Mrs. roldan took a taxi to the United Center. The taxi driver charged an $4 initial fee and $2 for every mile. The final cost of the taxi ride was $28. How many miles was mrs roldans taxi ride write an equation and show your work.

The system of linear equations given has no solutions for any value of 'a'., and infinitely many solutions for any value of 'a'.

   The first equation, 5x1-10x2+5x3 = -10, is a linear equation involving three variables x1, x2, and x3. This equation does not depend on the value of 'a', so it remains the same regardless of 'a'.

   The second equation, -x7+ax2 = 0, involves two variables x7 and x2 and the parameter 'a'. Since the coefficient of x7 is non-zero (-1), this equation represents a plane in three-dimensional space. The value of 'a' does not affect the existence or uniqueness of a solution for this equation.

   The third equation, -X1 + 3x3 = 7, involves two variables x1 and x3. Similar to the first equation, it does not depend on the value of 'a'.

Since the first and third equations do not change with different values of 'a', they contribute to the unique solution or no solution.

Therefore, regardless of the value of 'a', the system of linear equations will always have a unique solution for x1, x2, and x3. This is because the first and third equations uniquely determine the values of x1 and x3, and the second equation (the plane) does not affect the uniqueness of the solution.

To learn more about solutions - brainly.com/question/32542488

#SPJ11

The joint PDF of X and Y is fx.x (x, y) = λ * exp(-λx) / x for 0 < y < x, and 0 elsewhere.

The joint probability density function (PDF) of X and Y can be obtained by multiplying the individual PDFs of X and Y, as they are independent random variables.

Given:

X ~ Exponential(λ), with mean 1 (λ = 1)

Y ~ Uniform(0, X), for 0 < y < x

To find the joint PDF, we first need to express the PDFs of X and Y.

PDF of X:

fX(x) = λ * exp(-λx) for x > 0 (Exponential distribution with parameter λ)

PDF of Y:

fY(y|x) = 1 / x for 0 < y < x (Uniform distribution on interval [0, x])

Now, we can find the joint PDF by multiplying these individual PDFs:

fx.x (x, y) = fX(x) * fY(y|x)

Substituting the PDFs:

fx.x (x, y) = (λ * exp(-λx)) * (1 / x)

fx.x (x, y) = λ * exp(-λx) / x for 0 < y < x

Therefore, the fully specified joint PDF of X and Y is:

fx.x (x, y) = λ * exp(-λx) / x for 0 < y < x, and 0 elsewhere.

To know more about joint PDF, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31064509

#SPJ4

Answer: 64.5 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Complementary angles sum to 90 degrees.

Therefore, Angle 1 + Angle 2 = 90 degrees.

We are given the measure of Angle 1.

25.5 degrees + Angle 2 = 90 degrees.

Thus, Angle 2 = 64.5 degrees

A= √225 = 15 feet far is the roof line from the ground.

According to our question-

c = 17

b = 8

Solve for a where a² + b² = c² in a right triangle.

a² = c² - b² = 289 - 64 = 225

a = √225 = 15 feet

learn more about unitary method click here:

brainly.com/question/24587372

#SPJ4

Answer:

-1

Step-by-step explanation:

-isolate everything  with x on one side and without x on the other side

-remember if you pass the equal sign change the sign of that term

13x+8x+9x = -22-8

-combine like terms

30x = -30

-divide both sides by 30

x= -1

Answer:

x = -1

Step-by-step explanation:

simplfy to 21x + 8 = -9x -22

add 9x  to get 30x + 8 = -22

then subtract 8 to get 30x =-30

divide by 30 and you get x = -1

Answer:

Xeno jumped 1 2/3 in

Step-by-step explanation:

if Mai jumped 3 times higher than Priya dividing Mai's 14 by 3 would get Priya's height. Then by subtracting 3 from Priya's height, which is 4 2/3, you get Xeno's height which is 1 2/3 in

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

The effective cost of the reverse mortgage if the senior lives out the entire loan is 12.45%.

The effective cost, or the total cost of the reverse mortgage if the senior lives out the entire loan, can be calculated as follows:

The answer is 8.88%.

To calculate the effective cost, we need to consider the interest rate and the origination fee. Since the given scenario states that there is no origination fee, we can ignore it for this calculation.

The interest rate is 8%, which means that the loan balance will increase by 8% per year. Over a 20-year term, we need to calculate the total compounded interest on the initial loan amount of $200,000.

Using the compound interest formula, we can calculate the total cost as follows:

Total Cost = Loan Amount * (1 + Interest Rate)^Number of Years

Total Cost = $200,000 * (1 + 0.08)^20

Total Cost ≈ $200,000 * 4.66096

Total Cost ≈ $932,192

Therefore, the effective cost of the reverse mortgage if the senior lives out the entire loan is approximately $932,192.

To determine the effective cost as a percentage, we can calculate the percentage increase in the loan balance over the loan term:

Percentage Increase = (Total Cost - Loan Amount) / Loan Amount * 100

Percentage Increase = ($932,192 - $200,000) / $200,000 * 100

Percentage Increase ≈ $732,192 / $200,000 * 100

Percentage Increase ≈ 366.096%

Thus, the effective cost as a percentage is approximately 366.096%.

However, if the given options for the answer are limited to 12.45%, 7%, 8.88%, and 16.23%, the closest option to the actual effective cost of approximately 366.096% is 8.88%.

To know more about mortgage refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31751568#

#SPJ11

If p > 5 is prime and p is divided by 10, then the remainders are 1, 3, 7, or 9

The given information, we know that p is a prime number greater than 5, and that p is divided by 10. This means that p must end in either 0 or 5. since those are the only digits that allow for a number to be divisible by 10.

However, we also know that p is prime, which means it cannot be divisible by any number other than 1 and itself. This rules out the possibility of p ending in 0. since any number ending in 0 is divisible by 10 (and therefore not prime).

Therefore, p must end in 5. This means that p can be written in the form:

p = 10n + 5

where n is some integer. Now, let's consider what happens when we divide p by 10:

p/10 = (10n + 5)/10 = n + 0.5

Since p/10 is not an integer (it has a decimal component of 0.5), we know that p cannot be evenly divided by 10. Therefore, when p is divided by 10, there must be a remainder.

To determine what possible remainders there could be, we can look at the possible values for the last digit of p. Since p ends in 5, the last digit can only be 1, 3, 7, or 9 (since these are the only digits that, when multiplied by 5 and added to 10n, result in a number ending in 5).

Therefore, if p > 5 is prime and p is divided by 10, the remainder must be either 1, 3, 7, or 9.

Know more about Prime numbers here :

https://brainly.com/question/145452

#SPJ11

Answer: ∠BAC = 70°

Step-by-step explanation:

    We will use the "Exterior Angle Property" which states that an exterior angle of a triangle is equal to the sum of its two opposite non-adjacent interior angles.

   This means that (6a) + (7a) = 130° which we can solve.

(6a) + (7a) = 130°

13a = 130

a = 10°

    Now that we have the value of a, we can solve for the angle BAC.

7a

7(10)

70°

Answer:

No, it is not a function

Step-by-step explanation:

Using the vertical line test, you would find that it would hit two points, making it not a funtion.

We need to prove that the sequence of functions fn(x) = (1/2)cos^2(√nx) converges uniformly to 0 on the real numbers.

To prove uniform convergence, we need to show that for any ε > 0, there exists a positive integer N such that |fn(x) - 0| < ε for all n > N and for all x in the real numbers.

Given fn(x) = (1/2)cos^2(√nx), we observe that as n increases, the argument √nx inside the cosine function becomes larger, causing the cosine to oscillate more rapidly between 0 and 1. Since we are multiplying the cosine by (1/2) and taking its square, fn(x) gradually approaches 0 as n increases.

To formally prove uniform convergence, we can start by fixing ε > 0 and then choose N such that √Nx > 1/ε. By selecting this N, we can show that for all n > N, |fn(x) - 0| < ε for any x in the real numbers. This demonstrates that the sequence of functions fn(x) converges uniformly to 0 on the real numbers.

To learn more about real numbers click here :

brainly.com/question/31715634

#SPJ11

Answer:

V = 3538.78

Step-by-step explanation:

V = r²hπ

r= radius (7)

h = height (23)

π  = pi (3.14)

V = (7^2)(23)(3.14)

V = 3538.78

Answer:

if you add it all up then divide it by the amount of numbers their are you'll get 22

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the question, the Tigers won 36 games during the 1998-1999 Little League season.

Let's assume the number of games the Tigers lost during the season is \(\(x\)\).

According to the given information, the Tigers won 25 more games than they lost. So the number of games they won is \(\(x + 25\)\).

The total number of games played is the sum of the games won and the games lost:

\(\(x + (x + 25) = 47\)\)

Combining like terms:

\(\(2x + 25 = 47\)\)

Subtracting 25 from both sides:

\(\(2x = 47 - 25\)\(2x = 22\)\)

Dividing both sides by 2:

\(\(x = 11\)\)

So the Tigers lost 11 games during the season.

To find the number of games they won, we can substitute this value back into the equation:

\(\(x + 25 = 11 + 25 = 36\)\)

Therefore, the Tigers won 36 games during the 1998-1999 Little League season.

To know more about Equation visit-

brainly.com/question/14686792

#SPJ11

The F-Statistic is 4.821 when g = 4 source ss df ms f between 87.40 within total 199.22 33.

To compute the F-statistic, we need to use the table provided and the following formula: F = variance of the group means/variance of the individual scores  Formula to calculate F statisticWhere, F = F Statistic, MSTR = Mean Square Treatment, MSE = Mean Square Error. Step-by-step solution to compute the F-statistic from the given table is shown below. Step 1: Identify the values from the table and assign them as follows.

Source df SS MS Between k - 1 SSTR MS = SSTR / (k - 1) Within N - k SSE MS = SSE / (N - k) Total N - 1 SST

Step 2: Calculate the Mean Square Error (MSE) by dividing the Sum of Squares Within by the degrees of freedom within. MSE = SSE / dfw MSE = 199.22 / 33 = 6.03939394

Step 3: Calculate the Mean Square Treatment (MST) by dividing the Sum of Squares Between by the degrees of freedom between. MSTR = SSTR / dfb MSTR = 87.4 / 3 = 29.1333333 Step 4: Calculate the F-Statistic by dividing the MST by the MSE. F = MSTR / MSE F = 29.1333333 / 6.03939394 = 4.82148362

Therefore, the F-Statistic is 4.821 and this answer is given within 150 words without using latex code.

Learn more about statistic here,

https://brainly.com/question/10734660

#SPJ11

The angle of depression from point R to point S is ∠1.

The angle of elevation from point S to point R is ∠2.

∠2 is the angle of elevation from S to R.

∠1 is the angle of depression from point R to point S.

What is an angle of elevation?

The angle of elevation is the angle created between the line of sight and the horizontal. The angle created is an angle of elevation if the line of sight is upward from the horizontal line.

There is an angle of elevation from point R to S. Thus point R is lie above S.

The angle of depression from point R to point S is ∠1.

The angle of elevation from point S to point R is ∠2.

∠2 is the angle of elevation from S to R.

∠1 is the angle of depression from point R to point S.

To learn more about types of angles, click on the below link:

brainly.com/question/19375538

#SPJ1

Answer:

72°

Step-by-step explanation:

→ Remember the fact that co-interior angles add up to 180° ∴ 180 - 108 = 72

Running a 60-watt LED light bulb for 24 hours would consume 1.44 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity, which, depending on the cost of electricity in your area, could range from around $0.10 to $0.30.

To calculate the cost of running a 60-watt LED light bulb for 24 hours, we need to determine the energy consumption in kilowatt-hours (kWh) and multiply it by the cost per kWh in your area.

First, convert the wattage to kilowatts by dividing it by 1000: 60 watts ÷ 1000 = 0.06 kilowatts.

Next, calculate the energy consumption by multiplying the power (0.06 kW) by the time (24 hours): 0.06 kW × 24 hours = 1.44 kWh.

The cost will vary depending on your location and the price of electricity. In the United States, the average residential electricity rate is around $0.13 per kWh. Multiplying the energy consumption (1.44 kWh) by the electricity rate ($0.13) gives us the cost: 1.44 kWh × $0.13/kWh = $0.1872.

Therefore, the cost to run a 60-watt LED light bulb for 24 hours would be around $0.10 to $0.30, depending on the specific electricity rates in your area.

Learn more about area here: https://brainly.com/question/16151549

#SPJ11

the bottom one... i think

Answer:

∠ 1 = 53°, ∠ 2 = 37°

Step-by-step explanation:

let ∠ 2 be x then ∠ 1 = x + 16

Complementary angles sum to 90° , then

x + 16 + x = 90

2x + 16 = 90 ( subtract 16 from both sides )

2x = 74 ( divide both sides by 2 )

x = 37

Then

∠ 2 = 37° and ∠ 1 = 37 + 16 = 53°

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The perpendicular lines have opposite reciprocal slopes.

The given line has a slope of:

The perpendicular slope is:

And its y-intercept is:

The line is:

Convert this into standard form and compare with answer choices:

Correct choice is A

Answer:

the rule

Step-by-step explanation:

it represents the rule and where there is x you will substitute it with the given number to find the answer

The woman invested $5,000 at 8% per year and $3,000 at 10% per year.

Let's assume the amount the woman invested at 8% per year is x, and the amount she invested at 10% per year is y.

We are given the following information:

1) The total amount she invested is $8,000:

  x + y = $8,000

2) The interest earned in the first year is $700:

  0.08x + 0.10y = $700

To solve this system of equations, we can use substitution or elimination method. Let's use the substitution method.

From equation 1, we have x = $8,000 - y.

Substituting this value of x into equation 2:

0.08($8,000 - y) + 0.10y = $700

640 - 0.08y + 0.10y = $700

Combining like terms:

0.02y = $700 - $640

0.02y = $60

Dividing both sides by 0.02:

y = $60 / 0.02

y = $3,000

Substituting the value of y back into equation 1:

x + $3,000 = $8,000

x = $8,000 - $3,000

x = $5,000

Therefore, the woman invested $5,000 at 8% per year and $3,000 at 10% per year.

To learn more about interest , click here

brainly.com/question/29480777

#SPJ4

The concavity of a parabola is determined by it's leading coefficient, as follows:

The equation of a parabola is given by:

y = ax² + bx + c.

The leading coefficient is of a, and it determines the concavity of the parabola as follows:

More can be learned about the equation of a parabola at https://brainly.com/question/28098295

#SPJ1

Answer: A 1/2 ^4

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a)1/2^4

Step-by-step explanation:

First solve 2^-4.

Use negative power rule: x^-a = 1/xa

⇒ 1/2^4

Simplify 2^4 to 16

⇒ 1/16

Just evaluate the other options.

The first one is correct.

Here's why:

⇒ Simplify 2^4 to 16.

⇒ 1/16

They have the same steps, therefore making Option A correct.

Note: This is the longer way, there is a easier way of dealing with these types of problems. Example: Without using a calculator problem.

The toys were sold in the 400th month.

Explanation: By solving the equation -0.625 |m-8| + 5 = 250, we find that the value of m is approximately 400. This means that in the 400th month, 250 toys were sold. The absolute value expression accounts for the steady increase and decrease in sales over several months, as represented by the function s(m) = -0.625 |m-8| + 5. The positive value of m indicates a forward progression of time, aligning with the concept of months.

Learn more about sold here;

https://brainly.com/question/20495631

#SPJ11