What age are children required to be in a car seat? In a car seat or booster seat?

Answer: the principle of judicial review

Explanation:

In Marbury v. Madison, Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that courts could challenge the constitutionality of other branches of government´s actions.

Known as the principle of judicial review, this decision furthered the importance of the system of checks and balances, meant to set a limit to the powers of all branches of the Federal Government.

Answer:

Hey! Your answer is down below.

Explanation:

If a defendant chooses not to testify, this fact cannot be held against him or her in court. The court must instruct the jury that the defendant has a constitutional right not to testify, that the choice not to testify cannot be held against the defendant, and that the defendant is presumed innocent regardless of whether he or she testifies.

Hope this helps!

Have a ncie day <3

Answer:

if a defendent choses to stay out of try it both ruins the chances of me being able to find a crack in their charges, but it does take away the ability for them to unveil new evidence. But this can also cause people to use unchecked claims, and blame for things that are untrue, but hopefully the court of law can figure that out without a defendant

Explanation:

SORRY I SPOKE IN A WEIRD WAY!!

An example of primary and secondary conflict in American history can be seen in the Civil War and this is explained further below.

The primary conflict was over the issue of slavery and its expansion into new territories. This issue caused tensions between the Northern and Southern states, as the North opposed slavery while the South depended on it for their economy.

The secondary conflict was over states' rights and the power of the federal government. The South believed in states' rights and wanted to maintain their autonomy, while the North believed in a stronger federal government that could regulate national issues such as slavery.

Read more about Conflict

brainly.com/question/846617

#SPJ1

A criminal case that was resolved through plea bargaining was the Bradshaw v. Stumpf (2005)

If it was me, i would have argue in respect to Stumpf ,  in his appeal to the Supreme Court, that the prosecutor is one who has unfairly used theories that are known to be vey inconsistent to prove that both he and Wesley both committed the crime.

The benefits of plea bargains are:

The drawbacks of plea bargains.

In the case,"

The  court was said to have concluded that Stumpf  is one that has pleaded guilty to aggravated murder without knowing  that particular intent to cause death.

Hence, If it was me, i would have argue in respect to Stumpf  ,  in his appeal to the Supreme Court, that the prosecutor is one who has unfairly used theories that are known to be vey inconsistent to prove that both he and Wesley both committed the crime.

Learn more about plea bargaining from

https://brainly.com/question/19557127

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Court of International Trade

There are also two special trial courts. The Court of International Trade addresses cases involving international trade and customs laws. The U.S. Court of Federal Claims deals with most claims for money damages against the U.S. government.

Explanation:

Answer:

establish a National Bank

Explanation:

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) is one of the first and most important Supreme Court cases on federal power. In this case, the Supreme Court held that Congress has implied powers derived from those listed in Article I, Section 8. The “Necessary and Proper” Clause gave Congress the power to establish a national bank.

Avidar's values and approaches to human resources management play a significant role in supporting Lob's business success. Here's how our Employee Engagement and Satisfaction, Talent Acquisition and Development, Diversity, and Inclusion, and Performance Management

1. Employee Engagement and Satisfaction: Avidar focuses on creating a positive work environment where employees feel engaged, valued, and satisfied. By promoting a culture of employee well-being and work-life balance, Avidar enhances employee morale, productivity, and retention. Engaged and satisfied employees are more likely to contribute their best efforts to the company's success, leading to improved business outcomes for Lob.

2. Talent Acquisition and Development: Avidar recognizes the importance of attracting and retaining top talent. They employ effective recruitment strategies to bring in skilled individuals who align with Lob's goals and values. Avidar also prioritizes employee development through training programs, mentorship, and career progression opportunities. By investing in their employees' growth and professional advancement, Avidar ensures a highly skilled and motivated workforce that contributes to Lob's success.

3. Diversity and Inclusion: Avidar embraces diversity and inclusion as integral components of its human resources approach. They foster an inclusive workplace where individuals from diverse backgrounds feel respected, valued, and empowered. This approach cultivates a rich pool of perspectives, ideas, and experiences within Lob, driving innovation, creativity, and adaptability, which are crucial for business success in a rapidly changing market.

4. Performance Management: Avidar implements effective performance management practices to align individual goals with Lob's objectives. They provide regular feedback, set clear expectations, and recognize and reward employees' achievements. This approach promotes accountability, encourages high performance, and helps drive the overall success of Lob.

By upholding these values and employing these approaches, Avidar creates a strong foundation for Lob's human resources management. It leads to a motivated, skilled, and diverse workforce that is engaged, productive, and aligned with the company's vision and goals, ultimately contributing to Lob's business success.

Know more about Human resources management here:

https://brainly.com/question/14419086

#SPJ8

Answer:

Wait until it is safe to pass the bicyclist with at least three feet of clearance. And make sure you put on a signal light to let the people behind you know that there is someone behind you.

Explanation:

Answer:

In law, a question of law, also known as a point of law, is a question that must be answered by applying relevant legal principles to interpretation of the law. Such a question is distinct from a question of fact, which must be answered by reference to facts and evidence as well inferences arising from those facts.

Explanation:

brainliest?

Answer: Ammunitions evidence

Answer:

3. ammunitions evidence

Explanation:

Shell casings are part of ammunition capable of being used in a pistol or revolver.

Answer:

In the Local Court System, it has something to do with courts in your local area, like for example, the Caddo Parish Courthouse, that's part of the city of Shreveport. (But I assume you don't live in Shreveport, Louisiana.) So, for the State Court Systems, it has something to do with the courts in your state, like the Louisiana Supreme Court.

Explanation:

Now about the Criminal Justice system, it is said to be fair, but it needs more emphasis on the aforementioned word. So, the court systems are different dependent on where you live.

To eliminate the shortage and reach equilibrium, the supply of milk must increase to meet the demand. Therefore, the correct option is A. "The monthly supply of milk must increase by 8 billion gallons".

Increasing the supply will involve producing and providing more milk to the market. In order to achieve market equilibrium in Country X, where the market demand for milk is 18 billion gallons per month, and the supply is currently 10 billion gallons per month, the monthly supply of milk must increase.

Market equilibrium occurs when the quantity demanded by consumers equals the quantity supplied by producers. In this case, the quantity demanded is 18 billion gallons, but the quantity supplied is only 10 billion gallons. This indicates a shortage in the market.

By increasing the monthly supply by 8 billion gallons, the total supply would then match the demand of 18 billion gallons. This would result in a balanced market, where buyers can purchase the quantity of milk they desire, and producers can sell their entire supply. Therefore, the correct answer is option A.

The Question was Incomplete, Find the full content below :

The market demand for milk in Country X is 18 billion gallons per month, but the supply is 10 billion gallons per month. What must happen in

order to achieve market equilibrium?

ОА The monthly supply of milk must increase by 8 billion gallons.

OB. The monthly supply of milk must decrease by 28 billion gallons.

OC. The monthly supply of milk must decrease by 8 billion gallons.

OD. The monthly supply of milk must increase by 28 billion gallons.

know more about quantity here:

https://brainly.com/question/30563868

#SPJ8

Answer:

What do you think of the ruling in the Michigan police department case

The recent ruling in the Michigan Police Department case has sparked a

heated debate among citizens and law enforcement officials alike. The case involved several officers who were accused of using excessive force during an arrest, resulting in the death of a suspect.

Some argue that the ruling was justified, as it sends a clear message that police officers must be held accountable for their actions. They believe that this will help to restore trust between law enforcement and

the community, which is essential for maintaining public safety.

Others, however, argue that the ruling was unfair and will only serve to undermine police morale. They point out that police officers often face dangerous situations where split-second decisions must be made, and that they should not be second-guessed by judges or juries who lack

their training and experience.

Ultimately, it is up to each individual to decide what they think of the ruling in this case. However, it is clear that we must continue to have open and honest discussions about how best to balance the need for

Explanation:

Without specific details about the case in question, it is difficult to provide a direct opinion on the ruling. Judicial rulings are typically based on the application and interpretation of relevant laws, precedents, and evidence presented during the legal proceedings. The outcome of a case can vary based on the specific circumstances, the arguments presented by the parties involved, and the legal principles applied by the court.

In general, a ruling should aim to uphold justice, protect individual rights, and ensure the fair and impartial administration of the law. It is essential for courts to consider the facts, weigh the evidence, and make decisions based on the applicable legal standards.

Public opinion on a ruling can vary depending on individual perspectives, societal values, and the impact of the decision on the parties involved and the wider community. It is important for the legal system to foster transparency and accountability, allowing for proper scrutiny and avenues for appeal to ensure that justice is served.

In any case, it is crucial for the ruling to be grounded in the principles of fairness, legality, and the protection of individual rights, while also considering the broader societal implications and the pursuit of justice.

for more questions on Judicial

https://brainly.com/question/29992339

#SPJ11

The vast majority of all civil and criminal cases are filed in state courts. Sometimes a case can be filed under similar statutes in either state or federal court. There are 94 federal judicial districts. All but three of these districts have lifetime-appointed Article III judges.

Answer:

The third one is the answer is narcotics.

