Congress has enacted many laws regulating navigation generally, but not regarding the specific subject of water pollution by ships sailing on navigable bodies of water. A state enacted a law prohibiting any ship from discharging specified pollutants, including oil, into the navigable waterways of the state. Violation of the law was punishable by fines based on the amount of the discharge. The law is necessary to the important state interest of preventing pollution; there are no reasonable alternatives available. In addition, the benefits of the law to the state outweigh the burdens it imposes on interstate commerce. A ship owner from another state is fined pursuant to this law for discharging oil into a waterway in the state. Will the ship owner's challenge of the state law as unconstitutional be successful?
a. Yes, because the law regulates interstate commerce, which may be regulated only by Congress.
b. Yes, because the fine constitutes an impermissible ad valorem tax.
c. No, because the law is necessary to the important state interest of preventing pollution and there are no reasonable alternatives available.
d. No, because the law does not discriminate against interstate commerce and does not impose an undue burden on interstate commerce.
Answers
d. No, because the law does not discriminate against interstate commerce and does not impose an undue burden on interstate commerce.
The correct answer is d. No, because the law does not discriminate against interstate commerce and does not impose an undue burden on interstate commerce.
The state law prohibiting ships from discharging specified pollutants into navigable waterways is necessary for the important state interest of preventing pollution. Additionally, there are no reasonable alternatives available. The law does not discriminate against interstate commerce, as it applies to all ships regardless of their state of origin. Furthermore, the benefits of the law to the state in preventing pollution outweigh the burdens it imposes on interstate commerce. Therefore, the ship owner's challenge of the state law as unconstitutional would not be successful.
For more details of Congress :
https://brainly.com/question/10037853
#SPJ11
Related Questions
What organizations, issues, and individuals helped to pave for the institution of EMS services in the 1960s? Select all that apply.
Answers
The development of what we now know as contemporary EMS began in the 1950s as a spinoff of five separate industries: towing companies, medical equipment manufacturers, cemeteries, hospitals, and police and fire agencies.
What is the development?Development is a process that fosters expansion, advancement, and good change in the economic, environmental, social, and demographic aspects without depleting the environment's natural resources. All projects must need approval, but because they all have varying degrees of influence, they are divided into three categories. Complying,
As a spinoff of five distinct industries—towing firms, medical equipment companies, funeral homes, hospitals, and police/fire departments—the development of what we now know as modern EMS began in the 1950s.
Therefore, The development of what we now know as contemporary EMS began in the 1950s
Learn more about development here:
https://brainly.com/question/28011228
#SPJ1
Answer:
morticians
hospitals
fire departments
Explanation:
i got it have a good day
All crimes are investigated by the police.
True
False
Answers
Answer:
the answer is false.
Explanation: Not all crimes are reported, and even so, if they are deemed non important, nothing will happen
Do defense teams have the ability to mount a defense against evidence? What affects their ability?
Answers
Answer:
Here's a sample answer:)
No, defense teams do not have the ability to defend against evidence. Usually, this is because there is not enough money or resources for them to use. This can also be affected by the type and/or amount of evidence presented. If there is undeniable evidence or an overwhelming amount of evidence it is very difficult to defend against such. Typically in this situation,the legal strategy to undermine the prosecution’s case is used.
Robinson pleaded guilty to larceny in the second degree. The charge was based on her wrongful receipt of $9,932.95 in welfare benefits from the State of Connecticut. As a part of her sentence, Robinson was required to make restitution at the rate of $100 per month during her probationary period. Robinson filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition. She sought to have her obligation to make restitution discharged. Although they received notice of the Chapter 7 petition, the staff members of the Connecticut Department of Income Maintenance and of the Probation Office did not respond. Robinson’s obligation to make restitution was discharged. Later, the Probation Office objected when the restitution payments ceased. Robinson filed this action to have the discharge affirmed. Were the restitu-tion payments, as required as a condition of Robinson’s probation, dischargeable in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding? Why?
Answers
Yes, the restitution payments required as a condition of Robinson's probation were dischargeable in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding. In bankruptcy law, restitution obligations are generally considered to be dischargeable, unless they are specifically listed as non-dischargeable under Section 523(a)(7) of the Bankruptcy Code. However, in this case, the restitution payments were not listed as a non-dischargeable debt.
Furthermore, since the staff members of the Connecticut Department of Income Maintenance and the Probation Office did not object to Robinson's bankruptcy petition within the specified time frame, her obligation to make restitution was discharged. It is important to note that the timely objection by the Probation Office after the restitution payments ceased does not change the fact that the obligation was already discharged.
In summary, the restitution payments were dischargeable in the Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding because they were not listed as non-dischargeable debts, and the relevant parties did not object to the discharge within the specified time frame.
know more about Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding,
https://brainly.com/question/14482442
#SPJ11
Under constitutional law, does the President have the legal authority to mandate anything on the citizens in our country?
Answers
how science prevail over common sense?
Answers
Answer:
The difference between common sense and science. Plainly stated common sense is information gathered from everyday knowledge and science is thorough research on a particular subject with concluded facts.
The reason for science prevailing over common sense is because its uses conceptual schemes and theoretical structures while common sense has no structure to it,
Basically, a common sense means a conventional intelligence that people gathered from everyday situations, events etc.
Science mean a knowledge about our world based on facts learned through numerous experiments, observation etc.
In conclusion, the reason for science prevailing over common sense is because its uses conceptual schemes and theoretical structures while common sense has no structure to it.
Read more about Science
brainly.com/question/17216882
What if the disturbance in question is not noise but cigarette smoke seeping from neighboring units into the unit of a nonsmoking tenant?
Answers
In this situation, the disturbance is not a form of noise, but rather an issue of air quality. Cigarette smoke can be harmful to health, and it is understandable that a nonsmoking tenant would not want to be exposed to it in their own living space.
The tenant should first try to talk to their neighbors and request that they refrain from smoking in a way that allows smoke to seep into other units.
If the issue persists, the tenant can bring the matter to the attention of their landlord or property management company, as they may have policies in place to address this type of issue.
Ultimately, ensuring a healthy and safe living environment should be a top priority for all parties involved. The tenant should first try to talk to their neighbors and request that they refrain from smoking in a way that allows smoke to seep into other units.
Learn more about disturbance here
https://brainly.com/question/25822770
#SPJ4
In 1914, the Harrison Act made ________________ certain drugs illegal. All are true except:
a. buying b. abusing c. using d. selling
Answers
In 1914, the Harrison Act made certain drugs illegal. All are true except abusing. Option B is the correct answer.
The Harrison Narcotic Drug Act, the first law to restrict drug trafficking, was approved by Congress in 1914. By mandating people who transported, sold, or possessed drugs to report them to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and pay taxes, the legislation used a revenue-generating strategy to drug regulation. Option B is the correct answer.
The Harrison Act restricted access to opium to only modest doses that were prescribed by physicians, who had to register and pay taxes on the doses they recommended. Drug misuse was viewed less as a criminal crime and more as a public health issue. Medicines frequently contained drugs like opium and cocaine.
Learn more about Harrison Act here:
https://brainly.com/question/28463686
#SPJ4
The complete question is, "In 1914, the Harrison Act made certain drugs illegal. All are true except:
a. buying
b. abusing
c. using
d. selling"
Anita runs a business supplying furniture for special events. She has a contract to provide 100 chairs for Bob's 60thbirthday garden party, for $500. On the morning of the party, Bob and his helpers are setting up for the day's celebrations. Anita arrives, but she has only brought 93 chairs. She first speaks to Bob's nephew, Jasper. When he hears that only 93 chairs have arrived, Jasper quickly gets into his car to go find another furniture hire business. He finds one that will provide 7 similar chairs, for a cost of $63. When Anita sees Bob inside, and tells him she has only brought 93 chairs, Bob is angry. Anita claims that Bob must pay her the full $500, but Bob disagrees. Is Anita entitled to any payment (and if so, how much)?
Answers
Answer:
She is entitled to a pro-rated payment of $465.00
Explanation:
You would take the $500 and divide it by the 100 chairs. That is $5 a chair. Then multiply $5 x 93. That is $465.
to provide legal advice to the public is to engage in
Answers
To provide legal advice to the public is to engage in Nonlawyer legal service providers' content that they are not engaging in UPL because they are providing legal information, not advice.
Lawyer As a popular matter, the most effective legal professionals might also provide real prison recommendations, whereas any non-lawyer can also recite legal statistics. furthermore, it's far typically unlawful for a non-lawyer or unlicensed attorney to provide a legal recommendation or in any other case represent someone aside from themself in court. that have an effect on the rights of someone, representing someone in a court docket of law or in a legal rely on, negotiating the rights of a customer.
