Answer:
Explanation:In a legal context, there are several elements that can cut off the liability of the defendant, depending on the type of case and the applicable laws. Here are a few examples:
Statute of limitations: This is a time limit set by law for filing a lawsuit. Once the statute of limitations has expired, the plaintiff can no longer sue the defendant, regardless of the merits of the case.
Contributory or comparative negligence: In some jurisdictions, if the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to their injury, the defendant may not be liable or may only be partially liable for damages.
Assumption of risk: If the plaintiff voluntarily engages in a dangerous activity or assumes a known risk, the defendant may not be liable for any resulting harm.
Consent: If the plaintiff consents to the defendant's actions, they may not be able to sue the defendant for any harm caused by those actions.
Lack of causation: In order to hold a defendant liable, the plaintiff must show that the defendant's actions caused their harm. If there is no causal link between the defendant's actions and the plaintiff's harm, the defendant may not be liable.
Among adolescents and adults, alcohol use is involved in up to 70% of deaths
associated with water recreation activities.
TRUE
FALSE
Answer:
true
Explanation:
because its logic
The practice of elicitation refers to obtaining information through which of the following means?
A. Stating incorrect facts and observing the subject's reaction.
B. Asking a series of indirect questions.
C. Making the subject feel relaxed and comfortable.
D. Creating a situation in which the subject perceives that they may be in danger.
Answer:
B. Asking a series of indirect questions.
Explanation:
The practice of elicitation refers to obtaining information through asking a series of indirect questions.
Option A refers to a technique called deception, where incorrect facts are stated to observe the subject's reaction. Option C refers to building rapport, which can help to establish trust and encourage the subject to share information voluntarily. Option D refers to the use of intimidation or coercion, which is not a recommended or ethical method for obtaining information.
Which approach to foreign policy involves sending ambassadors to other countries?
Isolation
Diplomacy
Intervention
ImperialismWhich approach to foreign policy involves sending ambassadors to other countries?
Isolation
Diplomacy
Intervention
Imperialism
Answer: The approach to foreign policy that involves sending ambassadors to other countries is Diplomacy
Explanation:
With which statement would Howard Becker be MOST likely to agree?
A.
Deviant behavior is a requirement for society to function.
B.
Most people will practice conformity or rebellion at one time in their lives.
C.
Biology is the biggest factor in determining someone’s likelihood of performing deviant acts.
D.
Deviant behavior exists only because people have decided to define it as deviant.
Howard Becker be most likely to agree that A. Deviant behavior is a requirement for society to function.
What is Deviant behavior according to Howard Becker?Howard Becker serves as a social creation whereby social groups give room for deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitutes deviance.
This rules are been applied to particular people and they will be labeled as outsiders.
Learn more about Deviant behavior at:
https://brainly.com/question/6448479
What problem arose from the way the VP was selected in our original system?
Answer:
Explanation:
What problem arose from the way the Vice President was selected in our original system? Originally, whoever came in 2nd in the election was made the VP. This resulted in men from different parties serving together during the Election of 1800 and was son changed. What are the official duties of the Vice President?
The president of the Senate is designated by the Constitution as the vice president of the United States.
In addition to his role as presiding officer, the vice president has the unique authority to break a tie vote in the Senate and formally preside over the receipt and counting of electoral votes cast in presidential elections.
How VP is selected?Originally, the vice president was the person who received the second-highest number of electoral votes in the presidential election. This worked effectively until the 1800 election when Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr deadlocked.
Following that, the 12th Amendment to the United States Constitution stated that the president and vice president are elected separately, and if they tie, the Senate will choose them.
Soon after, political parties began to run the president and vice president on the same platform. As a result, vice-presidential candidates are typically picked by the leadership of a political party, with the presidential candidate of that party having a considerable influence. Typically, the vice president and president are members of the same political party.
For more information about the vice president refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/12722099
An energy transformation flow diagram is shown.
A flow diagram beginning with an X. An arrow goes from the X to a toaster oven. Another arrow goes from the toaster oven to the words Thermal Energy.
What type of energy does X most likely represent?
