Each of these laws has its own specific provisions and exceptions, and their applicability depends on the context and purpose of data sharing.
HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) is primarily focused on protecting the privacy and security of individuals' health information and sets standards for the use and disclosure of protected health information by covered entities such as healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses. While HIPAA does allow for certain uses and disclosures of health information for healthcare operations, research, and public health purposes, it also imposes strict safeguards to protect individuals' privacy.
The Privacy Act of 1974 applies to federal agencies and governs the collection, use, and disclosure of personal information by federal government entities. It grants individuals certain rights regarding their personal information held by federal agencies. However, the Privacy Act does contain provisions that allow for the disclosure of personal information for administrative purposes within and between agencies under specific circumstances.
FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) protects the privacy of student education records and applies to educational institutions that receive federal funding. FERPA generally requires schools to obtain consent before disclosing personally identifiable information from a student's education records. However, there are exceptions under FERPA that permit the disclosure of education records without consent, including for administrative purposes within the educational institution or for specific authorized individuals or entities.
While there may be certain administrative exceptions or allowances for data reuse within these laws, it is important to note that these exceptions are carefully defined and regulated to balance the need for privacy protection with the legitimate purposes of data sharing and integration. The specifics of these exceptions and their applicability can vary depending on the particular circumstances and requirements of each law.
Learn more about FERPA here:
https://brainly.com/question/28083828
#SPJ11
all federal privacy laws governing data sharing and integration, including hipaa, the privacy act of 1974, and ferpa, have exemptions or exceptions for administrative data reuse. Explain.
Which of the following is a factor that causes a change in supply?
Taxes and subsidies
Consumer income
Consumer interests/tastes
Number of consumers in the market
The United States has more police departments than any other nation in the world. True or false
Answer:
True
Explanation:
1. The intention to create a legal relation may be shown by
A. the words of the parties only
B. the conduct of the parties only
C. the written documents made by the parties only
D. the words and the conduct of the parties
Answer:
she is right ....
before the mexican elections of 2000, the presidential nominee of the institutional revolutionary party (pri) had been chosen by which of the following processes?
Before the Mexican elections of 2000, the presidential nominee of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) had been chosen by the process of Dedazo.
Dedazo, which literally means "big finger" in Spanish, was a process used by the PRI to select its presidential candidate. It involved the sitting president choosing his successor, often in a secretive and undemocratic manner. This process allowed the PRI to maintain control of the presidency for over 70 years, from 1929 to 2000. However, in the 2000 elections, the PRI lost the presidency for the first time, with Vicente Fox of the National Action Party (PAN) winning the election.
Learn more about elections
https://brainly.com/question/21910013
#SPJ11
during plea bargaining, a multiple-offense indictment may be used by a(n):
During plea bargaining, a multiple-offense indictment may be used by a prosecutor to increase their bargaining power and persuade the defendant to accept a plea bargain.
A multiple-offense indictment refers to a criminal charge that involves several different offenses committed by the defendant. These charges can include multiple counts of the same crime or various crimes committed during the same incident.
By including all these charges in the indictment, the prosecutor can show the defendant the severity of the charges they are facing and the potential penalties they could receive if they were to go to trial and be convicted on all counts.
The threat of facing multiple charges and a potentially lengthy sentence can be intimidating for a defendant, making them more likely to accept a plea bargain that offers a reduced sentence or lesser charges.
Therefore, prosecutors may use multiple-offense indictments strategically during plea bargaining to achieve their desired outcome. It is important to note, however, that the use of multiple-offense indictments must be within the bounds of the law and not used to intimidate or coerce a defendant into accepting a plea bargain.
For more question on prosecutor
https://brainly.com/question/28893404
#SPJ11
A driver was operating his vehicle along a residential street at the posted speed limit when he saw a ball roll across the street. The driver did not slow down because the ball cleared his path before he reached it. A few seconds later, a child darted out into the street after the ball without looking for cars. The driver's car struck the child, and the child was injured. The child's parents brought an action on the child's behalf against the driver in a jurisdiction that follows traditional contributory negligence rules. At trial, the above facts were established. At the close of the evidence, the driver moved for a directed verdict. What should the court do
Deny the driver's motion because it will be up to the jury to determine whether he should have slowed down to below the speed limit. A jury could find that a reasonable prudent person under similar circumstances (watching the ball roll into the street) would slow down to avoid any foreseeable risk of hitting a child darting into the street.
