T/F: Courts hold no distinguish between a "self-check"parking lot and a valet parking lot on the issue of bailment

Answer:

A Earth?

Explanation:

'Cause you make my earth quake

Oh, you make my earth quake

Riding around, you tell me something, baby, and it's making my heart break

'Cause you make my earth quake

Oh, you make my earth quake (earth quake, yeah)

Riding around, your love is shakin' me up and it's making my heart break (you already know)

Hello. You forgot and put the graph to which this question refers. The chart is attached below:

Answer:

42.354%

Explanation:

To answer this question it is necessary to make a very simple calculation that relates the total number of judgments by jury to the number of civil cases judged by juris. In this case, you must analyze the last line of the graph and use the following values in the calculation.

5082 ---- 100%

2154 ----- x

x = (2154 * 100) / 5082

x = 42.354%

It is a false statement that more than 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die as a result of felonious attacks by criminals.

As a crime, a felonious assault means any sort of attack or threat of attack on another individual in which the attacker uses a dangerous weapon and seeks to cause serious harm but however stops short of an attempt to kill the victim.

These attacks on Police officers does not constitute to why 90% of officers killed in the line of duty die, rather, the causes are accidents, illness, old age etc. Therefore, the statement is a false statement.

Missing options True/False

Read more about attacks

brainly.com/question/28866933

#SPJ1

as some government spending is for true public goods in sending countries, the loss of future tax contributions is likely to be  smaller than the reduction in future government spending as people migrate from the country.

When people migrate from a country, they no longer contribute to that country's tax revenue, leading to a loss of future tax contributions. However, some government spending is for true public goods, which means that they are non-excludable and non-rivalrous (available to everyone and one person's use doesn't diminish another person's use).

As a result, the reduction in future government spending on these public goods is not directly proportional to the number of people leaving the country. Therefore, the loss of future tax contributions is likely to be smaller than the reduction in future government spending.

In summary, the loss of future tax contributions due to people migrating from the country is likely to be smaller than the reduction in future government spending on true public goods.

To know more about government, visit;

https://brainly.com/question/18464634

#SPJ11

Answer:

I may not be 100% correct but I believe its B

Answer:

A political debate is a confrontation of ideas between two or more candidates for a certain position, where both try to convince the electorate to vote for them. Electoral debates, such as the one recently held between President Trump, candidate of the Republican Party, and Joe Biden, candidate of the Democratic Party, are especially important.

To determine who is the candidate who has best developed his performance in the debate, the power of conviction that this has had in front of the voters must be evaluated, as well as the dominance of the debated topics and, especially, his prevalence against the other candidate on the discussed issues.

The performance of a candidate in a debate can be evaluated based on the power of conviction and the dominance that a candidate has over others.

In conclusion, the performance of a candidate can be evaluated based on how much candidate was able to convince the electorates.

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/13674408

Even if you did not mean to be intentional in your discrimination against women, employment discrimination suits can still be brought so this is false.

As long as there is discrimination of women or other protected groups, discrimination suits can be brought.

Discrimination does not have to be intentional or unintentional. The law simply wants to know if there was discrimination. If there was, it is illegal and the intention doesn't count there.

The intention will however count in sentencing and you might receive a lesser punishment for not knowing that you were engaging in discrimination.

Find out more on discrimination at https://brainly.com/question/1084594

#SPJ1

Answer:

Never give up on the grind

I'm pretty sure its job availability and lifetime earnings because it cant be credit worthiness because being in prison doesn't affect that

Answer:

B. to make a profit

Explanation:

Profit is the major reason why so many people venture into any business and construction companies are no different.

According to the law of supply, when demand increases and the supply is not met, then the price increases. According to the same law, if the demand decreases, then the price also decreases. For a well functioning market, there needs to exist an equilibrium between demand and supply.

The construction companies decide to build more homes when the prices for homes increases to meet the demand and make a profit.

Answer:B. to make a profit

Explanation:

Answer:

C) Severity

Explanation:

The Three Strikes Rule is an example of the characteristic of punishment called severity. Severity refers to the harshness or degree of punishment that is imposed for a particular crime or offense. The Three Strikes Rule mandates harsher sentences, such as life imprisonment, for individuals who have been convicted of three or more serious crimes or felonies. This is a way to deter repeat offenders and to increase the punishment for those who commit multiple serious crimes.

Answer:

Yes, avoid blocking passing lanes :)

Answer:

c peacemaking

Explanation:

The Democratic and Republican National Conventions are vital events in the United States' democratic process. They provide an opportunity for the parties to nominate their presidential candidates and to showcase their policies and platforms.

The Democratic and Republican National Conventions are critical events that take place every four years in the United States. These conventions are important events in the country's democratic process and usually occur in a major American city, attracting thousands of party delegates, journalists, and spectators. The conventions serve as a platform for the party's presidential nominee to be announced, setting the stage for the presidential campaign.
At the Democratic National Convention, party leaders, activists, and delegates gather to elect their presidential nominee. During this event, various speakers address the audience, discussing the party's platform and policies. The delegates from each state also gather to cast their votes for the presidential nominee. The nominee is typically announced on the final day of the convention, after all votes have been cast.
In contrast, the Republican National Convention is similar to the Democratic National Convention in structure. The convention brings together party leaders, activists, and delegates to nominate the party's presidential candidate. However, the key difference is that the nominee is selected through a roll call vote, with each state's delegates announcing their support for a specific candidate.
Both conventions also serve as a platform for the party's leading voices to address issues important to the party and the country as a whole. The conventions often feature influential speakers, including political leaders, celebrities, and other prominent figures. The conventions also serve as an opportunity for the party to rally its base and energize its supporters.
In conclusion, the Democratic and Republican National Conventions are vital events in the United States' democratic process. They provide an opportunity for the parties to nominate their presidential candidates and to showcase their policies and platforms. The conventions also serve as an important rallying point for the party's base, and a platform for influential voices to address critical issues.

To know more about National Conventions visit :

https://brainly.com/question/28898220

#SPJ11

Answer:

To "protect the confidentiality of high level presidential communications and the principle of separation of powers protects the president through the independence of the executive branch.

Explanation:

Republic Act 9003, also known as the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000, is a Philippine law that aims to promote and implement a comprehensive solid waste management system.

Some of the salient features of RA 9003 include:

Waste Segregation and Source Reduction: The law emphasizes the importance of waste segregation at the source, encouraging households, establishments, and communities to separate their solid waste into recyclable, compostable, and residual waste.

Establishment of Materials Recovery Facilities (MRFs): RA 9003 requires the establishment of MRFs in every barangay or local government unit. MRFs serve as facilities for the segregation, recycling, composting, and storage of solid waste.

Prohibition of Open Dumping and Burning: The law prohibits open dumping and burning of solid waste due to their harmful environmental and health effects. It promotes the use of sanitary landfills and other environmentally sound disposal methods.

Creation of the National Solid Waste Management Commission (NSWMC): RA 9003 establishes the NSWMC, which is responsible for overseeing the implementation and enforcement of the law, as well as developing policies, guidelines, and programs related to solid waste management.

Promotion of Recycling and Composting: The law encourages recycling and composting as viable waste management practices. It promotes the establishment of recycling facilities and the use of composting methods to reduce waste and recover valuable resources.

Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR): RA 9003 introduces the concept of EPR, holding manufacturers, importers, and distributors accountable for managing and reducing the environmental impact of their products throughout their life cycle, including their disposal.

Public Awareness and Participation: The law emphasizes the importance of public participation and awareness in solid waste management. It encourages the involvement of communities, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and other stakeholders in planning, implementing, and monitoring waste management programs.

To know more about Waste Management refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/12467809

#SPJ11

The correct answer is False. Due to the expansion of school districts across the US, there has been a considerable increase in the number of governments.

The system's contradictions would be fixed if the federal government got involved. Every region, district, and legislature might establish their own standards for curriculum development if the states in the US are given the authority to determine their own educational standards.

The maintenance and management of public schools is essentially the responsibility of the states. The formation, choice, and control of the curricula, instructional strategies, and materials used in schools are all highly influenced by the states. Because it enabled "ordinary men" as well as the wealthy, the common school movement was associated with the rise in immigration to the United States.

Read more about united states at

https://brainly.com/question/3564822

#SPJ4

The legislative branch has power to approve international treaties negotiated by the executive branch. This is an example of checks and balances.

The legislative branch of government is the branch that makes laws and rules for the country with the support of the executive branch of government.

In a democratic democracy, the tasks, powers, and rights of the three branches of government (legislature, executive, and judiciary) are apportioned in such a way that no one branch of government has limitless authority and that checks and balances are in place.

As a result, international agreements negotiated by the Executive Branch require Legislative Branch approval.

Checks and balances refers to the separation of power in the United States government, which is secured by the institution of three distinct branches.

To know more about legislative branch:

https://brainly.com/question/14619244

#SPJ4

Answer:D

Explanation:

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech."

The freedom of speech and expression is safeguarded by the First Amendment of the US Constitution as a basic right. "Congress shall make no measure abridging the freedom of expression, or of the press," the amendment reads. This implies that no laws restricting or limiting speech in any form may be passed by the government. All governmental branches, including the executive, legislative, and judicial branches as well as state and local governments, are covered by the First Amendment.

The First Amendment's protection of free speech extends to a wide variety of expression, including not only spoken and written words but also nonverbal actions like wearing armbands to show opposition to war and symbolic speech like burning flags. The right to receive information and ideas is likewise protected by the First Amendment, as is the right to voice thoughts and ideas, even if they are disagreeable or divisive.

To know more about free speech visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29569001

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

A prior ruling or judgment on any case is known as a precedent.

Answer:

True

Explanation:

If a country's laws related to intellectual property rights are weak, firms with valuable technologies may be reluctant to bring them into that country. Without strong intellectual property protections, the firms' technologies and innovations may be vulnerable to theft or copying, which could undermine the firms' ability to profit from their investments in research and development. This could discourage the firms from investing in the country, or lead them to invest less in research and development. Strong intellectual property rights protections are therefore an important factor in encouraging innovation and economic growth.

primary Crime scene because the criminal escaped

1. The employer took the correct steps in terminating the medical assistant as part of the disciplinary measures.

2. The medical assistant lacks the right to fight the termination of her employment because the due process (verbal warning, correction action plan, including mandatory training) was observed.

3. Based on the steps taken, one cannot require the employer to re-assign the medical assistant to other tasks because they also involve documentation.

A medical assistant works along with the physicians.

Some tasks performed by medical assistants include:

Thus, it appears that the medical assistant was not cut out for the job at this period.

Learn more about the tasks of medical assistants at https://brainly.com/question/25964907

#SPJ1

The statement that "In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions commits the offense of aggravated perjury," is False.

In Texas, a courtroom witness who refuses to answer questions can be held in contempt of court for refusing to testify or failing to answer a question. This is not the same as aggravated perjury, which involves giving false testimony under oath with the intent to deceive or mislead.

Aggravated perjury is a serious offense in Texas and can result in significant criminal penalties, including imprisonment and fines.

Find out more on perjury at https://brainly.com/question/30312181

#SPJ1

The jurisdiction for this case would likely be the state of Oklahoma if the injury occurred within the state and the injured party, Stevens, is a citizen of Oklahoma. The court in Oklahoma would have jurisdiction over the case as it would be the state where the injury occurred and where Stevens, the plaintiff, resides.

Answer:

The U.S. Supreme Court has decided several cases involving the First Amendment rights of public school students, but the most often cited are Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969), Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser (1986) and Hazelwood School District v.

The nominating process can have a significant impact on the right to vote. First and foremost, the nominating process helps to determine which candidates will appear on the ballot in the general election.

If voters do not have a choice between multiple candidates, their right to vote is limited to a binary decision between the sole candidate on the ballot and abstention.
Additionally, the nominating process can impact voter turnout. If voters feel that their preferred candidate is not being adequately represented in the primary, they may be less likely to show up to the polls in the general election.

Conversely, if voters are passionate about a particular candidate or issue, the excitement generated by the nominating process can increase voter turnout and engagement.
Furthermore, the nominating process can impact the accessibility of the voting process. Some states require voters to register with a specific political party in order to participate in that party's primary. This can limit the ability of voters who do not identify with either major political party to have a say in the nominating process.
Overall, the nominating process plays a critical role in shaping the options available to voters and influencing the level of voter participation in the general election.

Its impact on the right to vote depends on the rules and procedures governing the nominating process, as well as the attitudes and behaviors of voters themselves.

Know more about the right to vote here:

https://brainly.com/question/808649

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

Legislation signed into law June 30 allows parents and students over 18 to decide for themselves whether they or their kids should repeat their 2020-21 grade. In other years, the decision to hold students back is made by school officials and teachers.