X = radiant energy
X = chemical energy
X = gravitational energy
X = electrical energy
Answer:
chemical
Explanation:
tilda purchases an automobile from ronston. at the time of sale, ronston tells tilda that the car has had only one previous owner and has been driven only 25,000 miles. tilda, relying on these statements, purchases the car. she pays 10 percent down and signs a promissory note to pay the remainder of the purchase price, with interest, in fifteen equal monthly installments. ronston transfers the note to patty. tilda then discovers that the car has actually had three previous owners and has been driven 250,000 miles. which of the following is the legal outcome if patty is a holder in due course (hdc)?group of answer choices
Tilda must pay Patty and also make sure to find recourse with Ronston in the situation given above for finding an appropriate legal outcome.
A legal outcome may be referred to or considered as the result or output, which may not be completely desired, but is as per the legal remedies mentioned under the laws related thereto. As per the law, paying to Patty and finding recourse with Ronston is most likely an appropriate legal outcome of the given condition that can be taken into interpretation by Tilda.
Learn more about legal outcome here:
https://brainly.com/question/25901482
#SPJ4
Complete question
tilda purchases an automobile from ronston. at the time of sale, ronston tells tilda that the car has had only one previous owner and has been driven only 25,000 miles. tilda, relying on these statements, purchases the car. she pays 10 percent down and signs a promissory note to pay the remainder of the purchase price, with interest, in fifteen equal monthly installments. ronston transfers the note to patty. tilda then discovers that the car has actually had three previous owners and has been driven 250,000 miles. what is the appropriate legal outcome if patty is a holder in due course (hdc)?
Stair and Erskine on the development of law
Answer:
Stair, Bell, and Erskine are the most well-known of these. In the 1660s, Stair brought together the elements of customary, feudal, and Roman law into one system based on legal principles and philosophy in his leading work The Institutions of the Law in Scotland (1681).
Explanation:
Hope this helps and have a great day!!!
Which of the following is an example of the difference between law and ethics?
A. The law tells us how we should act, while ethics tells us which actions will lead to consequences.
B. The law tends to be universal, whereas ethics tend to be dependent on the situation.
C. The law is simple and easy to understand, whereas ethics are comples and require much more study.
D. The law is official and enforced by the government, while ethics are unofficial but still generally accept by society.
More than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.
It is a false statement that more than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.
What is the meaning of felonious attacks?As a crime, a felonious assault means any sort of attack or threat of attack on another individual in which the attacker uses a dangerous weapon and seeks to cause serious harm but however stops short of an attempt to kill the victim.
These attacks on Police officers does not constitute to why 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die, rather, the causes are accidents, illness, old age etc. Therefore, the statement is a false statement.
Missing options True/False
Read more about attacks
brainly.com/question/28866933
#SPJ1
The buyer of stolen goods receives good title if he or she did not know the goods were stolen. True or False?
The buyer of stolen goods receives a good title if he or she did not know the goods were stolen is False.
The captain agreed to hand over the items on a condition, and if that requirement is not met, the buyer will be liable. If an owner of commodities is prevented from opposing the seller's permission to sell by the behavior, the buyer obtains a valid title.
To obtain a good title via estoppel, however, it must be demonstrated that the original owner deliberately endured or held out the buyer in question because a person authorized to sell the goods.
When the items are in a deliverable state & the seller gives the buyer notice, ownership/property in the goods is said that it has been transferred through the seller to the buyer. The seller retains possession of the item until it is no longer deliverable.
learn more about stolen goods here:
https://brainly.com/question/15178848
#SPJ4
The study of criminal law is the study of?
A first time DUI arrest can not only land you in jail, but the fines can be:
Group of answer choices
A) there are no fines; you only go to jail
B) at least 1 million dollars
C) easily charged on your credit card
D) more than $10,000
The fines for a first time DUI arrest can vary depending on the state, but they are typically in the range of $1,000 to $10,000. In some states, there are also mandatory jail sentences for first time DUI arrests. So, The correct answer is D. more than $10,000.
For a first DUI offense, there are additional consequences in addition to fines and jail time. These may consist of:
License revocation: For a set amount of time, usually between 90 days and a year, your driver's license will be suspended.
You might be compelled to have an ignition interlock device installed in your vehicle. With the help of this equipment, you cannot start your car after drin-king.
attending a DUI course You could have to go to DUI school. You will learn about the risks of dru-nk driving in this session, as well as how to prevent it. It's crucial to refrain from drink-ing and driving because the consequences of a first-time DUI arrest can be severe. If you are detained due to a DUI, it is important to speak to an attorney to discuss your options.
To know more about DUI :
https://brainly.com/question/32308136
#SPJ2
Question 6 of 10
A judge may be asked to decide that a Complaint has no legal remedy under
the law by submitting a
A. Motion for Nuisance Suits
B. Motion to Suppress the Complaint
C. Motion for Summary Judgment
D. Motion to Dismiss
SUBMIT
Answer:
D. motion to dismiss
Explanation:
Is the search of a vehicle, with the driver’s consent valid?
Is the use of the dog to sniff the detained vehicle valid? Why or why not? What Supreme Court case can you find that deals with this (in particular with roadblocks) and what was their decision?
If drivers are detained for usually only five minutes, what does the Supreme Court say about this? What if the detention is longer – say 20 minutes? What does the Supreme Court say about that?
Answer:
Yes, the search of the vehicle is valid
Explanation:
The search of a car is not like a house you do not have to have a search warrant to search. For example it is a appropriate time like when you get pulled over.
The detention period wouldn't be 20 Min long unless the situation is escalating and the officers need backup.
The 1st and 14th amendment makes a law enforcement officer's job harder by?
What if Appellate Courts did not exist, and there was no
way to review the decision of a Trial Court in either a civil or
criminal case?
Appellate Courts play an essential role in the legal system of every country as they are responsible for reviewing decisions made by lower courts and ensuring that legal errors are corrected.
The legal process would be significantly impacted if Appellate Courts did not exist, and there was no way to review the decision of a Trial Court in either a civil or criminal case. Here's what would happen in such a scenario:Content loadedThe quality of justice would be affected: Appellate Courts offer a second chance at justice for those who feel like they have been wronged in the Trial Courts.
Without Appellate Courts, there would be no way to appeal decisions made in lower courts. This could lead to wrongful convictions and the denial of justice to those who are genuinely innocent.The stability of the law would be affected: Appellate Courts also play a crucial role in ensuring the stability of the law by establishing legal precedents that are binding on lower courts.
The lack of Appellate Courts would mean that there would be no authoritative interpretation of the law. This could result in inconsistent decisions being made by lower courts, which could make it challenging to predict the outcome of legal disputes.The time and expense of litigation would increase: Without Appellate Courts, all legal disputes would have to be settled in the Trial Courts. This would increase the time and expense of litigation significantly. It would also put more pressure on the Trial Courts to make correct decisions. This could lead to long waiting periods, delayed justice, and increased frustration among litigants.
In conclusion, Appellate Courts play an essential role in ensuring the quality of justice, the stability of the law, and the efficiency of the legal system. If they did not exist, the legal process would be impacted significantly, leading to an increase in the time and expense of litigation, inconsistency in the law, and wrongful convictions. Therefore, it is essential that Appellate Courts continue to function as a necessary check on the decisions of lower courts.
To know more about Appellate Courts visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13944421
#SPJ11
suppose a judge sitting on a district court in texas is found to have been accepting monetary bribes from lawyers to rule in their favor on several cases. according to the texas constitution, what is the most likely action to be taken regarding this judge?
When a district court judge in Texas is discovered to have taken bribes from attorneys to decide in their favor on a number of cases, the Supreme Court of Texas will probably take steps to remove the judge from office.
The Judicial Conduct Commission has the authority to remove a judge from office for incompetence in the performance of the duties of the office, willful violation of the Code of Judicial Conduct, or persistent violation of rules promulgated by the Supreme Court of Texas.
In other words, judges are free to hold office for however long they see fit, and the only way to remove them from through impeachment.
A quorum must consist of seven persons. With the exception of recommendations for a judge's retirement, suspension, or removal, which must be granted by a vote of at least seven members, decisions must be made by most of those present.
To know more about Texas Supreme Court: https://brainly.com/question/14673579
#SPJ4
e Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 is applicable to all sales agreements concluded in South Africa is True or false
True. The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 applies to all sales agreements concluded in South Africa, including agreements between businesses and consumers, as well as agreements between two businesses.
What is the Consumer Protection Act about?The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 is a South African law that seeks to protect the rights of consumers by regulating business practices and promoting fair, transparent, and equitable dealings between consumers and suppliers. The Act came into effect on 1 April 2011.