At the trail for the injured child, as the driver moved for a directed verdict; the court will "deny the driver's motion".
What is Direct Verdict?A trial judge's decision to direct a jury's judgement is made after concluding that there is insufficient legal evidence to allow a fair jury to reach a different verdict. A directed verdict may be granted by the trial court spontaneously or in response to a motion made by either party.
The direct verdict is asked by-
In a criminal trial, the defense attorney for the defendant may move to have the charges dropped on the grounds that the prosecution has not made its case.In effect, in both kinds of cases, the lawyer asks the judge to direct a verdict for the defendant. The judge will either grant or deny the motion.Reason for the denial of drivers' verdict is-
As for the given case of child accident, the court will deny the driver's motion because because the jury will decide whether or not he ought to have slowed down to the legal pace. A jury could decide that a reasonable, cautious individual would have slowed down in the same situation (seeing the ball roll into the street) to reduce the likelihood of running into a youngster who was darting into the roadway.To know about the authenticity of evidence, here
https://brainly.com/question/23323608
#SPJ4
Why did President Truman go before a joint session of Congress after the British announced in 1947 that they could no longer afford to support the pro-western governments of the Mediterranean in their fight against communism?
Answer:
In February 1947, the British government informed the United States that it could no longer furnish the economic and military assistance it had been providing to Greece and Turkey since the end of World War II. The Truman administration believed that both nations were threatened by communism and it jumped at the chance to take a tough stance against the Soviet Union. In Greece, leftist forces had been battling the Greek royal government since the end of World War II. In Turkey, the Soviets were demanding some manner of control over the Dardanelles, territory from which Turkey was able to dominate the strategic waterway from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean.
Explanation:
In February 1947, the British government informed the United States that it could no longer furnish the economic and military assistance it had been providing to Greece and Turkey since the end of World War II. The Truman administration believed that both nations were threatened by communism and it jumped at the chance to take a tough stance against the Soviet Union. In Greece, leftist forces had been battling the Greek royal government since the end of World War II. In Turkey, the Soviets were demanding some manner of control over the Dardanelles, territory from which Turkey was able to dominate the strategic waterway from the Black Sea to the Mediterranean.
Physical security, economic security, freedom from threats, including security?
Physical security refers to the measures put in place to protect individuals, facilities, and resources from physical harm.
This includes implementing security systems such as cameras, locks, and alarms to prevent unauthorized access to restricted areas. Economic security, on the other hand, refers to the stability and sustainability of an individual or society's financial well-being. This can be achieved through economic policies that promote growth and job creation. Freedom from threats is a fundamental human right that ensures individuals are protected from harm and danger. Threats to individuals can come in many forms such as physical violence, cyber attacks, or terrorism. In order to maintain security, it is important to have measures in place that can detect and respond to these threats. Overall, security is a multifaceted concept that includes physical, economic, and social components. Achieving security requires a holistic approach that addresses the different aspects of security and ensures the safety and well-being of individuals and communities.
To learn more about security, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31072077
#SPJ11
Imagine you are a state judge running for reelection and are challenged by a popular lawyer in town, who is known as a champion for the poor. The latest poll indicated that you were five percentage points behind your opponent. A local labor union with 20,000 due-paying members comes to you to offer not only large donations, but also actual union member votes, which would assure your victory. You know that the same union has filed a lawsuit in your court requesting that the current state law governing the amount of political contributions by labor unions be lifted.
Would you accept their support?
If yes, how would you justify your decision ethically?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
This is not a bribe as they are not asking for you to vote in their favor. You can take it without feeling guilty as they know that this could be highly illegal if they try and sway you over.
Internet access has a measurable effect on political participation. Identify those groups that have greater and lesser access to the Internet.
*higher income
*less educated
*lower income
*more educated
-more access
-less access
Internet access has been shown to have a measurable effect on political participation.
Research has shown that internet access can have a measurable effect on political participation, allowing citizens to access information, communicate with others, and engage in online activism. However, not all groups have equal access to the internet, which can create digital divides in political participation. Below are some groups that have greater or lesser access to the internet:
Groups with greater access to the internet:
Higher income: People with higher income are more likely to have access to broadband internet and other technology devices, which can facilitate online political participation.More educated: People with higher levels of education are more likely to have digital skills and literacy, as well as access to online resources, which can enhance their political engagement.Groups with lesser access to the internet:
Less educated: People with lower levels of education may lack the skills or resources to use the internet effectively, which can limit their political participation.Lower income: People with lower income may face barriers to internet access, such as high costs or limited infrastructure, which can restrict their ability to engage in online political activities.Overall, the digital divide in internet access can have significant implications for political participation, as it may exclude some groups from participating in the democratic process and limit their ability to influence political outcomes. Efforts to bridge this divide, such as increasing internet infrastructure and providing digital literacy training, can help to promote greater inclusivity and democratic participation.
Learn more about internet access: https://brainly.com/question/529836
#SPJ11
A State Highway Law enacted by a state intended to regulate commerce and transportation on its highways that cross through and into the state, directly conflicts with the Federal National Highway Transportation Act. Which of the following describes the outcome of the State Highway Law. A. The Supremacy Clause holds that Federal Law is the supreme law of the land and when in conflict with state law, the Federal law preempts state law. B. None of the above. C. Pursuant to due process, Federal law cannot preempt state law. D. Pursuant to the Dormant Commerce Clause the federal law preempts the state law,
ANSWER:
A. The Supremacy Clause holds that Federal Law is the supreme law of the land and when in conflict with state law, the Federal law preempts state law.
What are the federal laws that regulate campaign finance?
Federal level control campaign financing through:
Federal campaign finance laws.The Tillman ActWhat legislation at the federal level control campaign financing?The use of funds in federal elections is governed by federal campaign finance regulations.
Federal campaign finance regulations govern the sources, recipients, sums, and frequency for contributions to partisan campaigns as well as the uses such donations may be put to. This is according to Congressional Research Service. Federal campaign finance laws place a strong emphasis on candidates' ongoing disclosure through mandatory filings.The Tillman Act, the very first federal campaign financing regulation, was passed in 1907. The topic of campaign funding has been a point of debate in American politics in the years after the passage of that statute.Thus, it should be remembered that only candidates and organisations running in federal elections are subject to the federal campaign funding regulations.
To know more about the federal laws, here
https://brainly.com/question/30118256
#SPJ4
Federal campaign finance laws govern campaign financing at the federal level. Tillman's Act.
Federal campaign finance laws govern the sources, recipients, amounts, and frequency of contributions to partisan campaigns, as well as the uses of such contributions.According to the Congressional Research Service. Federal campaign finance laws place a high value on candidates' ongoing transparency through mandatory filings. In 1907, the Tillman Act, the first federal campaign finance regulation, was passed. In the years since the statute's passage, the issue of campaign funding has been a source of contention in American politics. As a result, it is important to remember that federal campaign funding regulations apply only to candidates and organizations running in federal elections.
To learn more about Federal campaign finance:
https://brainly.com/question/26968759
#SPJ4
A disadvantage of using interacting groups to make decisions is...
a) group politics
b) void of expert opinion
c) an increase in programmed costs
d) faster decision making
e) too much brainstorming
The disadvantage of using interacting groups to make decisions is a) group politics.
When a decision-making process involves interacting groups, group politics is likely to come into play. Group politics refers to the dynamics, power struggles, and personal interests that can influence decision-making within a group. Individuals may engage in behaviors such as lobbying, forming alliances, or pursuing personal agendas, which can hinder the overall effectiveness and objectivity of the decision-making process. This can lead to biased or suboptimal decisions that may not necessarily align with the organisation's best interests or the problem being addressed.
Learn more about group politics: https://brainly.com/question/10744844
#SPJ11
Which of the following has the Supreme Court not recognized as an exigent circumstance?
a) preventing an escape
b) rendering immediate aid to a person in need of assistance
c) checking an identity
d) preventing destruction of evidence
The Supreme Court has not recognized checking an identity as an exigent circumstance.
Does the Supreme Court recognize checking an identity as an exigent circumstance?Exigent circumstances refer to situations where law enforcement officers are allowed to bypass the usual requirement of obtaining a warrant before conducting a search or seizure.
The Supreme Court has recognized certain circumstances as exigent, including preventing an escape, rendering immediate aid to a person in need of assistance, and preventing destruction of evidence. However, checking an identity has not been specifically recognized as an exigent circumstance by the Supreme Court.
Exigent circumstances are exceptions to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement, allowing law enforcement officers to take action without obtaining a warrant in certain situations. The Supreme Court has established a few recognized exigent circumstances, such as preventing an escape, rendering immediate aid to someone in need, and preventing the destruction of evidence
These exceptions are based on the need for immediate action to protect public safety or prevent the loss of crucial evidence. However, checking an identity alone has not been explicitly recognized as an exigent circumstance by the Supreme Court.
Learn more about Exigent circumstances
brainly.com/question/30611978
#SPJ11
why do business managers need to pay attention to the developments in a social cultural environment?
Explanation:
Business managers need to know the trends and what is popular to help grow business.
Why should anyone be allowed to record information about another person without their consent?
Explanation:
i strongly believe everyone has a choice and should be informed about who shares or records his or her information. It's just weird and rude if you just share stuff about another person withing him or her knowing..unless it's a surprise party
Which of the following entities are responsible for implementing
guidelines or requirements for ethical and/or consenting research
experiments? Select all that apply.
IRB
ONIJ
DAS
OIRS
Respect for people, beneficence, and justice are three ethical principles that IRBs use as a guide when evaluating research and are essential to protecting human subjects.
What are IRB ethical guidelines?Respect for people, beneficence, and justice are three ethical principles that IRBs use as a guide when evaluating research and are essential to protecting human subjects.
People with expertise and training in non-scientific fields, people with expertise and training in scientific fields, and members of the community who might serve as subjects for research studies make up the Institutional Review Board (IRB), a committee.
An IRB has the power to approve, demand changes are made (to secure approval), or disapprove research in accordance with FDA regulations. The rights and welfare of human research subjects are safeguarded in large part by this group review.
Therefore, the correct answer is option a) IRB.
To learn more about IRB refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/8905808
#SPJ4
How can one conclude the case of o organisation undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)
To conclude the case of "Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse v Minister of Transport and Others (32097/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 1; 2022 (2) SA 566 (GP)," it is necessary to analyze the judgment and its final outcome.
Locate the court's website or online portal by visiting the official website of the Gauteng Division of the High Court or the relevant judiciary website in South Africa. Searching for the case by using the provided case citation to search for the specific case on the court's website or database.
The case number "32097/2020" should help in locating the case. Get to the judgment Once you discover the case, you ought to be able to get to the complete text of the judgment, which can give the conclusion of the case and any important orders or decisions made by the court.
It's imperative to note that the particular conclusion of the case can as it were be decided by checking on the judgment itself, as the conclusion will depend on the realities, contentions, and lawful standards considered by the court.
To learn about Tax Abuse visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28337521
#SPJ4
Complete question: How can one conclude the case of o organization undoing tax abuse v minister of transport and others (32097/2020) [2022] zagpphc 1; 2022 (2) sa 566 (gp)? how can u approach a case?
How has the U.S. Supreme Court defined the legal use of the death penalty?
The Supreme Court has ruled that the death penalty does not violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment.
Defaulting on a federal student loan can disqualify a candidate for the FBI. False True
Answer: true
Explanation:
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
Just took the test
what is justice means to me?
Answer:
quero justuça mim
Explanation:
acho q assim espero ter ajudado ñ entendo muito de ingles
Answer:
the head of a supreme Court of a country or state
why do drugs laws need to be amended?
Shondra is a comptroller and has worked at both the local and state level in this position. She has been able to retain her same membership in the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees regardless of the level she worked at. Shondra is a member of a(n) _____ union.industrial
Shondra is member of an industrial union if she has worked at both local and state level in this position.
What is an industrial union?Workers in Finland's light and heavy industries are represented by the Industrial Union, a trade union. On January 1, 2018, the Industrial Union TEAM combined with the Metalworkers' Union and the Wood and Allied Workers' Union to form the union. It joined the Central Organization of Finnish Trade Unions, much like its forerunners. The Industrial Federation's representatives expressed their optimism that the Paperworkers' Union will join within a few years despite the union's decision to opt out of the merger that created it. The building and woodworkers' international, the International Association of food, agricultural, hotel, restaurant, catering, tobacco other allied workers' associations, and the UNI Worldwide Union are the four global union federations to which the union belongs.
To learn more about state, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20372541
#SPJ4
4. What happens when a person or government attempts to deprive someone of something that is necessary to human dignity?
Depriving someone of their fundamental right, translates to robbery and hence going against the Law. Hence, such person has violated the Law and should be tried.
The Rule of Fundamental human right is a very huge and respected law pertaining to individuals living in a democratic country. This means that, the right of other must not be trampled upon, either by other individuals or the government.Therefore, anyone who goes against these law has trespassed and could be face trial.
Learn more : https://brainly.com/question/24087938
What type of professional could BEST help the relationship between the police and the citizens ?
a) a forensic anthropologist
b) a forensic pathologist
c) a forensic sociologist
d) a forensic sociologist
Answer:
C a forensic sociologist
Explanation:
they talk to the police and the citizens.
The best profession, which helps in building the relationship between the police and the citizens is a forensic sociologist. Hence, Option D is correct.
Who is a forensic sociologist?Being a forensic sociologist, an individual will be engaged in the activity of analyzing the shreds of evidence and also keeps the research that is related to criminal cases or civil cases.
It is the duty of the forensic sociologist to make sure that not a single piece of evidence will be neglected during the whole investigation. For keeping a track of all the things, forensic sociologists maintain the relationship between the police and the citizens.
Sometimes people often get confused between forensic sociology and criminology. They both are having different sciences. Forensic sociology is an applied science. On the other hand, criminology is a specialized social science.
Thus, Option D is correct.
Learn more about forensic from here:
https://brainly.com/question/14403044
#SPJ2
Can it be said that: "Every act that causes damage to the legitimate interests of individuals and organizations in society is a violation of the law"? For example.
No
Explanation:
Depends on what you believe, more or less. In places where freedom of speech is allowed, then no, it's not a crime because you can say whatever you want. However, just because you can do something doesn't make it right. Not a lot of people seem to understand that.
?
13. What arguments support taking the views of a child into account when
making a custody determination? What arguments weigh against it?
What do judges consider when deciding child custody cases?
Age of the children. ...
Each parent's living situation. ...
Each parent's willingness to support the other's relationship with the children. ...
Each parent's relationship with the children before the divorce. ...
Children's preferences. ...
Continuity and stability.
Explanation:
You have a pedestrian crossing a main roadway, mid-block, when he is about halfway across he gets hit by a vehicle. The pedestrian is killed and the driver of the vehicle showed signs of impairment. He blew a .125.
Who is at fault for the collision, support your answer? Is there criminal charges?
Answer: The driver of the vehicle is responsible for the accident because he was driving while impaired.
Explanation: A blood alcohol level of .125 is above the legal limit and the driver was violating a criminal statute and would be responsible for the death of the pedestrian.
what is “ judical restraint” and which supreme court justices practiced it?
Judicial restraint is the refusal to exercise judicial review in deference to the process of ordinary politics.
Here are some Supreme Court justices who practiced it:
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. (served 1902–1932)Louis Brandeis (served 1916–1939)Felix Frankfurter (served 1939–1962)which pairing below correctly matches both a constitutional protection of voting rights and a past or current structural barrier to voting?
The pairing below correctly matches both constitutional protection of voting rights and a past or current structural barrier to voting would be the right of citizens who are 18 years or older to vote cannot be denied and Poll taxes.
The "Jim Crow" laws, which sought to deny black voters the right to vote and impose segregation, were developed in the South after Reconstruction, and the poll tax was a prime example of these laws. It is prohibited for the federal government or any state to restrict or deny an American citizen's ability to vote because of their age. This includes those who are eighteen years of age or older.
No state may enact or carry out any legislation that restricts the rights or privileges of US citizens; no state may rob anyone of their life, liberty, or property without first obtaining a court order; no state shall deny anyone living under its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law.
Learn to know more about Voting rights on
https://brainly.com/question/28592066
#SPJ4