Help please I’m being timed!!

The number of terms that the expression 5xy 9yz 3zx 5x 4y has is 5 terms.

What is an algebraic expression?

An algebraic expression is a set of numbers and letters that make up an expression that has a meaning, the letters are variables and the numbers are coefficients or independent terms, algebraic expressions can be part of an equation and model mathematical processes.

How to determine terms?

To determine the number of terms in an algebraic expression, we only have to count the spaces (addition and/or subtraction symbols) and add the unit, in this way we will have the number of terms.

5xy 9yz 3zx 5x 4y has 4 spaces

4 + 1 = 5 terms.

Learn more about  expression in:

https://brainly.com/question/27578903

#SPJ4

Answer:

X=4,y=30

Step-by-step explanation:

given,

y=8x-2 ....(i)

3x+y=42...(ii)

now,

putting value of y in equation ii

we get,

3x+y=42

3x+(8x-2)=42

or,3x+8x=42+2

or,11x=44

or,X=4

again,

putting value of X in equation i

y=8x-2

=8×4-2

=30

Answer:

"The x-intercept is the point at which the graph crosses the x-axis... ...The y-intercept is the point at which the graph crosses the y-axis." (Lumen)

The x-intercept is on the horizontal axis while the y-intercept is vertical axis. Aside from that they are practically the same and serve the same purpose while graphing, they just go in differing positions.

Answer:

$600

Step-by-step explanation:

15 x 8 x 5

Answer:

A. would be correct

Step-by-step explanation:

if 1 package is $8 and 2 packages cost $16

the ratio would be $8:1 so the unit rate would be $8 per package

To decide whether it is sensible for Stacy to utilize the ordinary show for the inspecting conveyance of the test extent, we got to check whether the conditions for utilizing the typical conveyance estimation are met. The conditions are:

The test estimate is expansive sufficient

The test information is autonomous

The populace is at slightest 10 times bigger than the test

The test estimate, in this case, is 50. To check whether it is expansive sufficient, ready to utilize the run the show of thumb that the test measure ought to be at the slightest 10% of the populace estimate.

Hence, based on these conditions, it is sensible for Stacy to utilize the ordinary demonstration for the inspecting conveyance of the test extent. She can accept that the testing dispersion is roughly typical with a cruel of p = 0.11 and a standard deviation of sqrt[(p(1-p))/n] = sqrt[(0.11(0.89))/50] = 0.05.

To learn about conveyance visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30420027

#SPJ4

The type of function that fits the given description is D. Exponential decay.

In an arithmetic sequence, the difference between consecutive terms remains constant. If the y-values of a function form an arithmetic sequence that decreases in value, it means that the difference between consecutive terms is negative.
Exponential decay functions exhibit a constant ratio between consecutive terms, resulting in a decreasing sequence. As the x-values increase, the y-values decrease at a consistent rate. This is represented by the formula y = ab^x, where b is a constant between 0 and 1.
In contrast, linear functions have a constant difference between consecutive terms, resulting in an arithmetic sequence. However, since the y-values are decreasing, the function cannot be linear.
Exponential growth functions, on the other hand, have a constant ratio between consecutive terms, but they result in an increasing sequence. The y-values of an exponential growth function increase as the x-values increase.

Therefore, based on the given information, the most appropriate type of function is D. Exponential decay.

For more similar questions on Exponential decay.

brainly.com/question/14269899

#SPJ8

The point of intersection of the perpendicular bisectors of the sides of a triangle is called circumcenter

To learn more about perpendicular bisectors refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/11006922

#SPJ4

Answer:

85.72 is ur answer...

Hope it helps!!!

The main topic is the split-half reliability test used in psychological research to assess the internal consistency of a scale.

In psychological research, reliability is a crucial aspect of measuring constructs or attributes. One commonly used method for assessing the reliability of a scale is the split-half reliability test.

In this test, the scale questions are divided into two parts equally, and the resulting scores of both parts are correlated against one another.

For example, if a scale had 20 items, the items could be randomly split into two groups of 10 items each.

Scores are then calculated for each group, and the scores are correlated with each other to determine the degree of consistency between the two halves.

The correlation coefficient obtained from this analysis provides an estimate of the internal consistency of the scale.

A high correlation coefficient indicates a high level of internal consistency, indicating that the two halves of the scale are measuring the same construct or attribute.

Conversely, a low correlation coefficient suggests that the two halves of the scale are not measuring the same construct or attribute, and the scale may need to be revised or abandoned.

Overall, the split-half reliability test provides a quick and efficient method for evaluating the reliability of a scale.

However, it is important to note that this method does have some limitations, such as the possibility of unequal difficulty or discrimination of the items in each half of the scale.

Therefore, researchers often use other methods, such as Cronbach's alpha, in conjunction with the split-half reliability test to provide a more comprehensive assessment of the reliability of a scale

Learn more about reliability test

brainly.com/question/27873337

#SPJ11

\( \: \: \)

\( \large\sf \sqrt{10,000 {x}^{64}} \)

\( \large \sf( {10}^{4} \times {x}^{64}) \frac{1}{2} \)

\( \large \sf \: 10 \frac{4}{2} \times x \frac{64}{2} \)

\( \large \sf \: {10}^{2} \times {x}^{32} \)

\( \large \boxed{ \sf \green{{100}^{32}}}\)

The simplified form of \(\sqrt{10000*10^{64}}\) is mathematically given as

100*10^{32}

Option B

Question Parameters:

What is the simplified form of \(\sqrt{10000*10^{64}}\\\)

Generally  the expression  is mathematically given as

\(\sqrt{10000*10^{64}}\\\)

Therefore,

\(\sqrt{10000*10^{64}}=1e34\)

and

100*10^{32}=1*10^{34}

Hence, the simplified form of \(\sqrt{10,000e64}\)  is \(100e32\)

For more information on Arithmetic

https://brainly.com/question/22568180

Answer:

For Part 1 Wednesday and Thursday

For Part 2 it's tuesday

Step-by-step explanation:

Because it's asking which was made

Boeing takes 29,454 hours to produce the fifth 787 jet. With an 80% learning factor, the time required for the production of the eleventh 787 is approximately 66,097 hours.

To calculate the time required for the production of the eleventh 787 jet, we can use the learning curve formula:

T₂ = T₁ × (N₂/N₁)^b

Where:

T₂ is the time required for the second unit (eleventh in this case)

T₁ is the time required for the first unit (fifth in this case)

N₂ is the quantity of the second unit (11 in this case)

N₁ is the quantity of the first unit (5 in this case)

b is the learning curve exponent (log(1/LF) / log(2))

Given that T₁ = 29,454 hours and LF (learning factor) = 80% = 0.8, we can calculate b:

b = log(1/LF) / log(2)

b = log(1/0.8) / log(2)

b ≈ -0.3219 / -0.3010

b ≈ 1.0696

Now, substituting the given values into the formula:

T₂ = 29,454 × (11/5)^1.0696

Calculating this expression, we find:

T₂ ≈ 29,454 × (2.2)^1.0696

T₂ ≈ 29,454 × 2.2422

T₂ ≈ 66,096.95

Rounding the result to the nearest whole number, the time required for the production of the eleventh 787 jet is approximately 66,097 hours.

Learn more about exponent here: https://brainly.com/question/29277932

#SPJ11

a. We do not have convincing evidence at the 0.05 level to conclude that the fertilizer has a positive effect on the weight of the corn ears.

b. The p-value (0.095) is still greater than the level of significance (0.05), we would still fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that we do not have convincing evidence to support the claim that the fertilizer has a positive effect on the weight of the corn ears.

(a) Hypothesis testing:

State the hypotheses:

Null hypothesis: The fertilizer has no effect on the weight of the corn ears.

Alternative hypothesis: The fertilizer has a positive effect on the weight of the corn ears.

Set the level of significance:

α = 0.05

Compute the test statistic and p-value:

We can use a one-sample t-test to test the hypothesis.

The test statistic is:

t = (\(\bar{x}\) - μ) / (s / sqrt(n))

where \(\bar{x}\)  is the sample mean, μ is the population mean, s is the sample standard deviation, and n is the sample size.

In this case, \(\bar{x}\)  = 8.33 ounces, μ = 8 ounces, s = 1.8 ounces, and n = 38. Substituting these values, we get:

t = (8.33 - 8) / (1.8 / sqrt(38)) = 1.66

Using a t-distribution table with 37 degrees of freedom (df = n - 1), we find that the p-value for a one-tailed test with t = 1.66 is 0.054.

Make a decision:

Since the p-value (0.054) is greater than the level of significance (0.05), we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, we do not have convincing evidence at the 0.05 level to conclude that the fertilizer has a positive effect on the weight of the corn ears.

However, it is worth noting that the p-value is very close to the significance level, so it is possible that a larger sample size might have produced a statistically significant result.

(b) If the sample mean had been 8.24 ounces instead of 8.33 ounces, the test statistic would have been:

\(t = (8.24 - 8) / (1.8 / \sqrt{(38)} ) = 1.33\)

Using the t-distribution table with 37 degrees of freedom, the p-value for a one-tailed test with t = 1.33 is 0.095.

For similar question on hypothesis.

https://brainly.com/question/29576929

#SPJ11

Answer:

She spent two times as long on the phone then she did cleaning the kitchen.

Step-by-step explanation:

1/4 times 2 is 1/2.

Answer:

In total she spent 45 minutes on the phone and in the kitchen cleaning

Step-by-step explanation:

1/4 of an hour is 15 minutes and 1/2 of an hour is 30 min. You add them together to get 45 minutes and that how much time she has spent in total on the phone and in the kitchen.

Calcium (Ca) can form a Ca2+ cation by losing its two valence electrons.

Elements in group 2A (2) of the periodic table form ions with a charge of 2+. Therefore, the correct answer is c. 2+.

Group 2A elements, also known as alkaline earth metals, have two valence electrons in their outermost shell, which they tend to lose in chemical reactions to form cations with a charge of 2+. For example, magnesium (Mg) can form a Mg2+ cation by losing its two valence electrons. Similarly, calcium (Ca) can form a Ca2+ cation by losing its two valence electrons.

Learn more about electrons

brainly.com/question/12001116

#SPJ11

Answer: the answer to this is true

Answer: No!

Step-by-step explanation: This is a parabola. The graph for this function is not straight. We can also tell this is not a linear function because the degree of the function is 2.

Hope this helps :)

No.

y = 3x² + 2 has a degree of 2. So, it'll not make a graph which is a straight line. It's NOT a linear function. Linear functions have a degree of 1 or 0.

This is a quadratic polynomial (degree = 2) & when drawn on a graph, it'll make a parabola.

_____

Hope it helps ⚜

The formula we need to use is given above. In this formula, we will substitute the desired values. Let's start.

A) First, we can start by analyzing the first premise. The team has \(8\) wins and \(5\) losses. It earned \(8 \times 3 = 24\) points in total from the matches it won and \(1\times5=5\) points in total from the matches it drew. Therefore, it earned \(24+5=29\) points.

B) After \(39\) matches, the team managed to earn \(54\) points in total. \(12\) of these matches have ended in draws. Therefore, this team has won and lost a total of \(39-12=27\) matches. This number includes all matches won and lost. In total, the team earned \(12\times1=12\) points from the \(12\) matches that ended in a draw.

\(54-12=42\) points is the points earned after \(27\) matches. By dividing \(42\) by \(3\) ( because \(3\) points is the score obtained as a result of the matches won), we find how many matches team won. \(42\div3=14\) matches won.

That leaves \(27-14=13\) matches. These represent the matches team lost.

Finally, the answers are below.

\(A)29\)
\(B)13\)

Answer:

  a) 29 points

  b) 13 losses

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to know points and losses for different teams using the formula P = 3W +D, where W is wins and D is draws.

The number of points the team has is ...

  P = 3W +D

  P = 3(8) +(5) = 29

The team has 29 points.

You want the number of losses the team has if it has 54 points and 12 draws after 39 games.

The number of wins is given by ...

  P = 3W +D

  54 = 3W +12

  42 = 3W

  14 = W

Then the number of losses is ...

  W +D +L = 39

  14 +12 +L = 39 . . . substitute the known values

  L = 13 . . . . . . . . . . subtract 26 from both sides

The team lost 13 games.

__

Additional comment

In part B, we can solve for the number of losses directly, using 39-12-x as the number of wins when there are x losses. Simplifying 3W +D -P = 0 can make it easy to solve for x. (In the attached, we let the calculator do the simplification.)

<95141404393>

The z-score associated with a 95% confidence level is approximately 1.96.

The z-score associated with a 95% confidence level is the value of the standard normal distribution that corresponds to an area of 0.95 to the left of the z-score.

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that the z-score associated with a 95% confidence level is approximately 1.96.

Therefore, if we want to calculate the z-score for a 95% confidence level, we can use the formula

z = invNorm(1 - α/2)

where α is the significance level (α = 0.05 for a 95% confidence level), and inv Norm is the inverse normal cumulative distribution function. Using this formula, we can calculate the z-score as:

z = inv Norm(1 - 0.05/2)

= inv Norm(0.975) ≈ 1.96

Therefore, the z-score is 1.96

Learn more about z-score here

brainly.com/question/15016913

#SPJ4

Answer:

b= -8

Step-by-step explanation:

Serena leans a 24-foot ladder against a 22.8-foot-tall building to climb on the roof is 71.8 degree.

Measurement of Angle:

The measurement of angles is done using basic geometric tools such as protractors and compasses. This tool helps to find precise measurements of angles. A protractor helps provide accurate measurements of angles, while compasses help construct angles. Angles are measured in three ways: degrees, radians, and revolutions.

According to the Question:

Suppose the measure of angle is θ, then we have

   Sinθ = 22.8/24

⇒ Sinθ = 0.95

Therefore,

θ = Sin⁻¹ (0.95)

  = 71.8 degree.

Therefore, Serena leans a 24-foot ladder against a 22.8-foot-tall building to climb on the roof is 71.8 degree.

Learn more about Degree:

https://brainly.com/question/364572

#SPJ4

The correct answer is option A

• In mathematics, comparison of numbers if the process that defines similar properties between two numbers and identifies that the number if smaller or greater than or equal to the other number.

• In maths there are three special symbols used in comparison of numbers. The basic symbols are

1. Greater than (>)

2. Less than (<)

3. Equals to (=)

According to the question

Option A :

4.13 = 4.130

As we know the value of 0 after all the numbers and after the decimal is insignificant,

So , 4.13 = 4.130

This is correct comparison.

Option B :

5.16<5.06

Bigger number can’t be less than the smaller number, comparison is wrong.

Option C :

6.28<6.08

Bigger number can’t be less than the smaller number, comparison is wrong.

Option D:

7.09>7.19

Smaller number can’t be greater than the bigger number, comparison is wrong.

Option A is correct

Learn more about comparison here

https://brainly.com/question/25275758

#SPJ9

Answer:

$19.13

Step-by-step explanation:

18 + 6.25 is 19.125 and you would round that to 19.13 as your total

The congruence theorem that can be used to prove that the triangles are congruent is F. Not enough information is given to prove that the triangles are congruent

If all three corresponding sides are equal and all three corresponding angles are equal in measure, two triangles are said to be congruent.

According to the Angle-Side-Angle Theorem (ASA), if two angles and their included side are congruent to two angles and their included side, then these two triangles are congruent.

The hypotenuse is always the opposite side of the right angle. The legs of the triangle are the other two sides of a right triangle. Because a right triangle has two legs and a hypotenuse, it is also known as a hypotenuse-leg (or HL) triangle.

In this situation, enough information aren't given about the triangles. Therefore, the correct option is F.

Learn more about triangles on:

https://brainly.com/question/2938476

#SPJ1

Answer:

One way that a cell maintains homeostasis is by controlling the movement of substances across the cell membrane. Cells are suspended in a fluid environment.

The best method to solve this system is elimination using subtraction and the solution is (12, 16).

First, we need to get one of the variables to have the same coefficient in both equations so we can eliminate it. In this case, the y variable already has the same coefficient of -2 in both equations.

Next, we subtract the second equation from the first equation to eliminate the y variable:

3x - 2y = 4
-(2x - 2y = -8)

This gives us:

x = 12

Now, we can plug this value of x back into one of the original equations to solve for y:

3(12) - 2y = 4
36 - 2y = 4
-2y = -32
y = 16

So the solution to this system is (12, 16).

Learn more about system of equations here: https://brainly.com/question/25976025.

#SPJ11

Our assumption that AC ≤ BC must be false.  To prove that the hypotenuse is the longest side of a right triangle, we will use an indirect proof. We will assume the opposite of what we want to prove and show that it leads to a contradiction.

Assume that AC ≤ BC. This means that the side opposite the acute angle A is shorter than the side opposite the acute angle C.

Now, let's draw a line segment from vertex C perpendicular to AB. This line segment divides the triangle into two smaller triangles, let's call them ΔACD and ΔBCD.

Since the line segment is perpendicular to AB, angle ACD and angle BCD are both right angles. And since angle A is acute, angle ACB must be acute as well.

Now, using the Pythagorean theorem, we can write:
AC² = AD² + CD²
BC² = BD² + CD²

Since AD < BD (because AC ≤ BC), we can substitute BD - AD for BD in the second equation:
BC² = (BD - AD)² + CD²
BC² = BD² - 2AD·BD + AD² + CD²

But now we have a contradiction:
AC² = AD² + CD² < BC² = BD² - 2AD·BD + AD² + CD²

If we simplify the inequality, we get:
0 < BD² - AC² - 2AD·BD

But this cannot be true, because all the terms on the right-hand side are positive (BD > AD, AC < BC, and both sides are squares). Therefore, our assumption that AC ≤ BC must be false.

We have proven that the hypotenuse is the longest side of a right triangle.

learn more about hypotenuse here: brainly.com/question/30389960

#SPJ11