Some of the key provisions of the Consumer Protection Act include:
Consumer rights: The Act guarantees certain rights to consumers, such as the right to fair and honest marketing, the right to receive goods and services that are of good quality, and the right to safe products.Prohibited conduct: The Act prohibits certain business practices, such as false or misleading advertising, fraudulent or unconscionable conduct, and unfair contract terms.Product liability: The Act holds suppliers responsible for any harm caused by defective or unsafe products.Consumer protection agencies: The Act provides for the establishment of various consumer protection agencies, such as the National Consumer Commission, to enforce the provisions of the Act and protect consumers.Dispute resolution: The Act provides for various mechanisms for resolving disputes between consumers and suppliers, such as mediation and arbitration.Learn more about Consumer Protection Act here: https://brainly.com/question/14952903
#SPJ1
command for creating a revised draft is called? crossword clue
The command for creating a revised draft is called "revising."
Revising is the process of improving the content, organization, and style of a document. It involves re-reading, editing, and making changes to ensure that your writing communicates effectively and clearly. To make a revised draft, start by reading through your work and taking notes about what needs to be revised. Once you have an idea of what needs to be changed, make any necessary edits, rearrange sentences, add/remove details, and make sure the tone of your writing is appropriate. Finally, make sure you proofread your document to ensure it is free of any spelling or grammar errors.
Know more about draft here:
https://brainly.com/question/29443724
#SPJ11
which of the following statements concerning power is correct?
Power can be found in all human relationships, it can be exercised obviously or subtly and involves a person to act according to the wishes of another person.
The correct option is option e.
Power can basically be defined as the ability of a particular person to get another person to act according to the first person's wishes as well as intentions. Authority can be defined as the rights which allow a person to use their power.
Power can be exercised in an obvious manner and also it can exercised in a subtle manner. Power can be found in all types of human relationships.
To know more about power
https://brainly.com/question/11481567
#SPJ4
--The given question is incomplete, the complete question is
"Which of the following statements concerning power is correct?
a. Its exercise can sometimes be obvious.
b. It can be exercised in subtle ways.
c. It involves a person getting another person to act in accordance with the first person's wishes.
d. It is found in all human relationships.
e. All of the above."
Law enforcement officers speak to witnesses in order to: A. Convince them to participate in a civil trial. B. have them sign affidavits of probable cause. C. gather evidence about a recent crime. D. Get their permission to search a suspect's property.
Law enforcement officers speak to witnesses in order to C. gather evidence about a recent crime.
Why do law enforcement officers speak to witnesses ?When investigating a crime, law enforcement officers often rely on witnesses to gather information and evidence related to the incident. Witnesses can provide firsthand accounts, observations, or relevant details about the crime or individuals involved.
By speaking to witnesses, officers aim to gather crucial information that can assist in understanding the sequence of events, identifying suspects, and building a comprehensive case. Civil trials typically involve legal disputes between private parties and are not within the direct purview of law enforcement.
Find out more on witnesses at https://brainly.com/question/2948653
#SPJ1
Although adults retain this right via the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution, most states refuse juveniles the _____.
6. A speed limit is best described as:
A - Substantive law
B - Procedural law
C - Local rules of a court
D - None of the above
7. State’s rights are outlined in the:
A - The 4 th Amendment to the U. B - The Federal Register
C - The 10 th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
D - The common Law
6. A speed limit is best described as Substantive law. Thus, the correct answer is option A.
7. State’s rights are outlined in the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Thus, the correct answer is option C.
The laws that specify how members of a society are expected to behave are known as substantive law. In contrast, procedural law—a collection of rules for creating, implementing, and upholding substantive law—is used to define and contrast this concept.
The Constitution reserves all other authorities to the individual States or to the people; neither the United States nor the States are given those rights by the Constitution. The Tenth Amendment was added to the Bill of Rights to clarify the relationship between the federal and state governments. According to the amendment, the federal government only has the authority that the Constitution expressly grants it.
Therefore, the appropriate options are A and C respectively.
To learn more on substantive law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8324784
#SPJ4
Read the following paragraph from this lesson, and respond by writing a response of 200-words that addresses how studying crimes that have already occurred can assist agents in solving crimes that have yet to be committed.
The FBI recognizes that in order to prevent crimes from occurring, one has to first understand how the criminal thinks. Behavioral science is the scientific study of ways to better understand human behavior. This is the motivation for the Behavioral Science Unit, located at the FBI Training Academy in Quantico, Virginia. It was first established in 1972 and focused on understanding criminal behavior. Scientists, researchers, and agents from this unit work to answer the following questions: who the criminals are, how they think, and why they do what they do. The investigators at the Behavioral Science Unit conduct research both independently and in conjunction with other federal agencies and private organizations. They are developing new approaches and techniques to help law enforcement agents solve crimes that have already happened and prevent new crimes from occurring.
