Since 2003 , the number of traffic fatalities per year in Texas has _____.

The amount of Austin's wages that California will tax, given when Austin became a resident of California, is C. $50,000 .

When you are from California and are considered a California resident, you are liable to pay taxes on income that you have made, wherever you are in the world . However , it is important to note that only income you earn while you are legally a California resident , will be liable for taxation under California law.

Now, Austin became a California resident on June 1, 2021. This means that every income he earned from this point on, would be treated as California income. This means that the entire amount of $ 50, 000 that Austin made in that period, would be taxable in California because he was a California resident at the time .

Find out more on California taxes at https://brainly.com/question/29236130

#SPJ1

Answer: 1, 3, 4

Explanation:

i took the test

Answer:

A C D

Explanation:

Edge 2021

State law requires that no person shall drive a vehicle on a roadway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing. This is referred to as the "Basic Speed Law."

The Basic Speed Law emphasizes the importance of driving at a safe speed, taking into account factors such as traffic, road conditions, and visibility.

It aims to minimize the risk of accidents and protect both the driver and other road users.

To adhere to this law, drivers must continuously assess their surroundings and adjust their speed accordingly, ensuring they do not exceed a reasonable and prudent speed for the given conditions.

To know more about State law refer here: https://brainly.com/question/12469633#

#SPJ11

The statement is true because the Supreme Court case Reed v. Reed (1971) marked a significant victory for women's rights movement.

In this case, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that an Idaho law favoring men over women in estate administration was unconstitutional, as it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

This decision established the precedent that gender-based discrimination is unconstitutional and laid the groundwork for further advancements in women's rights. Women's groups, such as the National Organization for Women (NOW), played a crucial role in seeking support from the courts, ultimately achieving this landmark victory for gender equality.

Learn more about rights movement https://brainly.com/question/31897973

#SPJ11

Answer:

you need to put the options

Explanation:

The right to one's own privacy may be traced back to English common law just as much as it can be found in the Constitution. This is one of the reasons why the 9th and 10th Amendments were included in the Constitution. They are around in part because of the common law that existed before it.

This is further explained below.

Generally, The concept of an individual's inalienable right to privacy may be found in a number of different legal systems. This right is designed to put a stop to governmental and private acts that violate the privacy of persons. The right to one's privacy is recognized in more than 150 country constitutions.

In conclusion, the right of an individual not to have things of a personal nature made public against their will or to be the subject of intrusion by other people.

Read more about the right to privacy

https://brainly.com/question/2033492

#SPJ1

In 2009, Caterpillar announced that it was decreasing the amount of time its employees in its Layfayette, Indiana plant could work. The recession had reduced Caterpillar’s business enough that it could no longer have its employees working an 8-hour day, but it didn’t want to let skilled employees leave the company. What approach did Caterpillar use to deal with their surplus of employees

Answer:

The answer is A

Explanation:

Eminent Domain refers to the power of state and federal government's to take private property for public use.

These secretions are mostly made up of salts, oils, and water. Added to these fluids is dirt from daily activities.

a. True

Specific receptors pick up the impression of the rise in temperature and transfer the data to the central nervous system, more especially to the preoptic area, which is located close to the hypothalamus. The effector cells, in this case the secretory cells of the sweat glands, receive an efferent reaction from the brain after the information has been processed.

The aqueous-based secretions of the eccrine glands in the fingers and palms, along with extra material from sebaceous glands, particularly on the forehead, are what normally make up fingerprints. The latter contamination is the result of typical human actions like touching one's face or hair.

Learn more about Fingerprints .

https://brainly.com/question/29515076

#SPJ4

Yes, words or terms in contracts that are subject to more than one reasonable interpretation can lead to mistakes.

When a contract is ambiguous or unclear, it may result in one or both parties misunderstanding the terms of the agreement. This can lead to disputes or litigation down the line, which can be costly and time-consuming for all involved. It is important for contracts to be written in clear and unambiguous language to avoid any misunderstandings or mistakes.

Words or terms in contracts that are subject to more than one reasonable interpretation can indeed lead to mistakes. This is because when a contract contains ambiguous language or vague terms, it can be difficult for the parties involved to fully understand their rights and obligations under the agreement. This can lead to misunderstandings, disputes, and even litigation.

Learn more about interpretation here:

https://brainly.com/question/30932003

#SPJ11

Based on the data, the conclusion which can be drawn about the impact of the 19th Amendment is that, The percentage of women voters remains high even decades later.​

What is the 19th Amendment?

On June 4, 1919, the Congress approved the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution, and on August 18, 1920, it was ratified. Women now have the right to vote thanks to the 19th Amendment. Women began to demand the right to vote in the middle of the 19th century through protests, petitions, and acts of civil disobedience, but it took them decades to succeed.

For American women, reaching this milestone was challenging since it required a protracted and challenging battle, but it was a win. The right to vote for women in America is thus legally guaranteed by the 19th amendment.

The 19th Amendment had a significant impact on the rising number of votes cast by American women, according to the data. Even decades after American women were granted the right to vote, their number of votes has continued rising and they now outnumber men.

To know more about 19th Amendment refer:

https://brainly.com/question/9822287

#SPJ4

Disclaimer- The complete question is-

Based on the data, which conclusion can be drawn about the impact of the 19th Amendment?

The high percentage of women voters has had a political impact.

Despite the opportunity to vote, women do not vote as often as men

Despite the ability to vote, women register in lower numbers than men.

The percentage of women voters remains high even decades later.​

United General Insurance Company Limited v Marilyn Hamilton - JamaicaIn the case of United General Insurance Company Limited v Marilyn Hamilton, the issue at hand is unfair or wrongful dismissal or termination of contract. The IRAC method can be used to analyze this case.

1. Issue: The issue, in this case,  is whether the dismissal or termination of Marilyn Hamilton's contract by United General Insurance Company Limited was unfair or wrongful.
2. Rule: In Jamaica, unfair or wrongful dismissal occurs when an employer terminates an employee's contract without a valid reason or fails to follow proper procedures. The Employment (Termination and Redundancy Payments) Act provides protection to employees in such situations.
3. Application: In this case, it needs to be determined whether the termination of Marilyn Hamilton's contract by United General Insurance Company Limited was done without a valid reason or if proper procedures were not followed.
4. Conclusion: Based on the available information, a direct answer to whether the dismissal or termination of Marilyn Hamilton's contract was unfair or wrongful cannot be provided without further details about the case's specific circumstances. It would require a thorough examination of the facts, evidence, and legal arguments presented in the case.

The case of United General Insurance Company Limited v Marilyn Hamilton involves the issue of unfair or wrongful dismissal or termination of a contract. To analyze this case using the IRAC method, we identify the issue, the relevant rule in Jamaica regarding unfair or wrongful dismissal, and apply the rule to the facts of the case. However, without specific details about the case's circumstances, it is impossible to provide a direct answer or conclusion regarding the fairness or wrongfulness of Marilyn Hamilton's dismissal. Further examination of the facts and legal arguments would be necessary to reach a conclusion in this case.

Tagging:

To know more about the IRAC method visit:

brainly.com/question/33477664

#SPJ11

Eurocentric approach of punishment is stereotypes to European countries while Africa correctional approach is based on interdependence.

They are ways or methods that have been implemented or use to to punish individual of an offense.

Correctional approach is usually determined by the environment or country.

Eurocentric approach of punishment is stereotypes to European countries where punishment are given differently and it gives a negative mindset while Africa correctional approach is based on culture where they believe individual depends on each other and as such are not stereotypes.

Therefore, Eurocentric approach of punishment is stereotypes to European countries while Africa correctional approach is based on interdependence.

Learn more punishment here,

https://brainly.com/question/1275830

The first amendment gives U.S. citizens freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to peacefully assemble, and the right to petition the government. This means that citizens are allowed to express themselves so long as they do not do so in a threatening manner or in a manner that breaches the peace. Freedom of the press ensures that citizens may fill in spaces that are fully accessible by the public. However, citizens may not record on someone's property without their permission, and obviously cannot be in possession of illegal content (which I will not be going into detail about). The right to peacefully assemble ensures that citizens are allowed to peacefully protest without being harassed, threatened, assaulted, or battered by law enforcement so long as the protestors do not act in a disorderly manner. Lastly, the right to petition the government allows citizens to express their concerns to the government without retaliation. For example, if someone wanted to record a police department that has allegedly violated citizens' rights, investigative journalists could go to the police department, record, or take pictures without interference.

National and state governments have similar structures and functions,with power distribution   defined by the U.S. Constitution.

The national government   and New Hampshire's state government share a three-branch structure,with executive, legislative, and judicial branches.

They have distinct functions,such as law enforcement, lawmaking, and law interpretation. Power distribution   is defined by the U.S. Constitution, including Article IV, Section 4,which guarantees a republican form of government in each state.

New Hampshire's current   state leaders, including the Governor,perform crucial roles in executing state laws and managing government affairs.

Learn more about structure of government at:

https://brainly.com/question/22236084

#SPJ1

Answer:

unethical

1 what if the cookies where spiked. then what would he do?

2 if the cookies had something she was allergic to and they didn't ask

3 maybe their familie was being nice but i think the parole officer didn't trust them so led the exception to his wife to make sure

Explanation:

Major-party presidential nominations are now determined primarily by the primary election process. In the United States, the primary elections allow registered party members and, in some cases, unaffiliated voters to participate in selecting their party's nominee for the presidential election.

This process involves a series of state-level primary elections and caucuses in which voters express their preferences for a particular candidate.

The primary election process has become the dominant method for selecting major-party presidential nominees over the years. It allows for broader participation and a more democratic approach compared to the previous system, which relied heavily on party leaders and delegates at the national conventions to choose the nominees.

Through primary elections, voters have a direct say in determining the candidate who will represent their party in the general election. Candidates campaign extensively, seeking support from voters across different states and competing to secure the majority of delegates needed to win the party's nomination.

To know more about  presidential nominations refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/31185431

#SPJ11

Answer:

b) to determine the natural rights of human beings and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power.

The purpose  in examining the “state of Nature” is To determine the natural rights of a human being and, thereby, the legitimate extent of political power. Thus, option (B) is correct.

Natural law claims that persons have certain rights. For instance, Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are listed as natural rights in the United States Declaration of Independence.

The right to property, the freedom to criticize the government, and the right to free, and independent thought are all examples of natural rights.

These are universal and inalienable since they are not founded on the laws, customs, or beliefs of any one community or government.

Therefore, it can be concluded that the goal of studying the "state of Nature" is to evaluate a human being's inherent rights and, as a result, the rightful degree of political authority. Hence, option (B) is correct.

Learn more about natural rights here:

https://brainly.com/question/20887193

#SPJ2

In the Classical world, the political and personal realms were deeply interconnected, with the actions and decisions of individuals having significant implications on both spheres. The intertwining of politics and personal life can be observed in various Classical societies, including Persia, Rome, Athens, and Early Christianity.

In Persia, the political world was closely tied to personal life through the concept of kingship. The Persian king, known as the Shah or Emperor, held absolute power and was considered the embodiment of divine authority. Personal loyalty and obedience to the king were highly valued, and failure to demonstrate loyalty could result in severe consequences. The personal lives of individuals were therefore heavily influenced by their allegiance to the political order, as any perceived disloyalty could lead to loss of status, exile, or even execution. Similarly, in Rome, personal life was intertwined with politics, particularly among the ruling elite. The concept of "mos maiorum" emphasized the importance of upholding traditional Roman values and social norms. The political success and reputation of individuals often depended on their adherence to these societal expectations in their personal conduct, such as maintaining strong family ties, demonstrating virtuous behavior, and fulfilling public duties. Personal scandals or moral transgressions could have detrimental effects on one's political standing and aspirations for office.In Athens, personal life was also political in nature, especially for male citizens who actively participated in the democratic system. Athenian citizens were expected to engage in public affairs, attend assemblies, and serve in various civic roles. The political participation of individuals was closely tied to their personal reputation and honor within the community. The ability to deliver persuasive speeches, form alliances, and gain the trust of fellow citizens played crucial roles in shaping one's political influence. Additionally, decisions made within the family unit, such as the selection of marriage partners or the upbringing of children, could have political implications, as alliances and connections formed through familial ties could influence political networks.
In Early Christianity, personal life was intertwined with politics through the establishment of a distinct religious community with its own moral codes and expectations. Early Christians faced persecution and oppression from the Roman Empire, which sought to suppress the growth of this new religious movement. The personal beliefs and practices of Christians often clashed with the dominant political and social norms of the time, leading to conflicts and tensions. Personal decisions to adhere to Christian teachings, participate in communal rituals, or openly identify as Christians were inherently political acts that challenged the established order.
Overall, in the Classical world, the political and personal spheres were intimately connected. Loyalty to rulers, adherence to societal norms, political participation, and religious affiliations all influenced personal lives and vice versa. The examples of Persia, Rome, Athens, and Early Christianity demonstrate the complex interplay between politics and personal life, highlighting how individual actions and choices carried broader political significance in these societies.

To know more about Classical world, click here https://brainly.com/question/5338138

#SPJ11

True, The amount of the casualty loss is $3,500 for Harvey

Amount of the casualty loss = insurance proceeds - adjusted basis

Amount of the casualty loss = $7,500 $10,000

Amount of the casualty loss = $3,500

To learn more about casualty from the given link :

https://brainly.com/question/16214927

#SPJ4

Answer:

There are several reasons why it may be better for the police to stay away from using informants in cases, even though informants can provide valuable information:

Reliability: Informants may not always provide accurate or reliable information. They may have their own biases or motivations for providing false or misleading information, which can compromise the integrity of a case.

Ethics: The use of informants raises ethical concerns, as informants may be coerced or threatened into providing information, or may be incentivized with promises of leniency or reduced sentences. This can raise questions about the fairness of the legal process.

Safety: Informants may be at risk of retaliation from criminal organizations or individuals if their identities are revealed. This can put the informant and others in danger, and can compromise ongoing investigations.

Legal challenges: The use of informants can be challenged in court, as defendants may argue that the use of an informant violates their rights under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Resource allocation: The use of informants can be resource-intensive, as police may need to devote significant time and effort to managing and protecting informants. This can divert resources away from other important aspects of law enforcement.

Explanation:

Discrimination in the purchasing or renting of real estate is regulated by Fair Housing Act.

When the Fair home Act was passed by Congress in 1968, one of its main goals was to outlaw racial discrimination in home sales and rentals. Nevertheless, racial discrimination in housing is still an issue more than 30 years later. The majority of complaints handled by the Justice Department follow a pattern or practise that alleges racial discrimination. Housing providers will occasionally make up information about the availability of housing in an effort to hide their discrimination, either by claiming that none was available or by directing homehunters to particular neighbourhoods depending on race. People who are given such inaccurate information or are misled may not even be aware that they have been the targets of prejudice. The Department of Justice has filed numerous lawsuits alleging this type of racial or ethnic discrimination.

To know more about real estate :

https://brainly.com/question/14423606

#SPJ4

The statement The United States Court System is very simplistic and easy to follow due to federalism is false as  The United States Court System is complex and not necessarily easy to follow due to federalism

The court system is made up of federal and state courts, with multiple levels of courts in each system. Each level of court has different responsibilities and jurisdictions, making the system intricate and challenging to navigate. Additionally, federalism creates the possibility for different interpretations of the law by different state courts, which can create further complexity.

The United States Court System is a complex system consisting of both federal and state courts. The federal court system is made up of the Supreme Court, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and 94 district courts. The state court system varies from state to state, but generally includes trial courts, appellate courts, and a state supreme court. The court system is responsible for interpreting and applying the law, resolving disputes, and ensuring justice is served. The court system plays a crucial role in the American legal system, and its decisions have far-reaching consequences.

To know more about  United States Court System here

https://brainly.com/question/29615892

#SPJ4

The statement "we want justice for ourselves, for our friends, and for our children" reflects a universal human desire for fairness, equality, and respect. Justice is an important concept that is essential for maintaining social order and ensuring that individuals are held accountable for their actions.

When we demand justice for ourselves, we are advocating for our own rights and freedoms, and we seek to hold those who have wronged us accountable. Similarly, when we seek justice for our friends, we are standing up for those we care about and protecting them from harm.

Moreover, when we seek justice for our children, we are ensuring that they grow up in a safe and equitable society where their rights are protected. This is particularly important given the vulnerability of children, who may not have the same ability to advocate for themselves as adults.

In essence, the desire for justice is a fundamental human need that transcends culture, race, and religion. It is an expression of our desire for fairness and equality, and it is critical for promoting social cohesion and ensuring that everyone has an opportunity to thrive.

When we demand justice for ourselves, for our friends, and for our children, we are taking a stand for what is right and just, and we are working to create a better world for ourselves and for future generations.

To learn more about Justice here:

https://brainly.com/question/25756666#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Based on the results of the Minneapolis domestic violence experiment, which concluded that arrest was the most effective in most domestic violence cases, the Minneapolis Police Department started requiring police officials to use it as the main approach and to make a report on the reasons not to do it if they fail to do it.

Explanation:

The police policies were changed in March of 1984 and led to a record of people in jail on spouse assault charges.

Answer:

Labeling theory suggests that after time you become what others label you as. For example, the child who is being labeled as "evil" in school will become an evil person. The person becomes the thing he is described as being.

Explanation: