In contract terminology, valid, void, and voidable contracts differ in the way they are defined, formed, and terminated. Here are the explanations for each
Valid Contract; A valid contract is an agreement that meets all legal requirements and is enforceable in a court of law. A contract becomes valid when it meets the following criteria: offer, acceptance, consideration, legality, capacity, and intention. Parties to a contract can make claims and hold each other responsible for performing their respective obligations in the event of a breach.
Void Contract; A contract that is deemed void is not legally binding from the outset. A void contract is considered as having never existed because it lacks the basic elements required to make a contract valid. A void contract is not enforceable in a court of law, and neither party is liable for any damages
Voidable Contract; A voidable contract is an agreement that one or both parties can legally cancel or void. Unlike a void contract, a voidable contract is valid and enforceable until the innocent party exercises their right to cancel the contract. The innocent party can choose to cancel the agreement without anyquen legal consequences in the event of a breach by the other party. However, the other party can dispute the cancellation in court.
To know more about legal consequences
brainly.com/question/17749455
#SPJ11
Select the elements that do not represent corpus delicti and click submit.
The elements that do not represent corpus delicti are:
causationconcurrenceWhat is corpus delicti?This refers to the legal term that has to do with the facts and circumstances that make up a crime.
Hence, we can see that The elements that do not represent corpus delicti are:
causationconcurrenceThis is because causation and concurrence are not valid proof that a crime was committed and guilt being established and thus is not a representation of corpus delicti.
In criminal law, the facts and circumstances are determined by several factors...
Read more about corpus delicti here:
https://brainly.com/question/17636247
#SPJ1
Match the law enforcement agencies to the crimes based on their jurisdiction .
Here are some examples of law enforcement agencies and the crimes they typically have jurisdiction over:
FBI - The Federal Bureau of Investigation is responsible for investigating federal crimes such as interstate drug trafficking, cybercrime, terrorism, and white-collar crime.DEA - The Drug Enforcement Administration has jurisdiction over drug-related offenses, including the illegal manufacture, distribution, and trafficking of controlled substances.ATF - The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives is responsible for investigating crimes involving firearms, explosives, and alcohol and tobacco-related offenses.U.S. Marshals Service - The U.S. Marshals Service is responsible for apprehending fugitives, providing security for federal courts, and transporting prisoners.State Police - State police agencies typically have jurisdiction over crimes that occur within their state's borders, including traffic violations, drug crimes, and violent crimes.County Sheriff's Office - County sheriff's offices are responsible for maintaining peace and order within their jurisdiction, enforcing state and local laws, and providing court security.Local Police Department - Local police departments have jurisdiction over crimes that occur within their city or town, including property crimes, drug offenses, and traffic violations.Law enforcement agencies have different jurisdictions and responsibilities based on their specialized areas. The FBI investigates federal crimes like cybercrime, terrorism, and drug trafficking. The DEA focuses on drug-related offenses, including the distribution and trafficking of controlled substances. The ATF handles crimes involving firearms, explosives, and alcohol and tobacco offenses.
The U.S. Marshals Service apprehends fugitives, provides court security, and transports prisoners. State police agencies have jurisdiction over crimes within their state, such as traffic violations, drug crimes, and violent offenses. County sheriff's offices maintain peace and enforce local laws within their jurisdiction. Local police departments handle crimes within their city or town, such as property crimes, drug offenses, and traffic violations.
Learn more about FBI: https://brainly.com/question/30053758
#SPJ11
Como as palavras estão organizadas nas estrofes?como são as letras que compõem o poema?
Olá. Primeiramente, é importante ressaltar que você não pode postar perguntas em português fora do campo "World Languagens". Esse não é o servidor brasileiro e sim o americano, por isso perguntas em português s´´o podem ser respondidas dessa forma.
Em segundo lugar, você não apresentou nenhum texto, o que dificulta que a sua pergunta seja respondida. Entretanto, eu posso te ajudar, afirmando que dentro das estrofes de um poema, as palavras sãpo organizadas em versos. O conjunto de versos, forma uma estrofe.
Em relação as letras, só é possivel determinar com elas são, depois que a leitura do texto for feita, mas podemos afirmar que na maioria dos casos, as letras maiusculas são usadas apenas no inivio do verso, enquanto as letras minusculas são usadas em todos os versos.
An attempt to define and explain factors that predict behavior under certain conditions is termed
a. theories.
b. case studies.
c. data collection.
d. causation determination.
Theories are attempts to define and explain factors that predict behavior under certain conditions.
While there are numerous sociological theories about crime, four major perspectives on deviance exist: structural functionalism, social strain typology, conflict theory, and labeling theorCesare Lombroso founded the Italian positivist school of criminology, which argued that a criminal mind was inherited and could be identified by physical characteristics and defects.Behavioral intention - This refers to the motivational factors that influence a given behavior, with the stronger the intention to perform the behavior, the more likely it will be performed. Subjective norms - This is the belief that the majority of people approve or disapprove of the behavior.
Learn mpore about behavior here:
https://brainly.com/question/28362085
#SPJ4
When is piracy considered qualified?
Answer: An act of piracy must meet very specific criteria to be considered an act of piracy according to the International Maritime Bureau.
Explanation: Among those criteria are: The pirates must board another vessel; The pirates must intend to steal or commit another crime.
This is not Plagiarized and can be directly copied and pasted to whatever assignment your working on.
In the Bill of Rights Section 2. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures of whatever nature and for any purpose shall be inviolable, and no search warrant or warrant of arrest shall issue except upon probable cause to be determined personally by the judge after examination under oath or affirmation of the complainant and the witnesses he may produce, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized.
How does this law guaranteed and protected the rights of every Filipino Citizens? Which and how it is important to you as a citizen?
What responsibilities come after your rights?
At what point does the common good of society limit your rights?
The provision you mentioned from the Bill of Rights in the Philippine Constitution guarantees and protects the rights of every Filipino citizen in several ways:
Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures: The law ensures that citizens have the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects. This means that the government cannot conduct searches or seizures without a valid search warrant or warrant of arrest. The requirement for probable cause and personal determination by a judge helps safeguard individuals from arbitrary intrusions by authorities.
As a citizen, these protections are important because they uphold fundamental rights and freedom , provide a sense of security, and promote the rule of law. They help prevent arbitrary actions by the government and protect individuals from unwarranted intrusion into their private lives and property.
Learn more about freedom here:
https://brainly.com/question/7723076
#SPJ11
1) Which of the following factors makes it difficult to drive in reverse?
A) Looking back, the driver has a fairly large blind spot.
OB Most of the trajectory is done with the gears in reverse.
OC) The driver could be confused when turning the steering wheel.
OD Both A and C are correct answers.
Answer:
D. Both A and C are correct answers.
the plaintiff brought his car to a mechanic for a tune-up. during the tune-up, the mechanic removed the fuse for the brake lights and inadvertently failed to replace it, causing the lights to stop working. as the plaintiff was driving his car home from the mechanic, he was involved in an accident. the plaintiff, seeing a friend walking along the road, slammed on his brakes to give the friend a ride. the defendant, who was driving the car behind the plaintiff, hit the plaintiff. the plaintiff sustained severe whiplash from the accident and has sued the defendant and the mechanic. at trial, the jury determined that the plaintiff's damages were $10,000 and that the defendant was 50% at fault, the mechanic was 25% at fault, and the plaintiff was 25% at fault. the jurisdiction recognizes pure several liability and partial comparative negligence. how much can the plaintiff collect from the defendant?
Answer:
100,000USD
Explanation:
Describe what an officer must demonstrate to justify an emergency search.
Answer:
Few provisions of the Bill of Rights grew so directly out of the experience of the colonials as the Fourth Amendment, embodying as it did the protection against the use of the “writs of assistance.” But though the insistence on freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures as a fundamental right gained expression in the colonies late and as a result of experience,1 there was also a rich English experience to draw on. “Every man’s house is his castle” was a maxim much celebrated in England, as Saman’s Case demonstrated in 1603.2 A civil case of execution of process, Saman’s Case nonetheless recognized the right of the homeowner to defend his house against unlawful entry even by the King’s agents, but at the same time recognized the authority of the appropriate officers to break and enter upon notice in order to arrest or to execute the King’s process. Most famous of the English cases was Entick v. Carrington,3 one of a series of civil actions against state officers who, pursuant to general warrants, had raided many homes and other places in search of materials connected with John Wilkes’ polemical pamphlets attacking not only governmental policies but the King himself
Explanation:
who is typically protected by good samaritan laws passed by the states?
Good Samaritan laws, which have been passed by most states in the United States, are designed to protect individuals who provide aid to others during emergency situations.
These laws provide legal protection to those who act in good faith and without expectation of compensation when providing emergency assistance to someone who is in danger or in need of medical attention. The individuals who are typically protected by these laws include doctors, nurses, paramedics, and other healthcare professionals, as well as ordinary citizens who may come across an emergency situation. These laws encourage people to provide help in emergency situations without fear of legal repercussions, which can often save lives. Good Samaritan laws provide crucial legal protection to those who provide aid to others during emergencies and help promote a culture of compassion and care.
To know more about Laws visit:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ11
___ merely recognizes that an individual has the right to demonstrate that he or she is incapable of forming the intent for the offenses committed.
a. insanity
b. competency
c. diminished capacity
d. diminished competency
Which rule of evidence could you use to try and keep the magazine out of
evidence even though the court decides it is relevant.
O Ariz. R. Evid. 402.
O Ariz. R. Evid. 102.
Ariz. R. Evid. 403.
No rule of evidence could be used to keep the magazine out.
Answer:
i feel for you
Explanation:
?
The exclusionary rule states that Group of answer choices federal law cannot be applied in state courts. the laws of one state court cannot be applied in the courts of another state. evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. state law cannot be applied in federal courts. none of the above.
The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. Therefore option (C) is the correct answer.
The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial. This rule prevents police officers from using evidence that they have collected in violation of an individual's constitutional rights. Therefore, if the court finds that evidence was obtained through illegal means, it will not be allowed to be used during a trial.The exclusionary rule does not prohibit the use of illegally obtained evidence in all circumstances. The rule only applies if the evidence was obtained in a manner that violates a person's constitutional rights.
The exclusionary rule states that evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. This means that if the evidence is collected in violation of a person's constitutional rights, it cannot be used in court against that individual. In summary, the correct option for the question is: Evidence obtained illegally is inadmissible in court. Option (C) is correct answer.
Learn more about exclusionary rule https://brainly.com/question/12239906
#SPJ11
what happens with illegally seized evidence in juvenile proceedings?
In juvenile proceedings, illegally seized evidence is handled differently than in adult court. If evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence.
An illegal seizure is a search or seizure by law enforcement without a valid warrant or without reasonable suspicion. An officer is required to have reasonable suspicion, or probable cause, before conducting a search or seizure. A search or seizure may be considered illegal if it violates the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, including the police. It applies to both adults and juveniles.
If the evidence is obtained illegally, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. The rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings. The exclusionary rule is designed to protect the constitutional rights of individuals and ensure that law enforcement officers do not violate their rights.In summary, if evidence is illegally seized during juvenile proceedings, it may be excluded from the proceedings and not used as evidence. The exclusionary rule applies to both adult and juvenile court proceedings.
To know more about proceedings:
https://brainly.com/question/29791715
#SPJ11
if a non-resident commences an action against a defendant who has a condo in new york county, but travels to columbia county to their farmhouse every weekend, the defendant’s residence for purposes of venue would be: new york county but not columbia county. columbia county but not new york county. either columbia county or new york county. any county in new york state.
Venue refers to the proper county or district where a lawsuit should be filed.
In this case, the defendant can establish residency in either county since they have a condo in New York County and regularly spend time at their farmhouse in Columbia County. However, it is important to note that the determination of the defendant's residence for venue purposes may also depend on the specific laws and regulations of the jurisdiction where the lawsuit is being filed. It is advisable to consult with a legal professional or research the relevant laws in the specific jurisdiction to ensure accurate information for your situation.
To ensure accurate and up-to-date information regarding residency and venue requirements, it is advisable to consult with a legal professional who specializes in the relevant jurisdiction or research the specific laws and regulations applicable to the case. They can provide guidance based on the specific circumstances and legal requirements of the jurisdiction in question.
Learn more about Venue refers: https://brainly.com/question/32605416
#SPJ11
Identify and discuss various type of crime content
mention 4ways in which the rule of law could protect community members whose private property was damaged during a protest action
During demonstrations or other times of civil unrest, protecting community people and their property is crucial. Only by upholding the rule of law can we make sure that those who violate the law are held accountable and that justice is done.
What is rule of law?According to the political idea known as "the rule of law," all individuals and institutions within a nation, state, or community, including legislators and other top officials, are subject to the same laws.
According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, the rule of law is "the system, method, institution, practice, or norm that maintains the equality of all individuals before the law, ensures a nonarbitrary type of government, and more generally avoids the arbitrary use of authority."
Learn more about rule of law, from:
brainly.com/question/12469633
#SPJ9
Canada Contractual Law
Valerie wants to splurge on her new she-shed (outdoor female equivalent of a man cave) Although her she-shed did have a lovely wine fridge and a crystal chandelier, something was missing. She hired a landscaping company – Major Tom’s Ground Control to provide a boxwood hedge, an angel stone path leading up to the shed, and several exotic plants and trees. A contract was drawn up which spelled out what Major Tom would do in exchange for $10,000.00. Valerie provided Major Tom with a $5,000.00 deposit to begin the work they had agreed upon. One stipulation in the contract, was that Major Tom would remove all leftover plant material and debris and clean the property before they left.
On the afternoon the landscaping was to be completed, she arrived home from work with her friends ready to begin enjoying the she-shed. The she shed looked lovely. Major Tom was nowhere to be found but they had left behind a hill of dirt, several shovels, a pair of work boots and two empty cases of beer. Valerie was not happy. She called Major Tom and told them that she would not pay the balance of $5000.00 because they had failed to clean the property as indicated by the contract after the work was completed.
What are the legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario? Does she have a case?
Based on the material in Chapter 7, provide a clear and detailed rationale as to what can be done to solve the problem in this scenario.
The legal concepts and laws that are triggered by this scenario are the Breach of Contract and Contractual Remedies. Valerie has a case in this scenario.
What can be done to solve the problem in this scenario is that a demand letter can be sent to Major Tom’s Ground Control company. This letter should indicate that they breached the contract by failing to clean the property after completing the work and that she will not be paying the balance of $5000.00. In addition, Valerie should include that she is willing to pay a fair amount to have another company come in and clean up the property. Finally, she could inform Major Tom’s Ground Control that if they fail to comply with her demands, she will take legal action against them.
It is necessary to note that a demand letter should be sent with registered mail. This ensures that the letter is received by the intended recipient. If the letter is ignored, Valerie may need to file a claim in Small Claims Court. The evidence to support her claim includes the contract, deposit, pictures of the property, the demand letter, and any other correspondence between her and Major Tom's Ground Control.
Learn more about Small Claims Court: https://brainly.com/question/16507110
#SPJ11
Though high-profile business bankruptcies such as Sports Authority and Radio Shack dominate the news, over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals. T/F
It is a true statement that over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals.
What is bankruptcy filings?A bankruptcy filings is a procedure that help a person to discard their debt or makes a plan to repay their debts.
Bankrupted Individual debts are wiped out with your filing's court approval which can take a few months or may need continuous payments on those balances throughout the repayment plan.
In conclusion, It is a true statement that over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals.
Read more about bankruptcy filing
brainly.com/question/26392690
Under the Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, if a lease does not state a clear expiration date, the lease is regarded as
Answer:
Hello. Under Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant Act, if the lease does not specify or make clear an expiration date, the lease will be regarded as: A tenancy from period-to-period.
Explanation:
Question does not ask for an explanation, so one will not be given. Have a nice day user.
Facts: Officers wanted to search Dollree Mapp's house, but she said no because they did not have a warrant. They were looking for a suspected bomber. Eventually, the police forced their way in. They did not find a bomber, but they did find a trunk of obscene pictures in the basement. Ms. Mapp was arrested and convicted for possession of obscenity. She appealed.
Question for the court: Can you be convicted on the basis of illegally obtained evidence? Decision: No. The court held that evidence seized without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions both in Federal and now State courts. This is called the Exclusionary Rule. Issue: Can the Exclusionary Rule cause a criminal to go free? Explain below in 2-4 sentences.
Answer:
they didn't have a warrant so they shouldn't have forced there way in. Also they cannot be arrested
Explanation:
hoped this helped sry if wrong lol
a litigant who seeks to have the u.s. supreme court rule on his or her case will file a petition for:
A litigant who loses in a federal court of appeals, or in the highest court of a state, may file a petition for a "writ of certiorari," which is a document asking the Supreme Court to review the case.
However, the Supreme Court is not required to grant review. Only when a case concerns an extremely significant legal concept or when two or more federal appellate courts have disagreed on how to interpret a statute will the Court normally consent to consider it. Additionally, there are a few unique instances in which the Supreme Court is mandated by law to consider an appeal.
To know more about litigant visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28945859
#SPJ4
For instance, imagine that a bank robber enters a bank, robs the bank, and kills a few people. This offender was unmasked and was caught on camera committing the crime. Under the theory of crime control model, what can be the actions taken considering the above scenario.
1. Immediate apprehension of the offender: The police should immediately apprehend the offender and bring him to justice.
2. Deterrents: The police should also implement deterrents to discourage similar criminal acts, such as increased surveillance and security measures in the bank and the surrounding area.
What are Deterrence techniques?3. Deterrence techniques: The police should also use deterrence techniques such as the death penalty or life imprisonment to discourage further criminal acts.
4. Increased public awareness: The police should also increase public awareness of the crime and the consequences of committing similar criminal acts.
5. Victim support: The police should also provide support to the victims of the crime, such as financial compensation, counseling, and medical treatment.
6. Education and prevention: Finally, the police should educate the public on the risks of committing similar criminal acts and provide prevention strategies to reduce the likelihood of similar criminal acts occurring in the future.
Read more about Deterrence techniques
https://brainly.com/question/14904611
#SPJ1
Question 2 Which is not one of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment? A) My client did it but is insane. B) My client did it for a good reason. C) My client did it D) My client did not do it.
One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.
Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.
Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.
The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.
Learn more about court here:
https://brainly.com/question/26318342
#SPJ9
Isaiah is doing a research paper on interactionist perspectives. What question would Isaiah’s paper MOST likely address?How can the shape of a person’s skull predict their behavior?
B.
How does a lack of hormones affect a person’s behavior?
C.
When a person does not show signs of a superego, are they destined to be criminals?
D.
How do the people and events around a person affect their path?
Answer:
How do the people and events around a person affect their path?
Explanation:
interactionism is a theoretical perspective that sees social behavior as an interactive product of the individual and the situation.
Also, i took the quiz :)
In a condition where Isaiah is doing a research paper on interactionist perspectives, the question of how people and events around a person affect the paths is most likely to be addressed by her in her research. Therefore, the option D holds true.
What is the significance of interactionist perspective?An interactionist perspective can be referred to or considered as the process that deals in expression of social interaction of a human being in the society that he or she is a part of.
In research related to such interactionist perspectives, it must be taken into consideration that the solution to the problem of person being affected in social interaction is provided by the researcher, like Isaiah in the above case.
Therefore, the option D holds true and states regarding the significance of interactionist perspective.
Learn more about interactionist perspective here:
https://brainly.com/question/11589195
#SPJ2
Which style of communication should officers maintain?
-Aggressive
-Passive
-Assertive
-Passive-aggressive
define government from different authors
Answer:
Explanation:
Government and politics are two interrelated terms in social science. Government refers to a group of authorized people who govern a country or state at a given time. Politics refer to the process used by the government to govern the country or state. Government mainly refers to a select group of people whereas politics refer to a process.
Earl's company wants to change the material it uses for its products to a cheaper, less-durable material. processing the material causes more waste and the final products will not be as safe for customers, but the company will make more money overall
Corporate Social Responsibility Moral Code Earl's business wants to switch to a less expensive, less resilient material for its goods.
What examples of a product are there?
A product is any thing or service you provide to meet a customer's need or desire. Both actual and virtual ones exist. Physical products include both long-lasting objects (like furniture, computers, and vehicles) and short-lasting ones (like food and beverages).
What kinds of items are there?
Convenience goods, shopping goods, specialized products, and unsought goods are the four categories of products, and each is categorized according to consumer preferences, pricing, and product features.
To know more about products visit:
https://brainly.com/question/22852400
#SPJ4
What are the basic fingerprint patterns?
Answer: Answer is below <3
Explanation: There are eight different kinds of fingerprint patterns, such as radiatal loop, ulnar loop, double loop, central pocket loop, plain arch, tented arch, plain whorl and accidental.
please give brainliest if I’m correct! Tyty <33
LEO and NLETS are different types of law enforcement
Answer:Problem-Solving Policing A type of policing that assumes that crimes can be controlled by uncovering and effectively addressing the underlying social problems that cause crime.
Explanation:
A type of policing that assumes that many crimes are caused by existing social conditions within the community and that crimes can be controlled by uncovering and effectively addressing underlying social problems.