Determine the acute angles between the curves at their points of intersection. Calculate the exact value of these acute angles and write this calculation on your answer sheet. Enter the acute angle in degrees at the point of intersection in the first quadrant to 1 decimal place in the answer box. y=x4,y=x7

Yes, the study results require a post-hoc test to be performed.

Since the main analysis, an ANOVA test, showed a non-significant result (F(3,26) = 1.92, p > .05), it may be tempting to conclude that there is no difference among the four groups. However, to ensure the accuracy of the findings, a post-hoc test should be conducted.

A post-hoc test is necessary because it helps to identify if there are any specific pair-wise differences among the groups that were not detected by the initial ANOVA test. Although the overall result may not be significant, there might still be significant differences between specific group pairs.

By conducting a post-hoc test, you can reduce the risk of Type II errors (false negatives) and better understand the underlying relationships between exercise and memory in the study. Some popular post-hoc tests include Tukey's HSD, Bonferroni, and Scheffe tests.

To know more about ANOVA test click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31192222#

#SPJ11

To find the dot product, we substitute the given values into the formula:

a · b = 40 * 30 * cos(34°)

Calculating the cosine of 34 degrees (cos(34°)), we find its value to be approximately 0.829.

Substituting this value into the equation, we get:

a · b ≈ 40 * 30 * 0.829 = 993.6

Therefore, the dot product of vectors a and b is approximately 993.6.

The dot product of two vectors represents the extent to which they align with each other. In this case, we have two vectors, a and b, with magnitudes of 40 and 30, respectively, and an angle of 34 degrees between them. The dot product formula involves multiplying the magnitudes of the vectors and the cosine of the angle between them. By substituting the given values into the equation, we find that the dot product of a and b is approximately 993.6. This value indicates that the vectors have a moderate alignment, as the dot product is positive and greater than zero.

Learn more about angle here:

brainly.com/question/32132688

#SPJ11

Answer:

A ≈ 14.8 units²

Step-by-step explanation:

the area (A) of the triangle is calculated as

A = \(\frac{1}{2}\) yz sin Y ( that is 2 sides and the angle between them )

where x is the side opposite ∠ X and z the side opposite ∠ Z

here y = XZ = 4.3 and z = XY = 7 , then

A = \(\frac{1}{2}\) × 4.3 × 7 × sin79°

   = 15.05 × sin79°

   ≈ 14.8 units² ( to 1 decimal place )

Answer:B

Step-by-step explanation:

B

Answer:

J is the answer of the percentage

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Permutations of "Panda"

Two of the 'Panda" s we can get as a result

Using Permutation

\(\boxed{\sf ^nP_r=n!}\)

\(\\ \sf\longmapsto ^5P_r=5!\)

\(\\ \sf\longmapsto 1\times 2\times 3\times 4\times 5\)

\(\\ \sf\longmapsto 120\)

Now

\(\\ \sf\longmapsto P(Panda)=\dfrac{2}{120}\)

\(\\ \sf\longmapsto P(Panda)=\dfrac{1}{60}\)

Answer:

.

Step-by-step explanation:     The first answer is c. 7+3w, because the puppy already weighs 7 ounces. Since the puppy didn't end up losing those pounds, then you would add instead of subtract. Since the puppy gains 3 ounces a week, you would multiply the 3 ounces by the number of weeks that pass by. So, if one week passes, the puppy gains three ounces. Add that to the original 7 ounces, then after one week, the puppy weighs 10 ounces.

The second answer would be a. 22 ounces, because if you use the previous formula (x=7+3w), then you would plug 5 in for w. This would give you 7+3(5). 3x5=15 and 15+7=22. therefore, x=22 ounces.

Answer:

7)c, 8)a

Step-by-step explanation:

since it is originally 7 oz, and grows 3 ounces a week, it would be 7+3w.

Substitutions would be 7+3(5) = 7+15 = 22 oz

Answer:

\(\huge\boxed{\sf v = 20\ m/s}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given Data:

Distance = S = 400 m

Time = t = 20 secs

Required:

Speed = v = ?

Formula:

v = S/t

Solution:

v = 400 / 20

v = 20 m/s

\(\rule[225]{225}{2}\)

Hope this helped!

Answer:

do u have a graph

Step-by-step explanation:

For the given problem:

Let the number = x

Two less than the quotient of a number and 8 is 1/4

so, we can write the following expression:

Now, solve the equation to find (x)

Multiplying by (8) to eliminate the denominators:

Add (6) to both sides:

So, the answer will be the number is 18

Answer:

\(\huge\boxed{\sf 60 \ miles}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that,

3 hours = 180 miles

Divide 3 to both sides

3/3 hour = 180/3 miles

1 hour = 60 miles

So, Mom drove 60 miles in one hour.

\(\rule[225]{225}{2}\)

Answer:

$32040

Step-by-step explanation:

1=2232

Answer:

=180-31+40

=180-71

=109

Answer:

25 hits

Step-by-step explanation:

you would divide 1000 by 40 and get 25

Explanation

let the surface of the water

Answer:

The answer is B

Step-by-step explanation:

I took the test

The box plot that represents the number of bus drivers with the given five-number summary is: option B (see image attached below).

A box plot is graphed to indicate the five-number summary as:

Given the five-number summary of the number of bus riders as: minimum = 18, lower quartile = 22, median = 26, upper quartile = 29, and maximum = 37, the box plot that represents the data is: Option B (see image attached below.

Learn more about box plot on:

https://brainly.com/question/14277132

#SPJ5

False, Mathematically, an odds ratio equates to a risk ratio, therefore, odds ratios can be interpreted in an exactly same way as risk ratio.

What distinguishes risk from probability?

The fundamental distinction is that the relative risk is a ratio of two probabilities, but the odds ratio is a ratio of two odds (yes, it's that clear). (The risk ratio is another name for the relative risk.)

Used to approximate the relative risk in case-control studies, when the occurrence of diseases are KNOWN

odds of an event = the number of ways an event can occur to the numbers of ways an event cannot occur

odds ratio = P / (1-P)

where P = probability of occurrence

Learn more about odds ratios

brainly.com/question/24223396

#SPJ4

Sophie's favorite number is 83

We have that;

A two-digit number is Sophie's preferred number. Her favorite number is 45 less when the digits are in reverse. Her favorite number has digits that add out to 11 in total.

To get Sophie's favorite number, we need to assume the case as;

Let,

⇒10x + y = 10y + x + 45

   x + y = 11

   y = 11-x

⇒10x + 11 - x = 10(11 - x) + x + 45

  10x + 11 - x = 110 - 10x + x + 45

  9x + 11 = 155 - 9x

  18x + 11 = 155

  18x = 144

  x = 8

Therefore, y = 11 - 8

                  y = 3

Sum = x + y = 8 + 3 = 11

Hence, the given condition is satisfied.

Sophie's favorite number is 83.

To learn more about Sum click here:

https://brainly.com/question/14712183

#SPJ4

Answer:

Is this question in Spanish

It has 816 ways to 3-element subsets, such that no two consecutive integers are in the subset.

You need three digits from 1 to 20, but you don't want any consecutive ones. You should call them a, b, and c.

Without loss of generality, a < b < c.

We use combinations,

Remember that we can write a + 1 b if a b and they're not sequential. With the aid of this insight, we can see the number of desired the number of methods for choosing a, b, and c from among the integers so that,

(1 ≤ a) & (a + 1 < b) & (b + 1 < c) & (c ≤ 20)

In other words, you want to know how many possibilities there are to choose the three numbers a, b, and c so that;

1 ≤ a < b − 1 < c − 2 ≤ 18

As a result, the question is equal to asking how many ways there are to select three integers (a, b - 1, and c - 2) from a range of 1 to 18. In other words, we are interested in how many ways we can select three items from a total of 18 options.

