Claire shoots Donovan and injures him. Donovan goes to the hospital. Unfortunately, his doctor is pretty sick with bird flu because he was just traveling somewhere that had it, and bird flu is contagious. It is the first case of bird flu ever in the state of Washington. Donovan gets bird flu and dies (adapted from Bush v. Commonwealth).
CAN CLAIRE BE CONVICTED FOR THE DEATH OF DONOVAN?
Answers
Answer:
Claire is not convicted for Donovan's death, only convicted of attempted murder. The doctor is convicted for Donovan's death as his bird flu transmitted to Donovan, causing him to die.
Related Questions
What does it mean for a bill to be "make up"?
Answers
A bill to create a new law can be introduced in either chamber of Congress by a senator or representative who sponsors it.
Using one example from US History, show how the Supreme Court has exercised the power of judicial review
Answers
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
What is a written statement by an attorney that summarizes a case and the laws and rulings that support it ?
Answers
To prepare a brief, you take the case’s most important parts and restate them in your own words.
5. Identify the offices and institutions that make up each of the three branches of the federal
government. For each branch, give at least one example of how it can check the power
of another
branch of the federal government. (5 points)
Answers
Answer: Legislative—Makes laws (Congress, comprised of the House of Representatives and Senate) Executive—Carries out laws (president, vice president, Cabinet, most federal agencies) Judicial—Evaluates laws (Supreme Court and other courts)
Explanation:
FORENSIC SCIENCE
at a crime scene investigators find a victim lying on the floor. They are confirmed to be dead, but there are no obvious signs of trauma. Which person in the forensic science field would be able to beat help them determine what caused the death?
A. Forensic Psychiatrist
B. Forensic Anthropologist
C. Forensic Pathologist
D. Forensic Odontologist
Answers
Answer:
C. Forensic Pathologist
Explanation:
forensic pathologists preform autopsies on people who die suddenly to find the cause of the victim's death
Do you think a government could function without the Departments? Why or why not?
at least a paragraph and full detail.
please
Answers
Answer: Yes&No depends on the kind of government we are trying to become.
Explanation:
List all of the areas in which Article 1 section 8 of the US Constitution provides for federal employment and the spending of federal dollars.
Answers
Answer:
Money: Lines 1, 3, 5, 6
Federal Employment: Lines 7, 14
Article I, Section 8:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;
To establish Post Offices and post Roads;
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;
To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;
To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
To provide and maintain a Navy;
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;--And
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
Federal employment:7,14
What percentage of all collisions result from avoidable and unavoidable distractions?
Answers
Distracted Driving Statistics 9.4% of accidents in this state were caused by that. In Utah, distracted driving incidents cause an average of 2,006 injuries and 20 fatalities per year.
How many collisions are entirely preventable?Automobile collisions can frequently be avoided. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Agency (NHTSA), human error accounts for between 94% and 96% of all motor vehicle collisions.
What proportion of accidents are the result of distractions?Yet, when you compare the total number of distracted driving collisions to the overall number of collisions, distracted driving has continued to be a significant factor, accounting for 14% to 17% of all collisions.
To know more about Distracted Driving Statistics visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/30358115
#SPJ1
If Santa were shown to court for illegal travel and conducting a pirating toy factory would he lose or win?
Answers
Answer:.
Well he would only be in jail for one day if someone comes to pick him up
Explanation:
Investigators have found a murder victim who was apparently exposed to a toxic substance. In order to find out what the substance was and how it killed the victim, they might look for the help of a
1. forensic geneticist
2. forensic sociologist
3. forensic etymologist
4. forensic chemist
Answers
How can consumers use consumer protection laws to protect themselves in the marketplace?
Answers
Mapp v. Ohio Case: Do you agree with the Court’s decision in the Mapp case? Give reasons for your answer.
Answers
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment. Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."
which degrees are examples of post secondary education 
a) high school degree
b) associate degree
c) bachelor’s degree
d) masters degree
e) doctoral degree
Answers
Answer: B. Associate Degree
Explanation: College (a four-year program of study) or an associate's degree at a community college (usually a two-year program of study). Community colleges also offer certificate programs, which are usually completed in less than one year if attended full time.
