The statute titled "harassment by persons in certain correctional facilities" is also known as Section 1983.
Section 1983 is a federal law in the United States that allows individuals to sue government officials and entities, including those in certain correctional facilities, for violations of their constitutional rights. It is a key provision of the Civil Rights Act of 1871, which was enacted to provide a remedy for individuals whose rights are infringed upon by state actors.
While the specific title of the statute may vary depending on the jurisdiction, Section 1983 is commonly referred to as the "harassment by persons in certain correctional facilities" statute. This provision is crucial in addressing incidents of harassment, abuse, or other violations of constitutional rights that occur within correctional facilities.
Under Section 1983, individuals who have been subjected to harassment or other misconduct by prison personnel or officials can file lawsuits seeking damages and other forms of relief. This statute helps to protect the rights of incarcerated individuals and holds those responsible for misconduct accountable for their actions.
It's important to note that Section 1983 is not limited to addressing harassment specifically. It covers a broader range of civil rights violations, including excessive force, denial of medical care, and other forms of misconduct that infringe upon an individual's constitutional rights within correctional facilities.
In summary, the statute titled "harassment by persons in certain correctional facilities" is commonly known as Section 1983. This federal law provides a legal recourse for individuals who have experienced constitutional rights violations by government officials or entities, particularly in the context of correctional facilities.
Learn more about harassment here
https://brainly.com/question/30561803
#SPJ11
Define the differences between accuracy and agreement per IOA according to Kazdin
The main difference between accuracy and agreement per IOA according to Kazdin is that accuracy measures the correctness of a behavior while agreement measures the consistency of observations.
Accuracy refers to the degree to which an observation or measurement represents the true value or state of a behavior. It assesses how close the recorded data is to the actual behavior being measured. In other words, accuracy focuses on whether the observer's interpretation of the behavior aligns with the objective reality of the behavior.
On the other hand, agreement per IOA (Interobserver Agreement) is concerned with the level of consistency or agreement between multiple observers who are independently recording the same behavior. It assesses how similar the observations are among different observers. Agreement measures the extent to which different observers agree on the occurrence or non-occurrence of a behavior.
While accuracy emphasizes the relationship between the recorded data and the true behavior, agreement per IOA emphasizes the relationship between the observations made by different observers. Both accuracy and agreement are important in ensuring the reliability and validity of behavioral measurements. However, they address different aspects of the observation process.
Learn more about agreement per IOA
brainly.com/question/21418130
#SPJ11
Why is it that it takes 9 months for us to be born but a whole 12 months for our first birthday!?
Answer: Because it celebrates one full year of us being alive. *Birth*day
Explanation:
An Outline of ___ is required for long-term care policies and provides a brief description of the important features of the policy.
- Policy
- Coverage
- Summary
- Benefits
The required outline for long-term care policies that provides a brief description of the important features of the policy is called a Summary.
A Summary is a key component of long-term care policies, mandated by regulations, that outlines the important features of the policy in a concise manner. It serves as a summary or overview of the policy, helping individuals understand its coverage, benefits, and other significant details.
The Summary typically includes information such as the types of services covered, the benefit amounts, any limitations or exclusions, the duration of coverage, and the conditions for eligibility.
This document is essential for potential policyholders to review and compare different long-term care policies, enabling them to make informed decisions about their coverage options based on the outlined features and benefits provided in the Summary.
Visit here to learn more about policyholders:
brainly.com/question/24307380
#SPJ11
Crime is a straightforward, easy topic to research and study.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
Crime can differ from place to place. A crime in one location may not be a crime in another. On top of that, the reasoning behind committing a crime must be looked upon, and is not the same every single time. On top of that, the law can change, and so crime is ever changing. Remember, crime is breaking the law. If there is no law, then there is no crime.
Answer:
well if its a true or false question it would be false
Which of the following forensic units is responsible for examining the
ballistics evidence collected from a crime scene?
Answer:
the ballistics unit?
Explanation:
what are the options?
Write your speech composition here about "How to develop the
Reducing cyber crimes".
In three paragraphs only (introduction, body, and
conclusion).
important note: The number of words: 150 - 250 words
Answer:
Introduction:
Good day everyone, cybercrime is becoming rampant these days and it has been a nightmare for individuals, organizations, and even nations. Cybercrime ranges from identity theft, phishing, cyberbullying, cyber espionage, ransomware, and a host of others. The need to develop ways to reduce cybercrime is pertinent for both individuals and groups. In this speech, I will be discussing some viable ways to reduce cybercrime.
Body:
To start with, individuals must be cautious about their online activities. Most cybercrime attacks are successful through phishing emails and texts. It is advisable to never click on suspicious links and email attachments. Also, creating strong passwords for all online accounts can go a long way in securing one's information. It is pertinent to change passwords regularly and avoid using the same password for all accounts. This will limit one's vulnerability to cyber-attacks.
Furthermore, organizations and governments have a role to play in reducing cybercrime. There should be cybersecurity awareness training for employees of organizations. This will help them identify cyber threats and prevent them. Governments should also implement laws and regulations that would make cybercrime punishable. This will act as a deterrent to cyber criminals.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, reducing cybercrime is a collective effort that can be achieved through individuals, organizations, and government efforts. As individuals, we must be cautious of our online activities. Organizations must prioritize cybersecurity and training while governments must implement strict laws. Together, we can reduce cybercrime and create a safer internet for all. Thank you.
Explanation:
MARK ME AS BRAINLIST
what do you think about the differences between the common law and
the UCC rules on offers and acceptances? Can you think of an
example where you might have madr offer forming a contract?
In a contract under common law, all of the following must be included: the offer, the type of the work, the price, the quantity, and the performance. In a contract under the UCC, just the quantity must be specified.
In general, the UCC offers what the common law does: if the parties have a written document that is meant to be their final agreement, it "may not be contradicted by evidence of any prior agreement or of a contemporaneous oral agreement." The "course of dealing or usage of trade" may, however, provide an explanation. When someone visits a grocery store to buy their groceries, they enter into an agreement with the store to pay money in exchange for food and drink.
Read more about common law at
https://brainly.com/question/31657506
#SPJ4
In order to obtain court supervision for a traffic violation, a minor must appear in court with a parent/legal guardian and attend a traffic safety school. True or false?.
A minor must appear in court with their parent or legal guardian and complete a driving safety course in order to get court supervision for a traffic offence. Hence, the statement is TRUE.
Did you know that a parent or legal guardian can revoke a minor's driver's license at any time before the age of 18?
Some states mandate a minimum of 50 hours of supervised driving behind the wheel for children or those under the age of 16. It is required in order to obtain a driver's license.
Drivers who are minor or under the age of 18 must hold their instruction permit for nine months prior to receiving their driver's license.
Find out what is NOT a punishment for committing a traffic violation here: https://brainly.com/question/10464560
#SPJ4
Attic Dwellers Sometimes, animals like rats, mice, and squirrels will climb into an attic. They like to chew on things. It is not good if they decide to chew on electrical wires. If they do, this can cause a fire. So, it is important to make it hard for these animals to get under your roof. Some people try to get rid of these unwanted house guests by putting out mouse traps in the attic. Others might call an exterminator. This is a person who comes to someone's house to get rid of these animals. 2 An exterminator is a person who goes to someone's house to get rid of rats and mice. Why would someone want to call an exterminator to go into the attic? A. to tell the rats and mice to leave the attic B. to feed the rats and mice in the attic C. to keep the house from catching on fire D. to cut the electrical wires in the house
Answer:
C. to keep the house from catching on fire
Explanation:
Rats pose a problem when they enter into a house. Apart from damage they cause by eating food and chewing furniture and other items, a particularly dangerous activity is chewing of wires.
When rats chew wires the negative and positive wires can touch and cause fire.
An exterminator is a person that gets rid of unwanted pests in a house.
In this scenario the exterminator is called to get rid of the rats that chew wires. This is a way to prevent fire outbreak.
So the main reason the home owner calls the exterminator is to keep the house from catching on fire
where there is a conflict between the vicarious liability laws of new york and state x in an action brought in new york between new york residents for an accident occurring in state x, the court should apply the law of:
In which there may be a conflict among the vicarious legal responsibility legal guidelines of new york and state x in an action introduced in new york among their citizens for an accident occurring in his state x, the courtroom should/must apply substantive law.
Substantive regulation establishes the rights and responsibilities that govern human beings and organizations; it consists of all legal guidelines of standard and precise applicability. Procedural regulation establishes the criminal guidelines with the aid of using which substantial regulation is created, carried out and enforced, specifically in a courtroom docket of regulation. For example, a declare to get better for breach of settlement or negligence or fraud could be a not unusualplace regulation substantial proper.
A kingdom or federal statute giving an worker the proper to sue for employment discrimination could additionally create a substantial proper. A substantial regulation defines a criminal courting or prohibits positive conduct. That is, it says what you may or can not do. For example, a kingdom that says, aleven though shalt now no longer steal. This could be a substantial regulation.
Learn more about law visit : brainly.com/question/820417
#SPJ4
Your car must have two red taillights mounted on the rear visible from ______ feet
Suppose an operator of a weight scale certifies the weight of a good that is for sale. However, the accuracy of the scale used to weigh the good has not been checked in more than four years, even though the weight scale operator could have easily checked the accuracy of the scale. The scale gave an improper weight measurement that resulted in many problems with the shipping and sale of the product.VSuppose an operator of a weight scale certifies the weight of a good that is for sale. However, the accuracy of the scale used to weigh the good has not been checked in more than four years, even though the weight scale operator could have easily checked the accuracy of the scale. The scale gave an improper weight measurement that resulted in many problems with the shipping and sale of the product.
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
Suppose an operator of a weight scale certifies the weight of a good that is for sale. However, the accuracy of the scale used to weigh the good has not been checked in more than four years, even though the weight scale operator could have easily checked the accuracy of the scale. The scale gave an improper weight measurement that resulted in many problems with the shipping and sale of the product.
The above scenario is an example of what?
Answer:
Negligent misrepresentation
Explanation:
As you can see in the question above, the operators' neglect to adjust the scale properly to ensure the proper functioning and accuracy of weighing resulted in the exposure of incorrect information that hindered the transportation and sale of a certain product. This is a case of Negligent misrepresentation, since there was a display of a false statement due to imprudence, a negligence.
In a negligence case, the plaintiff must establish Question 13 options: duty, actus reus, foreseeable harm, and causation. duty of due care, breach, factual cause, proximate cause, and damages. duty, strict liability, causation, and injury. mens rea, breach, foreseeable harm, and injury.
In a negligence case, the plaintiff must establish duty of due care, breach, factual cause, proximate cause, and damages. Duty of care refers to the obligation that a person has to behave in a manner that does not cause harm to others.
Breach refers to a failure to meet the standard of care, which is considered to be negligence. Factual cause is the cause-and-effect relationship between the defendant's actions and the plaintiff's injury. Proximate cause refers to the relationship between the defendant's actions and the plaintiff's injury that is not too remote or unforeseeable.
Finally, damages are the injuries or losses suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the defendant's negligence. In order to establish negligence, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant had a duty of care, that the defendant breached that duty of care, that the breach was the factual cause of the plaintiff's injury, that the breach was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injury, and that the plaintiff suffered damages as a result of the defendant's negligence.
you know more about negligence pls visit-
https://brainly.com/question/32769351
#SPJ11
How does south African law ensure that people who are living with HIV/AIDS are not discriminated against? Give THREE ways.
The South African Constitution has a Bill of Rights that protects all people. This means that people living with HIV/AIDS have the same rights as any other person. No employer can require that a job applicant have an HIV test before they are employed.Nov 8, 2
The three ways South African laws ensure that people living with HIV/AIDS are not discriminated against are as follows:
Constitutional protection is provided.Workplace discrimination is not allowed.Provision of free treatment to HIV/AIDS sufferers.What are the HIV/AIDS policies in South Africa?The HIV/AIDS Act of South Africa provides for:
Prevention, treatment, care, support, and control of HIV and AIDSPromotion of public health in relation to HIV and AIDSProvision of appropriate treatment, care, and supportUsing available resources to care for people living with or at risk of HIV and AIDS.Thus, South African law has always taken special care of those living with HIV/AIDS.
Learn more about HIV/AIDS in South Africa at https://brainly.com/question/5181745
(3 points) Define a recursive Prolog rule(s) remove_them(Lst, N, Result) where Result is a list of the elements of the list Lst that are not members of the list N.