So, the response is:

\((^1^8_3)\) = 816 ways

To learn more about combinations click here:

brainly.com/question/28042664  

#SPJ4

Answer:

a = 5.5, d = 11/3

Step-by-step explanation:

An arithmetic progression is a sequence of number such that the difference between consecutive numbers is a constant. It is given by:

\(a_n=a+(n-1)d\\a_n \ is\ the \ nth\ term, d\ is\ the\ common\ difference\ and\ n \ is\ the \ number\ of\ terms\)

The sum of fifth and sixth terms is 44

Therefore:

a + 4d + a + 5d = 44

2a + 9d = 44                       (1)

The sum of the first n terms is:

\(S=\frac{n}{2} (2a+(n-1)d)\\Therefore\ the\ sum\ of\ the\ first\ 18\ term\ is:\\\\S=\frac{18}{2} (2a+(18-1)d) = 9(2a+17d)=18a+153d\\\\The\ sum\ of\ the\ first\ 10\ term\ is:\\\\S=\frac{10}{2} (2a+(10-1)d) = 5(2a+9d)=10a+45d\)

Since the sum of the first eighteen terms is thrice the sum of the first ten terms:

18a + 153d = 3(10a + 45d)

18 a + 153d = 30a + 135d

18a  - 30a + 153d - 135d = 0

-12a + 18d = 0                    (2)

Multiply equation 1 by 6 and add to equation 2:

72d = 264

d = 11/3

Putting d = 11/3 in eqn 2

-12a + 18(11/3) = 0

-12a + 66 = 0

12a = 66

a = 5.5

This is an example of a (B) stratified sample.

Therefore, this is an example of a (B) stratified sample.

Know more about stratified samples here:

https://brainly.com/question/1577827

#SPJ4

The complete question is given below:

A public opinion poll in Ohio wants to determine whether registered voters in the state approve of a measure to ban smoking in all public areas. The researchers select a simple random sample of 50 registered voters from each county in the state and ask whether they approve or disapprove of the measure. This is an example of

A) a systematic county sample

B) a stratified sample

C) a multistage sample

D) a simple random sample

The required height of the seat from the ground is 100√3. Option D is correct.

A seat on a Ferris wheel is level with the center of the wheel. The diameter of the wheel is 200 feet. Suppose the wheel rotates 60°, causing the height of the seat to decrease. How much closer to the ground is the seat after the is to be determined.

These are the equation that contains trigonometric operators such as sin, cos.. etc.. In algebraic operation.

Diameter = 200
Radius = Diameter/2 = 100
Rotational angle = 60°
Let the height be h
tan60 = h/100
√3 = h/100
100√3 = h

Thus, the required height of the seat from the ground is 100√3. Option D is correct.

Learn more about trigonometry equations here:

brainly.com/question/22624805

#SPJ5

Answer:

50 √3 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

Correct on edge 2023.

So, there is three pounds. Each bag gets a half pound. Two half pounds = one full pound. One full pound is two bags. Another pound is another two bags. And same with another. So that'd be 6 bags, one half pound each.

This is a simple probability problem to solve, first, we need to know how many cookies we have inside the bag. So we have 8 chocolate chip cookies + 4 peanut butter cookies + 9 sugar cookies + 6 oatmeal cookies = 27 cookies (total). Once we have the total we can see the probability to first randomly select a chocolate chip cookie is P (first chocolate chip cookie) = 8/27 (we just have 8 chances to select a chocolate chip cookie between 27 cookies).

After we select a chocolate chip cookie and eat it, now we just have 26 cookies inside the bag. So our probability to select randomly a sugar cookie is P (sugar cookie second) = 9/26 (we just have 9 chances to select a sugar cookie between 26 cookies). Now we just need to combine those two probabilities, and to do that as a sequence (probability 1 first, next probability 2) we use the product operator *. So P(chocolate chip cookie first and sugar cookie second) = P (first chocolate chip cookie) * P (sugar cookie second) = (8/27) * (9/26) = 72/702.

Finally, our final answer is P(chocolate chip cookie first and sugar cookie second) = 0.1025 (approximately).

Maggie claims that there are transformations that preserve the length of the rectangle's sides. A vertical stretch of scale factor 2 through center C. Option D

Generally, Maggie's claim is that there are transformations that preserve the length of the rectangle's sides.

A reflection over the side RS is a transformation that preserves the length of the rectangle's sides, as the reflection of a segment is congruent to the original segment.

A rotation of 90° clockwise about vertex Q is also a transformation that preserves the length of the rectangle's sides, as a rotation preserves the length of the sides of a polygon.

A dilation of scale factor 1 through center C is also a transformation that preserves the length of the rectangle's sides, as a dilation with a scale factor of 1 leaves the lengths of the sides unchanged.

A vertical stretch of scale factor 2 through center C is NOT a transformation that preserves the length of the rectangle's sides, as a stretch changes the lengths of the sides. Therefore, the answer is D.

Read more about transformations

https://brainly.com/question/11709244

#SPJ1

(A) Total number of points served by Samson and multiply by 100  (B) Null hypothesis(H0) and Alternative hypothesis (Ha) (C)  there would be a 24% chance of observing a difference in performance as extreme as the one observed in the data.

(D) Based on the p-value of 0.24, we do not have strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis. (E) it would be a Type II error. (F) Type II error would mean that we concluded there is no difference in Samson's performance when serving and when his opponent is serving, but in reality, there is a difference. (G) To reduce the likelihood of a Type II error occurring, we can increase the sample size (H)  No, we cannot conclude that Samson's serving is the cause of the difference in his ability to win points when serving compared to when his opponent is serving

a) The difference in the percentage of points won when serving and when the opponent is serving can be calculated by subtracting the percentage of points won when the opponent is serving from the percentage of points won when serving.  To find the percentage of points won when serving, we divide the number of points won when serving by the total number of points served by Samson and multiply by 100. Similarly, to find the percentage of points won when the opponent is serving, we divide the number of points won when the opponent is serving by the total number of points served by the opponent and multiply by 100.

b) The hypotheses we are interested in testing are:
- Null hypothesis (H0): There is no difference in Samson's performance when serving and when his opponent is serving.
- Alternative hypothesis (Ha): Samson performs better when serving compared to when his opponent is serving.

c) A p-value of 0.24 indicates that if the null hypothesis were true, there would be a 24% chance of observing a difference in performance as extreme as the one observed in the data. In other words, the p-value represents the probability of obtaining the observed difference in performance or a more extreme difference, assuming that there is no actual difference in Samson's performance when serving.

d) Based on the p-value of 0.24, we do not have strong evidence to reject the null hypothesis. This means that the data does not provide convincing evidence that Samson plays better when serving compared to when his opponent is serving.

e) If our conclusion from part d was in error, it would be a Type II error. This occurs when we fail to reject the null hypothesis even though it is false. In this case, it would mean that there is a difference in Samson's performance when serving, but we failed to detect it.

f) In the context of this question, a Type II error would mean that we concluded there is no difference in Samson's performance when serving and when his opponent is serving, but in reality, there is a difference. This could potentially lead to underestimating Samson's ability to perform better when serving.

g) To reduce the likelihood of a Type II error occurring, we can increase the sample size. By collecting more data, we can increase the power of our test and improve our ability to detect a difference in performance if it truly exists. Additionally, we can also adjust the significance level of our test (e.g., from 0.05 to 0.01) to make it more likely to detect smaller differences.

h) No, we cannot conclude that Samson's serving is the cause of the difference in his ability to win points when serving compared to when his opponent is serving. The data provided only shows an association between serving and winning points, but it does not establish a causal relationship. Other factors, such as skill, strategy, or the opponent's performance, could also contribute to the difference observed. To establish causality, further investigation and controlled experiments would be needed.

To know more about hypotheses refer to:

https://brainly.com/question/25263462

#SPJ11