A car driven by a vacationer and a tractor-trailer driven by truck driver collided with each other. The vacationer filed an action based on negligence against the truck driver in federal district court in the state in which he resided. The court had subject-matter jurisdiction over this action but not personal jurisdiction over the truck driver, who did not reside in the forum state but rather in the state in which the accident had occurred. The truck driver timely filed a motion to dismiss the action due to lack of personal jurisdiction and proper venue. May the court transfer the action to the federal district court for the district in which the truck driver resides if the court determines that such transfer is in the interest of justice
Answers
Answer:
Answer C is correct
Explanation:
Although venue isn't improper in the forum court because the accident did not occur in the forum state nor did the defendant truck driver reside there, the forum court may transfer the action to any judicial district in which it originally could of been brought if it determines that such transfer in the interest of justice. Here, the action could of been brought into the federal district court for the district in which the truck driver resides
Considering the situation described in the question, it is true that:
The court may transfer the action to the federal district court for the district where the truck driver resides if the court determines that such transfer is in the interest of justice.
This is based on the United States law code 28, Part IV, Chapter 87, Subsection 1404, Article A., which explains the need for Change of Venue.
This portion of the United States code stated that for convenience purposes that involve parties to the case and witnesses, particularly in the interest of justice, a district court might move any civil action to any other district to which all parties have consented.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that it is true that the court may transfer the action to the federal district court for the district where the truck driver resides if the court determines that such transfer is in the interest of justice.
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/24893162
Is there a difference between a education permit and an instructional permit?
Answers
An education permission and now an instructional permit do differ from one another.
What does a permit look like?A visa is a formal document that grants permission to accomplish something. For instance, obtaining a work permit to work abroad is typically required. He needs to submit a permission application, and we need to get him a job.
A sort of permission given to those learning to drive is known as an education permit and is sometimes referred to as a drivers licence or temporary license. With the use of this permit, the person is able to test driving under the guidance of a valid driver's license.
A person can take driving lessons from a certified instructor with the use of an instructional permit. With this permit, the person is only permitted to practice driving with a certified instructor and not on their own.
To know more about Permit visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30378153
#SPJ1
What is the process for recalling a sheriff from office?
Answers
The process for recalling a sheriff from office typically involves filing a petition, collecting signatures from registered voters, and holding a recall election.
The process for recalling a sheriff from office varies depending on the specific jurisdiction and the laws in place. However, in general, the process typically involves the following steps:Petition: A group or individual seeking to recall a sheriff must initiate the process by filing a petition. The petition usually needs to state the reasons for the recall and gather a required number of signatures from registered voters within the jurisdiction.Signature Collection: Supporters of the recall campaign must collect the necessary number of valid signatures within a specified timeframe. The required number of signatures is typically apercentage of the total votes cast in the previous election for that office.Verification: The submitted signatures are verified by the appropriate election officials to ensure they meet the eligibility criteria, such as being from registered voters within the jurisdiction.Recall Election: If the petition and signatures meet the requirements, a recall election is scheduled. Registered voters within the jurisdiction then have the opportunity to vote on whether to recall the sheriff from office.Election Outcome: If the majority of voters in the recall election choose to recall the sheriff, they will be removed from office. In some cases, a successor may be appointed or a special election held to fill the vacant position.It is important to note that the specific details and requirements may differ depending on the jurisdiction, so it is crucial to consult the applicable laws and regulations governing the recall process in a particular area.For more such question on recalling
https://brainly.com/question/30617654
#SPJ8
north has three brother south west and east whats the last one?
Answers
Check out this app! It's millions of students helping each other get through their schoolwork. https://brainly.app.link/qpzV02MawO.
I like it
Answers
Examples of public servants that are not civil servants
Answers
The Examples of public servants that are not civil servants are those who are firefighters and police officers.
Do all public employees work as civil servants?Members of the government, employees of various government agencies, as well as personnel in embassies and consulates all fall under the category of civil servants. Firefighters, police officers, as well as volunteers and privates who help the less fortunate members of society are all examples of public servants.
Note that Employees in the public sector, including those working in the NHS and education, are not regarded as civil servants. Police personnel and officers are not considered civil servants.
Therefore, Firefighters and police officers are examples of public servants, but so are volunteers and privates who provide services to the community and the most vulnerable members of society.
Learn more about public servants from
https://brainly.com/question/20296498
#SPJ1
1–4. Spotlight on AOL—Common Law. AOL, LLC, mistakenly made public the personal information of 650,000 of its members. The members filed a suit, alleging violations of California law. AOL asked the court to dismiss the suit on the basis of a "forum-selection clause" in its member agreement that designates Virginia courts as the place where member disputes will be tried. Under a decision of the United States Supreme Court, a forum-selection clause is unenforceable "if enforcement would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which suit is brought." California courts have declared in other cases that the AOL clause contravenes a strong public policy. If the court applies the doctrine of stare decisis, will it dismiss the suit?
Answers
Answer:
If the court applies the Stare decisis doctrine, the case will not be dismissed.
Explanation:
The stare decisis doctrine will provide the necessary legal bases for the case to proceed within California. This will happen because there is a legal decision applied throughout the national territory that states that this type of clause, which presents a selection forum, is inexorable. This happens because the AOL clause violated, in fact, a very strong public policy, so the judges are obliged to continue with the case, within the state where the public policy was violated.
what are six sentencing choices that many state judges have?
Answers
Answer:
State judges in the United States have a range of sentencing choices available to them, which can vary based on the specific laws and guidelines of each state. While the exact options may differ, here are six common sentencing choices that many state judges have:
Incarceration: Judges can choose to impose a prison sentence, where the convicted individual is confined in a correctional facility for a specific period. The length of the sentence can vary based on the severity of the crime and other factors.
Probation: Instead of incarceration, judges may opt for probation, which allows the convicted individual to remain in the community under specific conditions. These conditions typically include regular check-ins with a probation officer, adherence to certain rules, and completion of any mandated programs or community service.
Fines: Judges can impose monetary fines as part of the sentence. The amount of the fine can vary depending on the offence and the financial situation of the convicted individual. Fines serve as a form of punishment and may also be used to compensate victims or cover court costs.
Restitution: In cases where the victim has suffered financial losses or damages, judges may order the convicted individual to pay restitution. This involves reimbursing the victim for medical expenses, property damage, or other financial losses resulting from the crime.
Community Service: Judges can order community service as part of the sentence, requiring the convicted individual to perform unpaid work for a specified number of hours within the community. Community service aims to provide a form of punishment, promote rehabilitation, and contribute to the community in a positive way.
Suspended Sentence: In certain cases, judges may choose to suspend the imposition of a sentence. This means that the convicted individual is not immediately incarcerated or subjected to other penalties. However, the judge may set specific conditions that the individual must meet, such as regular check-ins, completion of counselling or rehabilitation programs, or maintaining good behaviour. Failure to meet these conditions may result in the activation of the original sentence.
It's important to note that sentencing choices can vary among states and are influenced by factors such as the nature of the crime, criminal history, and the discretion of the judge within the bounds of applicable laws and sentencing guidelines.
hey, i hope that helped :)
could you pop me as brainliest pls :)
Suppose there are 200 people total in the neighborhood where the robbery occurred. Let’s say that given a sample size of 30 people in the neighborhood, 5 of them were wearing black jeans and 2 of them were wearing a purple t-shirt. How many people can you narrow down this class evidence to?
Answers
Explanation:
It's difficult to accurately narrow down the class evidence to a specific number of people without additional information. The sample size of 30 people is relatively small in comparison to the total neighborhood population of 200. Additionally, knowing that 5 people were wearing black jeans and 2 were wearing a purple t-shirt doesn't provide enough information to accurately estimate the total number of people wearing those specific items of clothing in the neighborhood.
However, if we assume that the sample of 30 people is representative of the larger population, we can estimate that approximately 33% of the neighborhood population (or 66 out of 200 people) are wearing black jeans, and approximately 10% of the population (or 20 out of 200 people) are wearing a purple t-shirt. This is based on the assumption that the proportion of people wearing black jeans or a purple t-shirt in the sample of 30 people is representative of the proportion in the larger population.
It's important to note that this is just an estimate and not a definitive answer, as there could be a variety of factors that could affect the accuracy of this estimate.
Frequency of black jeans: 5/30 = 1/6
Frequency of purple t-shirts: 2/30 = 1/15
To estimate the number of people in the neighborhood who were wearing black jeans, we can multiply the frequency by the total population:
Estimated number of people wearing black jeans: (1/6) x 200 = 33.33
To estimate the number of people in the neighborhood who were wearing purple t-shirts, we can use the same approach:
Estimated number of people wearing purple t-shirts: (1/15) x 200 = 13.33
Since we cannot have a fraction of a person, we need to round the estimates to the nearest whole number. Therefore, based on the class evidence of black jeans and purple t-shirts, we can narrow down the potential suspects to approximately 33 people wearing black jeans and 13 people wearing purple t-shirts in the neighborhood where the robbery occurred.
Which of the following is NOT a factor that increases the difficulty of comparing handwriting samples A. The questioned document may only contain a few words. B. The samples presented for comparison have been created for completely different purposes (such as a list and a signature) C. The writing samples may be incomplete D. The samples have been written by different people
Answers
The correct answer is The samples have been written by different people. Option D
What is handwriting analysis?Handwriting analysis involves comparing the characteristics of two or more handwriting samples to determine whether they were likely written by the same person, or whether they were written by different people. If the samples have been written by different people, they would not be compared as part of a handwriting analysis.
While the other factors mentioned (A, B, and C) can increase the difficulty of comparing handwriting samples, the fact that the samples have been written by different people is not a factor that affects the comparison process
Learn more about handwriting samples at:https://brainly.com/question/30021636
#SPJ1
Is it illegal to open someone else's mailbox? If so, why?
Answers
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Opening or destroying mail that is addressed to someone else is a crime called “Obstruction of Correspondence.” It is a serious felony that could lead to prison time.
Answer:
Yes, it's not only illegal but a felony.
Explanation:
Taking, tampering with, vandalizing, destroying, or even looking at mail that's inside someone else's mailbox is a serious crime. Mailboxes are considered government property to make it easier to ensure that mail has been delivered with no issues.
If someone receives a misdirected package, it would be best to knock on the door of the place the mail was directed to, leave a note for them, or leave it in the mailbox for delivery staff to come pick it up on their next round. Never put the mail directly into their mailbox unless you're a postal employee.
does "in god we trust" have something to with legislative?
Answers
Answer:
Eisenhower signed into law H.R. 619, a bill that required that the inscription “In God We Trust” appear on all paper and coin currency. Representative Charles E.
Explanation:
Ned wants to enter the home of a suspect to search for evidence but does not have a warrant. He sees someone shredding paper through the window. Which of the following exceptions allow him to enter the home?
A.
probable cause
B.
arrest
C.
exigent circumstances
D.
hot pursuit
E.
USA PATRIOT Act
Answers
Answer: c
Explanation: took the test
Ned wants to enter the home of a suspect to search for evidence but does not have a warrant. Exigent circumstances following exceptions allow him to enter the home. Thus, the correct option is (C).
In the context of the criminal process, an exigent circumstance is defined as an emergency situation demanding immediate action to avert imminent risk to life or substantial property damage, or to avoid the probable escape of a suspect or the loss of evidence.
Conditions requiring a warrantless entrance, search, or seizure by police when a warrant would normally be necessary compare knock and announce rule, and no-knock search warrant at the warrant.
Therefore, the correct option is "C".
To know more about the exigent circumstances, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30611978
#SPJ2
Which of these is the strongest example of multilateral foreign policy? 'O One nation states publicly that it will refuse to trade with any nation that criticizes its leader. One nation refuses to trade with a rival nation because it does not allow women to vote in an upcoming election. O Two rival nations go to war with one another over disputed territory. O Two allied nations enforce economic sanctions on a country until its government changes a key policy.
Answers
Answer:
Two allied nations enforce economic sanctions on a country until its government changes a key policy.
Explanation
took the test its correct
The strongest example of multilateral foreign policy is two allied nations enforcing economic sanctions on a country until its government changes a key policy.
What is foreign policy?Foreign policy refers to those objectives that guide the activities and relationships of one state to another state.
The strongest example of multilateral foreign policy is two allied nations enforcing economic sanctions on a country until its government changes a key policy.
Therefore, D is the correct option.
Learn more about Foreign policy here:
https://brainly.com/question/11248576
#SPJ5
What is the purpose of the exclusionary rule? (Select all that apply.) Responses To ensure that police do not arrest people without a legal cause. To ensure that police do not arrest people without a legal cause. To ensure that evidence is collected legally. To ensure that evidence is collected legally. To ensure that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. To ensure that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. To ensure that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant. To ensure that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant.
Answers
The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct by preventing the use of illegally obtained evidence during a criminal trial.
What is evidence?Evidence is any type of proof that is used to support a claim or conclusion. It can be physical, such as an object or document, or it can be testimonial, such as a witness providing a statement. Evidence is often used in legal proceedings to prove a point of law or fact. It can also be used in scientific research to support or refute a hypothesis. Evidence can also be used in everyday life to support an argument or decision. In any situation, evidence should be reliable, relevant, and sufficient to support the claim or conclusion.
This rule ensures that police do not arrest people without a legal cause, that evidence is collected legally, and that items in plain view are admissible as evidence. Additionally, it ensures that police do not obtain any evidence without a warrant.
To learn more about evidence
https://brainly.com/question/23323608
#SPJ1
mendel’s laws of segregation and independent assortment are based on the movement of chromosomes during meiosis, even though mendel did not know about chromosomes during his lifetime. can you match each of the following events with the law it illustrates?
Answers
According to Mendel, the law of segregation posits that an individual has two alleles and a parent typically passes only one allele to the offspring.
Your information is incomplete. Therefore, an overview of the law of segregation and independent assortment will be given. Mendel's Law of Independent Assortment implies that the inheritance of one gene is independent of the inheritance of the other pair.
It should be noted that the law of segregation and independent assortment are vital during meiotic division. Mendel's law of segregation simply entails how homologous chromosomes are separated in meiosis.
Learn more about laws of segregation on:
https://brainly.com/question/25783034
fill in the blanks please
Answers
1. The basis for a divorce is irreconcilable differences.
2. When a judge decides the issue of child custody, the judge uses the standard of best interests of the child.
3. A mediator helps divorcing persons resolve the issues of child custody, child support, property division, and alimony.
4. A marriage counselor helps married couples resolve problems in their marriage.
5. A divorced parent who remarries another divorced parent creates a blended family.
6. Divorcing spouses may choose to go pro se and not pay legal fees.
1. The basis for a collaborative divorce is the mutual agreement between the divorcing parties to work together in resolving their issues amicably and without litigation.
2. When a judge decides the issue of child custody, the judge uses the standard of the best interests of the child, considering factors such as the child's welfare, stability, and relationship with each parent.
3. A mediator helps divorcing persons resolve the issues of child custody, child support, property division, and alimony by facilitating communication, negotiation, and finding mutually agreeable solutions.
4. A marriage counselor helps married couples resolve problems in their marriage by providing therapy, counseling, and guidance to improve communication, understanding, and relationship dynamics.
5. A divorced parent who remarries another divorced parent creates a blended family, where both partners bring their own children from previous relationships into the new family unit.
6. Divorcing spouses may choose to go pro se, meaning they represent themselves in the legal process, without hiring an attorney. This option allows them to save on legal fees but requires them to navigate the legal proceedings and paperwork on their own.
Know more about the judge here:
https://brainly.com/question/30455267
#SPJ8
The question is incomplete. Find the full content below:
Directions: Fill in the blanks with the correct answer from the list below. Some terms be used more than once.
1 alimony
2 best interests of the child
3 blended family
4 child custody
5 child support
6 collaborative divorce
7 community property
8 covenant divorce
9 divorce
10 in loco parentis
11 irreconcilable differences
12-joint custody
13 kinship care
14 legal fees
15 marriage counselor
16 mediator
17 no-fault divorce
18 pro se
19 property division
20 separate property
21 Separation
22 stepparent
23 tender years doctrine
1. The basis for a ____ is ____
2. When a judge decides the issue of _____ the judge uses the standard of _____
3. A _____ helps divorcing persons resolve the issues of ___, ___, ____ and ____
4. A ____ helps married couples resolve the problems in their marriage.
5. A divorced parent who remarries another divorced parent creates a _______
6. Divorcing spouses may choose to go _____ and not pay_____ .