The phrases legal professional and lawyer are frequently used interchangeably. for that reason, people inside and outside of the felony discipline often ask an attorney and a lawyer an equal thing. In colloquial speech, the specific requirements vital to be taken into consideration a lawyer vs lawyer are not constantly considered. felony recommendation applies the regulation, along with statute and case regulation and felony principles to a selected scenario.
Learn more about Legal advice here:-https://brainly.com/question/17494866
#SPJ9
Heat Stress is when the body is exposed to a hot environment, the main source of cooling is sweat. However, in very high temperatures sweat does not evaporate quickly enough and therefore has very little cooling effect. As body heat increases, the ability to sustain the work activity diminishes and fatigue sets in:
Answers
High temperatures exceed the body's temperature-regulating mechanism, decreasing physical activity and weariness. In high temperatures, sweat, the body's main cooling mechanism, is ineffective, preventing evaporative cooling. Heat stroke and weariness might result.
What is Heat stress?Generally, Heat stress occurs when the body's temperature regulation system is overwhelmed by high temperatures, leading to decreased ability to perform physical activity and increased fatigue.
Sweat, the body's primary means of cooling, is less effective in very high temperatures, resulting in a lack of evaporative cooling.
This can lead to symptoms such as heat exhaustion and heat stroke.
Read more about Heat stress
https://brainly.com/question/15174745
#SPJ1
vijay enters into a contract to sell his laptop to winnie. winnie takes possession of the laptop as a minor and continues to use it well after reaching the age of majority. winnie has
Answers
Vijay enters into a contract to sell his laptop to Winnie. Winnie takes possession of the laptop as a minor and continues to use it well after reaching the age of majority. Winnie has disaffirmed the contract. The correct answer is c.
Winnie's continued use of the laptop after turning 18, as opposed to an implied or express ratification, shows a disaffirmation of the agreement. The act of a minor voiding or rejecting a contract they signed before turning 18 is known as disaffirmation.
Winnie is essentially indicating their intention not to be bound by the terms of the contract by using the laptop without taking any explicit action to affirm or accept it. This is a common legal safeguard for minors to make sure they aren't unduly burdened by contracts they signed while lacking the mental capacity to fully comprehend the implications.
Learn more about contract at:
brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ4
The complete question is "Vijay enters into a contract to sell his laptop to Winnie. Winnie takes possession of the laptop as a minor and continues to use it well after reaching the age of majority. Winnie has a. expressly ratified the contract. b. impliedly ratified the contract. c. disaffirmed the contract. d. none of the choices.
Tactical treats can be performed in a variety of ways. Which way is not correct.
Coordinated
Coordinated
Ruse
Ruse
Deliberate
Deliberate
Dynamic
Dynamic
Answers
Basing government decisions on known legal principles is known as which of the following? Democracy Republicanism Rule of law Separation of power
Answers
Answer:
Rule of Law
Hope this helps, even though it’s been 3 days
Question #4
Multiple Choice
Key computer issues addressed by the Bureau of Consumer Protection (BCP) include all of the following except
how to increase the amount of "cookies"
how to avoid "malware"
how to protect kids online
O how to prevent "scammers," "hackers," and identity theft
Answers
The Bureau of Consumer Protection (BCP) addresses key computer issues such as avoiding malware, protecting kids online, and preventing scammers, hackers, and identity theft. However, it does not specifically focus on increasing the amount of "cookies."
The Bureau of Consumer Protection (BCP) is an agency that works to protect consumers from various issues related to computer and online activities. It provides resources and information to help individuals navigate the digital landscape safely. Some of the key computer issues addressed by the BCP include educating consumers on how to avoid malware, which refers to malicious software that can harm computers and compromise data security. The BCP also emphasizes the importance of protecting children online, promoting awareness about the potential risks and offering guidance to parents and caregivers.
Additionally, the BCP plays a crucial role in raising awareness about scams, hackers, and identity theft, aiming to help consumers prevent and respond to these threats effectively. However, increasing the amount of "cookies," which are small text files stored on a computer to track website activity, is not a specific issue addressed by the BCP. While the BCP may provide general information about online privacy and data collection, its primary focus is on protecting consumers from potential harm and fraudulent activities rather than addressing technical aspects like increasing the number of "cookies."
Learn more about Bureau of Consumer Protection here:
https://brainly.com/question/15216453
#SPJ11
Guys what’s jay walking is it like the moonwalk
Answers
Answer:
uh no. it's when you cross the street without sing the crosswalk.
Explanation:
Hope this helps! May i please have brainliest? :)
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
Price in Dollars
18
16
14
12
10
8
4
2
10
20
40
Quantity Supplied
→
50
What does the graph show about the relationship
between a product and its price?
O As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the amount of a product goes down, the price
goes up.
O As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes
up.
O As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes
up.
Answers
The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
What is the relationship between a product and its price?The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.
The factors may be as follows -
Income of the consumers.Price of substitute goods.Price of complementary goods.Taste and preferences of consumers.Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.
Learn more about price at:
brainly.com/question/26075805
#SPJ1
Full Question:
Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:
The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.
What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?
As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.
As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.
See attached image.
True of False: While no federal laws cover all product liability, all U.S. citizens are protected by the Uniform Commercial Code, which has been adopted by all fifty states.
Answers
False. The statement is not entirely accurate as it implies that the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) provides comprehensive protection for all U.S. citizens against product liability, which is not the case.
Product liability is primarily governed by state laws, and these laws vary from state to state. Some states have strict liability laws, which impose liability on manufacturers without requiring plaintiffs to prove negligence or fault. Other states may require plaintiffs to prove negligence, breach of warranty, or other legal theories to recover damages.
While the UCC has been adopted by all fifty states, it is not a comprehensive law governing product liability. The UCC provides rules and guidelines for commercial transactions, including the sale of goods, but it does not cover all aspects of product liability.
There are federal laws that regulate specific types of products, such as the Consumer Product Safety Act, which regulates the safety of consumer products, and the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which governs the safety and labeling of food and drugs. These federal laws provide additional protections for consumers, but they do not cover all product liability claims.
In conclusion, while the UCC may provide some protection for consumers in commercial transactions, it is not a comprehensive law governing product liability, which is primarily regulated by state and federal laws. Therefore, the statement is false.
Know more about the Product liability click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30805836
#SPJ11
which leadership style is most appropriate when addressing the problem of low worker involvement? supportive achievement-oriented directive participative
Answers
The leadership style that is most appropriate when addressing the problem of low worker involvement is the participative leadership style.
The participative leadership style involves actively involving employees in decision-making processes, seeking their input, and encouraging their contributions. This approach helps to increase worker involvement by creating a collaborative and inclusive environment where employees feel valued and empowered.
When workers are not actively engaged or involved in their work, it can lead to reduced productivity, motivation, and job satisfaction. By adopting a participative leadership style, leaders can address this issue by fostering a sense of ownership and commitment among employees.
Under a participative leadership style, leaders encourage open communication, seek input and ideas from employees, and involve them in decision-making processes that affect their work. This approach not only increases worker involvement but also promotes creativity, innovation, and a sense of shared responsibility.
It is important to note that leadership styles should be adapted to fit the specific context and needs of the organization and its employees. In some situations, a combination of different leadership styles may be necessary. However, when specifically addressing the problem of low worker involvement, a participative leadership style tends to be effective in creating a more engaged and motivated workforce.
Learn more about leadership here
https://brainly.com/question/28170051
#SPJ11
critically examine te meaning and concept of nation,nationalities and peoples stated under article 39(5) of the fdre constitution vs the modern thouthts of nation and nationalism?
Answers
why is severing on a jury important?
Answers
Answer:
Explanation:
Jurors perform a vital role in the American system of justice. ... Jury service is a high duty of citizenship. Jurors aid in the maintenance of law and order and uphold justice among their fellow citizens. Their greatest reward is the knowledge that they have discharged this duty faithfully, honorably, and well.
What is the factual background regarding the Aetna v. Pendleton Detectives of Miss. case?
Answers
The parties in this action are Aetna, which served as The Merchants Company, Inc.'s insurer and surety bond provider, and Pendelton Detectives of Mississippi, Inc., which Aetna hired to provide security for Merchants' distribution warehouse facilities.
What is a surety bond provider?In the world of finance, a guarantee, surety bond, or guaranty is a pledge made by one party to take over the debt obligation of a borrower in the event of that borrower's default.
A surety bond or surety is typically a commitment made by a surety or guarantor to pay one party (the obligee) a specific sum of money if a third party (the principal) fails to fulfill any duty, like upholding the terms of a contract.
The surety bond guards the obligee from losses brought on by the principal's breach of the contract. The entity making the commitment is also referred to as a "surety" or a "guarantor."
Learn more on surety bonds here https://brainly.com/question/14329633
#SPJ1
the main goal of the gramm-leach-bliley act (glba) is to protect investors from financial fraud. t/f
Answers
False. The main goal of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) is to regulate the financial industry in a way that promotes competition, efficiency, and consumer protection. It does this by removing barriers between different types of financial institutions, such as banks and securities firms, allowing them to offer a wider range of services to customers. However, the GLBA does have provisions that aim to protect consumers from financial fraud, such as requiring financial institutions to develop and implement security measures to protect customer information.
Additionally, the act established the Federal Trade Commission as the primary agency responsible for enforcing consumer privacy protections in the financial sector.
To learn more about information click here: brainly.com/question/30350623
#SPJ11
The police are investigating a crime that occurred at Shoprite. They find a red umbrella in the store where a man was assaulted by an unknown person. Three blocks away from Shoprite, investigators find a wallet with the same fingerprints on them as the umbrella. The place where the umbrella was found is called the...
A) Primary Crime Scene
B) Secondary Crime scene
C) Tertiary Crime scene
D) Accomplice
Answers
primary Crime scene because the criminal escaped
If a state were to have the majority of its productive capacity in the public sector, this would most likely indicate the existence of a(n):
Answers
Answer: D. social market system.
Explanation:
I'm a social market system, the economy runs as an amalgamation of two economic policies being the capitalist system and the socialist system.
The goal of this is to improve the welfare of humans whilst still encouraging competition. As a result, most of the country's productive sector will be in the public sector where the government tries to institute it's ideals of trying to improve the general welfare of the people.
can Nevada count those votes any slower jeez
Answers
right? like nevada please hurry up ;;
Which of the following is illegal?
(A) = Saying "hi" to someone politely.
(B) = Cooking Mash potatoes and accidentally made it ugly.
(C) = Swinging a bat around in public for no reason.
(D) = Making fun of the clouds.
(E) = Carrying a Firearm with a License for it.
(F) = Killing someone for self-defense purposes.
(G) = Saying the Word "Voldemort" in public.
(There is only one answer that is illegal and could get your bat taken away and fine, and maybe incarceration (Arrest), and this is an example called disorderly conduct.)
Answers
Answer:
c?
Explanation:
i'm guessing it is c because that is the most reasonable and well one that seems like it might be because you can either hurt someone or attempt murder or something. the other answers are just random and are all legal now that i come to think of it, which is weird.
A federal statute requires any individual or entity owning more than 100 cars to ensure that at least 10 percent of those cars are electric-powered. A city has sued the federal official responsible for enforcing this statute in federal district court, seeking an injunction prohibiting enforcement of the statute on the ground that it is unconstitutional. Should the court grant the injunction
Answers
It is not possible to determine whether the court should grant the injunction.
The court would need to assess the constitutionality of the federal statute in question by considering relevant legal principles and constitutional provisions. One aspect that may come into play is the principle of federalism, which involves the division of powers between the federal government and the states. The court would evaluate whether the federal government has the authority to regulate car ownership and impose requirements on the percentage of electric-powered vehicles.
Additionally, the court would likely examine any constitutional challenges raised by the city, such as whether the statute infringes upon the city's rights or violates the principles of due process or equal protection. The city would need to provide compelling arguments and evidence to support its claim that the statute is unconstitutional.
Ultimately, the court's decision would be based on the interpretation of constitutional law and relevant legal precedents. It would consider the arguments presented by both parties and weigh the potential impact of granting or denying the injunction. Without further information on the specific legal arguments and evidence presented in the case, it is not possible to determine whether the court should grant the injunction.
Learn more about injunction here:
https://brainly.com/question/23850251
#SPJ11
What inventions did south america have before the europeans came to south america
Answers
Shield laws protect journalists' right to refuse to testify against their sources while gathering information in their role as journalists. There is no shield law at the federal level.
Which of the following states has the greatest protection for freedom of the press based on the information on the map?
A-New York (NY)
B-Missouri (MO)
C-Wyoming (WY)
D-Georgia (GA)
Answers
According to the map, New York (NY) has a shield law that always defends the sources of journalists.
Do shield laws safeguard press freedom?A shield law is a piece of legislation intended to safeguard journalists' rights. This privilege pertains to the freedom of journalists to withhold testimony about the information and/or sources used in the news collecting and dissemination process.
How is press freedom safeguarded in the US?A democracy where the people are the government's ultimate arbiters depends on press freedom, which is safeguarded by the First Amendment. A free press serves as a watchdog that can look into and report on misconduct by the government.
Who safeguards press freedom?The First Amendment prohibits Congress from enacting laws that would establish a specific religion or outlaw its practice, limit the freedom of the press or of expression, or limit the ability of the general public to peacefully assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.
Know more about freedom:
brainly.com/question/13273450
#SPJ4