Studying crimes that have already occurred can assist agents in solving crimes that have yet to be committed because it helps law enforcement officers understand better how criminals carry out their operations.
Studying the crimes of the past allows investigators have knowledge on who the criminals are, how they think, and why they do what they do.Investigators think like criminals in order to be able to apprehend them. This makes their investigation a lot more easier.Therefore, studying crimes of the past helps investigations to be successful.
Learn more about essay:
https://brainly.com/question/4008478
no system of federal (national) courts was created. individual states could create their own courts within their state. what was some problems with this law
The lack of a federal court system under this law led to inconsistency, lack of uniformity, difficulty in resolving interstate disputes, and challenges in enforcing national laws and protecting individual rights.
Some problems with the law that allowed individual states to create their own courts without a federal court system were:
1. Inconsistency in laws: Since each state had its own court system, different interpretations of the Constitution and laws could lead to inconsistency across states.
2. Lack of uniformity: The absence of a federal court system meant that there was no uniformity in the application of laws across the nation.
3. Difficulty in resolving interstate disputes: Without a federal court system, it was challenging to resolve disputes between states, as each state's court might favor their own state's interests.
4. Inability to enforce national laws: The lack of a federal court system made it difficult for the national government to enforce its laws consistently across all states.
5. Limited protection of individual rights: Without a federal court system to ensure the consistent interpretation and protection of individual rights, citizens' rights could vary significantly from state to state.
To know more about national laws , refer here
https://brainly.com/question/8867273#
#SPJ11
Shawn files for bankruptcy. However, he does not mention his farmhouse in Farmington in the bankruptcy proceedings. The farmhouse is later discovered by the mortgage firm and included in the proceedings. Which of the following is true in this case?
A) Shawn is guilty of the offense of concealment.
B) Shawn can use the discovery of the estate as a defense to his concealment.
C) Shawn is guilty of larceny as he did not reveal his estate during bankruptcy proceedings.
D) Shawn can be found guilty of counterfeiting.
E) Shawn is likely to be found not guilty since the estate was recovered and included in the proceedings.
Based on the available options and the situation described, the truth of the case is that Shawn is guilty of the offense of concealment.
What is the Offense of Concealment?The offense of Concealment is a term that is used to describe the offense committed with direct or indirect intent.
Generally, the concealer must know at the moment of committing the deed, in any of the normative ways, that the good comes from committing a deed provided by criminal law.
Therefore, in this case, since it is revealed that Shawn did not mention his farmhouse in Farmington in the bankruptcy proceedings and was later discovered by the mortgage firm and included in the proceedings, or will be concluded that Shawn is guilty of the offense of concealment.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option A.
Learn more about the Offense of Concealment here: https://brainly.com/question/30033867
#SPJ1
What type of crime shows one of the most serious trends as people live longer, and involves an increased number of professionals in the field who are willing to risk client harm in fraudulent schemes?
White collar crime involves an increased number of professionals in the
field who are willing to risk client harm in fraudulent schemes.
This type of crime is divided into groups which are occupational and
corporate crime. White collar crime mostly involves embezzlement of funds.
This is usually carried out by the professionals in that field.
The white collar crime are usually willing to risk client harm in fraudulent
schemes for their personal gains and is mostly carried out by men than
women as it is easier to convince people it is legit as a man than a woman.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/19320562
discretionary fiscal policy refers to the deliberate manipulation of taxes and government spending by congress to alter real domestic output and employment, control inflation, and stimulate economic growth
Discretionary fiscal policy is the deliberate manipulation of taxes and government spending by Congress to impact the economy.
Discretionary fiscal policy refers to the intentional changes made by Congress to tax rates and government spending in order to influence the economy. By adjusting taxes and spending levels, Congress aims to alter real domestic output, employment rates, control inflation, and stimulate economic growth.
For example, during times of economic downturn, Congress may implement tax cuts or increase government spending to boost consumer demand and stimulate economic activity. Conversely, during periods of high inflation, Congress may raise taxes or reduce government spending to curb excessive aggregate demand and control price levels.
The deliberate manipulation of taxes and government spending by Congress to influence the economy by implementing discretionary fiscal policy.
Learn more about Discretionary fiscal policy
brainly.com/question/31864770
#SPJ11
The petitioner is the party against whom a petition is filed, especially one on appeal.
A.) True
B.) False
Answer: I believe its false
Explanation: