Recommend three practical ways in which local communities could play a significant role in helping government in effective service delivery​

Answer:

A company limited by guarantee does not have any shares or shareholders (like the more common limited by shares structure) but is owned by guarantors who agree to pay a set amount of money towards company debts.

True, Medical payments coverage (Med Pay) helps pay for medical, dental, and funeral expenses for people riding in your covered vehicle, regardless of who is at fault.

What is Med pay and how its useful?

Med Pay is an optional coverage offered by auto insurance companies that helps pay for medical expenses for anyone injured in an accident involving your covered vehicle.

Med Pay coverage is paid in addition to any liability coverage you may have, and it can be used to pay for medical expenses such as hospital stays, surgical procedures, and therapy sessions.

Med Pay can also be used to pay for dental expenses, such as tooth repair or replacement, and funeral expenses, in the event of a fatal accident.

Med Pay is usually offered in small dollar amounts, like $1,000, $5,000, or $10,000, and the amount of coverage you choose will determine how much you pay in premiums.

Med Pay is designed to help pay for medical expenses quickly, without the need to wait for a liability determination to be made.

In summary, Medical payments coverage (Med Pay) is an optional coverage offered by auto insurance companies.

It helps pay for medical, dental, and funeral expenses for people riding in your covered vehicle, regardless of who is at fault.

Med Pay is paid in addition to any liability coverage you may have and is designed to help pay for medical expenses quickly.

To learn more about Med pay refer:

brainly.com/question/13960193

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

The Bad Frog case is a legal case that involves the First Amendment rights of a beer company. The court's decisions vary, but it primarily stands for the protection of free speech. However, if I were the judge, I would have ruled in favor of the beer company, as I believe in upholding freedom of expression.

Answer:

Christian

Dydyducruehfydfdrr

The US Supreme Court ruled against Charles Schenck in the case of Schenck v United States.

In the case of Schenck v United States, the US Supreme Court ruled against Charles Schenck, a prominent member of the Socialist Party, who was charged with violating the Espionage Act of 1917. The Espionage Act made it a crime to obstruct military recruitment or encourage insubordination among military personnel during World War I.

The Supreme Court's decision was delivered in 1919 by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., and it established the "clear and present danger" test, which limited free speech rights during times of war. Holmes argued that Schenck's actions posed a clear and present danger to the United States and that the government had the authority to restrict speech that presented a danger to national security.

This ruling had significant implications for the First Amendment and the balance between free speech and national security. It established the principle that speech could be restricted if it posed a direct threat to the nation, even if that threat was not imminent. The "clear and present danger" test would be influential in subsequent cases and would shape the interpretation of free speech rights for years to come.

Learn more about Socialist Party

brainly.com/question/19460473

#SPJ11

Whenever you are asked to tell How, that means you are expected to give an explanatory response or essay. See the below for how do do an effective explanatory essay.

Once you realize that your essay is really only a combination of three part, it becomes easy. The parts to an essay is:

Keep in mind that the objective is to explain the topic you have been given and that you are constrained to 150 words.

Use the first 50 words to do a very focused and well aligned introduction that gets the reader very interested.

Expatiate and support the claims that you have made in the introduction  in the body.

Reiterate all your key points in the summary/conclusion.

See more about explanatory essays at the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/27010110

#SPJ1

Answer: Driving without corrective lenses can result in injury to yourself and others. If your driver's license includes a corrective lenses restriction, you have to wear your glasses when driving.

Explanation:

The healthful dietary principle of moderation can be best described as finding a balance and avoiding excess in food consumption.

It involves practicing portion control, consuming a variety of foods in appropriate amounts, and avoiding extremes or overindulgence. Moderation recognizes that no single food or nutrient is inherently good or bad, but rather it's the overall pattern of eating that contributes to health. By practicing moderation, individuals can enjoy a wide range of foods while maintaining a balanced and nutritious diet.

In terms of food choices, moderation encourages a well-rounded diet that includes a variety of nutrient-dense foods such as fruits, vegetables, whole grains, lean proteins, and healthy fats. It promotes avoiding excessive consumption of foods high in added sugars, saturated fats, and sodium.

Moderation also emphasizes portion control, recognizing that the quantity of food consumed plays a significant role in maintaining a healthy weight and overall well-being. It encourages being mindful of serving sizes and listening to the body's hunger and fullness cues to prevent overeating.

Question: Which statement best describes the healthful diet principle of moderation? Pay attention to portion size and plan your entire day's diet so that you don't overconsume nutrient sources.

To know more about healthful dietary, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30839467

#SPJ11

C. Up to $10,000 in legal fees NOT a consequence of copying or distributing copyrighted software.

Copying or distributing copyrighted software without authorization can have legal consequences. The options listed (A, B, D) are all potential consequences of such actions, but option C, "Up to $10,000 in legal fees," is not typically considered a direct consequence of copying or distributing copyrighted software.

The consequences of copyright infringement for software can include civil penalties, criminal charges, and fines. For example, imprisonment (option B) may be a consequence for serious cases of copyright infringement. Civil fees (option D) can involve substantial monetary damages awarded to the copyright owner as a result of a lawsuit.

However, legal fees (option C) generally refer to the costs associated with legal representation or hiring an attorney to defend against copyright infringement allegations. These fees are typically the responsibility of the party being accused and are not imposed as a direct consequence of the act of copying or distributing copyrighted software.

To read more about Copyrighted Software click here

https://brainly.com/question/31458300

#SPJ11

The celebrated Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido was a momentous United States Supreme Court case which was determined on October 11th, 2018 regarding the comprehension of the venerable Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).

Two firefighters, John Guido and Dennis Rankin, who were both more than 40-years old, formalized an action against this particular governmental division of the state of Arizona asserting that they had been dismissed due to their age unlawfully in negation of the established ADEA.

However, the District ardently contended that it ought not be subject to the ADEA's edicts since it employed fewer than 20 personnel.

Read more on Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido here https://brainly.com/question/26174453

#SPJ1

complete question

Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido (October 11, 2018) decision and reasoning for the decision.

Malapportionment in AP Gov refers to the unequal distribution of population among legislative districts or constituencies. This means that some districts have significantly more or fewer residents than others, which can result in some voters having more or less influence in the political process than others.

Malapportionment can occur intentionally or unintentionally, and can be the result of factors such as gerrymandering, demographic shifts, or legal restrictions. It is generally seen as a threat to the principles of democracy and equal representation, and efforts are often made to correct malapportionment through redistricting or other measures.
In the context of AP Government, malapportionment refers to the unequal distribution of representation in a legislative body, such as Congress.

This occurs when some districts or constituencies have significantly larger or smaller populations than others, leading to an imbalance in representation. As a result, citizens in over-represented districts have more influence on government decisions, while those in under-represented districts have less influence. The U.S. Supreme Court case Baker v. Carr (1962) addressed this issue and led to the "one person, one vote" principle, which aims to ensure equal representation for all citizens.

To know more about Malapportionment, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/15663250#

#SPJ11

Answer:

True

The conduct of a practitioner may indeed be sanctionable if the practitioner intentionally misleads a client so as to defraud that client. This is based on the ethical and professional standards that govern various professions, particularly those in the legal, medical, and financial sectors.

To understand this in detail, let's break it down into smaller logical steps:

1. Professional Conduct: Practitioners across various fields are bound by certain rules of professional conduct. These rules are designed to ensure that practitioners act in a manner that is ethical, honest, and in the best interests of their clients. They cover a wide range of behaviors, including honesty in communications, confidentiality, conflict of interest, and more.

2. Intentional Misleading: Intentionally misleading a client involves knowingly providing false or inaccurate information with the aim of deceiving the client. This could take many forms, such as lying about qualifications, providing incorrect advice, or withholding important information.

3. Defrauding a Client: Defrauding a client involves using deceit or dishonesty to gain an unfair or dishonest advantage, often financial. This could involve overcharging for services, billing for services not provided, or manipulating a client's decisions for personal gain.

4. Sanctions: If a practitioner is found to have intentionally misled a client so as to defraud them, they can face sanctions from their professional body. These sanctions can range from fines and reprimands to suspension or revocation of their license to practice.

5. Evidence and Investigation: Allegations of such misconduct would typically be investigated by the relevant professional body or regulatory authority. The investigation would seek to gather evidence to determine whether the practitioner did indeed intentionally mislead the client and defraud them.

6. Legal Implications: In addition to professional sanctions, practitioners who defraud their clients could also face legal consequences. This could include criminal charges for fraud or civil lawsuits for damages.

Therefore, it is true that the conduct of a practitioner may be sanctionable if they intentionally mislead a client so as to defraud that client.

The probability that this answer is correct is very high given that it is based on widely accepted principles of professional ethics and conduct.

Answer:

I belive its B or D but I would pick D I'm so so so sorry if wrong

The act established new guidelines for corporations, such as raising the bar for auditors to prevent conflicts of interest and reassigning control of the preparation of complete and accurate financial reports.

A record of a fact or anything that has been expressed, done, or agreed upon is called an act. Acts typically take the form of written legal documents with executory and probative power.

A new law or a change to an existing law is created by an act of parliament. A Bill that has received the Royal Assent of the monarch, been adopted by the House of Commons and the House of Lords, and is now an Act.

Learn more about Act here:

https://brainly.com/question/714974

#SPJ1

In addition to encouraging settlement, Judge Smith calls parties before the court for a pretrial conference to hammer out logistical details, such as how long the trial will take and how many witnesses the parties may call.

The option (A) is correct.

The purpose of the pretrial conference is to streamline the trial process and ensure a smooth and efficient trial. During this conference, the judge can clarify any legal issues, set deadlines for submitting evidence, and address any procedural matters.

By discussing these details beforehand, the court can better manage the trial proceedings and ensure that both parties have a fair and organized trial experience.

Learn more about pretrial conference:

https://brainly.com/question/32911930

#SPJ4

This question is not complete, Here I am attaching the complete question.

In addition to encouraging settlement, judge smith calls parties before the court for a pretrial conference to hammer out blank details, such as how long the trial will take and how many witnesses the parties may call. multiple choice question.

(A) will take and how many witnesses the parties may call.

(B) The judge tries to get the parties’ attorneys.

(C) None.

Comments made by a protester on the steps of a police station would not be covered by the defense of qualified privilege. Option A is the correct answer.

In a defamation case, qualified privilege is a sort of defense wherein a defendant's speech is not seen as defamatory in specific circumstances when there is no evidence of malice. Employers frequently utilize it to cite former workers as references. Option A is the correct answer.

A defendant in a defamation case may raise a qualified privilege as a sort of defense. Generally speaking, the claim that it wasn't defamatory must have a compelling justification. In order for qualified privilege to be effective as a defense, there also has to be genuine malice behind the assertion. When it can be established that the relevant speech was not defamatory and there was no deliberate malice behind the remark, qualified privilege grants immunity.

Learn more about Privilege here:

https://brainly.com/question/28004435

#SPJ4

The complete question is, "Which of the following would not be covered by the defense of qualified privilege?

a. Comments made by a protester on the steps of a police station.

b. Comments contained in a police blotter or jail register.

c. Statements made by a mayor during her annual state of the city address.

d. All of the above would be covered"

Preponderance of the evidence standard of proof applies to the competency to stand the trial  :  the  defense must prove that it is more likely than not the accused is incompetent.

What do you mean by Preponderance?

It can be defined as one type of evidentiary standard which is majorly used in a burden of proof analysis. In this the whole process revolves around around to prove that something is most likely than not. It is a very strong and important component in proving cases based on law.

is majorly based upon two factors

Hence ,the  defense must prove that it is more likely than not the accused is incompetent.

To learn more about Preponderance from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/26765712

#SPJ4

Answer

To control disruptive behaviour.

Explanation:

Although there are several functions of law in society, yet it is to control the disruptive behaviour of individuals. In a society where there is no law, such will be characterised with disorderliness. Law helps to resolve dispute, protects right and freedom, establish rules of conduct, provides a system of enforcement and protect the society at large.

Laws are created in a society to instill discipline on it's citizens and to set out clearly what is right from what is wrong. It also maintains social order, economic and political stability in a society. It maintains social order in the scenes that there is a limit to how individuals must act in relation to one another in any given society.

Other functions of law are that it governs how people behave and then set out how government would deal with such behaviour. Individuals also have power or rights under law hence create a limit to government power which in turn promote peace in a society.

Answer:

Hans Gross was an Austrian jurist known for creating the field of criminology. Hans Gustav Adolf Gross or Groß (26 December 1847 – 9 December 1915) was an Austrian criminal jurist and criminologist, the "Founding Father" of criminal profiling.

Answer:

Wait is that true? if so thats freakin gnarly. They must be freakin hot under all that

Answer:

yes ik that and all the gear they have to wear 75 pounds

Explanation:

Answer: A. It's the most conmanly applied sanction

Explanation:

"Probation plays an extremely important role in the operation of the law enforcement and corrections systems in the United States. Probation is currently the most commonly applied correctional sanction," - from the article the very first paragraph in the page off Edge.

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

Because the hoodlum made a huge mistake attacking a policeman and almost killed him. It maybe would've been okay if the hoodlum attacked a regular person and no one was looking, but policemen are important.

As in the current scenario, the police man has the rights to get self-defense and in the self-defense the police man shoot the hoodlum.

In order to control conduct, social or political institutions make laws that are then enforced. However, the exact concept of law is still up for question. It has been called both a science and the practice of justice in diverse contexts.

As, the hoodlum stabbed the police man, and by the stabbed the policeman get injured its. As in the law the self-defense is there as by using his revolver and went after B. After firing a shot in the air,

Therefore, As a result, by the using the revolver, the police man controls the situation.

Learn more about the law here:

https://brainly.com/question/6590381

#SPJ2

Answer:

Evidence

Explanation:

In general, all forms of evidence have class or individual characteristics. Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source.

In general, all forms of evidence have class or individual characteristics. Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source.The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic. For example, if the bullet came from a .38 caliber handgun, every .38 caliber handgun on the planet is the possible murder weapon. However, finding a suspect’s fingerprint (an individual characteristic) on a .38 caliber handgun suggests that this .38, to the exclusion of all others, was the murder weapon. This is particularly true if the killing bullet can also be matched to this particular .38.

In general, all forms of evidence have class or individual characteristics. Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source.The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic. For example, if the bullet came from a .38 caliber handgun, every .38 caliber handgun on the planet is the possible murder weapon. However, finding a suspect’s fingerprint (an individual characteristic) on a .38 caliber handgun suggests that this .38, to the exclusion of all others, was the murder weapon. This is particularly true if the killing bullet can also be matched to this particular .38.Alternatively, blood recovered from a crime scene that tests show is type B (a class characteristic) could have come from any of the tens of millions of people who share this blood type. If the suspect has type B blood, he remains a suspect. From there, DNA (an individual characteristic) from the suspect and DNA from the blood evidence are tested to determine conclusively whether they match. If, however, the suspect’s blood is type A, he then is excluded as the source of the blood

Answer:

At their heart, all public relations campaigns are about planning and strategy. After all, without a good strategy, it would be impossible for a PR expert to ensure that they were having the right impact on an audience with their marketing solutions, or that they were releasing press content at the right time. The “strategic planning” part of public relations is what sets it apart as a critical component of building a business and managing a company reputation.

Strategic planning starts with setting a goal for a PR campaign. Once a vision of success is established, PR companies can then work alongside their clients to carve out an effective route to that end target. Strategic planning ensures that press releases go out just at the right time to cause a social splash, and that reputation management strategies have components in place that allow businesses to respond quickly when disaster strikes.

Explanation:

A controversial aspect of sentencing is the implementation of mandatory minimum sentencing, which establishes predetermined guidelines for punishment without allowing judicial discretion. Mandatory minimum sentencing can contribute to disparities in the criminal justice system, disproportionately affecting marginalized communities.

Mandatory minimum sentencing refers to laws that require judges to impose a specific minimum sentence for certain crimes, regardless of individual circumstances or the judge's discretion. These laws aim to ensure uniformity and consistency in sentencing by setting fixed guidelines. However, they have become a subject of controversy due to their inflexibility and potential for unjust outcomes.

Critics argue that mandatory minimum sentencing limits the judge's ability to consider the unique circumstances of each case and the offender's background. This approach disregards factors such as the defendant's level of involvement, intent, prior criminal record, or potential for rehabilitation. As a result, individuals convicted of non-violent offenses may receive disproportionately harsh sentences, leading to overcrowded prisons and high incarceration rates.

Furthermore, mandatory minimum sentencing can contribute to disparities in the criminal justice system, disproportionately affecting marginalized communities. Certain offenses, particularly those associated with drug-related crimes, have been criticized for disproportionately impacting minority communities.

Opponents of mandatory minimum sentencing advocate for a more flexible and individualized approach to sentencing, where judges can consider various factors to determine a fair and just punishment. They argue that such an approach would allow for better rehabilitation opportunities and reduce the societal and economic costs associated with mass incarceration.

Learn more about justice system here:

brainly.com/question/30950447

#SPJ11

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Answer:

true; women are very frequently sexually assaulted by men and because of the patriarchal system, their assualts rarely get attention. if society treated both men and women fairly male violence against women would go down.

Answer:

Staff

Explanation: If the member in question is working in the lab, then that means he is part of the Staff Group.