Sally is a world champion boxer. She got mad at Cathy and hit her, knowing she might die from being hit that hard. Cathy did not die and was instead knocked unconscious. While unconscious, Cathy threw up and choked to death (adapted from People v. Ginger, which was not about boxers).
CAN SALLY BE CONVICTED FOR THE DEATH OF CATHY?
Answers
Related Questions
Which of the following is impossible?
A. To recognize someone, but not remember where you know them from.
B. To recognize someone, even though you have not seen them for 20 years.
C. To recognize someone and remember their name, but not remember any other information about them.
D. To fail to recognize someone because they have changed their hairstyle.
Answers
Answer:
C
Explanation:
"What is civic responsibility and how does the structure of our government impact you personally?"
Answers
The structure of our government shapes the rights, opportunities, and responsibilities of individuals in society by actively participating in civic responsibility and engaging with the government, I can make a positive impact on my community and contribute to the democratic process that governs our nation.
Civic responsibility refers to the duty and commitment of individuals to actively participate in the functioning of their community, society, and government.
It involves being informed about important issues, voting in elections, respecting the law, and contributing to the well-being of others and the overall community.
Civic responsibility is essential for a thriving and democratic society as it fosters active citizenship, promotes social cohesion, and ensures the accountability of government to its citizens.
The structure of our government impacts me personally in several ways. As a citizen, I have the right and responsibility to vote in elections, which allows me to have a say in the governance of my country.
By exercising this right, I can influence decisions that affect public policies, social issues, and the direction of the nation.
Additionally, the government's structure impacts me through the laws and regulations it enacts.
These laws govern various aspects of my life, including my rights, responsibilities, and interactions with others.
Understanding the legal framework is crucial to ensure I am in compliance with the law and to protect my rights as a citizen.
The government's structure also impacts me through the services it provides.
This includes public infrastructure, education, healthcare, and social welfare programs that contribute to the overall well-being of society.
As a citizen, I benefit from these services and contribute to them through taxes and civic engagement.
Moreover, the structure of government impacts my freedom of speech and assembly, enabling me to voice my opinions, express my ideas, and participate in peaceful protests and advocacy for causes I believe in.
For similar questions on civic responsibility
https://brainly.com/question/21336016
#SPJ1
On a two-lane roadway, driving on the left side of the road in a No Passing Zone is____
A: Allowed if an obstruction on the right side of the road makes it necessary, and only if the oncoming lane is clear.
B: Allowed for motorcycles, but not allowed for cars and vehicles of normal width and quickness.
C: Allowed if the vehicle in front of you is driving slower than the speed limit.
Answers
The two lane roadway is currently used in most states and is an intermediate road. The traffic can move at a speed of 25 to 40 mph. They should have a controlled intersection and driveway. The cars can also be parked along the side.
They are allowed when obstruction on the right side of the road makes it necessary, and if the oncoming lane is clear to go.Hence the option A is correct.
Learn more about the driving on the left side of the road in.
brainly.com/question/10369348.
There are two suspects in a shooting investigation. Bullets are recovered from the crime scene. Both suspects own guns, and these guns have been seized by the police. How will the investigators check to see if one of these guns fired the found bullets?
A.
They will observe the suspects’ guns under a comparison microscope.
B.
They will compare gunpowder residue from the guns to the bullets.
C.
They will fire bullets from the guns to match with the found bullets.
D.
They will compare fingerprints from the guns to the bullets at the scene.
Answers
They will observe the suspects gun under a comparison microscope.
Where can you find the cartridge's headstamp?
O On the side
O On the internet
O On the base
O On the top
Answers
The cartridge's head stamp can be found on the base. Thus, option C is correct.
What is the head of a cartridge?The propellant and primer are housed in the cartridge casing (including the primer cap). The 'head stamp' on most small calibre cartridges has text or symbols that may identify manufacturer, calibre, or date information. The head stamp is located on the bottom of the cartridge casing.
A bullet or shot charge is discharged through a metal tube. It might be rifled or smooth. The section of a cartridge case containing the primer, often known as the head.
Finally, before you shoot, check the ammo box and ammunition head stamp for the correct caliber of cartridge, or gauge and height of shot shell.
The marks on the bottom of a cassette built for a weapon are known as a head stamp. Therefore, it can be concluded that option C is correct.
Learn more about cartridge here:
https://brainly.com/question/13724994
#SPJ1
Which of these actions would most likely violate civil rights laws?
A. an airline bans smoking on flights
B. a school system requires a dress code for students
C. an employer refuses to consider senior citizens for jobs
D. a police department uses written tests to help select recruits
Answers
Hello! The answer would be C: an employer refuses to consider senior citizens for jobs.
This is because one' is discriminating towards a specific group of people which happens to be senior citizens. This does not allow equal opportunity for them so there it is violating their civil rights.
what is state ,main components of state and 5 theory of state
Answers
A.what hazards might a motorcyclist encounter B. what precautions should be taken by a driver when traveling near a motorcyclist
Answers
A Hazards that a motorcyclist might encounter include: Lack of visibility, Road conditions, Driver inattention B. Precautions that should be taken by drivers when traveling near a motorcyclist include: Increase awareness, Maintain a safe following distance, Signal intentions
What hazards might a motorcyclist encounter?A. Hazards that a motorcyclist might encounter include:
1. Lack of visibility: Motorcycles are smaller and less visible compared to cars, making it harder for other drivers to spot them. This increases the risk of being involved in accidents due to drivers not seeing the motorcycle.
2. Road conditions: Uneven road surfaces, potholes, debris, or wet and slippery conditions can pose significant hazards for motorcyclists. These conditions can cause loss of control, skidding, or difficulty in maneuvering the motorcycle.
3. Driver inattention: Other drivers on the road might be distracted, not paying attention, or not properly checking blind spots. This can lead to collisions or near-misses with motorcyclists.
B. Precautions that should be taken by drivers when traveling near a motorcyclist include:
1. Increase awareness: Drivers should actively scan the road for motorcycles, especially in blind spots, during lane changes, and at intersections. Being aware and alert can help prevent accidents.
2. Maintain a safe following distance: Keep a safe distance between your vehicle and the motorcycle in front of you.
3. Signal intentions: Use your turn signals to indicate lane changes or turns well in advance, allowing motorcyclists to anticipate your actions.
Learn more about Hazards at https://brainly.com/question/30090471
#SPJ1
of the 1 000+ employees within interpol what percentage are police officers
Answers
Police officers seconded by their national governments (INTERPOL) make up around a quarter of the employees.
What is an Interpol organization?An agency with its headquarters in Paris oversees police investigations into crimes with an international component.
How does the FBI stack up against Interpol?The FBI investigates crimes like bank robberies, tax evasion, and kidnapping. Both the CIA and FBI have access to cutting-edge technologies worldwide, as well as intelligent, motivated employees. France's Lyon is home to Interpol's main office.
What authority does Interpol possess?International law enforcement agency INTERPOL provides administrative support to enable nations to cooperate in the battle against global crime. It lacks executive authority. As a result, its representatives never detain suspects or take action without consulting national authorities.
To know more about Interpol visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29240094
#SPJ1
Which aspect of US politics is most closely tied to the concept of indirect democracy?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
In a Democracy is power is vested in the people. The people have a say in the management of their affairs. The people can directly decide, or they can choose a few individuals to represent them.
Americans have political representation in both the Senate and the House of Representatives
In a short paragraph, describe the requirements that both city firefighters and wild land firefighters must have in order to pass the physical conditioning tests.
Answers
Answer:
Firefighters must be safe at all times, protecting people etc and must be fair to all people. They also must understand that lives are at risk
Explanation:
Have a nice day
Firefighters must always act safely, protect others, and treat everyone fairly. They should also be aware that lives are in danger.
What is Firefighters?
First responders and rescuers who specialize in combating fires are known as firefighters. Their primary responsibility is to extinguish hazardous fires that pose a threat to the environment, property, and human lives. They may also be required in specific circumstances or jurisdictions to save the lives of animals.
A fireman's duties do not solely involve fighting fires. That is only one of the many things a fireman does. In addition to putting out fires and protecting people from danger, a firefighter helps with hazardous materials, traffic accidents, medical emergencies, floods, and even saves cats from trees.
Male firefighters may occasionally be referred to as firemen (and, less commonly, a female firefighter as firewoman).
Thus, Firefighters must always act safely.
For more information about Firefightersclick here:
https://brainly.com/question/1023064
#SPJ2
PLEASE HELP!!!
In 1997, Jennifer Tombs, a 16-year-old, was convicted of shooting and killing her babysitter because her babysitter would not let her go out and see her friends. Which of
the following would have been needed to try Tombs in adult court?
prosecutorial waiver
status exclusions
adjudication ruling
proof of a crime
Answers
Answer:
Prosecutorial Waiver
Explanation:
A prosecutorial waiver is a type of waiver to adult court that occurs when there is concurrent jurisdiction between juvenile and adult courts and the prosecutor has the option of filing charges against the juvenile offender in either court.
Prosecutorial waiver would have been needed to try Tombs in adult court. Hence, option A is correct.
What is the advantages and disadvantages of the prosecutorial waiver?The benefit of a waiver is that more serious criminals who are charged with violent offenses are excused and subject to harsher punishments. The drawback is that juveniles may serve reduced sentences for their first offenses and are required to be freed once they reach a specific age.
A juvenile who is being tried as an adult in criminal court may request to have the case moved to juvenile court for adjudication or disposition under the legislation of 23 States.
When a judge waives the safeguards that juvenile court offers, some juvenile cases are transferred to adult criminal court through a procedure known as a "waiver."
Thus, option A is correct.
For more information about Prosecutorial waiver, click here
https://brainly.com/question/6831848
#SPJ6
Is it illegal to support Christianity in russia
Answers
Answer:
No, they're are many Christian churches in Russia
A jury convicted two defendants for crimes involving the transportit
aliens. After the trial was over, the federal judge in the case enforced a court rule
that prohibited anyone from interviewing any juror, relative, friend, or associate
of the juror regarding the deliberations or verdict of the jury unless the person
can show good cause. Two weeks after the verdict, a newspaper publisher and
reporter filed a motion to get permission to interview the jurors for a news story.
The court denied the motion.
The publisher and reporter filed a lawsuit, claiming that they have a right under
freedom of the press to gather news and that the denial of access to interview the
jurors violates that constitutional right.
The court defends its ruling and its order not to grant permission by stating that,
like other First Amendment rights, the right to gather news is not absolute. The
purpose of prohibiting interviews of the jury is to protect jurors from annoyance
and harassment. Additionally, freedom of debate and independence of thought
would be stifled if jurors were made to feel that their arguments and ballots were
to be freely published to the public.
The law requires that restrictions of the press's news-gathering rights must be
justified by a compelling governmental interest and narrowly tailored to serve
that interest.
1. Who is the plaintiff?
2. Who is the defendant?
3. What does the plaintiff want?
4. What does the defendant want?
5. What is the issue in this case?
What arguments does the plaintiff make?
Answers
The answer responses are:
The plaintiff in this case is the newspaper publisher and reporter.The defendant in this case is the court.The plaintiff wants permission to interview the jurors for a news story.The defendant wants to maintain its ruling and order not to grant permission to interview the jurors.The issue in this case is whether the plaintiff's right to gather news under the First Amendment of the US Constitution is being violated by the defendant's prohibition on interviewing jurors.What arguments does the plaintiff make?The plaintiff argues that they have a right under the freedom of the press to gather news and that the prohibition on interviewing jurors violates this right.
They may also argue that the prohibition is not justified by a compelling governmental interest and is not narrowly tailored to serve that interest, as required by law.
Therefore, the plaintiff may also argue that the prohibition is overly broad and unnecessarily restricts their ability to gather news.
Learn more plaintiff from
https://brainly.com/question/1463591
#SPJ1
pls, I am so desperate I'll give brainliest!!! Jordan is especially interested in the concept of being presumed innocent until proven guilty. He is convinced that most jurors will form an initial opinion about whether or not the defendant is innocent or guilty from the first time they see the defendant. Jordan believes that initial impression can have a negative impact on the outcome of the case and plans to take that angle in the story he will be writing for the newspaper. To help Jordan determine if his theory is correct, you’ve decided to attend the trial with him and take on the role of a juror. You are determined to maintain an open mind and not form an initial impression of the defendant’s guilt or innocence.
Answer the following questions using a total of 3-5 sentences each:
How would you keep an open mind and truly presume the defendant is innocent at the start of the trial?
Describe at least three things you could do to uphold the presumption of innocence as a juror is supposed to do.
Answers
The key to keeping an open mind is to go in truly blind to the trial. That means the potential juror shouldn't have any exposure to media about the defendant or the events in question. The juror should learn everything during the court case itself when the prosecution presents the case carefully laid out, and the juror should also weigh the defenses argument as well. This is why jurors are not allowed to consume outside media, especially news articles or watch news on tv. In some cases, jurors are sequestered to isolate them further from the outside world to prevent accidental jury tampering. Unfortunately a lot of news in the modern era tends to have an editorialized spin to it. Meaning there are opinions, conjecture and speculation injected into things when they shouldn't be there. It should be facts only.
In addition to going into the case blind, the juror should also be free of any prejudices about the person's class, race, etc. These preconcieved notions tend to potentially affect the decision a juror would make, and these notions tend to be unintentional. If the juror could spot these tendencies and try to eradicate them (before they get worse), then it likely would lead to a more impartial juror.
Here are 3 things you could do to adhere to the philosophy of "innocent before proven guilty"
Keep the idea in your head that another person could be guilty.Try to put yourself in the shoes of the defendant.Everyone is human. Even if the first impression may have been a bad one, it could have just been a bad day for the defendant. The same may apply for the day in question involving the crime.At the end of the day, keep in mind the most important thing: The burden of proof lies with the prosecution and not the defense. It's up to the state to prove the defendant guilty. This is why the verdict is a simple binary choice of "guilty" vs "not guilty". It's because the jury is testing the claims made by the prosecution.
"In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself."
"The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself."
Source: Federalist #51 by James Madison
1) What Enlightenment idea of Montesquieu's does this quote refer to?
2)What is James Madison referring to when he says our government is "obliged to control itself?
3)What example can you come up with of how checks and balances are seen in our government today?
4)Explain "Checks and Balances" in your own words. What Enlightemeat thinker came up with this idea?
Answers
Montesquieu's separation of powers is being referred in the question while James quotes about different governments controlling each other. Along with this he advocated for checks and balances.
When he says "obliged to control itself', James Madison means that the government's primary job is to control the governed but in order to control the governed, the government itself needs to be controlled. Such control needs to be exercised by government itself.
The President has the right to veto any laws that Congress passes. Laws may be vetoed by the President, but Congress has the authority to overrule his decision. This is the perfect example of checks and balances which exist today.
Checks and balance is a system in which each component of an organization, such as a government, has the ability to influence and regulate the others in order to prevent any one component from gaining undue power.
To know more about Separation of powers:
brainly.com/question/20630947
#SPJ1
When is it hardest to see motorcyclists?
a. Oncoming traffic, as when seen head on, they take up so little of your visual field.
b. On the freeway, as many people are changing lanes.
c. In the rear-view mirror, as they could easily be in your blind spot. You must check your blind spot.
d. All of the above are true. They are simply harder to see, and you must LOOK for them.
Answers
The hardest to see motorcyclists : All of the above are true. They are simply harder to see, and you must LOOK for them. Option D is the correct answer.
Motorcyclists can be difficult to see in various situations, and it is essential for drivers to be vigilant and actively look for them. Here's an explanation for each option:
a. Oncoming traffic, as when seen head-on, they take up so little of your visual field: Motorcycles have a narrower profile compared to other vehicles, making them less visible when approaching from the opposite direction. Due to their smaller size, they can be easily overlooked, especially if drivers are not actively scanning for them.
b. On the freeway, as many people are changing lanes: Motorcycles can be particularly challenging to spot on the freeway due to the high volume of traffic and frequent lane changes. The quick maneuverability of motorcycles allows them to navigate through traffic, but this also increases the risk of being overlooked by drivers who are not attentive or fail to check their blind spots before changing lanes.
c. In the rear-view mirror, as they could easily be in your blind spot. You must check your blind spot: Motorcycles can easily fall into a driver's blind spot, which is an area not visible in the rear-view or side mirrors. It is crucial for drivers to check their blind spots by turning their heads and using proper mirror adjustment to ensure they are aware of any motorcyclists in their vicinity.
Option D is the correct answer.
For such more question on motorcyclists:
https://brainly.com/question/27196118
#SPJ8
Drivers convicted of a DWI offense who need to drive for an approved reason may be issued __________ by the state.
A. a DWI waiver
B. an ignition interlock device
C. an occupational license
Answers
What percentage of all collisions result from avoidable and unavoidable distractions?
Answers
Distracted Driving Statistics 9.4% of accidents in this state were caused by that. In Utah, distracted driving incidents cause an average of 2,006 injuries and 20 fatalities per year.
How many collisions are entirely preventable?Automobile collisions can frequently be avoided. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Agency (NHTSA), human error accounts for between 94% and 96% of all motor vehicle collisions.
What proportion of accidents are the result of distractions?Yet, when you compare the total number of distracted driving collisions to the overall number of collisions, distracted driving has continued to be a significant factor, accounting for 14% to 17% of all collisions.
To know more about Distracted Driving Statistics visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/30358115
#SPJ1
Amerimed is negotiating a deal with Mountain Medical (MM) for the sale of Amerimed's latest health supplement. Amerimed would like to package its supplements in bottles produced by Rick, but Rick says he will not enter into a contract with Amerimed until the MM contract is finalized. MM has sent Amerimed a letter of intent, but Rick thinks it is too vague and refuses to enter into an agreement with Amerimed. What should Amerimed do?
Answers
In this scenario, Amerimed should send Mountain Medical (MM) its own letter of intent, stating that they do have a binding agreement.
What is a contract?
A contract can be defined as a legally binding and enforceable agreement between two (2) or more parties (business associates), which gives rise to a mutual and legal obligation for the parties involved to do business together.
What is a letter of intent?
A letter of intent can be defined as a formal document that outlines the understanding between two (2) or more parties (business associates) while explicitly stating (declaring) the intentions of the writer with respect to formalizing a legally binding agreement (contract).
In this scenario, a business deal is being negotiated between three (3) parties:
AmerimedMountain Medical (MM)RickSince Mountain Medical (MM) has sent Amerimed a letter of intent, it is necessary that Amerimed acknowledges the letter and respond with its own letter of intent, wherein, it would be stated that there is a legally binding agreement between, regardless of what Rick thinks or his subsequent actions.
In conclusion, Amerimed should send Mountain Medical (MM) its own letter of intent, stating that they do have a binding agreement.
Read more on contracts here: https://brainly.com/question/17185606
I need conclusions please and thank you
I will really appreciate it
Answers
Answer:
if nothing changes about this law distracted driving will continue to kill people. its up to us as people to do the right thing and make the right choices. things start to matter when action starts to happen onto whats right and wrong.
Explanation:
its need one more sentance i feel but i feel like the answer itself is soobvious i mean the conclusion should always be abt the whole point of whatever ur writing in the first place, so im kinda confused on how it was hard for u to make one when its litterly abt the concept of the whole essay -_-
When the bill of rights was added to the U.S constitution. What principle was given greater strength
A. Republicanism
B. Limited government
C. Checks and balances
D. Popular sovereignty
Answers
When the bill of rights was added to the U.S constitution, the principle that was given greater strength was option B. Limited government.
Why the principle of Limited government was given greater strength in US Constitution?“Limited government” means “constitutional limits on the power of rulers.” These constitutional limits on government were meant to keep monarchs or dictators from abusing their power through arbitrarily enacting decrees against the will of the people.This principle of limited government began a good thousand years ago when nobles started placing constraints on monarchs’ actions by establishing what Democracy Web calls “consultative or representative institutions”—whether through unwritten agreements or documents such as the Magna Carta.In the United States, the modern concept of popular self-governance and limited government began in the late 18th century. The country’s “great experiment” involved establishing the legitimacy of state power through the will of the people, commonly expressed in the form of voting. Because the people of the nation (or more accurately at the time, the white men of the nation) had a voice using their votes, the government became the instrument of carrying out its citizens’ will, as expressed by their elected representatives.Hence, option B is the answer.
To learn more about the limited government, refer to: https://brainly.com/question/1649308
#SPJ2
How much of a following distance should you keep with those big vehicles, such as trailers and industrial vehicles?
Select one:
O a. 200 feet minimum
O b. 300 feet minimum
O c. 400 feet minimum
O d. It's up to the driver
Answers
Based of ‘The Judiciary’ pls answer
Answers
Court
Law or state
This sound right to me, I hope it’s right
11. The attack at
to active shooter situations.
A) Columbine High School
B) Virginia Tech
C) Sandy Hook
D) A club in Orlando
Page 11 of 15
Please read and answer each question carefully.
<< Previous Page
Quit
significantly changed law enforcement's tactics regarding response
Next Page >>
Answers
The attack at to active shooter situations Virginia Tech.
What did Virginia Tech go through?
On April 16, 2007, two attacks on the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University campus in Blacksburg, Virginia, United States, comprised the Virginia Tech shooting spree.
Which shooting at a school was the deadliest?
With 33 fatalities and 23 injuries, the Virginia Tech massacre was the deadliest school shooting in the United States. The Sandy Hook Elementary massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, which resulted in 27 fatalities, was the next deadliest school shooting, according to the number of victims.
Why is Virginia Tech participating in Sandman?
The sound of "Enter Sandman" was detected by nearby seismograph readings during last season's home opener against North Carolina, an ACC rival. Although technically not earthquake-level, suffice it to say that Hokie fans were LOUD. Last night's seismograph readings for Blacksburg, Virginia.
Learn more about Virginia Tech here:
https://brainly.com/question/27248920
#SPJ13
Describe the role of federal courts in checking the power of the legislative branch.
Answers
Like any big city, Los Angeles has to deal with illegal drugs. Of course, many of those drugs come from outside the city. Some drugs come over the border from Mexico. Some are manufactured in illegal labs around the United States. Within California, growers have hidden illegal marijuana farms in state and national parks. The Los Angeles Police Department can target drug problems within the city. However, they don’t have the jurisdiction or resources to stop the influx of drugs from outside the city.
What agencies might the Los Angeles police want to collaborate with to address these problems? What barriers might make this collaboration difficult?
Answers
The Police Department will collaborate with federal agencies such as the Drug Enforcement Administration to address drug problems coming from outside the city.
What agencies would Los Angeles police collaborate with?Collaborating with federal agencies such as the DEA and ATF could provide the LAPD with the necessary resources and jurisdiction to combat the influx of drugs from outside the city but the barriers to collaboration might include differences in agency culture, conflicting priorities and resources and potential bureaucratic red tape.
There can be issues with sharing information and coordinating efforts between agencies. Effective collaboration will require clear communication, a shared understanding of goals and a willingness to work together.
Read more about state agencies
brainly.com/question/18150165
#SPJ1
Crimes can be divided into the broad
classes of
-)))
O misdemeanors & felonies
O civil & criminal
O criminal & felonies
O civil & misdemeanors
Answers
Answer:
the first one
Explanation:
none of the others make sense to me
1.5 Describe how the following aspects could help to fight social challenges: social responsibilities
Answers
Responsibility for one's community and the natural environment may help combat societal issues by providing assistance in finding solutions to such issues.
When an individual or organization accepts responsibility for protecting society and the environment, this may help against societal issues.
This is further explained below.
What are social responsibilities ?Generally, In addition to maximizing the wealth of the company for its shareholders, companies have a duty to conduct their operations in a manner that is beneficial to society.
Businesses with a strong commitment to social responsibility should develop strategies that simultaneously improve the health of society and the environment while reducing the adverse effects their operations have on those two spheres.
In conclusion, Responsibility for one's community and the environment may help mitigate social issues and even help to solve them. Responsibility for one's own safety and the safety of others may be a powerful weapon in the fight against societal ills.
To combat hunger and poverty, several organizations and individuals host food drives.
Read more about social responsibilities
https://brainly.com/question/24176816
#SPJ1
1. What is the importance of the concept of the "Rule of Law"?
Answers
Answer:
The rule of law. The mechanism, institution practice etc
Explanation:
As citizens we should respect these laws above