If i invest $8,100 with a 7. 2 compound interest how much will i have after 7 years

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

Direction is defined as the path that something takes. North, south, east and west all are the direction. Up down, left and right are also used to represent the direction. Using the direction chart we get the equator is at 0 distance away from the location of kylie.

Given-

Kylie uses the number 400 to represent 400 miles north of the equator.

Kylie uses the number -2000 to show 2000 miles south of the equator.

What is the direction?

Direction is defined as the path that something takes. North, south, east and west all are the direction. Up down, left and right are also used to represent the direction.

As Kylie use the number 400 to represent 400 miles north of the equator. Thus if he need to back at 400 towards the south to reach back to the equator. Thus the equator is the point from where he has started and the equator is at 0 distance away from the location of kylie where he had started earlier.

Similarly Kylie uses the number -2000 to show 2000 miles south of the equator. Thus if he need to come back at 2000 towards the north to reach back to the equator. Thus the equator is the point from where he has started and the equator is at 0 distance away from the location of kylie where he had started earlier.

Hence both the statement suggest that the equator is at 0 distance away from the location of kylie where he had started earlier.

If the measure of the sides of the square is 12 inches , then the maximum possible error for the square's area is 146.8944  .

In the question ,

it is given that ,

the measure of the length of the side of the square is = 12 inches ,

the possible error is = 1% ,

the error length of the side = 0.12 ,

the length of the side = 12.12 inches .

the area of the square ⇒ 12.12 × 12.12

= 146.8944   .

Therefore , the maximum possible error in the square's area is = 146.8944 .

Learn more about Error here

https://brainly.com/question/14279452

#SPJ4

The equivalent values of option a, b, c and d are -7, 9/10, -8/5 and -8/5

Linear equations are equation that has a leading degree of 1.

If x is 2/5, y is -4, and z is -0.2, then:

a. x + y

Substituting the given values, we get:

2/5 + (-4) = -15/5 + (-20/5) = -35/5 = -7

Therefore, x + y = -7.

b. 2x - z

Substituting the given values, we get:

2(2/5) - (-0.2) = 4/5 + 2/10 = 8/10 + 1/10 = 9/10

Therefore, 2x - z = 9/10.

c. x + y + z

Substituting the given values, we get:

2/5 + (-4) + (-0.2) = -8/5

Therefore, x + y + z = -8/5.

d. y × x

Substituting the given values, we get:

(-4) × (2/5) = -8/5

Therefore, y × x = -8/5.

Learn more on linear equation here: https://brainly.com/question/14323743

#SPJ1

The ratio of pencils to pens can be calculated by dividing the number of pencils by the number of pens. In this case, the ratio of pencils to pens is 10/14.

A ratio is a way to compare two or more values or quantities. It is expressed as a fraction or as a colon-separated pair of numbers. The first number in the ratio represents the number of units of the first quantity, and the second number represents the number of units of the second quantity.

In the case of the ratio of pencils to pens, the first quantity is the number of pencils and the second quantity is the number of pens. To calculate the ratio, you divide the number of pencils by the number of pens. In this case, you would divide 10 by 14, which is equal to 10/14 or 5/7.

The ratio can be expressed as either a fraction or as a colon-separated pair of numbers. In this case, the ratio of pencils to pens is either 5/7 or 5:7.

To learn more about ratio please click on below link        

https://brainly.com/question/1504221

#SPJ4

Answer:

18 green fish and there are 12 yellow fish

Answer:

120 males

Step-by-step explanation:

Well you need to set up your proportions which should look like this x/300 and 40%/100%.You need to cross multiply meaning you need to multiply 300 and 40 which equals to 12,000 then you will divide 12,000 by 100 and get 120

Bail-in and bail-out are terms used in resolving bank failures. Bail-in involves the bank's stakeholders bearing the losses, while bail-out involves external financial support. Pros of bail-in include protecting taxpayers and promoting market discipline, while cons include potential contagion effects, complexity, and investor uncertainty. Bank regulators seek to improve bail-in frameworks to enhance financial stability and protect taxpayers.

Bail-in refers to a process in which a failing bank's creditors and shareholders are required to bear the losses incurred by the bank. In a bail-in, the bank's liabilities are written down or converted into equity, effectively recapitalizing the bank and restoring its solvency. This approach aims to ensure that the costs of the bank's failure are borne by the bank's stakeholders rather than taxpayers or the government.

On the other hand, a bail-out involves providing financial support to a failing bank by external sources, typically the government or a central bank. The bail-out involves injecting funds into the bank to prevent its collapse and maintain its operations. This approach aims to protect depositors and maintain stability in the financial system but can often place a burden on taxpayers.

Now let's discuss the pros and cons of using bail-in to resolve a bank failure.

Pros of using bail-in:

1. Protection of taxpayers: Bail-in reduces the burden on taxpayers by making the bank's stakeholders, such as bondholders and shareholders, responsible for covering the losses. This helps prevent moral hazard and ensures that the costs of the bank's failure are borne by those who have a stake in the bank.

2. Market discipline: Bail-in promotes market discipline by holding creditors and shareholders accountable for their investment decisions. This encourages better risk assessment and monitoring of banks by investors, as they become more cautious about investing in banks with higher risk profiles.

Cons of using bail-in:

1. Potential contagion effects: The implementation of bail-in measures can potentially lead to contagion effects in the financial system. If investors lose confidence in one bank, it may spread to other banks and institutions, causing a broader financial crisis.

2. Lack of clarity and complexity: Determining the appropriate allocation of losses and implementing a bail-in can be complex and challenging. There may be difficulties in accurately valuing assets, determining the order of creditor hierarchy, and navigating the legal and operational complexities involved.

3. Investor uncertainty: The possibility of bail-in may increase uncertainty among investors, leading to higher borrowing costs for banks and reduced market confidence. This can negatively impact the stability of the financial system.

In recent years, bank regulators have been seeking to improve their bail-in frameworks to enhance financial stability and protect taxpayers. They aim to establish clear rules and procedures for implementing bail-ins, ensure sufficient loss-absorbing capacity within banks, and enhance transparency and investor confidence.

To know more about bail-in, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/32306239#

#SPJ11

Option a: Adding a constant to each value of a variable will not change the correlation. This is a property of the correlation coefficient, r. In fact, the correlation coefficient only measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables, and is not affected by any linear transformation, such as adding or subtracting a constant to eachvalue of a variable. Therefore, option a is a property of the correlation coefficient.

Option b: -1 ≤ r ≤ 1 for a least-squares line with positive slope. This is also a property of the correlation coefficient. The correlation coefficient, r, always takes values between -1 and 1, where -1 indicates a perfect negative linear relationship, 0 indicates no linear relationship, and 1 indicates a perfect positive linear relationship. When a least-squares line has a positive slope, it means that the variables have a positive linear relationship, and therefore, the correlation coefficient should be positive and between 0 and 1. Therefore, option b is also a property of the correlation coefficient.


Option d: r is close to 1 for a strong linear relationship between x and y, and close to -1 for a weak relationship. This is not a property of the correlation coefficient. While it is true that r takes values between -1 and 1, and that values close to 1 indicate a strong linear relationship, and values close to -1 indicate a weak relationship, this is not a fixed property of the correlation coefficient. The strength of the linear relationship depends on the data set and the context of the problem. For instance, a correlation coefficient of 0.8 could be considered strong in some cases, but weak in others. Therefore, option d is not a property of the correlation coefficient.

To know more about correlation coefficient visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29978658

#SPJ11

The derivative of the function f(x) = 390 by using the rules of differentiation is f'(x) = 0.

To find the derivative of the function f(x) = 390, we can apply the rules of differentiation.

In this case, the function f(x) = 390 is a constant function, which means it does not depend on the variable x. The derivative of a constant function is always zero.

Therefore, the derivative f'(x) of the function f(x) = 390 is:

f'(x) = 0

The derivative of a constant function is zero because a constant value does not change with respect to the variable x. So regardless of the value of x, the rate of change of the function is always zero.

To know more about derivative, click here: brainly.com/question/29144258

#SPJ11

Answer: $87.50

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the equation Part=%×whole

Always turn percents into decimals (move the decimal over by 2)

x=.35×250

x=$87.50

Calculating wattage is a quick process once you know the appliance's amperage and voltage — you simply multiply the two figures. An appliance that uses 110 volts of electricity and 5 amps uses 550 watts.

Hope this helps!

Answer:

Hoping someone else can answer with more confidence, but here's what I have:

on the left hand side:

upper is partial/penumbral lunar eclipse

lower is total solar eclipse

on the right hand side:

on the top: it's impossible for the moon to be behind the sun, so I'm not sure what they want there

middle is total solar eclipse

bottom is partial/penumbral lunar eclipse

Hope I helped at least a little

If many random samples of this size were taken and intervals constructed, 90% of them would contain the true population mean. In repeated sampling, about 90% of the constructed confidence intervals will capture the true population mean difference. The correct answer is C.

When we construct a confidence interval, it is important to understand its interpretation. In this case, the correct answer (Oc) states that if we were to take many random samples of the same size and construct confidence intervals for each sample, approximately 90% of these intervals would contain the true population mean difference.

This interpretation is based on the concept of sampling variability. Due to random sampling, different samples from the same population will yield slightly different sample means.

The confidence interval accounts for this variability by providing a range of values within which we can reasonably expect the true population mean difference to fall a certain percentage of the time.

In the given scenario, when constructing a 90% confidence interval for the paired difference, it means that 90% of the intervals we construct from repeated samples will successfully capture the true population mean difference, while 10% of the intervals may not contain the true value.

It's important to note that this interpretation does not imply a probability or chance for an individual interval to capture the true population mean. Once the interval is constructed, it either does or does not contain the true value. The confidence level refers to the long-term behavior of the intervals when repeated sampling is considered.

Learn more about confidence interval at https://brainly.com/question/15576092

#SPJ11

Answer:

50

Corresponding angles

Answer:

The plane's resultant vector is 890.3 miles, at an angle of 59.5° west of north.

Step-by-step explanation:

• To find the magnitude of the resultant vector, we have to use Pythagoras's theorem:

\(\boxed{a^2 = b^2 + c^2}\)

where:

a ⇒ hypotenuse (= resultant vector = ? mi)

b, c ⇒ the two other sides of the right-angled triangle (= 452 mil North, 767 mi West).

Using the formula:

resultant² = \(452^2 + 767^2\)

⇒ resultant =  \(\sqrt{452^2 + 767^2}\)

⇒ resultant = 890.3 mi

• To find the direction, we can find the angle (labeled x in diagram) that the resultant makes with the north direction:

\(tan (x) =\frac{767}{452}\)

⇒ \(x = tan^{-1} (\frac{767}{452} )\)

⇒ \(x = \bf{59.5 \textdegree}\)

∴ The plane's resultant vector is 890.3 miles, at an angle of 59.5° west of north .

Answer:

\(\displaystyle Approximately\:59°\:at\:a\:magnitude\:of\:approximately\:890\:miles\)

Step-by-step explanation:

\(\displaystyle \frac{OPPOCITE}{HYPOTENUSE} = sin\:\theta \\ \frac{ADJACENT}{HYPOTENUSE} = cos\:\theta \\ \frac{OPPOCITE}{ADJACENT} = tan\:\theta \\ \frac{HYPOTENUSE}{ADJACENT} = sec\:\theta \\ \frac{HYPOTENUSE}{OPPOCITE} = csc\:\theta \\ \frac{ADJACENT}{OPPOCITE} = cot\:\theta\)

We must use trigonometry to help us find the direction of the aeroplane's resultant vector. Do as I do:

\(\displaystyle \frac{452}{767} = cot\:x \hookrightarrow cot^{-1}\:\frac{452}{767} = x; 59,488772482...° = x \\ \\ \boxed{59° \approx x}\)

Now, we will use the Pythagorean Theorem to find the magnitude of the aeroplane's resultant vector. Do as I do:

\(\displaystyle a^2 + b^2 = c^2 \\ \\ 767^2 + 452^2 = c^2 \\ \sqrt{792593} = \sqrt{c^2}; 890,27692321... = c \\ \\ \boxed{890 \approx c}\)

Therefore, the direction and magnitude of the aeroplane's resultant vector are approximately eight hundred ninety miles at an angle of elevation of fifty-nine degrees.

I am joyous to assist you at any time.

Answer: 49 in^2

Step-by-step explanation:

Trapezoid area formula = (a+b/2) x h

So...

(5+9/2) x 7

= 49 in^2

\( \huge \boxed {\longmapsto\mathcal {\purple {Answer}}}\)

Area of trapezoid :

\( \boxed{ \frac{1}{2} \times sum \: of \: parallel \: sides \times height }\)

=》

\( \boxed {\frac{1}{2} \times (9 + 5) \times 7}\)

=》

\( \boxed {\frac{1}{2} \times 14 \times 7}\)

=》

\(\boxed{7 \times 7}\)

=》

\(\boxed{49}\)

\( \boxed {\mathfrak{area = 49 \:in {}^{2} }}\)

Answer:

6 passengers got off at New Jersey

Step-by-step explanation:

let the number of passengers who got off be x and let the number of passengers who boarded the bus be y

y=2x

44 - x + y=50

y=50-44+x

y=6+x

subst y=2x

2x=6+x

2x-x=6

x=6

Answer:

-3/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x be the missing number

The correct answer is 'in statistical hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis are stated in terms of population parameter.

A population parameter is always used to express a statistical hypothesis: The null hypothesis is true if the test statistic's value is within the nonrejection zone.

We look for evidence supporting the null hypothesis when testing a statistical hypothesis. The null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis are the two variants of the hypothesis that are typically used in research (called the experimental hypothesis when the method of investigation is an experiment).

According to the alternative hypothesis, a population parameter does not equal the given value. Usually, this number is zero, which is the null hypothesis value for an effect of zero.

You can reject the null hypothesis and favour the alternative hypothesis if your sample includes enough evidence to support it.

To know more about 'statistical hypothesis' related questions

visit- https://brainly.com/question/15980505

#SPJ4

Given the state-space model with acceleration being the control input,Let x [t + 1] 1 δ x [t] 0 = + u[t]. v [t + 1] 0 1 v [t] δWhere x[t] = vt is the reference trajectory to track.

The reference trajectory to track is x[t] = vt.The position and speed errors being the state can be found using the following steps. State-space model of the system: {x[t+1]=x[t] + δv[t]v[t+1]=v[t] + δu[t]}Let the position and speed errors be e1[t] = x[t] - v*tand e2[t] = v[t] - v.

From the above state-space model:{x[t+1] = v*t + e1[t] + δv[t]v[t+1] = v + e2[t] + δu[t]}Differentiate e1[t] and e2[t] with respect to time t: {e1[t + 1] = e1[t] + δe2[t + 1] = e2[t] + δNow, we can write the state-space model with errors in state:{e1[t + 1] e2[t + 1] = 1 δ 0 1 e1[t] e2[t] + 0 δ 1 0 δ u[t].

Now, a linear controller that stabilizes the system can be found as below:Let A = [1 δ; 0 1] and B = [0; δ].Let the state-feedback control law be given by u[t] = -K[e1[t]; e2[t]] such that the eigenvalues of the closed-loop system are negative. Therefore,K can be found using the following formulae:

K = (B'PB + R)^{-1}(B'PA)

where,P is a positive definite solution of the algebraic Riccati equationA'PA - P + Q - A'PB(B'PB + R)^{-1}B'PA = 0andR and Q are positive definite matrices.The destabilizing controller can be found by using K = [0 1].Then, the closed-loop system becomes{x[t+1] = (1- δ^2) x[t] + δv[t]v[t+1] = (1- δ^2) v[t] + δu[t]}.

In order to stabilize the system, a linear controller has been found using the reformulated model. The destabilizing controller can also be found.  Thus, this is how the state-space model can be reformulated and linear controllers can be found to stabilize or destabilize the system.

To know more about Riccati equation :

brainly.com/question/31476486

#SPJ11

Answer:

I think it's A/the first one

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

About 9,346.2 mm²

Step-by-step explanation:

First, find area of the smaller circle and the larger circle.

[smaller]

πr²

π25²

Around 1,963.5

[larger]

πr²

π60²

Around 11,309.7

[find shaded region]

Larger / shaded - smaller = around 9,346.2 mm²

Answer: True

Step-by-step explanation: This statement is true because when clusters are heterogeneous they are a "scaled-down version" of the population sampled. I hope this helped!

Answer:true

Step-by-step explanation:

a. Bisection Method: To use the bisection method to find the real roots of the equation f(x) = x³ + x² - 10x + 8, we need to find an interval [a, b] such that f(a) and f(b) have opposite signs.

Let's make a preliminary estimate and choose the interval [1, 2] based on observing the sign changes in the equation.

Iteration 1: a = 1, b = 2

c = (a + b) / 2

= (1 + 2) / 2 is 1.5

f(c) = (1.5)³ + (1.5)² - 10(1.5) + 8 ≈ -1.375

ince f(c) has a negative value, the root lies in the interval [1.5, 2].

Iteration 2:

a = 1.5, b = 2

c = (a + b) / 2

= (1.5 + 2) / 2 is 1.75

f(c) = (1.75)³ + (1.75)² - 10(1.75) + 8 ≈ 0.9844

Since f(c) has a positive value, the root lies in the interval [1.5, 1.75].

Iteration 3: a = 1.5, b = 1.75

c = (a + b) / 2

= (1.5 + 1.75) / 2 is 1.625

f(c) = (1.625)³ + (1.625)² - 10(1.625) + 8  is -0.2141

Since f(c) has a negative value, the root lies in the interval [1.625, 1.75].

Iteration 4: a = 1.625, b = 1.75

c = (a + b) / 2

= (1.625 + 1.75) / 2 is 1.6875

f(c) = (1.6875)³ + (1.6875)² - 10(1.6875) + 8 which gives 0.3887.

Since f(c) has a positive value, the root lies in the interval [1.625, 1.6875].

Iteration 5: a = 1.625, b = 1.6875

c = (a + b) / 2

= (1.625 + 1.6875) / 2 is 1.65625

f(c) = (1.65625)³ + (1.65625)² - 10(1.65625) + 8 is 0.0873 .

Since f(c) has a positive value, the root lies in the interval [1.625, 1.65625].

Iteration 6: a = 1.625, b = 1.65625

c = (a + b) / 2

= (1.625 + 1.65625) / 2 which gives 1.640625

f(c) = (1.640625)³ + (1.640625)² - 10(1.640625) + 8 which gives -0.0638.

Since f(c) has a negative value, the root lies in the interval [1.640625, 1.65625].

teration 7: a = 1.640625, b = 1.65625

c = (a + b) / 2

= (1.640625 + 1.65625) / 2 results to 1.6484375

f(c) = (1.6484375)³ + (1.6484375)² - 10(1.6484375) + 8 is 0.0116

Since f(c) has a positive value, the root lies in the interval [1.640625, 1.6484375].

Continuing this process, we can narrow down the interval further until we reach the desired level of accuracy.

b. Newton-Raphson Method: The Newton-Raphson method requires an initial estimate for the root. Let's choose x₀ = 1.5 as our initial estimate.

Iteration 1:

x₁ = x₀ - (f(x₀) / f'(x₀))

f(x₀) = (1.5)³ + (1.5)² - 10(1.5) + 8 which gives -1.375.

f'(x₀) = 3(1.5)² + 2(1.5) - 10 which gives -1.25.

x₁ ≈ 1.5 - (-1.375) / (-1.25) which gives 2.6.

Continuing this process, we can iteratively refine our estimate until we reach the desired level of accuracy.

c. Secant Method: The secant method also requires two initial estimates for the root. Let's choose x₀ = 1.5 and x₁ = 2 as our initial estimates.

Iteration 1: x₂ = x₁ - (f(x₁) * (x₁ - x₀)) / (f(x₁) - f(x₀))

f(x₁) = (2)³ + (2)² - 10(2) + 8 gives 4

f(x₀) = (1.5)³ + (1.5)² - 10(1.5) + 8 gives -1.375

x₂ ≈ 2 - (4 * (2 - 1.5)) / (4 - (-1.375)) gives 1.7826

Continuing this process, we can iteratively refine our estimates until we reach the desired level of accuracy.

To know more about Bisection Method visit-

brainly.com/question/32563551

#SPJ11

The expected value of X is 297/35 and the variance of X is 774/1225.

Let's define the indicator random variable Xi as follows:

Xi = 1, if the i-th roll results in a new number (that hasn't been rolled before).

Xi = 0, otherwise.

Then, X is the sum of these indicator variables, that is:

X = X1 + X2 + X3

We know that E[Xi] = 1/p, where p is the probability of rolling a new number on the i-th roll, given that i - 1 distinct numbers have already been rolled. Since there are i - 1 distinct numbers already rolled, the probability of rolling a new number on the i-th roll is (6 - i + 1)/6.

Thus, we have:

E[Xi] = 6/(6-i+1) = 6/(7-i)

Using the linearity of expectation, we can find the expected value of X:

E[X] = E[X1] + E[X2] + E[X3] = 6/7 + 6/6 + 6/5 = 297/35

To find the variance of X, we need to calculate the variance of each Xi:

Var(Xi) = E[Xi^2] - E[Xi]^2

We know that:

E[Xi^2] = 1(6-i+1)/6 + 0(i-1)/6 = (7-i)/6

So, we have:

Var(Xi) = (7-i)/6 - (6/(7-i))^2

Using the linearity of variance, we can find the variance of X:

Var(X) = Var(X1) + Var(X2) + Var(X3)

= (4/6) - (6/7)^2 + (3/6) - (6/6)^2 + (2/6) - (6/5)^2

= 774/1225

To learn more about variance :

brainly.com/question/25639778

#SPJ11

Answer:

50%

Step-by-step explanation:

90-60 = 30

30÷60 = .5

The area of the computer monitor display is approximately 0.103 square meters, with three significant figures.

The area of the monitor display in square meters is found by converting the measurements from inches to meters and then calculate the area.

The conversion factor from inches to meters is 0.0254 meters per inch.

Width in meters = 14.60 inches * 0.0254 meters/inch

Height in meters = 10.95 inches * 0.0254 meters/inch

Area = Width in meters * Height in meters

We calculate the area:

Width in meters = 14.60 inches * 0.0254 meters/inch = 0.37084 meters

Height in meters = 10.95 inches * 0.0254 meters/inch = 0.27813 meters

Area = 0.37084 meters * 0.27813 meters = 0.1030881672 square meters

Now, we determine the number of significant figures.

The measurements provided have four significant figures (14.60 and 10.95). However, in the final answer, we should retain the least number of significant figures from the original measurements, which is three (10.95). Therefore, the answer should have three significant figures.

Thus, the area of the monitor display in square meters is approximately 0.103 square meters, with three significant figures.

To know more about area, refer to the link :

https://brainly.com/question/11952845#

#SPJ11