The principal sources of lawmaking pertaining to white-collar crime involve legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government. In the area of white-collar crime, one key development is the passage of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) in 1970.
Specifically, the influences involved in this lawmaking process include:
Legislative Branch: Congress plays a primary role in enacting laws related to white-collar crime. Members of Congress propose and draft bills, which undergo a legislative process, including committee hearings, debates, and voting. Influences on this process include public opinion, interest groups, lobbyists, and expert testimonies.Executive Branch: The executive branch, led by the President, also influences white-collar crime lawmaking. The President can propose legislative agendas, issue executive orders, and direct executive agencies to focus on specific areas of white-collar crime. The Department of Justice (DOJ) and other law enforcement agencies under the executive branch are responsible for investigating and prosecuting white-collar crimes.Judicial Branch: Courts interpret and apply laws related to white-collar crime through their decisions and precedents. Judicial opinions and rulings help shape the understanding and enforcement of white-collar crime laws. Influences on this process include legal arguments, case precedents, and evolving societal norms.Administrative lawmaking, a distinctive feature of the regulatory process, involves the creation of regulations and rules by administrative agencies empowered by Congress.
In the area of white-collar crime, one key development is the passage of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) in 1970. RICO law targets organized criminal activities, including white-collar crimes such as fraud, embezzlement, and money laundering. RICO introduced enhanced penalties and civil remedies for individuals involved in ongoing criminal enterprises.
For such more question on government:
https://brainly.com/question/26119802
#SPJ8
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) apprehends a Guatemalan family illegally crossing the border into the United States. For ICE to legally limit the family's right to due process of law, the court would require a(n)
Group of answer choices
important government interest.
government interest.
legitimate government interest.
compelling government interest.
To legally limit a Guatemalan family's right to due process of law, the court would require a compelling government interest. In order to understand this concept, let's break it down step by step:
1. Due process of law: This refers to the legal requirement that the government must respect all of a person's legal rights. It ensures that individuals are treated fairly and that they have the opportunity to defend themselves in court.
2. Guatemalan family illegally crossing the border: In this scenario, the family is entering the United States without following the proper immigration procedures. This is considered an illegal act.
3. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): ICE is the agency responsible for enforcing immigration laws in the United States. They have the authority to apprehend and detain individuals who are found to be in the country illegally.
4. Legally limiting due process: To restrict or limit a person's right to due process, there must be a compelling government interest. This means that the government must have a strong and valid reason to restrict the family's rights.
5. Compelling government interest: A compelling government interest refers to a significant and legitimate reason for the government to take action. In the context of immigration, it could include concerns about national security, public safety, or the integrity of immigration laws.
In summary, for ICE to legally limit the Guatemalan family's right to due process of law, the court would require a compelling government interest. This means that the government must have a strong and valid reason, such as national security or public safety, to restrict the family's rights.
To know more about government, visit:
brainly.com/question/4160287
#SPJ11
A new patient has had no care by any member of the billing physician's specialty or practice group within the past {} years. 3. Which type of patient (new ...
The statement suggests that the patient is considered a "new patient" based on the criterion of not having received care from any member of the billing physician's specialty or practice group within the past three years.
In medical practice, patients are often categorized as new or established based on their prior interactions with the specific physician or practice. In this context, the patient falls under the category of a "new patient" since they have not received care from any member of the billing physician's specialty or practice group for the specified duration of three years.
Learn more about new patient"
https://brainly.com/question/29992408
#SPJ4
which kind of judicial decision-making acknowledges the power of judges to promote new social policy by overturning precedent?
The correct answer is judicial activism that acknowledges the power of judges to promote new social policy by overturning precedent.
According to the legal theory of "judicial activism," courts can and must consider societal effects in addition to the law that applies when making decisions. It is occasionally used in defiance of court restraint.
It refers to a judge deviating from precedent and relying more heavily on their own convictions while rendering decisions. Politicians disagree on both the overall concept of judicial activism and specific activist judgements.
Additionally, they contend that the judiciary invalidates the actions of both elected and unelected officials, including sometimes legislative acts that reflect the viewpoint of the momentary majority at the time of passage rather than necessarily the viewpoint of the momentary majority at the time the legislation is invalidated.
To find similar questions related with 'judicial activism'
visit- https://brainly.com/question/509532
#SPJ4
FILL THE BLANK. as a design principle, the ancient greek sculptor polykleitos used___________________to create the ideal human figure
As a design principle, the ancient Greek sculptor Polykleitos used the concept of "proportion and symmetry" to create the ideal human figure. He believed that achieving balance and harmony in the body's parts would result in a perfect, aesthetically pleasing representation of the human form. This approach significantly influenced the development of classical art in ancient Greece.
As a design principle, the ancient Greek sculptor Polykleitos used "symmetria" to create the ideal human figure. Symmetria refers to the balanced proportions of the body, where each part relates harmoniously to the whole. Polykleitos believed that these proportions were not only aesthetically pleasing but also reflected the natural order of the universe. He codified his approach in a treatise called the "Canon," which provided a set of guidelines for other sculptors to follow. Polykleitos' ideas had a profound influence on the development of classical Greek art and continued to inspire artists throughout the centuries.
To know more about Polykleitos visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31596804
#SPJ11
Legislatures: In the book The Silver Chair, important matters affecting Narnia are debated at night by a parliament of what kind of birds?
In the beloved children's book series, "The Chronicles of Narnia," written by C.S. Lewis, the world of Narnia is filled with all kinds of magical and mundane creatures. In the fourth installment of the series, "The Silver Chair," a group of essential matters affecting Narnia are debated by a "parliament of owls" at night. While fictional, this parliamentary system of governance highlights the importance of representation and deliberation in decision-making processes.
In the real world, legislatures or parliaments serve as the people's representative bodies in a democratic society. They are responsible for creating, debating, and passing laws that affect the lives of citizens. The people elect the members of parliament to represent their interests and advocate for their needs. The legislative process involves careful consideration of different viewpoints and deliberation on various matters before making a final decision.
Overall, using a parliament of birds in "The Silver Chair" is a creative and imaginative portrayal of the importance of deliberation and representation in decision-making. While it may not reflect how legislatures work, it highlights the fundamental principles of democratic governance.
To learn more about the Silver Chair, visit: https://brainly.com/question/31054342
#SPJ11
Nothing thank you I made it myself
Answer:
hi manna how are come in comment section
which of the following is a correctional policy that stipulates that prisons are meant to punish, not coddle, inmates?
A. No frills policy
B. Hard-hitting coreections
C. Robust rehabilitation
D. Stringent sentencing
Answer:
The answer is A. No frills policy.
Explanation:
A no-frills policy is a correctional policy that stipulates that prisons are meant to punish, not coddle, inmates. This policy typically includes restrictions on amenities and privileges, such as cable television, weightlifting equipment, and in-cell coffee pots. The goal of a no-frills policy is to create a harsh and unpleasant environment that will deter crime and make inmates less likely to re-offend.
the rationale for attempt crimes focuses on what two types of danger?
What kinds of control are available legislatures? Needs to be 5 sentences
Answer:
1. Financial authority: Legislators have the authority to approve budgets and allocate funding to various programs and initiatives.
2. Legislative authority: Legislators have the authority to create and pass laws that govern numerous parts of society.
3. Oversight control: Legislators can investigate and oversee government agencies to ensure they are operating properly.
4. Appointment control: Legislators have the authority to confirm or reject appointments made by the executive branch.
5. Impeachment control: Through the impeachment process, legislatures can remove public officials from office.
All of these checks and balances are necessary for the legislature to keep the government working properly and citizens' rights safeguarded.
__________ is impermissible because the opposing attorney cannot question the person who made the original statement to determine the statement's veracity.
Hearsay is impermissible because the opposing attorney cannot question the person who made the original statement to determine the statement's veracity.
Hearsay refers to an out-of-court statement offered in court to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. Generally, hearsay evidence is not admissible in court because it is considered unreliable and lacks the safeguards that come with live testimony and cross-examination.
One reason why hearsay is impermissible is that it deprives the opposing party of the opportunity to cross-examine the person who made the original statement. Cross-examination is a critical part of the legal process as it allows the opposing counsel to challenge the credibility and reliability of the witness's testimony. When hearsay evidence is presented, however, the opposing counsel cannot question the original speaker about the circumstances under which the statement was made or any other relevant information that may impact its reliability.
There are some exceptions to the hearsay rule, such as when the statement falls under a recognized hearsay exception or when it is used for a non-hearsay purpose, but generally speaking, hearsay evidence is not admissible in court.
learn more about Hearsay here
https://brainly.com/question/31668354
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements is true of the criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act?
A. They are only imposed on foreign officials.
B. They are only imposed on foreign companies.
C. Fines imposed on individuals may not be paid by their employer.
D. Fines imposed on individuals do not exceed $10,000.
E. If corrupt payments are made through intermediaries, only the intermediaries are fined.
The correct statement regarding the criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is: C. Fines imposed on individuals may not be paid by their employer.
The criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) are not solely limited to foreign officials (Option A) or foreign companies (Option B). While foreign officials and companies can be held accountable under the FCPA, the scope of enforcement extends to any individual or entity, regardless of nationality, involved in corrupt practices.
Under the FCPA, fines imposed on individuals cannot be paid by their employer (Option C). This means that an individual found guilty of violating the FCPA cannot rely on their employer to cover the financial penalties. Each individual is personally responsible for paying the fines imposed as a result of their misconduct.
Furthermore, fines imposed on individuals for FCPA violations can exceed $10,000 (Option D). The actual fines can vary depending on the severity of the violation, the benefits obtained from the corrupt practices, and other factors considered during sentencing. The fines can be substantial, often reaching into the hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.
Lastly, if corrupt payments are made through intermediaries, both the intermediaries and the individuals involved can be fined (Option E). The FCPA does not shield intermediaries from penalties; rather, it holds all parties involved accountable for their role in the corrupt activities.
Learn more about Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
brainly.com/question/30626255
#SPJ11
By what means are the civil and legal rights of individuals respected in a trial?
Answer:
It means due process, which is the fair treatment through the normal judicial system, especially a citizen's entitlement to notice of a charge and a hearing before an impartial judge.
Hope this helps :)
Taking a deeper look at the debate of the death penalty, where you do stand on the debate between death and a life sentence (without parole)? There is no right or wrong answer, just make sure to defend your answer. The answer needs to be 4-6 sentences for full credit.
My stance on the death penalty is that if a person is able to take the life of another person then they can be made to face the death penalty as well.
What is the death penalty?This is the capital punishment that involves taking the life of another person because they have committed a grave crime.
Even though, I believe that the death penalty does not have to be carried for all levels of crime, I believe that it should be implemented in situations where people take the life of others on purpose.
If they take away the right to life of other people, losing theirs is a way of causing others to stay away from committing such crime.
Read more on death penalty here: https://brainly.com/question/509558
#SPJ1
how did president reagan try to influence the federal court system on the roe decision?
President Reagan tried to influence the federal court system on the Roe decision in several ways. First, he appointed conservative judges to the federal bench who were more likely to rule against Roe. He appointed three Supreme Court justices during his time in office, including Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, and Anthony Kennedy. All three were conservative and were expected to rule against Roe.
Second, Reagan's administration filed briefs in court cases that challenged Roe, arguing that the decision was wrongly decided and should be overturned. Reagan believed that Roe was a violation of the sanctity of human life and that it was important to protect the rights of the unborn.
Third, Reagan used his position as president to speak out against abortion and to rally support for the pro-life movement. He delivered speeches, participated in rallies, and met with leaders of the movement to discuss strategies for overturning Roe.
Overall, Reagan's efforts to influence the federal court system on the Roe decision were part of a broader effort to shift the nation's cultural and political climate on the issue of abortion. While he was not successful in overturning Roe during his time in office, his legacy as a champion of the pro-life movement continues to shape the political landscape today.
To know more about President visit :
https://brainly.com/question/29761568
#SPJ11
Which of the following is NOT an adjustment to total income in arriving at adjusted gross income?
Select one:
a. Health insurance of self-employed persons
b. Certain contributions to a medical savings account
c. Contributions to a ROTH IRA
d. Interest paid on student loans
Among all the one that is not an adjustment to total income in arriving at adjusted gross income is contributions to a ROTH IRA. Hence, Option C is correct.
What is a gross income?Gross income, before any deductions or taxes, is the total of all wages, salaries, profits, interest payments, rents, and other sources of income for both families and individuals.
The opposite of gross income is net income, which is the gross income less all taxes and other deductions.
Items like tuition costs, interest on student loans, alimony payments, and contributions to retirement accounts are all considered adjustments to income.
Therefore, Option C is correct.
Learn more about gross income from here:
https://brainly.com/question/547727
#SPJ1
Which of the following refers to the study of motion, angles, and behavior of projectile objects?
O A. serology
OB.
forensics
O C.
ballistics
OD.
trace evidence
O E.
blood spatter
Answer:. B. forensics
Answer:
C. ballistics
Explanation:
the science of dynamics that deals with the flight, behavior and effects of projectiles, especially bullets, unguided bombs, rockets, or the like; the science or art of designing and accelerating projectiles so as to achieve a desired performance.
Which one of these is covered by a specific type of insurance policy
Answer:
Specific type of insurance policy is covered best with insurance policy wherein it protects against all 16 of the most common perils and almost any other peril, except those specifically excluded (such as earthquake, flood, landslide or mudslide, nuclear accident and sinkholes).
ordinarily a promise to perform an existing legal obligation is
Ordinarily, a promise to perform an existing legal obligation is not considered valid consideration in a contract.
This is because an individual is already legally obligated to perform the task or fulfill the obligation, and therefore, a promise to do so does not add any additional value or benefit to the agreement. In order for a promise to be considered valid consideration, it must involve a new obligation or benefit that was not previously required or expected. However, it is important to note that there may be exceptions to this general rule based on the specific circumstances of the contract and the jurisdiction in which it is being enforced. Ultimately, it is best to consult with a legal professional to determine the validity of a promise to perform an existing legal obligation in a particular situation.
To know more about obligation visit:
brainly.com/question/29437673
#SPJ11
Look at the graphic of the three branches of government. Explain to a sixth grade student what these three branches did for the country at the time of the Constitutional Convention. Your explanation should take no more than 50-75 words.
Answer:
During The Constitutional Convention, James Madison suggested to have three branches. The legislative branch, the Congress, would make laws. The executive branch would carry out the laws. A judicial branch would settle legal arguments. This set up a system of checks and balances where all three branches had a distribution of power so that nothing could become more powerful than them. They were under the Virginia Plan, which provided for a national government for them.
Explanation:
What happens when people drink alcohol beverages
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Name the ways in which a court order can compel specific performance as a remedy for breach of contract?
Answer:
Specific performance is a type of equitable remedy available in a breach of contract action. It is a remedy based on the concept of fairness. Specific performance recognizes that money may not adequately compensate the non-breaching party in certain situations.
Explanation:
The California Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC) provides that no trade or business expense deduction is allowed for expenditures made at, or payments made to, a club that restricts membership or the use of its services or facilities on the basis of which of the following:
Business losses of the following kinds cannot be deducted from business income: losses incurred before the firm has even started. losses a firm experiences when it closes. losses sustained as a result of capital asset damage, destruction, etc.
Which costs not allowable to be claimed as a business expense?Any interest, commission or brokerage, rent, royalties, fees for professional services, fees for technical services, or any other sum payable to a resident contractor shall not be allowed as a deduction in the prior year in which the expenses are incurred, when determining the income chargeable under the head "Profit."
Personal or business charges that you cannot deduct from your gross income while filing your taxes are known as nondeductible expenses. On the other hand, deductible expenses are costs that you can deduct from your income to reduce your tax obligation.
To know more about business expense, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/29679593
#SPJ1
What type of contract did Godfrey form when he put the advert for his lost phone up, and can the young boy enforce this contract against him?
The advert for Godfrey's lost phone is not a contract but an invitation to treat.
What is a contract?A contract is an agreement between different parties that is enforceable by law.
For a contract to exist, these elements are required:
Mutual assentValid offer and acceptanceAdequate considerationCapacityLegality.Thus, the young boy cannot enforce the contract against Godfrey as none was made between him and Godfrey.
Learn more about the requirements for a contract at https://brainly.com/question/15058983
#SPJ1
Name at least 3 characteristics of black street gangs
Answer: violent, territorial, and predatory
Explanation: Black gangs have significantly evolved over the last 40 years, and trend analysis indicates that these gangs will continue to grow in both rural and urban areas. As gangs and gang membership increase, gangs will become more violent, territorial, and predatory in response to competition and rivalry.
People and Families is the systems theory used to understand people, their families, and their dynamics.true or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This theory allows one to understand the organizational complexity of families, as well as the interactive patterns that guide family interactions. In order to understand a family system, we must look at the family as a whole and observe how they interact with each other to maintain homeostasis.
Which action is legal when towing a water-skier behind a vessel?
When towing a water-skier behind a vessel, it is legal to have an observer on board to monitor the skier and ensure their safety.
A water-skier is an individual who participates in the recreational activity of water skiing. Water skiing involves being pulled behind a motorized boat while standing on skis and gliding on the water's surface. The water skier holds onto a handle connected to a tow rope, which is attached to the boat's stern. As the boat accelerates, the skier uses their balance and body positioning to remain upright and navigate across the water.
Water skiing can be enjoyed by people of various skill levels, from beginners to advanced practitioners. It requires physical strength, agility, and the ability to maintain balance while being pulled at high speeds. Water skiers often wear safety gear such as life jackets and may use specialized equipment such as water skis designed for different purposes, including slalom skiing (skiing around buoys) or trick skiing (performing various stunts and maneuvers).
Additionally, the vessel must display an orange flag to indicate that a skier is in the water and being towed. It is also important to follow all state and federal laws regarding boating and towing activities.
To learn more about recreational
https://brainly.com/question/29800924
#SPJ11
Legal actions when towing a water-skier involve having a capable observer, maintaining appropriate speed, ensuring the skier uses a life jacket and limiting activity to daylight hours.
Explanation:There are several legal actions when towing a water-skier behind a boat. This primarily relates to following safety guidelines to ensure the well-being of the water-skier and others on the water. For instance, it's essential that the vessel has a capable observer to watch the skier. The skier should always wear a U.S. Coast Guard-approved life jacket. Lastly, the act of towing skiers at night is illegal - all water-skiing activities should only be done during daylight hours between sunrise and sunset.
Learn more about Water-Skiing Laws here:https://brainly.com/question/9806663
Bentham and Kant agree on?
Answer:
Morality constrains individual self-interest
Explanation:
both authors believe that morality puts limits on what any given individual may do in the pursuit of his or self-interest. For example: Kant argues that one should never make a lying promise, even if is one's interest to do so; Bentham argues that one shoukd maximise everyone's aggregate pleasure minus pain, not only one's own.
Mayra offers to sell her home to Hanna for "about $100,000 plus closing costs" Hanna accepts Mayra's offer. Later, a dispute arises over the precise dollar amount
The way a court will resolve this dispute is e) The court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract.
What makes a binding contract?For a contract to be considered legally binding on the parties, it must comply with the elements of contracts, including:A consideration is a promise of some valuable thing offered by a promissor in exchange for something of value by a promisee.
The rules of consideration ensure that there is a mutual agreement between the promisor and the promisee about its value and also in the eyes of the law.
Thus, in this case, the court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract.
Learn more about vague considerations in contracts at https://brainly.com/question/17083291
#SPJ1
Question Completion with Answer Options:
Hanna accepts Mayra's offer but later, a dispute arises concerning the precise dollar amount of the purchase price. How will a court resolve this dispute?
a) The court will determine a reasonable price to be paid by Hanna.
b) The court will determine that Hanna pays only the figures mentioned in the contract.
c) The court will appoint a licensed real estate appraiser to determine the price to be paid by Hanna.
d) The court will require Hanna to pay the average of her price and Mayra's price.
e) The court will declare the purchase price and terms too indefinite to create a binding contract
When the techniques used on injured soldiers began to be applied to civilian trauma patients, both physicians and politicians started treating traumatic deaths as an abnormality, for many of the newest technologies that were applied to EMS produced immediate, quantifiable benefits. True False
Answer:
True
Explanation:
When the techniques used on injured soldiers began to be applied to civilian trauma patients, both physicians and politicians started treating traumatic deaths as an abnormality.
This however led to the development of a new technology. The technology was thereby applied to EMS and there was a great change as it produced immediate, quantifiable benefits.