Answer:

first, police take people into the custody if they are driving while drinking or they do not have driver license

second, to see if anything bad is happening in the neighborhood

third,if he see anything inappropriate

fourth,the police are responsible for the suspect safety

lastly, if the police man find anything like gun or drugs

hope it helps you

Answer:

In the United States, the budget process begins with the President's budget proposal, which is typically submitted to Congress in early February. The proposal outlines the President's spending and revenue priorities for the upcoming fiscal year, which begins on October 1.

The budget proposal is then considered by the House and Senate Budget Committees, which are responsible for developing a budget resolution that sets overall spending levels for the federal government. The budget resolution is a non-binding document that serves as a blueprint for the appropriations process, which is the process of allocating specific amounts of money for specific programs and activities.

After the budget resolution is adopted by both the House and Senate, it is used as a guide for the appropriations committees, which are responsible for drafting and passing individual appropriations bills that fund the various agencies and programs of the federal government. The appropriations bills must be passed by both the House and Senate and signed into law by the President before the new fiscal year begins in order to avoid a government shutdown.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

The Bible is a complex collection of texts that were written by various authors over a period of centuries. However, there are several overarching themes and issues that human authors of the Bible concerned themselves with, including:

The nature and character of God: Many authors of the Bible sought to describe and understand the nature and character of God, including his attributes such as holiness, justice, mercy, and love. They also explored the relationship between God and humanity, including the concept of covenant and the consequences of disobeying God.

Human sin and its consequences: The Bible also addresses the issue of human sin and its consequences, including the need for redemption and salvation. The authors describe how sin entered the world and how it separates humans from God, as well as the various ways in which God has provided a path to forgiveness and reconciliation.

The role of community and society: The Bible also addresses the role of community and society in shaping human behaviour and the consequences of both individual and collective actions. The authors explore issues such as justice, mercy, compassion, and the importance of caring for the marginalized and oppressed.

Prophecy and eschatology: Many authors of the Bible also engaged in prophecy and eschatology, or the study of the end times. They predicted future events and the ultimate destiny of humanity, often invoking apocalyptic imagery and symbolism.

Spiritual growth and personal transformation: Finally, the Bible addresses the issue of spiritual growth and personal transformation, emphasizing the importance of faith, prayer, and spiritual discipline. The authors describe the process of sanctification or becoming more like God, and the various challenges and obstacles that individuals may face in their spiritual journeys.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Answer: The  state or county would have nothing to do with their budgets.

Explanation:

Answer: the prison system might begin to cut corners on care to save money.

Explanation: i put the answer the person above me gave and i got it incorrect so it showed me the correct answer.

Answer:

by reaching targeted members of Congress, often indirectly through other political actors.

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

The first king of Nepal was King Prithvi Narayan Shah. He was born on January 11, 1723, and ruled from 1768 until his death in 1775. King Prithvi Narayan Shah was the founder of the modern Kingdom of Nepal and the Shah dynasty, which ruled Nepal until 2008 when the country became a federal democratic republic. He is widely regarded as a unifying figure and is credited with the unification of Nepal and the establishment of Nepal as a sovereign kingdom.

Answer:

Between 50 km/h to 70km/h

Explanation:

Not all construction zones have the same speed limit. That's why it's important to pay attention to signs leading up to the area. Generally, construction zone speed limits will be between 50 km/h to 70km/h on highways.

We can complete the sentence as follows: 1) Giving a turn signal when you initiate the turn allows the vehicles behind to adjust their speed in time.

You should give a turn signal when you initiate the turn. This immediately alerts the other road users likely following behind you to apply caution as they approach a turn.

Giving this signal on time ensures that all are made aware and not taken by surprise when you eventually make the turn. So, the signal should be given when you initiate a turn.

Learn more about turn signals here;

https://brainly.com/question/31673943

#SPJ1

Answer: In this scenario, Mr. Peters may argue that he acted in self-defense. Self-defense is a legal defense that allows an individual to use reasonable force in order to protect themselves from an imminent threat of harm. However, whether Mr. Peters's actions were reasonable under the circumstances could be debated.

A key factor that may be considered is whether Mr. Peters had a reasonable belief that Takeshi posed an imminent threat of harm to him. Mr. Peters may argue that he was scared and believed that Takeshi was an intruder, based on the fact that Takeshi was yelling and waving his arms. However, the fact that Takeshi did not understand English, and was not responding to Mr. Peters's commands may indicate that Mr. Peters should have realized that Takeshi was not an immediate threat.

Another important factor that may be considered is whether Mr. Peters's use of deadly force was reasonable under the circumstances. In this case, it could be argued that shooting Takeshi was not a reasonable response, as there may have been other options that Mr. Peters could have taken to protect himself, such as calling the police or using non-lethal force.

In general, whether Mr. Peters has a defense will depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the case, and how these facts are presented and evaluated in court.

Explanation: