Answer:
B. 17-39
Explanation:
what was memorable about Nathanial Langford?
Nathaniel Pitt Langford was a notable figure in the formation of Yellowstone National Park as well as the early years of the Montana gold mines. He was an American adventurer, merchant, administrator, vigilante, and historian from Saint Paul, Minnesota.
What did Nathaniel Langford do?A wagon route was to be built from Saint Paul to the Salmon River mining districts of the Rocky Mountains through Fort Benton on June 16, 1862, when Langford left as a member and officer of the Northern Overland Expedition under the command of Captain James L. Fisk. The expedition arrived at the Gold Fields of Grasshopper Creek in what would later become Bannack, Montana.
There, Langford and his business associates founded a sawmill, freight firms, and other enterprises. Langford was designated Montana Territory's Internal Revenue Collector and National Bank Examiner in 1864, not long after the territory was created on May 28. He served both roles for five years.
Learn more about Nathaniel Langford here:
https://brainly.com/question/28501938
#SPJ2
which amendment outlawed the manufacture, sale, transportation, import, or export of alcoholic beverages?
Answer:
the 18th Amendment
Explanation:
Mr. kuma break the copyright law and was find guilty by a court. find out the total amount Mr kumah would pay if he was find maximum penalty units and minimum penalty units.
Answer:
somewhere from $200 to like $100,00 or $150,000 I believe
ms.urbanski kept a pistol in her home as protection against intruders. one evening she heard a noise in the den and went to investigate. upon entering the room she saw a man stealing her television. the bugular seeing the gun ran for the window but ms. urbanski fired and killed hime before he could escape. in a trial for manslaughter ms urbanski pleaded self-defense. would you find her guilty? why or why not? would it matter if the state had a stand your ground law
Hãy viết một đoạn văn ngắn về tên quan phụ mẫu trong tác phẩm Sống chết mặc bay
Answer:
My mother is my best friend. She can understand me and help me to solve my problems. My mother is always ready to give any sacrifice for my wishes and my needs.Mothers are one of the first indications of the sovereignty of God in our lives. Mothers teach us to have confidence and belief in ourselves. Mothers knew from experience how important for people to believe in themselves in order for children to be whole, strong and grow with a healthy estimation of oneself.The love between mother and child arises instantly, as a bond uniting two bodies and souls. A mother's love is unconditional and eternal. Explanation:
Why are there different sentences for different crimes? Why are there different sentences for the same crime?
The existence of different sentences for different crimes and variations in sentencing for the same crime can be attributed to several factors within the legal systems of different jurisdictions.
Why are there different sentences for different crimes, and different sentences for the same crime?Here are a few key reasons for these differences:
Crimes differ greatly in terms of their seriousness and effects on society. Different penalties are given for various offenses in legal systems in an effort to represent this variety. For instance, crimes like murder or armed robbery are typically seen as more serious and subject to harsher punishments than less serious crimes like petty theft or simple assault.Legislative discretion: Lawmakers have the power to adopt laws and amend them, including choosing the punishments for certain offences. Due to their discretion, legislators are able to weigh a variety of variables when determining punishments, including the potential harm that will be done, society norms and values, issues with public safety, and the necessity for deterrent or rehabilitation.Legal precedent and case-specific factors can also have an impact on how sentencing rules are applied. Legal precedents are established by earlier court rulings. The particulars of a case, such as the defendant's criminal history, purpose, level of involvement, mitigating or aggravating circumstances, and the discretion used by judges or juries, may result in different sentences.Learn more on crime sentence here https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1
Types of civil service
the federal odometer act gives victims of odometer tampering a remedy for damages but does not make altering vehicle odometers a criminal offense.
There are e levels (or tiers) to the US Court System and they are:
A. District Court, Court of Appeals, and US Supreme Court
B. District Court, Trail Court, and Magistrate Court
C. District Court, Court of Appeals, and Magistrate Court
D. District Court, Court of Appeals, and Trail Court
Answer:
a. District Court, Court of Appeals, and US Supreme Court
Explanation:
When speaking of Federal Law Enforcement, one of the biggest departments is the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) created shortly after 9/11. List the various agencies that are contained within DHS. Discuss the main goals and objectives of DHS and how these various agenices help to accomplish that goal.
Answer:
你真的翻译了它你绝望的you子
Explanation:
Explain the qualities of a scientific investigation
Answer:
Five key descriptors for the scientific method are: empirical, replicable, provisional, objective and systematic.
Which of these responsibilities of US citizenship is considered mandatory?
A.holding political office
B.serving in the army
C.serving on a jury
D.joining a political party
Both proposal and ratification use methods that can either go through the states or through Congress. Why do you think the Founders allowed for both options?
Answer:
Strike a balance between the powers of the federal government and the states.
Explanation:
The Founders of the United States allowed for both state-based and congressional-based methods of proposing and ratifying constitutional amendments in order to strike a balance between the powers of the federal government and the states.
At the time of the Constitutional Convention, there were concerns that the new federal government would be too powerful and could infringe on the rights of the states and their citizens. To address these concerns, the Founders designed a system of federalism in which power is shared between the federal government and the states. The ability to propose and ratify amendments to the Constitution through both state-based and congressional-based methods reflects this balance of power.
The state-based method of proposing amendments, in which two-thirds of the states must call for a convention, gives the states a direct role in the amendment process and allows them to bypass Congress if they feel that Congress is not adequately representing their interests. This method gives the states a significant amount of power in the amendment process and allows them to push for changes to the Constitution that they feel are necessary.
The congressional-based method of proposing amendments, on the other hand, requires two-thirds of both houses of Congress to vote in favor of the amendment. This method gives Congress the power to propose amendments and ensures that the federal government has a role in the amendment process.
Similarly, the Founders allowed for both state-based and congressional-based methods of ratifying amendments in order to balance the powers of the federal government and the states. The state-based method of ratification requires approval from three-fourths of the states, while the congressional-based method requires approval from three-fourths of state legislatures. By giving both the states and Congress a role in the amendment process, the Founders ensured that power would be distributed in a way that balanced the interests of the federal government and the states.
For any geometric figures A and B , if A ≈ B, then B ≈ A.
Answer:
yeah
Explanation:
if a=b and b=c then a=c
what's the question here
Why do many poisonings go undetected in our modern day?
OB.
C.
D.
because poison testing is very expensive
because poison testing is unreliable
because there are no routine procedures for poison testing
because poison testing can only be carried out by forensic toxicologists with at least 15 years of experience
Poisonings go undetected in our modern day because poison testing can only be carried out by forensic toxicologists with at least 15 years of experience.
Injury or death brought on by ingesting, breathing, touching, or injecting various medications, chemicals, venoms, or gases is referred to as poisoning. Many chemicals, including medicines and carbon monoxide, become hazardous at larger dosages or concentrations. Pesticides, personal care and topical goods, and cleaning chemicals are some of the top 10 household products that cause poisoning exposures experience each year. Poisonings at work result from exposure to a range of chemicals. Over 90% of toxic exposures take place at home.
To learn more about Poisonings, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/8439604
#SPJ1
Which of the following is NOT an element of a crime?
A. Mens Rea
B. Concurrence
C. Collaboration
D. Cause in result of harm
Collaboration is not an element of a crime. Collaboration refers to working together and is not directly related to the essential components of a crime. Therefore, option C is correct.
The elements of a crime typically consist of four key components.
First, there is the actus reus, which refers to the guilty act or the physical action that constitutes the offense. Second, there is the mens rea, which represents the mental state or intent of the offender. Third, there must be a concurrence, meaning that the act and the intent must align or occur simultaneously. Finally, there must be a causation, demonstrating that the actions of the offender directly resulted in the harm or illegal outcome. These elements collectively form the basis for determining criminal liability and culpability.Learn more about elements of crime here:
https://brainly.com/question/11221577
#SPJ6
The fine for a first time littering ticket is
up to:
$250
How do avidar’s values and approaches to humans resources management support Lob’s business success?
Avidar's values and approaches to human resources management play a significant role in supporting Lob's business success. Here's how our Employee Engagement and Satisfaction, Talent Acquisition and Development, Diversity, and Inclusion, and Performance Management
1. Employee Engagement and Satisfaction: Avidar focuses on creating a positive work environment where employees feel engaged, valued, and satisfied. By promoting a culture of employee well-being and work-life balance, Avidar enhances employee morale, productivity, and retention. Engaged and satisfied employees are more likely to contribute their best efforts to the company's success, leading to improved business outcomes for Lob.
2. Talent Acquisition and Development: Avidar recognizes the importance of attracting and retaining top talent. They employ effective recruitment strategies to bring in skilled individuals who align with Lob's goals and values. Avidar also prioritizes employee development through training programs, mentorship, and career progression opportunities. By investing in their employees' growth and professional advancement, Avidar ensures a highly skilled and motivated workforce that contributes to Lob's success.
3. Diversity and Inclusion: Avidar embraces diversity and inclusion as integral components of its human resources approach. They foster an inclusive workplace where individuals from diverse backgrounds feel respected, valued, and empowered. This approach cultivates a rich pool of perspectives, ideas, and experiences within Lob, driving innovation, creativity, and adaptability, which are crucial for business success in a rapidly changing market.
4. Performance Management: Avidar implements effective performance management practices to align individual goals with Lob's objectives. They provide regular feedback, set clear expectations, and recognize and reward employees' achievements. This approach promotes accountability, encourages high performance, and helps drive the overall success of Lob.
By upholding these values and employing these approaches, Avidar creates a strong foundation for Lob's human resources management. It leads to a motivated, skilled, and diverse workforce that is engaged, productive, and aligned with the company's vision and goals, ultimately contributing to Lob's business success.
Know more about Human resources management here:
https://brainly.com/question/14419086
#SPJ8
The steps to making laws
Answer: 1. First, a Representative sponsors a bill.
2. The bill is then assigned to a committee for study.
3. If released by the committee, the bill is put on a calendar to be voted on, debated or amended.
4. If the bill passes by simple majority (218 of 435), the bill moves to the Senate.
5. In the Senate, the bill is assigned to another committee and, if released, debated and voted on.
6. If the Senate makes changes, the bill must return to the House for concurrence.
7. The resulting bill returns to the House and Senate for final approval.
8. The President then has 10 days to veto the final bill or sign it into law.
A judge’s cases were being reviewed, and it was discovered that the judge systematically gave longer sentences to minority defendants but shorter sentences to attractive women. What ethical standard is the judge MOST LIKELY violating?
A.
utilitarianism
B.
virtue
C.
common good
D.
fairness and justice
The judge is likely transgressing the laws of fairness and justice.
Is utilitarianism a moral principle?Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that establishes right from wrong by emphasising outcomes. It embodies consequentialism in some way. According to utilitarianism, the decision that would result in the greatest good for the greatest number of individuals is the morally ideal one.
Is utilitarianism a reliable ethical principle?Its is a fundamental tenet—that the moral rightness or wrongness of actions relies on their consequences—is shared with other consequentialist systems. The only an effects that really matter are the outcomes of that an action produces, whether positive and negative.
To know more about justice visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/30169554
#SPJ1
A person who has good judgement
A. is able to make smart choices
B. is not able to make smart choices
C. feels indifferent about their choices
Answer:
is able to make Smart choices
Which of these actions would most likely violate civil rights laws?
A. an airline bans smoking on flights
B. a school system requires a dress code for students
C. an employer refuses to consider senior citizens for jobs
D. a police department uses written tests to help select recruits
Hello! The answer would be C: an employer refuses to consider senior citizens for jobs.
This is because one' is discriminating towards a specific group of people which happens to be senior citizens. This does not allow equal opportunity for them so there it is violating their civil rights.
What are some different sentences a criminal might face?
Answer: 5-year sentence, lifetime sentence, and ten-year sentence.
Explanation: Just depends on what the judge decides.
What is the degree of influence an officer must exert over the suspect to take him or her safely into custody?
A. Restraint
B. Deadly force
C. Control
D. Reasonability
Answer:
C. Control
Explanation:
In all cases, control is that degree of influence the officer must exert over the violator to take the person safely into custody.
Answer:
C. Control
Explanation:
The control is the degree of influence an officer must exert over the suspect to take him or her safely into custody.
Write an essay:
Why has there been a rise in crime in our country and what can law enforcement do to reduce it?
The rise in crime in South Africa, high levels of poverty and inequality, unemployment, social disintegration, substance abuse, inadequate education and social support systems, and weak law enforcement and criminal justice systems.
How to reduce crime in South Africa ?To curtail crime, law enforcement agencies can employ a range of strategies. First and foremost, they can prioritize community policing approaches, fostering collaborations with local communities to cultivate trust, enhance communication, and collaborate on crime prevention initiatives.
This entails engaging community members actively, establishing neighborhood watch programs, and implementing outreach initiatives to tackle underlying social issues.
Find out more on South Africa at https://brainly.com/question/31152480
#SPJ1
Case 1: Jerry, a teen, borrowed his family's car and spent an afternoon cruising around
town with his best friend Manuel. They had a lot of fun driving around the usual places
where their classmates hang out. Each was texting pals to see who would be out and
Jerry, while distracted, ran a red light and entered an intersection where he another car
rammed him, seriously hurting Manuel.
Has Jerry committed a tort against his friend Manuel and be held liable for damages in
civil court? Why or why not? Be sure to apply the "test" for negligence or state why the
“presumption" of negligence applies if you believe Jerry is liable for Manuel's damages.
do you need help wording this?
What would happen if people didn’t defending the nation
one benefit of a society that is is socially chosive
What Kind of Special Training or Knowledge do you have to have to be a lawyer?
To be a lawyer one must possess knowledge of legislation along with degree in Juris Doctor (JD) degree and clearance of the state bar exam.
What is a lawyer?
A lawyer refers as to an individual who occupies his profession in the field of law as an advocate. This individual has knowledge about legal proceedings that took place in court as part of their Job.
In order to become a lawyer, candidates must complete a challenging educational program, pass a licensing exam, and demonstrate excellent communication skills, legal knowledge, protocol knowledge, and a thorough understanding of rules.
Learn more about lawyers, here:
https://brainly.com/question/16679161
#SPJ1
Mr. Peters has a legal handgun to protect his home against intruders and against the increasing crime in his neighborhood. One night, Takeshi, a 16 year old Japanese exchange student, walks up Mr. Peters’ driveway looking for a party. Takeshi thinks Mr. Peters is hosting the party and begins yelling and waving his arms. Mr. Peters gets scared, retrieves his handgun, and points it at Takeshi while yelling “Freeze!” Takeshi does not understand English and keeps walking toward Mr. Peters. Thinking he is an intruder, Mr. Peters shoots and kills Takeshi at the front steps of his house. Mr. Peters is charged with first-degree muder. Does he have a defense?
Answer: In this scenario, Mr. Peters may argue that he acted in self-defense. Self-defense is a legal defense that allows an individual to use reasonable force in order to protect themselves from an imminent threat of harm. However, whether Mr. Peters's actions were reasonable under the circumstances could be debated.
A key factor that may be considered is whether Mr. Peters had a reasonable belief that Takeshi posed an imminent threat of harm to him. Mr. Peters may argue that he was scared and believed that Takeshi was an intruder, based on the fact that Takeshi was yelling and waving his arms. However, the fact that Takeshi did not understand English, and was not responding to Mr. Peters's commands may indicate that Mr. Peters should have realized that Takeshi was not an immediate threat.
Another important factor that may be considered is whether Mr. Peters's use of deadly force was reasonable under the circumstances. In this case, it could be argued that shooting Takeshi was not a reasonable response, as there may have been other options that Mr. Peters could have taken to protect himself, such as calling the police or using non-lethal force.
In general, whether Mr. Peters has a defense will depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the case, and how these facts are presented and evaluated in court.
Explanation: