Answers
Hope this helps.. :)
Related Questions
According to the text, the establishment of the American Law Institute (ALI) was a result of
Answers
True or false for top. will thumbs up if done correct
70. In general, a drawer can stop payment of a certified or cashier's check.
71. Certification of a check must be written on the check and must be signed by an agent of the bank.
72. An indorser's conditional liability is discharged if a check is not presented for payment within three days after the date the indorser signed the check.
Answers
Answer: 70 t
71 t
72 f
Explanation:
71. True
72. False
"Personal Jurisdiction" is the authority a court has over the subject of the legal questions involved in the case True False The regulatory power of Congress over channels of interstate commerce is strictly limited. True False In Wayfair v, South Dakota, the Supreme Court overturned its holding in Quill that the dormant Commerce Clause prohibits states from collecting sales tax for goods from businesses with no physical presence within the state. True False
Answers
Personal jurisdiction refers to a court's authority over the parties involved in a legal case, not specifically the subject of the legal questions.
Therefore, the statement "Personal Jurisdiction is the authority a court has over the subject of the legal questions involved in the case" is false.
Personal jurisdiction deals with whether a court has the power to exercise jurisdiction over a particular person or entity involved in the case, based on factors such as their location or contacts with the jurisdiction.
On the other hand, the statement "The regulatory power of Congress over channels of interstate commerce is strictly limited" is false.
The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the authority to regulate interstate commerce, and this power is broad.
Congress can enact laws and regulations that affect the channels, instrumentalities, and activities associated with interstate commerce, subject to certain constitutional limitations.
In the case of Wayfair v. South Dakota, the Supreme Court did overturn its holding in Quill.
The statement "In Wayfair v. South Dakota, the Supreme Court overturned its holding in Quill that the dormant Commerce Clause prohibits states from collecting sales tax for goods from businesses with no physical presence within the state" is true.
In the Wayfair decision, the Court ruled that states can require online retailers to collect sales tax even if they do not have a physical presence in the state.
This decision expanded states' authority to collect sales tax from remote sellers, addressing concerns related to the changing landscape of e-commerce.
Learn more about personal jurisdiction
brainly.com/question/33166793
#SPJ11
Independent agencies typically possess both quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial functions.
A. True
B. False
Answers
A. True Independent agencies typically possess both quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial functions.
Independent agencies are government organizations that operate independently from the executive branch. These agencies are created by Congress to regulate specific industries, protect the public interest, and enforce laws. Examples of independent agencies include the Federal Reserve, the Federal Trade Commission, and the Environmental Protection Agency. Unlike executive agencies, independent agencies are typically headed by a board or commission, and their leadership is not subject to direct presidential control. This allows them to make decisions that are free from political influence. However, they are still accountable to Congress and must comply with applicable laws and regulations.
Learn more about Independent agencies here:
https://brainly.com/question/23124980
#SPJ11
What do you like least in online distance learning
Answers
Answer:
We cannot interact with our friends and talk with them even tho we can ch at
We may get distracted by things around us
Explanation:
lending small sums of money to the poor so they can work their way out of poverty is referred to as
Answers
Lending small sums of money to the poor so they can work their way out of poverty is referred to as microfinance.
Microfinance is a banking service that is provided to people who do not have access to traditional financial institutions. It is an economic development tool that is designed to help low-income individuals and groups become self-sufficient. The goal of microfinance is to provide financial assistance to those who need it most and to help them develop the skills and resources they need to become financially stable over time.
Microfinance typically involves providing small loans, typically ranging from $50 to $5,000, to low-income individuals who would otherwise have difficulty accessing credit. Microfinance loans are typically made to women, who are often excluded from traditional banking services. In addition to loans, microfinance institutions may also offer savings accounts, insurance, and other financial services to their clients. Overall, microfinance is an important tool for reducing poverty and promoting economic development in low-income communities.
To know more about poverty click here
brainly.com/question/10850821
#SPJ11
The case of Max v. National Credit Co. is heard in a trial court. The case of O! Boy! Ice Cream Co. v. Pecan Corp. is heard in an appellate court. The difference be-tween a trial and an appellate court is whether
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
The case of Max v. National Credit Co. is heard in a trial court. The case of O! Boy! Ice Cream Co. v. Pecan Corp. is heard in an appellate court. The difference be-tween a trial and an appellate court is whether
any breach excuses the nonbreaching party's duty to perform.t/f
Answers
The statement, "any breach excuses the nonbreaching party's duty to perform" is False.
A breach of the agreement does not automatically absolve the nonbreaching party from fulfilling its obligations. When one party to a contract doesn't carry out their end of the bargain, there has been a breach of the agreement. The non-performing party is referred to as the "nonbreaching party," and the side that breaches the agreement as the "breaching party."
When a breach of contract occurs, the nonbreaching party may have several options, depending on the severity of the breach: They may choose to continue with the contract and seek damages for any losses they suffered as a result of the breach. They may choose to terminate the contract and seek damages for any losses they suffered as a result of the breach.
For example, if a homeowner hires a contractor to remodel their kitchen, and the contractor fails to complete the project on time, the homeowner may have the right to terminate the contract and seek damages for any losses they suffered as a result of the breach.
However, if the homeowner hired the contractor to complete the project in six months, but failed to provide the necessary materials until five months into the project, the contractor's failure to complete the project on time would not excuse the homeowner's duty to provide the materials.
To Know more about party's duty
https://brainly.com/question/29487533
#SPJ11
Tactical treats can be performed in a variety of ways. Which way is not correct.
Coordinated
Coordinated
Ruse
Ruse
Deliberate
Deliberate
Dynamic
Dynamic
Answers
does chase freedom unlimited have foreign transaction fees?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
No, Chase Freedom Unlimited does not have foreign transaction fees. This means that you can use your card for purchases outside the United States without incurring any additional fees. However, keep in mind that foreign merchants may charge a fee for using a credit card, which is separate from any fees charged by the card issuer. It is always a good idea to check with the merchant and your credit card issuer about any fees before making a purchase.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
true or false: after the trial court's verdict, the losing party has the right to request one of the 13 u.s. circuit courts of appeal to hear the case.
Answers
True. After the trial court's verdict, the losing party has the right to request one of the 13 U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal to hear the case. This is called an appeal, and it is a legal process in which a higher court reviews the decision of a lower court.
The purpose of an appeal is to determine if the lower court made any legal errors that affected the outcome of the case. If the appellate court finds that the lower court made a legal error, it can reverse the decision or remand the case back to the lower court for further proceedings. However, if the appellate court finds that the lower court's decision was correct, it will affirm the decision. It is important to note that an appeal is not a new trial, and the appellate court will only review the record from the lower court to make its decision.
To know more about Court's verdict:
https://brainly.com/question/2291539
#SPJ11
In what year was the importation of enslaved persons banned in the united states?.
Answers
Not only did it drive trade underground, but ships caught illegally trading were often brought into the United States and its passengers sold into slavery.
If a minor purchases alcohols his or her license plate can be suspended under Texas Zero Tolerance policy .
Answers
Answer: The answer is yes or true.
Explanation:
Under the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code § 106.06 the judge can direct the Department of Public Safety to suspend the driver's license or permit of the defendant, to deny the issuance of a driver's license or permit of the defendant for 180 days.
Annette is a forensic technician. She is testing a hair found at a crime scene to determine if it came from an animal or a human. Which part of
the hair shaft should she measure for diameter?
Annette should measure the
to see if it is less than one-third the diameter of the hair shaft, which would indicate it is human hair.
Answers
Answer:
Any single hair from anywhere on the human body can be used to identify a person. This conclusion is one of the key findings from a nearly year-long study by a team of researchers from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's (LLNL) Forensic Science Center (FSC) and Michigan State University.
Explanation:
human hair. Hair is used as class evidence, and can be used as individual evidence if theres a follicle attached. ... The shaft of a mature human hair does not contain nuclear DNA so that only mitochondrial DNA analysis is possible for such samples.
Answer: Annette should measure the Medulla
Explanation:
The medulla is less than one third on humans and more than one half on animals hence why it would indicate whether it’s human hair or animal hair
. 'P' was picked up by a gang of robbers in a car from the street. He was given a revolver and asked to shoot at 'M'. When 'P' resisted, a revolver was put on his ear and he was told that if he did not shoot, he would be shot dead. Then 'P' shot 'M' dead. On a charge of murder, 'P' argued that his act was not voluntary nor was there mens rea. 'P' is guilty of: (a) culpable homicide not amounting to murder (b) no offence (c) attempt to commit murder (d) murder 1
please tell
Answers
Answer:
A, culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
I hope this helped at all, sorry if it is incorrect.can legal pratictioner be both advocate and judge
Answers
Answer:
I believe so
Explanation:
I have no clue I'm a high schooler who likes kpop and life revolves around sleeping 24/7
why Miranda is considered one of the most important cases in the history of our legal system
Answers
Answer:
In the landmark supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona (1966), the Court held that if police do not inform people they arrest about certain constitutional rights, including their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, then their confessions may not be used as evidence at trial.
Explanation:
In a civil case, the object is to a. resolve a dispute to the satisfaction of all concerned parties. b. obtain a remedy to compensate the injured party. c. punish a wrongdoer to deter others from similar actions. d. take coercive action against a violating party.
Answers
In a civil case, the object is to obtain a remedy to compensate the injured party.
The Civil CaseCivil cases involve those conflicts cases between people or businesses.
These court cases deal with finances or damage to individual rights.
A civil case begins when an individual or business reasons to have been hurt by another person or company.
The civil cases are between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Thus option B is the correct answer.
Learn more about "the Civil Case" here:
brainly.com/question/1065754
Which of these le an example of eminent domain?
Answers
Answer:
The answer is A
Explanation:
Eminent Domain refers to the power of state and federal government's to take private property for public use.
the statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges is
Answers
The statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges is typically set by individual provinces or territories within their respective legal frameworks.
The statute of limitations to lay most provincial charges varies depending on the specific charge and the province in which it is being laid. Generally, the limitations range from one to five years, but some charges may have longer limitations or none at all. For example, in Ontario, the limitation period for most provincial offences is one year from the time the offence was committed, while in British Columbia, the limitation period is generally two years. However, some charges, such as sexual assault and murder, have no limitation period and can be laid at any time. It is important to note that the statute of limitations does not apply to all offences, and some charges may be laid even after the limitation period has expired if certain conditions are met.
To know more about provincial visit:
brainly.com/question/31273238
#SPJ11
Question 4 of 10
In what way have laws about sexual orientation impacted HR management?
A. It means HR managers must work to close the wage-gap
throughout an organization.
B. It means HR managers must create policies that prevent
discrimination.
c. It means HR managers must provide work visas to all employees.
D. It means HR managers must prepare for an increasingly aging
workforce.
SUBMIT
Answers
It means HR managers must work to close the wage-gap throughout an organization in the way have laws about sexual orientation impacted HR management. Thus, option (a) is correct.
What is management?The term “management” refers to the act of managing. The management of the business activities. Management is the basis of art, science, and the profession. Management are they manage the organization. Management are based of the different functions are the step by step.
According to the HR management, is the department of the organization. The HR management was the main work to the hiring and the firing. There were the laws on the sexual orientation impacted HR managers must work to close the wage-gap throughout an organization.
As a result, the HR managers must work to close the wage-gap throughout an organization in the way have laws about sexual orientation impacted HR management. Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on HR management, here;
https://brainly.com/question/25806768
#SPJ5
Briefly describe what Marks says in the beginning of his talk about conflict and compromise.
Answers
Answer: Marks States We are constantly told that conflict is bad that compromise is good; that conflict is bad but the consensus is good; that conflict is bad and collaboration is good. But in my view, that's far too simple a vision of the world. We cannot know whether conflict is bad unless we know who is fighting, why they are fighting ,and how they are fighting. And compromises can be thoroughly rotten if they harm people who are not at the table, people who are vulnerable, disempowered, people whom we have an obligation to protect.
Explanation:
Which is the most accurate statement concerning the relationship between state and federal regulations
Answers
Answer:
The relationship between state and federal regulations in the United States is one of delegation and complement: in principle, the states are the holders of sovereignty and, therefore, possess all the rights and powers that they have not expressly delegated to the Federal Government to through the Constitution. In turn, in the event that the states have delegated prerogatives to the federal government, these may only be exercised by the federal government, and subsidiarily (and always in a complementary manner and respecting federal guidelines) by the states.
Are these statements true or false? Give your opinions and explain the reason why:
1. Offers to enter into commercial contracts terminate when the offeree replies that the offer is accepted.
2. When the offeree replies that a part of the offer is accepted, the offeree shall be deemed to have made a new offer.
3. Remedy of fines and remedy of damages shall be applied concurrently
4. Time when written contracts are entered into is at the time when the offeree replies that the offer is accepted.
5. When a party breaches the contract without material loss, the remedy of damages shall not be applied
6. The parties agreed that the fine level accounts for 8% of the contract value. This agreement is contrary to the provisions of law
7. When a party breaches the contract without material loss, the remedy of fines shall be applied
8. Every contract for purchase and sale of goods between traders and traders is commercial contract.
9. The subjects of commercial contract for purchase and sale are the signers of contract
10. The aggrieved party shall bear the burden of proof of loss when requesting the breaching party to pay for damages.
Answers
Answer:
sorry I didn't have the answer ok I needed the points
It is 1782 and a German aristocrat is having difficulty with his young son. The boy is consistently late for his studies and seems to be in the middle of any mischief that occurs in the house. The aristocrat wants to know if this boy has a chance to straighten up or if he is doomed to be a troublemaker his entire life. He takes the boy to the famous doctor Franz Joseph Gall for an examination. What would Dr. Gall be MOST interested in examining? the boy's genes the length of the boy's arms or fingers the shape of the boy's skull the history and family dynamics
Answers
Answer:
the boy's genes
the history and family dynamics
Explanation:
Behavior, dedication to studies and intelligence, are characteristics that can be highly influenced by the genetics that an individual presents, as well as by the environment in which that individual is inserted. Based on this statement, in order to present conclusions about the boy shown in the question above, the doctor would need to assess the boy's genetic makeup, analyzing the genes and being able to look for how it affects his behavior. However, the doctor will also need to know the dynamics and family history, to know how the environment that the boy is inserted in has influenced him.
Answer:
the shape of the boy’s skull
Explanation:
when interpreting a contract, courts may be asked whether implied conditions can be read into involved parties' obligations to perform when _______.
Answers
When interpreting a contract, courts may be asked whether implied conditions can be read into involved parties' obligations to perform when there are ambiguities or gaps in the language of the contract. This means that if the language of the contract is not clear or complete, the courts may need to fill in the gaps by looking at the context and circumstances surrounding the agreement.
When interpreting a contract, courts may be asked whether implied conditions can be read into involved parties' obligations to perform when there are ambiguities or gaps in the language of the contract. This means that if the language of the contract is not clear or complete, the courts may need to fill in the gaps by looking at the context and circumstances surrounding the agreement. For example, if the contract does not explicitly state a deadline for completion of a task, the court may look at the parties' past conduct, industry standards, or other factors to determine what a reasonable deadline would be. Ultimately, the goal of interpreting a contract is to give effect to the parties' intentions, even if those intentions are not explicitly stated in the contract itself. This is why it is important to be clear and thorough when drafting contracts, to avoid ambiguity and the need for judicial interpretation.
To know more about courts visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8433911
#SPJ11
which of the following is not a consequence of general acceptance of the law of the sea convention?
Answers
The non-acceptance of the law of the sea convention by a country or countries. The general acceptance of the law of the sea convention has several consequences, including the establishment of clear rules and guidelines for the use and management of the world's oceans and resources.
The promotion of peaceful and cooperative relations among nations, and the protection of the marine environment. However, if a country or countries do not accept the convention, they are not bound by its rules and may potentially engage in activities that go against the principles outlined in the convention. This could lead to conflicts and disputes between nations and potentially harm the marine environment.
In conclusion, the non-acceptance of the law of the sea convention is not a consequence of general acceptance of the convention but rather an obstacle to its effective implementation and the achievement of its goals. It is important for all countries to recognize the importance of the law of the sea and work together to promote its principles and protect the world's oceans and marine life.
To know more about sea convention visit :
https://brainly.com/question/29234248
#SPJ11
the u.s. supreme court has held that trial judges must give juries a strict definition of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. true of false
Answers
It is true to say that the U.S. Supreme court has held that trial judges must give juries a strict definition of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
The Supreme Court said on Monday that a choice last term holding that the Constitution requires consistent jury decisions for state criminal preliminaries doesn't matter retroactively.
The decision is a misfortune for Thedrick Edwards and many others in Oregon, Louisiana and Puerto Rico, purviews that permitted non-consistent decisions under the steady gaze of the High Court's choice last year in Ramos v. Louisiana.
The 6-3 greater part choice was written by Equity Brett Kavanaugh, who was joined by the court's other moderate individuals.
In her contradiction, Equity Elena Kagan, joined by the court's other two liberal individuals, composed that last year's choice "accompanies a commitment, or in any event."
"On the off chance that the right to a consistent jury is so key - in the event that a decision delivered by a partitioned jury is 'no decision by any means' - then Thedrick Edwards shouldn't consume his time on earth in the slammer more than two hearers' resistance. I consciously disagree," she composed.
To know more about court,visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/29786682
#SPJ4
Defendant is accused of the wrong doing?
Answers
can you buy me a bird
Answers
Answer:
i would love to but im broke
Explanation:
good luck getting a bird