ESSAY: FIXING A FIGHT
1. When did the fight occur, and what was it about?
2. Who was at fault—you, the other person, or both of you?
3. Why do you think it ended poorly?
4. In general, what would you have done differently?
5. What could you have said differently that would have let the other person know you were listening?
6. If you could take back something you said during the fight, what would it be?
7. What do you wish you would have said during that fight?
8. Did the fight result in your not being friends or not getting along with that person anymore?
9. Would you want repair your relationship with this person again? If so, what are some possible ways to fix the damage?
Answer:well this is required for ur knowledge and ur experience but i could give u an example if u want
last week i had lied to my step mother about something that was small, she found out emediatly that i was lying and got mad. she asked me why do i lie to her so much and i couldnt answer cuz i didnt know. i lied to her many times before and did some other stuff to her such as stealing and lying about important stuff. yesterday when she finally wasnt mad at me we talked long and hard and she told me that each time i lied or stole from her it broke alittle bit of her trust in me, she asked me if it was cuz i just didnt like her and i told her no and that i saw her as a family memember but she told me she didnt believe me and that she cant believe a thing i say due to how much i lied to her. there was a lot of tears after that long talk and after i calmed down i did some stuff and then started thinking of reasons why i did the things i did. then i started thinking of how i could of fixed it. a way i could of fixed the issue before it was even an issue was i could of not lied nor stole from her, i could of told her how i felt instead of holding my emotions in. id love to fix what i lost but its not possible. a way i could fix the issue i have rn is try not to lie and try to convince her to trust me. something i want to take back during our talk? not saying anything at all.
now im not saying any of that was true but its a good example of what to say during this essay you could use ur own words and ur own problem to explain how you could fix,repair and all that other stuff. just use ur own story for the essay. in ur own words and story try to answer all the questions asked.
If you had to relive that situation all over again, how would you fix the fight or keep it from turning into one?
Think about the following questions and then write several paragraphs in response: When did the fight occur, and what was it about?
Who was at fault—you, the other person, or both of you?
Why do you think it ended poorly?
In general, what would you have done differently?
What could you have said differently that would have let the other person know you were listening?
If you could take back something you said during the fight, what would it be?
What do you wish you would have said during that fight?
Did the fight result in your not being friends or not getting along with that person anymore?
Would you want repair your relationship with this person again?
If so, what are some possible ways to fix the damage?
what would you do To help others become aware of the Gifts and Fruits of the Holy Spirit?
Answer:
We can help others become more familiar with the promptings of the Spirit when we share our testimony of the influence of the Holy Ghost in our lives.
Explanation:
PLZ I RLLY NEED HELP AND THIS IS DUE IN 20 MINS!!!!!!
What might the "huge rushing shadow" be and what happened to Zebra a year ago? What details from the text support your ideas? Explain.
Answer:
The huge rushing shadow Zebra saw was a car. A year ago Zebra was crashed into a car. In the text it states, "a year ago, racing down Franklin Avenue, he had given himself that push and had begun to turn into an eagle, when a huge rushing shadow appeared." I believe that shadow to be a car because what else is huge that would be on the streets. After crashing into a car when he awoke the doctors told him "he would never be able to run like that again."
Eric is conducting research about the exploration of Antarctica, and he has gathered these resources:
• a diary written by someone who has traveled to Antarctica twice
• a brochure printed by a cruise ship advertising trips to Antarctica
• a government website listing regulations for exploring Antarctica
• an interview with a group interested in mining for gold in Antarctica
Which resource is likely to be most credible and why?
A diary written by someone who has traveled to Antarctica, because this person has actually visited Antarctica.
A brochure printed by a cruise ship that travels to Antarctica, because it is illegal for a company to print inaccurate information.
A government website listing regulations for exploring Antarctica, because governmental sources must provide accurate information.
An interview with a group interested in mining for gold in Antarctica, because its members feel strongly about what they want to do.
Answer:
a government website listing regulations for exploring Antarctica
Explanation:
There is more reliable information on this.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Why did the women hide the evidence from the men in Trifles?
Peters conclude that Mrs. Wright (Minnie Foster) shot in the head but that she had a reason for doing so based on the evidence they had uncovered. To avoid Mrs. Wright's potential conviction, they hide evidence in Trifles.
Why are the men not able to find the necessary evidence against Mrs Wright?Due to the kitchen's home nature and the fact that no woman could have slain the husband, they fail to see it. For the tangible proof, the men look upstairs and outside.
What do the women in trifles hide to protect Mrs Wright?The women discover a dead canary, which would be the crime's motivation. They think that if they are believed, Mrs. Wright will be found guilty of the crime and the men will mock them for their ridiculous theories. To avoid ridicule and Mrs., they conceal the bird.
To know more about Trifles visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29618269
#SPJ4
Write a paragraph that analyzes the effect of the author’s use of imagery in the gift of magi?
Answer:
Imagery is descriptive language that creates a picture in the reader’s mind. One example of imagery from the first paragraph of the story uses color and figurative language to describe Della’s reaction to not having enough money to buy a decent Christmas present. The color imagery is burning cheeks, which gives the reader a strong impression that Della was ashamed at asking for lower prices. The sentence also use the phrase figuratively, because her cheeks were not on fire. When she talks of “bulldozing” the shopkeepers, this figurative description reinforces the idea of her personality being the driving force, and her desperation and self-destruction to get her way.
Answer:
Imagery is used in “The Gift of the Magi” to add humor and description to the story, so that we feel like we are there with the young couple.
Imagery is descriptive language that creates a picture in the reader’s mind. One example of imagery from the first paragraph of the story uses color and figurative language to describe Della’s reaction to not having enough money to buy a decent Christmas present. "Pennies saved one and two at a time by bulldozing the grocer and the vegetable man and the butcher until one's cheeks burned with the silent imputation of parsimony that such close dealing implied." The color imagery is burning cheeks, which gives the reader a strong impression that Della was ashamed at asking for lower prizes. The sentence also use the phrase figuratively, because her cheeks were not on fire. When she talks of “bulldozing” the shopkeepers, this figurative description reinforces the idea of her personality being the driving force, and her desperation and self-destruction to get her way. The author vreated omagery in many more ways.
Explanation:
Hiya, I'm writing an essay on "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" for my honors class! Can someone just proof read this? Does it sound okay?? :)
In "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" the author, William Shakespear, really highlights the perception of morals and how it can affect a society or a specific person. You can see how the idea of morals is used by judging the actions of Brutus, Cassius, Antony, and the rest of the conspirators. William Shakespeare really made for a dramatic betrayal through Brutus’s perception of right and wrong, his basic morals. The theme was hit on a lot by using different perceptions and perspectives of this huge event, it was all really about how morals can affect people and the society as a whole depending on how big of a decision.
To begin, the theme is seen as the conspirators first approach Brutus with the offer to join them. This starts the debate of morally right and morally wrong. Was it morally right or wrong to kill Caesar? This question was often debated by Brutus. Cassius then proceeds to send Brutus fake letters, leading Brutus to only further debate. Eventually, the decision is made. Brutus comes to the conclusion that it would be morally right to kill Caesar.
Brutus was deceived by the conspirators, leading him to believe them. Brutus helps them carry out the assassination because he truly believed that it would be morally right to rid Rome of Casear, having seen that his friend was slowly becoming a tyrant, wanting to dictate Rome, keeping all of Asia under his control wouldn’t be hard with such power.
Please keep in mind this is due tmr and I'm in an honor class that grades tough :0
Answer: This is actually pretty good. Awesome grammar. Big vocab terms.
good luck
Explanation:
what is Dialogue delivery in acting
Answer:
Remember that dialogue means two or more people conversating. A monologue is a long speech by only one person.
Dialogue delivery is making sure that you deliver your scripted words to the conversation.
30 PONTS!!
(1) Actions speak louder than words. (2) That's pretty much what English chef Jamie Oliver believes. (3) Talking about fine food and saying that all young people can succeed were not enough. (4) He wanted to open a restaurant where he could help young people find success.
How should sentence 2 be changed so it has the right tone?
A.
English chef Jamie Oliver is into thinking this way.
B.
English chef Jamie Oliver says so.
C.
That is what English chef Jamie Oliver believes.
D.
This English chef guy Jamie Oliver thinks so.
Which excerpt from the text demonstrates
that the Lion was in trouble?
A. "Please, King of the Forest, please
spare me!"
"All of a sudden, the Lion was
enclosed in the toils of a hunter's
thick white net.
B.
C.
D.
"He swiftly caught the culprit who
disturbed him and angrily slammed
his sharpened paw on the miniature
creature who was shaking with fear.
"Out of frustration and fury, the Lion
filled the forest with his angry roar."
Answer:
"All of a sudden, the Lion was
enclosed in the toils of a hunter's
thick white net.
“How does loss of personal freedom and individualism can affect you mentally?” Please give me two good reasons so that I can write an entire essay on it
According to Emerson, society conspires against individuals by robbing them of their hard earned money and independence. He believed that society interfered with self-reliance by limiting individual freedoms .
How can you relate individualism to society?Society does not exist independently without individual. The individual lives and acts within society but society is nothing, in spite of the combination of individuals for cooperative effort. On the other hand, society exists to serve individuals―not the other way around. Human life and society almost go together.
How does individualism affect people?Individualism emphasizes personal freedom and achievement. Individualist culture, therefore, awards social status to personal accomplishments such as important discoveries, innovations, or great artistic achievements.
To know more about individuals visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/15378488
#SPJ1
at is the wall
in this passage:
Lee grew up near the old-growth forest. She loved
wandering the trails and looking at the natural beauty
around her. But the city council recently approved plans to
cut down the forest in order to build a shopping center and
apartment buildings. The council believed the
development would create new jobs and provide more
affordable housing. Lee was upset when she heard about
the plans to destroy her beloved forest, and she vowed to
do something to save it.
A. The number of jobs that will be created by the council's plans
B. Lee's decision to fight the city council and save her
beloved forest
C. The city council's decision to destroy the forest that Lee loves
D. The amount of time Lee spends wandering alone in the forest
Even though you posted the passage and the options, your post is missing the main question. I've found it online, and it is the following:
What is the main source of the conflict in this passage?
Lee grew up near the old-growth forest. She loved wandering the trails and looking at the natural beauty around her. But the city council recently approved plans to cut down the forest in order to build a shopping center and apartment buildings. The council believed the development would create new jobs and provide more affordable housing. Lee was upset when she heard about the plans to destroy her beloved forest, and she vowed to do something to save it.
A.The city council's decision to destroy the forest that Lee loves
B.The number of jobs that will be created by the council's plans
C.The amount of time Lee spends wandering alone in the forest
D.Lee's decision to fight the city council and save her beloved forest
Answer:
The main source of conflict in this passage is:
A.The city council's decision to destroy the forest that Lee loves .
Explanation:
A conflict is a struggle between two opposing forces. In literature, the conflict often takes place between the protagonist and the antagonist, although that is not necessarily a rule. There are different kinds of conflict, such as man vs. man, man vs. society, man vs. nature, etc. In the passage we are analyzing here, the source of conflict is the city council's decision to destroy the forest that Lee loves. That decision causes a reaction that leads Lee to feel antagonized. She and the city council are now in opposite sides, struggling to get their own way. Lee and the city council are the opposing forces in this conflict.
Your cousin got divorced recently and moved out of his house, so you invited him to stay for a few days. It's now six weeks later and he's still living with you. He isn't working at the moment, so he just stays at home and watches TV all day. Make a dialogue
Answer:
Cousin, Oh, no! Do you mind fixing the dishwasher, waiting for the cable man, walking the dog, and filling up on toilet paper while you're here? It's been really beneficial to have you stay in our house for such a long time!
Talk to your family and let them know what's going on. You're having trouble getting your relative off your sofa after they visited for a "week" and ended up staying for two months. Inviting your aunt and uncle to stay with you is also a good idea. Perhaps your grandmother. "I simply thought we were having so much fun together, we should bring the entire family together!" you remark cheerfully as your cousin gazes at you with terror. I secured them a three-month visa! "
Because I live in a home with new carpet and you have to leave your shoes outside, then gripe about where your shoes are, why there are so many half-filled glasses on odd bookcases around the flat, and roll your eyes when they walk in. I'll give you a bus ticket every day to assist you in looking for a job so you can become self-sufficient and enjoy life.
PLEASE HELP! IMPORTANT ASSIGNMENT QUESTION!!
What is the meaning of climb the walls?
A. To play indoors
B. To be restless or nervous
C. To accept an offer now for a later time
D. To struggle to succeed when chances are bad
Answer:
B. To be restless or nervous
Explanation:
I look it up :)
but yeah that should be right.
Based on what you know about the immaturity of the amygdala in early childhood, what is a likely experience that many young children have?.
A likely experience many young children have because of the immaturity of the amygdala is frightening nightmares.
What is the amygdala?The amygdala is a part of our brains that is in charge of handling emotional processes, including stimuli related to fear. Since the amygdala is immature in children, it is likely that many of them will experience frightening nightmares as a consequence.
With the information above in mind, "frightening nightmares" is the best way to answer the question.
Learn more about the amygdala here:
https://brainly.com/question/26504011
Imagine you wrote a book about yourself and you have to come up with a title of your book,what would it be?
Answer:
If I wrote a book about myself, I would call it:
The Search for Meaning: A MemoirThis title reflects my lifelong journey to find meaning in life. I've been through a lot in my life, both good and bad, and I've learned a lot along the way. I hope that by sharing my story, I can help others to find their own meaning in life.
if I wrote a book about myself the tittle would be
Believe in yourself because in your life you should believe in yourself and your dream rather than following others and wasting your time
Using the instructions given in the brackets, rewrite each of the following sentences
without changing its meaning.
1.The big green leather bag belongs to them.
(Replace ‘them’ with a possessive pronoun)
Answer:Singular persons Multiple persons
My Bag Our Bag
Your Bag Your Bag
Bag Bag
('fusion letter)
Singular persons Multiple persons
School (u) m School (u) banana
School (u) n Your School (u)
School Schools
Singular persons Multiple persons
Pencil (i) m our pencil (i)
Item (i) n Your Item (i)
Pen Pens
Properties of Possessive Pronouns
1. The third person singular suffix (-i) in possessive pronouns should not be confused with the case suffix (-i) of the noun.
If the suffix (-i) replaces the noun, it is a pronoun, if not, it is a case.
SAMPLE:
"His pen is gone."
-i = possessive pronoun (indicates the owner of the pen.)
"We bought the pen before."
-i = state suffix
*** The case suffix of the noun (-i) and the possessive pronoun (-i) are used together in the same word. In this case, the first greeting (-i) becomes the possessive pronoun. Then it comes out.
SAMPLE:
He gave me his pen.
-i = possessive pronoun
n = fusion letter
-i = state suffix
He sold his house.
-i = possessive pronoun
n = fusion letter
-i = state suffix
Explanation:I found this way I hope it's true have a nice day
what are the legal opinions about self driving cars ( i just need 2 opinions )
write a paragraph about what you learned from the previous videos. in your paragraph you can describe strategies used to gain the right and events in history that led to the ratification of the 19th amendment. be sure to use correct capital letters, punctuation, and sentence structure. your paragraph should be at least 5 complete sentence
The right to vote for women in America is legally protected under the 19th amendment. This accomplishment needed a protracted and challenging battle; triumph required decades of activism and resistance. Beginning in the middle of the 19th century, multiple generations of proponents of women's suffrage gave speeches, published articles, organized protests, lobbied lawmakers, and engaged in acts of civil disobedience to modify the Constitution in a way that many Americans viewed as extreme. Few early backers survived to witness the ultimate victory in 1920.
Women started organizing, petitioning and picketing in the 1800s to get the right to vote, but it took them decades to succeed. Advocates for women's voting rights put in a lot of effort between 1878 when the amendment was initially proposed in Congress, and August 18, 1920, when it was passed, although their methods for doing so differed.
Some followed a strategy of enacting suffrage bills in every state; by 1912, nine western states had done so. Male-only voting rules were contested in court by others. Some suffragists used more aggressive strategies, including picketing, silent vigils, and hunger strikes. Supporters frequently faced vehement opposition. They were jeered at, imprisoned, and occasionally physically assaulted.
To learn more about the 19th Amendment act:
https://brainly.com/question/2141708
#SPJ4
Despite the language barrier, at the end of the story, both Muni and the American got what they wanted. Do you agree with this statement? Justify your response.
Answer:
Yes surely, both of the men Muni and American got their way.
Explanation:
Muni was a a poor man who used to live in a small village in Tamil with his wife. He only knew two words of English, that were yes or no.
One day his wife asks him to buy her some food, but he didn't have any money. He goes to the shop, but the shopkeeper kicks him out because he already had a lot of debt. Next day, when Muni takes his goats out of grazing, he stops for a quick rest under a horse statue, where suddenly an American appears. The American, thinking that Muni was the owner, got interested in buying the horse statue, and made an offer. Muni, who couldn't understand English, thought that the American made an offer for his goats, and he sold them because he needed money. Later he realized that the goats were still at his home, but the statue was missing.
If we think about it, both Muni and the American got what they wanted, even if it was through a confusion. Muni wanted money for food, which he got from the American, the American wanted the horse statue, which he took after paying Muni.
The map shows the militarization of the Rhineland. A map titled Militarization of the Rhineland is shown. It shows that a section of Germany called the Rhineland, which borders Holland, Belgium, France, and Switzerland, was militarized in 1936. The Allies responded to German occupation of the Rhineland by remaining neutral because they feared another war. attacking the Nazis to stop further expansion. negotiating a peace treaty to stop another war. stationing troops along the French border.
Answer:
The Allies responded to German occupation of the Rhineland by remaining neutral because they feared another war.
Explanation:
The re-occupation of the Rhineland was a measure taken by Nazi Germany in 1936 to end the demilitarization of the Rhineland in violation of international agreements and to return troops to the region. On March 7, German troops marched to the Rhineland to the delight of the Germans and did not face resistance as they progressed. The French had not sent their troops into motion. In this situation, Britain did not want to take the initiative before the French, but began to pursue a policy of condescension towards Germany after the demilitarization of the Rhineland was abolished. In political terms, Hitler succeeded exactly where he wanted it to, regaining Germany's pre-World War I position.
Answer:
A) remaining neutral in fear of another war
Edge 2022
The dude above is correct, just didn't make the answer clear.
Which would be the most credible source of information for Corrine to use for her history paper about the Revolutionary War?
hide details about some of his characters.
focus only on the main character of the story.
give information about all of the characters.
limit information about all characters except one.
Answer:
Give information about all of the character.
I BEG, PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS
Unpacking Animal Farm (Guided Reading
Answer:
what grade is this because bro
_______ is reflected in this statement: "i feel i am a person of worth, as good as other people."
The concept of self-esteem is reflected in this statement. Self-esteem is an individual's perception of their own worth and value as a person.
When someone feels they are a person of worth and just as good as others, it demonstrates that they have a healthy level of self-esteem. This means they have a positive self-image, are confident in themselves, and believe that they are capable of achieving their goals. Having a high level of self-esteem is important for an individual's mental health and well-being.
To know more about confident refer :
https://brainly.com/question/29416609
#SPJ11
2. Your history teacher has asked you to read excerpts from a journal of household activities, written by a woman who helped settle the plains of Montana in the mid-1800s. What have you been asked to read? a secondary source historical fiction a primary source historical statistics
Answer:
A primary source
Explanation:
Answer:
A primary source
Explanation:
I took the quiz and got this correct.
person vs society conflict example #1 __________________________________________________
person vs society conflict example #2 __________________________________________________
Answer:
Racism, religious beliefs, being wrongly accused of something
Explanation:
What are the 4 SIMILARITIES between theme and main idea?
(Someone please help me with this for 20 points and a brainliest!)
Answer:
The main idea is what the book is mostly about. The theme is the message, lesson, or moral of a book. By asking crucial questions at before you read, while you read, and after you read a book, you can determine the main idea and theme of any book you are reading!
Explanation:
Hi
Souvlaki, paella, and aloo tikki are examples of _____.
vegan dishes
organic dishes
ethnic food
sustainable food
Answer:
Souvlaki, paella and aloo tikki are examples of ethnic food.
What does the word prerogative mean in the following sentence?
Because he was the guest of honor, it was his prerogative to go through the buffet line first.
A.
opportunity
B.
destiny
C.
responsibility
D.
privilege
Answer:
D. privilege
Explanation:
"Because he was the guest of honor, it was his prerogative to go through the buffet line first.
Looking at "the guest of honor," and "go through the buffet line first," as context clues, I can deduce the meaning of prerogative being a privilege is the definition used in this context.
Answer:
D. privilege
Explanation:
The way prerogative was used in the sentence made it obvious.
If you are older than 17 years old and living in an internment camp what does the us government require you to do farewell to manzanar
The memoir "Farewell to Manzanar" sheds light on the experiences of a Japanese-American family during World War II, highlighting the unjust internment of Japanese-Americans and its lasting impact.
The US government mandates that anybody who is older than 17 and residing in an internment camp must perform the following: In Farewell to Manzanar, fill out a questionnaire, and respond to loyalty inquiries.
Farewell to Manzanar is a memoir written by Jeanne Wakatsuki Houston and James D. Houston. The memoir details the experiences of a Japanese-American family living in the United States during World War II. It covers their removal from their home on Terminal Island in California to the Manzanar internment camp.
The US government interned approximately 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry, two-thirds of whom were American citizens, during World War II. This was in response to concerns about Japanese espionage following the attack on Pearl Harbor. The internment of Japanese Americans is widely regarded as a dark chapter in American history.
To learn more about Farewell
https://brainly.com/question/7850259
#SPJ11
Complete question:
What specific requirements does the US government impose on individuals over 17 years old who are living in an internment camp, as portrayed in the book "Farewell to Manzanar"?