art piece is approximately 15.02 feet.

How to solve height?

To find the length of the shadow of the art piece, we need to use trigonometry. Specifically, we can use the tangent function to relate the angle of elevation to the length of the shadow.

Let's start by drawing a diagram to represent the situation. We have a vertical art piece, a cat on the ground, and the shadow of the art piece. We can label the height of the art piece as 10 ft and the angle of elevation of the cat as 35 degrees.

Now, we need to find the length of the shadow. We can call this length "x". To use the tangent function, we need to identify the right triangle that includes the angle of elevation and the length of the shadow. This triangle is formed by the cat, the base of the art piece, and the point where the shadow touches the ground.

Using trigonometry, we can write:

tan(35 degrees) = 10 ft / x

To solve for x, we can rearrange the equation:

x = 10 ft / tan(35 degrees)

Using a calculator, we find:

x ≈ 15.02 ft

Therefore, the length of the shadow of the art piece is approximately 15.02 feet.

To know more about height visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/28122539

#SPJ1

Answer:

x = 3

Step-by-step explanation:

(13x - 2) and (12x + 1) are vertically opposite angles and are congruent , so

13x - 2 = 12x + 1 ( subtract 12x from both sides )

x - 2 = 1 ( add 2 to both sides )

x = 3

(a) Since f is exponential, we can write f(t) = \(Ce^{kt}\) for some constants C and k. We can use the information f(6) = 13 and f(14) = 23 to solve for C and k:

f(6) = \(Ce^{6K}\) = 13

f(14) = \(Ce^{14k}\) = 23

Now that we have divided both equations, we have:

f(14)/f(6) = \(Ce^{14K} / Ce^{6K}\)

                 = \(e^{8k}\)  = 23/13

When we take the natural logarithm of both sides, we obtain:

8k = ㏑ 23/13

k = 1/8 ln (23/13)

Substituting this value of k into the first equation, we get:

\(13 = Ce^{6k} = Ce^{6*1/8 ln (23/13)} = C(23/13)^{3/4}\)

Solving for C, we get:

\(C = 13/(23/13)^{3/4} = 13 (13/23)^{3/4}\)

Therefore, the formula for f(t) assuming f is exponential is:

\(13 (13/23)^{3/4} e^{t/8ln(23/13)}\)

(b) To find \(f^{-1}(P)\), we solve for t in the equation P = f(t):

\(P = 13(13/23)^{3/4} e^{t/8ln(23/13)} = t = 8 ln (P/13(13/23)^{3/4} ) ln(23/13)\)

Therefore, the formula for \(f^{-1} (P)\) is:

\(f^{-1} (P) = 8ln (P/ 13(13/23)^{3/4} ) ln (23/13)\)

(c) To find f(50), we simply plug in t = 50 into the formula for f(t):

\(f(50) = 13 (13/23)^{3/4} e^{50/8ln(23/13)} = 39\)

(rounded to the nearest whole number)

(d) To find \(f^{-1}(50)\) , we plug in P = 50 into the formula for \(f^{-1} (P)\):

\(f^{-1}(50) = 8 ln (50/13(13/23)^{3/4} ) ln (23/13) = 35.7\)

(rounded to at least one decimal)

To know more about exponential function refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29287497?#

#SPJ11

The diver's velocity during the first 2 sec of fall using the modified Euler method with Ar= 0.2 is 62.732 mph.

Given data: Initial velocity, u = 0 ft/sec

Acceleration, a = g = 32.2 ft/sec²

The maximum rate of fall, vmax = 80 mph

Time, t = 2 seconds

Air resistance constant, Ar = 0.2

We are supposed to determine the sky diver's velocity during the first 2 seconds of fall using the modified Euler method.

The governing equation for the velocity of the skydiver is given by the following:

ma = -m * g + k * v²

where, m = mass of the skydive

r, g = acceleration due to gravity, k = air resistance constant, and v = velocity of the skydiver.

The equation can be written as,

v' = -g + (k / m) * v²

Here, v' = dv/dt = acceleration

Hence, the modified Euler's formula for the velocity can be written as

v1 = v0 + h * v'0.5 * (v'0 + v'1)

where, v0 = 0 ft/sec, h = 2 sec, and v'0 = -g + (k / m) * v0² = -g = -32.2 ft/sec²

As the initial velocity of the skydiver is zero, we can write

v1 = 0 + 2 * (-32.2 + (0.2 / 68.956) * 0²)0.5 * (-32.2 + (-32.2 + (0.2 / 68.956) * 0.5² * (-32.2 + (-32.2 + (0.2 / 68.956) * 0²)))

v1 = 62.732 mph

Therefore, the skydiver's velocity during the first 2 seconds of fall using the modified Euler method with Ar= 0.2 is 62.732 mph.

To know more about the Euler method visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32564424

#SPJ11