In order to define a recursive Prolog rule(s) \(remove_them(Lst, N, Result)\), where Result is a list of the elements of the list Lst that are not members of the list N, we need to define a base case and recursive case.
Let's define the base case: \(remove_them([], _, []).\)
Here, the empty list in the first argument indicates that we have reached the end of the list, so the function returns an empty list as well since there are no elements to remove.\(remove_them([H|T], N, Result) :-\)
Let's define the recursive case :
\(member(H, N), !, remove_them(T, N, Result).remove_them([H|T], N, [H|Result]) :- remove_them(T, N, Result).\)
In the first line, we check if the head of the list is a member of the list N using the member() predicate. If it is, we skip over that element and continue with the rest of the list by calling the function recursively.
In the second line, if the head of the list is not a member of the list N, we add it to the result list and continue with the rest of the list by calling the function recursively.
Now, if we call the function with a list Lst and a list N, the function will return a new list Result containing all the elements of Lst that are not members of N.
To know more about elements visit :
https://brainly.com/question/31950312
#SPJ11
summarize articles 4-6 of the constitution
Answer:
4) The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
5) Article Five of the United States Constitution describes the process whereby the Constitution, the nation's frame of government, may be altered
6) Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution first says that any debts or engagements that the country was involved in before the Constitution was put into action are still valid.
Explanation:
Read above ^
Mrs. Pierce would like to enroll in a Medicare Cost plan that offers Part D prescription drug coverage. She comes to you for advice about when she can enroll in a plan you have previously discussed. What should you tell her?
Answer:
Enrollment in Cost plans offering Part D coverage is available only during enrollment periods under the Part D program, and Cost plans must accept enrollments during these periods
Explanation:
In case of each of the following situations, state the conditions, as
specified under the Contract Act, 1872 which must be fulfilled to make a
binding contract.
(i) In February 2014, Raheel promised to pay Rs. 300,000 to Sameer against a
debt of Rs. 500,000 which was due for payment in March 2010. (03)
(ii) Shazia promised to pay Rs. 100,000 to her brother Rauf on account of his
University fees for three years
Is unique beneath the contract Act, of 1872 which needs to be fulfilled to make binding settlement decisions. option A In February 2014, Raheel promised to pay Rs. 300,000 to Sameer in opposition to debt of Rs. 500,000 which turned into a due fee in March 2010.
The Indian agreement Act of 1872 presents proper personnel to the parties who have certain guarantees in an agreement. accordingly, the parties in any such situation can most effectively implement their contractual rights against every different most effective and no longer against the sector at big.
Section 28 of the Indian settlement Act, of 1872 states that an agreement in absolute restraint of criminal proceedings is void. phase 28 (a) of the Indian contract Act, of 1872 states that: No agreement can debar the enforcement of rights via a courtroom of law. No settlement can oust the jurisdiction of a court docket.
Learn more about contracts here
https://brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ1
what insurance covers a patient who has been hospitalized up to 90 days for each benefit period?
The insurance plan that covers a patient who has been hospitalized for up to 90 days per benefit period is typically a Medicare plan. Medicare is a government-run health insurance program that primarily covers people who are 65 or older, people with certain disabilities, and people with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD).
Medicare has several different parts, including Part A, Part B, Part C, and Part D. Part A is the part that covers inpatient hospital stays, skilled nursing facility care, hospice care, and some home health care. For each benefit period, which starts the day you are admitted to the hospital and ends when you have been out of the hospital for 60 consecutive days, Part A covers up to 90 days of inpatient hospital care.
It's important to note that while Medicare Part A covers a large portion of hospitalization costs, it does not cover everything. Patients are responsible for paying a deductible for each benefit period, as well as coinsurance for each day they are in the hospital beyond the first 60 days. Additionally, there may be other costs associated with hospitalization, such as physician fees, that are not covered by Medicare Part A.
To ensure that you have the most comprehensive coverage possible, it's important to explore your Medicare options and understand what each part covers. You may also want to consider supplemental insurance, such as a Medigap plan, to help cover some of the out-of-pocket costs associated with hospitalization.
To know more about End-Stage Renal Disease visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28484075
#SPJ11
Does the president have the power to lead the U.S. Armed Forces? Or is that up to the Congress?
Answer:
The Constitution explicitly assigns the president the power to sign or veto legislation, command the armed forces, ask for the written opinion of their Cabinet, convene or adjourn Congress, grant reprieves and pardons, and receive ambassadors. Commander-in-chief. The president of the United States is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces and as such exercises supreme operational command over all national military forces of the United States.
Conduct a case study on a location of your choice and identify sources of air or water pollution. Discuss any environmental laws the pollutants or polluters are violating. You will have the option to discuss a relevant factor in your location, such as environmental injustice, epigenetics, or sustainable development. This will be due at the end of Unit 7. Instructions: • Research, find, and describe a case of air or water pollution from a location of your choice from within or outside of the United States. • Discuss the pollutants and how they would be in violation of any current pollution laws or legislation in the area. If here in the United States, how they would be in violation of the Clean Air or Clean Water Acts? Or perhaps the country you have researched has no restrictions on pollution for air and water, discuss how this would further endanger the lives of humans and wildlife in the area. • Choose one (1) of the following special topics below and discuss how the source of pollution is contributing to it. Be sure to support your work with at least two (2) pieces of scientific evidence: o An Environmental Injustice o A threat to Epigenetics by potentially causing inheritable gene defects o Defies sustainable development (contributes to the degraded environment and causes harm to wildlife or the ecosystem) Requirements: • Provide multiple pieces of supporting evidence in your claims, using at least two (2) scholarly resources. • Include all references and citations formatted correctly in APA. • Project should be at least three (3) pages in length, with additional Title and Reference pages. • Use complete sentences and appropriate grammar and spelling.
One example of a case of air pollution is the city of Delhi in India. Delhi has been experiencing severe air pollution issues for many years, particularly during the winter season.
The main sources of air pollution in Delhi include vehicular emissions, industrial pollution, construction activities, and the burning of agricultural residues.
In terms of legislation, India has implemented various laws and regulations to address air pollution. The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 is the primary legislation that empowers the central and state pollution control boards to regulate and control air pollution. The act provides for the prevention, control, and abatement of air pollution through measures such as emission standards, setting up pollution control committees, and conducting regular monitoring.
The pollutants in Delhi's air, such as particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), would be in violation of the air quality standards set by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) in India. These standards aim to protect human health and the environment by defining permissible limits for different pollutants.
If we consider the special topics you mentioned, one aspect related to Delhi's air pollution is environmental injustice. The impact of air pollution is not evenly distributed across the population, with marginalized communities often being disproportionately affected. Factors such as socioeconomic status, access to healthcare, and living conditions can exacerbate the health risks associated with air pollution, leading to environmental injustice.
To read more about Air Pollution click here
https://brainly.com/question/31023039
#SPJ11
CANADIAN LAW - What are three reasons why intoxication shouldn’t be used as a defence in a court of law?
Three reasons why intoxication shouldn’t be used as a defense in a court of law include:
Intoxication does not excuse criminal behavior.It is not fair to the victim to use intoxication to escape justice.Intoxication does not necessarily negate intent or premeditationWhy is intoxication not a defense ?A person is still responsible for their actions, even if they were under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time of the crime. Intoxication can be used as a way to escape responsibility for committing a crime, which is not fair to the victim or society as a whole.
The presence of intent or premeditation, which are crucial elements in establishing the seriousness of a crime, is not always disproved by intoxication.
Find out more on intoxication at https://brainly.com/question/30279443
#SPJ1
You did not obtain a license for your bicycle. The city ordinance requiring bike licenses carries a $50 fine for the failure to obtain a license. Which of the following is true? A. This is an example of a criminal law. B. This is an example of a private law. C. This is an example of a state regulation. D. This is an example of tort law.
The city ordinance requiring bike licenses carries a $50 fine for the failure to obtain a license. Option C. This is an example of a state regulation.
The situation described, where failing to obtain a license for a bicycle results in a $50 fine under a city ordinance, falls under the category of a state regulation. State regulations refer to laws or rules enacted by a government entity, in this case, the city, to govern certain activities or behaviors within its jurisdiction.
These regulations aim to maintain order, safety, or other desired objectives in the community. In this scenario, the city has implemented a regulation requiring bicycle licenses, and the failure to comply with this requirement incurs a specified penalty.
Bike licenses are legal permits required by some jurisdictions for bicycles. They serve as a form of identification and can be subject to regulations, fees, and penalties for non-compliance.
To learn more about bike licenses refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/121230#
#SPJ11
FILL IN THE BLANK. francis blair's newspaper, the globe, portrayed the diplomatic struggle for the oregon territory as a fight between democracy and___, the same struggle that characterized the american revolution.
Answer:
francis blair's newspaper, the globe, portrayed the diplomatic struggle for the oregon territory as a fight between democracy and monarchy, the same struggle that characterized the american revolution.
6. A speed limit is best described as:
A - Substantive law
B - Procedural law
C - Local rules of a court
D - None of the above
7. State’s rights are outlined in the:
A - The 4 th Amendment to the U. B - The Federal Register
C - The 10 th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
D - The common Law
6. A speed limit is best described as Substantive law. Thus, the correct answer is option A.
7. State’s rights are outlined in the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Thus, the correct answer is option C.
The laws that specify how members of a society are expected to behave are known as substantive law. In contrast, procedural law—a collection of rules for creating, implementing, and upholding substantive law—is used to define and contrast this concept.
The Constitution reserves all other authorities to the individual States or to the people; neither the United States nor the States are given those rights by the Constitution. The Tenth Amendment was added to the Bill of Rights to clarify the relationship between the federal and state governments. According to the amendment, the federal government only has the authority that the Constitution expressly grants it.
Therefore, the appropriate options are A and C respectively.
To learn more on substantive law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8324784
#SPJ4
what is a major concern about COMPSTATs effectiveness? -
Compstat as a policing tactic gained popularity as a result of the notable decline in crime that occurred in New York City in the 1990s.
Compstat has received a lot of attention from academics and police practitioners as an innovative management method in policing. Despite its widespread use, the scientific efficacy of the Compstat method has not received much empirical investigation. Few research has also focused on Compstat tactics used outside of New York City during the 2000s. The current study examined whether Compstat led to a noticeable increase in "broken windows" arrests (minor nuisance offenses) and, using multivariate time-series analysis, the role of the Compstat strategy in explaining changes in violent, property, and total index crimes. Compstat was used by the FWPD to analyze monthly time-series arrest and crime data over a multi-year period.
Learn more about Compstat here:
https://brainly.com/question/30022415
#SPJ11
What can I do to help?
Answer: I'm not sure if I understand your question, or if you misunderstood the workings of this platform but this is how you ask question where other people answer your question(s).
If you have any questions let me know.
Genital features useful in assessing a woman’s sexual
history
Answer:
a thorough physical examination of the reproductive tract includes a complete history, general physical examination, and evaluation of the external and internal genitalia. Ancillary tests that can be applied to this system include uterine culture, biopsy, cytology, and lavage.
read the paragraph.
Legal members of the United States, or its citizens, have the right to participate in government. One way to become involved is by registering to vote in elections. People who can prove eligibility to vote are placed on an official list. To have permission to be a part of the process of choosing one’s government leaders, a person must show he or she is a legal adult (18 years old), a citizen of the United States (by birth or by naturalization), and a resident living permanently in the state in which he or she wishes to vote.
Based on the context of the paragraph, what is the meaning of eligibility?
A living in a place with an established address for an extended time
B following the rules of law
C meeting all the requirements to be allowed to do something
D using available resources to accomplish a goal
Answer:
C meeting all the requirements to be allowed to do something
Explanation:
I did the test!
After much thought, you decide that it is best to vote in favor of the act. While diminishing some Fourth Amendment protections, the safety concerns outweigh the privacy concerns. Federal Intelligence Agencies targeting foreign spies and terrorists would be hamstrung if they needed to stop and get a warrant every time a foreign target was in touch with someone on U.S. soil, and critical information could be lost in the time it would take to get a warrant. The lessened expectation of privacy of anyone knowingly in contact with a spy or terrorist overseas removes any Fourth Amendment concerns.
Let’s review a few concepts before you make another decision about this scenario.
Enemy combatants are not subject to ____________.
due process rights
the Protect America Act
the Geneva Convention
USA PATRIOT Act